UK North Sea Oil and Gas: Jobs at Risk, Costs Skyrocketing, and the Anti-Fossil Fuel Push

Energy News Beat

The UK’s North Sea has long been a powerhouse for oil and gas production, fueling the nation’s economy, supporting high-skilled jobs, and bolstering energy security. But with anti-fossil fuel regulations tightening their grip, the industry faces an uncertain future. From punitive taxes to outright bans on new exploration, these policies are threatening tens of thousands of jobs, risking billions in economic losses, and setting the stage for soaring energy costs. Let’s break down the impact of these regulations, the potential fallout of a total shutdown, and what it could mean for UK households and businesses.

The North Sea: A Vital Economic Engine

The North Sea has been a cornerstone of UK energy for decades, contributing £350 billion in production taxes since the 1970s and supporting around 200,000 jobs, including direct, indirect, and induced roles. In 2021, the region produced 500 million barrels of oil equivalent, meeting 82% of domestic oil demand and 38% of gas demand. Despite its maturity, the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) still holds an estimated 14.5 billion barrels of oil and gas equivalent, with 4 billion in approved reserves and 6.4 billion in known investment opportunities.
However, production has been declining since its peak around 2000, and the UK has shifted from a net exporter to a net importer of fossil fuels. This decline is natural for a mature basin, but recent anti-fossil fuel policies are accelerating the downturn, putting jobs and economic stability at risk.
Anti-Fossil Fuel Regulations: A Direct Hit on Jobs
The Labour government’s energy policies, particularly its ban on new oil and gas exploration licenses and increased windfall taxes, have sparked alarm across the industry. The windfall tax, raised to 38% (bringing the total tax burden on producers to 75%), combined with the scrapping of investment allowances, has made new projects less viable. Analysts warn that these measures could lead to a loss of 30,000 jobs in less than a decade, with 400 jobs potentially disappearing every two weeks over the next five years.
The North Sea workforce, already halved over the past decade due to natural decline, faces further pressure. A 2021 survey of offshore workers found that transitioning to renewable energy jobs is costly, with training fees deterring many from making the switch. While the government touts a “just transition” to clean energy, the reality is stark: clean energy jobs, particularly in offshore wind, are not materializing fast enough to absorb displaced oil and gas workers. The Climate Change Committee (CCC) estimates that while 135,000–725,000 net new jobs could be created by the net-zero transition, these are not guaranteed and depend on robust government support for retraining and investment.
The human cost is real. Communities in Aberdeen and other North Sea hubs rely on these high-skilled, well-paid jobs. Without a clear plan to replace them, entire regions face economic hardship. Critics argue that the government’s focus on renewables is ignoring the immediate needs of workers and the ongoing role of oil and gas in the energy mix, which still accounts for 71.8% of UK energy demand.
Financial Impact of a Total Shutdown
What if all UK oil and gas exploration companies were forced to shut down? The financial implications would be catastrophic, affecting tax revenues, energy security, and consumer costs.
  1. Loss of Tax Revenue: The oil and gas industry has paid £375 billion in production taxes to date. A complete halt to exploration would choke off future revenues, leaving a gaping hole in public finances. The North Sea Transition Deal, signed in 2021, projected that the sector could support 40,000 jobs and generate significant tax income through 2030 with proper management. Without exploration, these benefits vanish, forcing the government to raise taxes elsewhere or cut public services.
  2. Stranded Assets and Decommissioning Costs: Shutting down exploration would likely lead to stranded assets—fields and infrastructure rendered unusable due to policy shifts. The CCC warns that oil and gas projects risk becoming stranded by 2050 under 1.5°C pathways. Decommissioning existing infrastructure could cost taxpayers billions, as tax reliefs for cleanup are a standard part of the UK’s tax regime. Green Alliance estimates that continued exploration without a transition plan could leave the public on the hook for uneconomic assets.
  3. Increased Import Dependency: The UK already imports over half its gas and a significant portion of its oil. A total shutdown would make the country wholly reliant on foreign supplies, exposing it to volatile global markets. In 2022, rocketing international gas prices drove the UK’s energy price cap up by £2,800 for a typical household, despite domestic production. Without North Sea output, the UK would face even greater exposure to price spikes, particularly from suppliers like Norway, the US, or Qatar.

Energy Cost Increases: A Painful Reality

How much more would energy cost the UK if exploration stopped entirely? The answer lies in the interplay of global markets, import reliance, and the slow pace of renewable deployment.
  • Gas Price Volatility: Gas sets the marginal price for electricity 97% of the time under the UK’s pricing rules, meaning higher gas import costs directly inflate electricity bills. Uplift’s analysis shows that new North Sea fields would supply only a few weeks of gas per year, but existing fields still provide 38% of domestic gas consumption. Losing this buffer would leave the UK at the mercy of international price swings. For context, the 2021–24 gas price spike saw fossil fuel-based electricity costs soar, while renewables like onshore wind were 39% cheaper than the cheapest fossil fuel generators.
  • Household Bill Impact: If exploration halts and production declines faster than renewable capacity grows, energy bills could rise significantly. The New Economics Foundation estimates that investing in renewables and energy efficiency could save households £342–£400 annually, but current policies prioritize fossil fuel subsidies over these measures. A complete shutdown could add £900 or more to household bills, as claimed by some analysts, due to increased import costs and reduced domestic supply.
  • Economic Ripple Effects: Higher energy costs would hit businesses, particularly energy-intensive industries, driving up prices for goods and services. The Office for Budget Responsibility notes that the UK’s economy is less energy-intensive than in the 1970s, but reliance on global supply chains amplifies the impact of fuel price shocks. A shutdown could exacerbate inflation, reduce competitiveness, and slow economic growth.

The Counterargument: Renewables and Climate Goals

Proponents of anti-fossil fuel regulations argue that new oil and gas exploration is incompatible with the UK’s net-zero-by-2050 target and the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal. The International Energy Agency (IEA) states that no new oil and gas fields should be developed to stay within safe climate limits. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that existing fossil fuel infrastructure already risks exceeding the 1.5°C carbon budget.
Renewables, they claim, are cheaper and more sustainable. In 2021, onshore wind was 39% cheaper than fossil fuel generators, and solar and hydropower were 11% cheaper. Labour’s plan to double onshore wind and quadruple offshore wind by 2030 aims to create jobs and lower bills. The government’s £21.7 billion investment in carbon capture, hydrogen, and offshore wind, alongside Great British Energy, signals a shift toward clean energy.
However, critics point out that renewables cannot yet fully replace fossil fuels, which meet 75% of UK energy demand. Gas boilers heat 24 million homes, and 32 million vehicles rely on petrol or diesel. Transitioning too quickly without adequate infrastructure risks energy shortages and higher costs, as seen during the 2022 energy crisis.

A Balanced Path Forward?

The UK stands at a crossroads. Anti-fossil fuel regulations aim to align with climate goals, but they risk decimating North Sea jobs and driving up energy costs. A total shutdown of exploration companies would cost billions in lost revenue, increase import dependency, and burden households with higher bills—potentially £900 or more annually.
A more balanced approach could involve managing existing fields, investing heavily in renewables, and supporting workers through retraining programs. The North Sea Transition Deal’s commitment to cut emissions by 50% by 2030 and create 40,000 jobs shows what’s possible with pragmatic policy. Reversing punitive taxes, as some advocate, could preserve jobs while funding the transition to clean energy.
The UK cannot afford to ignore its energy reality. Oil and gas will remain part of the mix for decades, and dismantling the industry prematurely could leave the nation poorer, colder, and less secure. The question is whether policymakers will listen to science, economics, and the workers whose livelihoods hang in the balance. 
What will happen if they run all oil and gas companies out of the UK? They will lose all energy security and be susceptible to the whims of other countries.

I, for one, would prefer to invest in the U.S. Energy markets.


Splash 24/7 Update

The UK could lose more than half of its offshore oil and gas jobs by the early 2030s unless urgent and coordinated action is taken immediately, a new report claims.

A new report from Robert Gordon University, named Striking the Balance, outlines three offshore energy workforce scenarios (low, mid, and high cases) and a need for up to £350bn ($473.4bn) of future investment in the UK’s offshore energy sector between 2025 and 2035.

The report suggests a 2030 UK offshore energy workforce requirement for oil, gas, and renewables of between 125,000 and 163,000 jobs, compared to today’s figure of approximately 154,000.

However, the specific UK oil and gas workforce is forecast to fall from 115,000 in 2024 to between 57,000 and 71,000 by the early 2030s. That’s equal to losing approximately 400 jobs every two weeks for the next five years.

On the other hand, the UK offshore renewables workforce is forecast to increase from approximately 39,000 in 2024 to between 84,000 and 153,000 by 2035.

But, there is likely to be limited capacity for the UK offshore renewables sector to host and accommodate the quantity of oil and gas workers becoming available on the job market due to the decline in the oil and gas industry before 2027.

Under a high-case scenario, workforce demand levels across the UK could hit over 210,000, but this will require the delivery of an additional 35GW of offshore wind or 6GW per year, and sustaining UK oil and gas activities for an extended period, like policies applied in Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands.

This also must include up to 40% UK content in capital expenditure work, and around 600,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day by 2030. The current level of UK content in renewables is typically around 25% for capital activities and up to 85% for operating activities.

“With nearly 1 in 30 of Scotland’s working population currently employed in or supporting the offshore energy industry, compared to a UK-wide figure of approximately 1 in 220, the potential risks for Scotland’s supply chain and workforce are substantial,” the report said.

If Scotland fails to capture the full range of offshore energy opportunities and the oil and gas decline continues to accelerate, the Scottish-based offshore energy workforce could decrease from approximately 75,000 in 2024 to between 45,000 and 63,000 by the early 2030s.

“The UK’s lack of joined-up action means that the window of opportunity for delivering a just transition is closing. Inaction or simply slow progress will mean that UK offshore energy job numbers overall could drop by almost 20% to 125,000 by 2030, making the path towards net zero even harder to negotiate,” said Professor Paul de Leeuw, director of the Energy Transition Institute at Robert Gordon University.

The post UK North Sea Oil and Gas: Jobs at Risk, Costs Skyrocketing, and the Anti-Fossil Fuel Push appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

On Key

Related Posts