How has green energy policies impacted the environment, society, and our financial systems? DOGE found that the Inflation Reduction Act was funding change.

Energy News Beat

But what change you ask, well let’s start with the Inflation Reduction Act and what the huge “Porkulus Bill” as Dan Bongino has called it and see some of the line items. We will then jump to some current publications and announcements about what DOGE has found. It is truly amazing to realize that we have been forced to participate in a money transfer program that was not designed to help humanity or the environment.

According to Grok on X, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 has a comprehensive scope with various funding allocations. According to information available on the web:

  • The IRA was initially estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to include about $790 billion in offsets to fund roughly $485 billion of new spending and tax breaks. This includes $739 billion of offsets and $433 billion in investments, as per the calculations provided by the CBO for the legislation.
  • In terms of actual spending, by June 30, 2024, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had spent $6.9 billion (12%) of the $79.4 billion it initially received from the IRA for improvements in taxpayer services, technology upgrades, and enforcement actions. Note that subsequent budget adjustments reduced the IRS’s enforcement funding.
  • The Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office received approximately $11.7 billion in appropriations to support issuing new loans, increasing loan authority by about $100 billion.
  • Estimates and projections of the total cost of the IRA vary significantly depending on the source. Some analyses suggest that due to uncapped incentives, the spending could exceed initial estimates, potentially pushing past $1 trillion. However, these are projections based on how incentives and investments might stimulate further spending or savings.
  • For clean energy and climate provisions specifically, the IRA allocates nearly $369 billion in direct investment, according to some reports.

It’s important to note that these figures represent different aspects of the IRA’s financial impact, including direct spending, tax credits, and projected economic effects. The actual amount spent can be influenced by how quickly projects are implemented, the uptake of tax incentives, and changes in legislation or funding allocations over time.

To summarize, while exact figures for total spending from the IRA are complex due to ongoing implementation and evolving economic impacts, significant amounts have been allocated and spent, with projections suggesting the total financial commitment might exceed initial estimates.

 Step In DOGE and Elon’s Team

The Senate held a press conference with some amazing tidbits of information. I believe that we are in the beginning stages of discovering the total level of corruption in the United States and the negative impact that the Democrats, and RINOs have had on our finances and horrific negative impactful issues around the world.

One group was the EPA granted $50 Million Dollars to the organization called Climate Justice Alliance. So they went to the website and they saw the bulldozer that went through the fence when Hamas attacked Israel, and they have other renderings on their website of decolonized Palestine with the same bulldozer. If you go through more of their website you can see that they support defunding the police.

The Senate committee points out a great question; Is any of the money actually going to be used on cleaning the water, air, or any research to lower energy prices? Or is it just for political activism money?

Here are some highlights:

  • Fraudulent Government Payments: DOGE has allegedly identified significant fraud in government entitlement payments. This includes payments to individuals without valid identification or Social Security numbers, potentially including payments to illegal immigrants and known fraudulent or terrorist groups. This was particularly noted in relation to the Treasury Department’s payment systems.
  • Embezzlement and Money Laundering: There have been claims of uncovering one of the largest money laundering and embezzlement schemes related to USAID, which some sources describe as a front for the CIA. This includes funds being misused or directed towards left-wing NGOs.
  • Waste and Abuse in Federal Programs: DOGE’s investigations have reportedly exposed what some describe as billions, or even hundreds of billions, in fraud and abuse within agencies like the Department of Education and the military. This includes inefficiencies and unnecessary expenditure that could be cut to reduce government waste.
  • Corruption Schemes: There are allegations of corruption and embezzlement linked to various federal agencies, with some posts on X suggesting that the scale of fraud discovered by DOGE is unprecedented, particularly in terms of annual financial misuse.
  • Bureaucratic and Financial System Fraud: DOGE has also been involved in scrutinizing systems at agencies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), looking into payment and contracting systems for signs of fraud and waste.

As of the latest updates found on the web and posts on X, the DOGE clock has tracked savings to the tune of approximately $63.39 billion in taxpayer dollars. This information was noted around February 6, 2025. Please note that this figure might have changed since the last update, as the DOGE clock updates in real-time.

So getting back to the global spending on renewable energy.

In 2024, the global investment in solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is projected to exceed $500 billion, making it the leading form of investment in electricity generation. For wind energy, although specific global figures for 2024 alone are not directly stated in the provided sources, we can infer from trends and comparative data:

  • The International Energy Agency (IEA) notes that investment in solar PV is now more than all other electricity generation technologies combined, reaching $500 billion in 2024.
  • Wind energy, while not explicitly quantified for 2024, is part of the broader renewable energy investment landscape. Posts on X mention that $1.8 trillion was spent globally on the green transition in the previous year, indicating significant investment in renewables, including wind.

Combining these insights:

  • Solar PV Investment in 2024: Exceeds $500 billion.
  • Wind Energy Investment in 2024: While exact figures for wind alone aren’t specified, it’s part of a large investment in renewable energy, suggesting billions are involved, but less than solar PV for this year.

Thus, the total spending on wind and solar renewable energy in 2024 is likely to be at least $500 billion for solar, with wind contributing significantly but to a lesser extent. The exact combined total for both wind and solar would require more specific data on wind investment, but it’s clear that renewable energy, particularly solar, has seen substantial financial commitment in 2024.

Without fail in every major market that is putting in large amounts of wind and solar we are seeing a huge increase in electricity prices. So called “Renewable” wind and solar is not cheaper, nor better for the enviornment.

Over the last 20 years, the global cost of electricity has shown varied trends across different regions, influenced by factors like energy policies, the mix of energy sources, economic conditions, and geopolitical events. Here’s a summarized view based on the web and X posts:

    • United States:
      • Electricity prices in the U.S. have increased by an average of about 2.67% per year over the last 25 years (from 1998 to 2023), with a 20-year average increase closer to 3% per year. The most significant year-on-year increase was observed in 2022 with nearly 11% due to global energy crises and domestic policy changes.
      • Texas is about half of California and New York because of the balanced approach. Wind, Solar, nuclear, coal and natural gas. The plans for ERCOT look to be on target to meet the grid demand doubling in the next 5 years. This is being achieved almost exclusively with the natural gas infrastructure being increased or added. We need nuclear, but the regulatory processes are just now being looked at by the new Trump Administration.
    • Europe:
      • Europe, particularly countries like Germany, has seen electricity prices more than double over the past 20 years, largely due to political decisions affecting energy policy, including renewable energy surcharges and taxes. In Q4 2024, Europe had the highest residential electricity prices at USD 0.228 per kWh.
    • Asia and Africa:
      • In Asia, countries like Iran have some of the lowest electricity prices due to subsidies, while in Africa, the prices can vary significantly; for instance, Ethiopia has very low electricity costs due to low-income levels necessitating subsidies.
  • Geopolitical and Economic Events:
    • Events like the 2022 energy crisis, largely influenced by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, led to sharp increases in electricity prices worldwide, particularly in Europe. This event underscores how global events can affect electricity pricing.
  • Country-Specific Examples:
    • Germany: Prices more than doubled over the last 20 years due to policies like the Renewable Energy Act which imposed significant surcharges. You can also see the impact of the total deindustrialization of Germany from the loss of cheap Russian natural gas, the closing of their nuclear plants and having to fire up their closed coal plants again.
    • Türkiye: Experienced a 47% decrease in household electricity rates from 2020 to 2023, although this was also influenced by currency devaluation.

The Bottom Line:

I have said for years that the more money spent on “Renewable Wind and Solar” the more fossil fuels will be used. We see more oil and gas demand, more coal being burned and the only way to meet demand while being fiscally responsible is the addition of natural gas power stations.

Call it Turley’s Law if you would like, but it is a constant. The more we spend on non-renewable wind and solar as it should be called, the more coal, natural gas, we will use. The world would be a cleaner place with less pollution if we would cut out the fraudulent spending on “renewable energy”, and cut all the bills and government subsidies like the Inflation Reduction Act. It was used as a piggy bank and never positively impacted the United States Citizens.

As for the environment we are about to see how bad “renewables” are on the environment. As subsidies dry up around the world we are going to see who is responsible to clean up the toxic wast of the solar farms and wind farms. Right now the land owners are on the hook and it is not shaping up to be pretty. If companies start going out of business, who is going to clean up the defunckt renewable energy farms is going to be a huge financial and environmental crisis.

I for one am looking forward to more reports coming out from Elon’s DOGE team and watching more of the Democrat and RINOs trying to defend the corruption that has gone on for 50 years.

Energy policies should be made by looking at physics, science and fiscal responsibility. Our new Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright, has been vocal of not pushing the Net Zero by 2050, but rather Zero Energy Poverty by 2050. That is a great way to look at energy policies.

The post How has green energy policies impacted the environment, society, and our financial systems? DOGE found that the Inflation Reduction Act was funding change. appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Trump Slashes Biden’s Green Agenda, Rejects Woke Policies And Climate Fearmongering

Energy News BeatPolicies And Climate

Trump reversed Biden’s climate and energy policies, slashed EV mandates, boosted drilling, and led a corporate retreat from ESG and DEI initiatives.

President Donald Trump’s landslide election offers evidence that a majority of Americans have lost patience and charity for woke government policies premised upon alarmist pseudoscience claims that choke energy-driven consumer commodity costs and lifestyles, business and employment opportunities, and national prosperity and security. [emphasis, links added]

What’s more, he has wasted no time proving to the entire world that he’s serious about changing all of that pronto.

One of his first actions upon taking office was to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord, declaring, “The United States will not sabotage our industries while China pollutes with impunity.

Key among his energy initiatives, Trump, in concert with GOP leaders has vowed to dismember the massive Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Democrat’s signature Green New Deal (often referred to as the “Green New Scam”) along with the so-called 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and 2022 CHIPS and Science Act.

Together, these Democrat green energy grifts authorized funds for electric vehicle charging stations to be made available through the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program and the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant program.

A Trump executive order (EO) now allows the White House and Congress to roll back and revise IRA rules under the Congressional Review Act, including special interest tax credits, low-interest loans, and grant programs that by some estimates could save taxpayers an annual $1 trillion.

Trump overturned EPA vehicle emission regulations essentially mandating that automobile manufacturers shift at least 59% production to EVs and 16% hybrids by 2032, rescinded Biden’s 2021 EO requiring all government vehicle purchases be emission-free by 2035, and still another Trump EO issued a notice of intent to eliminate EV subsidies.

The president also blocked pending California fuel emission waivers greenlighted by the previous administration allowing the state to set even stricter emission regulations than the federal government.

New York, Maryland, and Virginia are among many states that were poised to join California’s zero-emission policies.

As Trump promised, “You’ll be able to buy the car of your choice. We will build automobiles in America again at a rate that nobody could have dreamt possible a few years ago.”

A comprehensive Trump EO declaring a “national energy emergency” is primarily related to the infrastructure needed to increase fuel and electricity generation and the capacity to deliver energy to meet demand…calls for streamlining the “identification, leasing, development, production, transportation, refining, and generation capacity of the United States.”

President Trump directed his administration’s Department of Energy under new Secretary Chris Wright to restore oil and gas leasing on 13 million acres of Alaska’s 23-million-acre National Petroleum Reserve and reversed Biden’s EO that restricted offshore drilling across 625 million acres off the East and West Coasts.

A Trump EO titled Unleashing American Energy lifts a January 2024 Biden pause placed on LNG exports, directing his Energy secretary to “restart reviews of applications for approvals of liquified natural gas exports as expeditiously as possible.”

Another EO, Restoring America’s Mineral Dominance, includes rare earth materials essential to numerous advanced electronic systems, installing a “whole of government” synthesis to “identify all agency actions that impose undue burdens on domestic mining and processing of nonfuel minerals and undertake steps to revise or rescind such actions.”

Among numerous and varied Biden EOs reversed by Trump, several directly take on climate fearmongering and energy virtue-signaling excuses to regulate fossil energy into oblivion with no practical alternatives on the immediate horizon.

Biden EOs revoked by Trump, include:

Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, Establishment of the Climate Change Support Office, Strengthening America’s Leadership in Clean Cars and Trucks, and Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability.

An all-encompassing Trump EO, Initial Recissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, aims to rid all federal agencies of the “divisive and dangerous preferential hierarchy” imposed by woke diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies.

A related EO revokes Biden’s EO, Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice.

The past year has already seen a growing list of Fortune 500 companies dial back on DEI preferential programs, including Meta, Walmart, Ford, McDonald’s, Harley-Davidson, John Deere, Tractor Supply Company, Lowe’s, Molson Coors, Nisan, Toyota, and Stanley Black & Decker.

Big corporate “Environment Social Guidance” (ESG) titans had begun to recognize that ideologically hyped climate and social equity-based investments were becoming increasingly difficult to sell due to inferior market performance before Republicans won the White House and Congress.

Six of the largest U.S. banks — Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley — had dropped out of the U.N.-sponsored Net-Zero Banking Alliance within weeks of the election.

The Net Zero Asset Managers initiative (NZAMi) announced that it would suspend activities on January 13, just days after giant investor BlackRock dropped out of the club on January 9.

These ESG departures followed in the wake of half of Net-Zero Insurance Alliance membership jumping ship in 2023.

A big reason for this mass corporate exodus from ESG revolves around legal liabilities to fund managers for violating fiduciary responsibilities to investors under the 1974 Employee Retirement Investment Security Act (ERISA) protections.

This risk follows a Jan. 13 U.S. district court ruling that American Airlines mishandled its employees’ retirement funds by allowing fund managers to pursue ESG investments.

So no, woke climate-driven energy policies make neither dollars nor sense for America … or anywhere else.

Read more at Newsmax

We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Trump Slashes Biden’s Green Agenda, Rejects Woke Policies And Climate Fearmongering appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Trump Admin Halts Billions In Funding For Biden’s Troubled EV Charging Network

Energy News BeatEV Charging Network

The Trump administration halted funding for Biden’s costly, controversial EV charging network, an effort marred by slowdowns and cost overruns.

​The Trump administration announced Thursday that it is halting funding for the buildout of a Biden-era electric vehicle (EV) charger program. [emphasis, links added]

The Department of Transportation said in a Thursday letter to transportation officials that it was pausing funding for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program, which was established by the Biden-Harris administration in November 2021 to deploy a network of EV chargers across the U.S.

This marks the latest move from the Trump-Vance administration to overturn various Biden-era green energy policies.

While former President Joe Biden pledged to build a network of half a million EV chargers nationwide by 2030 through the NEVI program, the effort was marred by a slew of slowdowns.

Notably, Biden’s EV charging program has thus far allocated a staggering $5 billion in funding.

The DOT’s latest announcement comes after the agency announced on Jan. 28 that it had begun moving to overturn Biden’s stringent fuel economy standards for vehicles.

Despite the Biden-Harris administration’s massive push for the adoption of EVs as part of Biden’s signature climate agenda, the U.S. EV market has faced lackluster consumer demand in recent years.

Since returning to the White House on Jan. 20, President Donald Trump has made several moves to revoke Biden-era energy policies, including signing an executive order to “unleash” American energy.

Trump’s Department of Energy Chair Chris Wright signed his first secretarial order on Wednesday in a move to begin overturning several of Biden’s clean energy regulations.

While on the campaign trail, Trump promised to “revolutionize” the U.S. auto industry, also vowing to repeal Biden’s EV policies, calling them “insane.”

Notably, a coalition of green energy activists and companies began lobbying on Capitol Hill Wednesday to protect the Biden-Harris administration’s green energy tax credits.

Read rest at Daily Caller

We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Trump Admin Halts Billions In Funding For Biden’s Troubled EV Charging Network appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

EU country confirms resumption of Russian gas supply

Energy News BeatRussian gas

Slovakia has started importing natural gas via the TurkStream pipeline, Prime Minister Robert Fico has announced

Slovakia has started receiving Russian natural gas via the TurkStream pipeline after Ukraine halted transit via its territory, the EU country’s prime minister, Robert Fico, has said.

TurkStream, a key energy corridor under the Black Sea, has become the main route for Russian gas to southern and southeastern Europe following Kiev’s refusal to renew a transit deal with Moscow. The decision forced Slovakia and several other EU states to seek alternative supply routes.

In a video message posted on Facebook on Monday, Fico said, “The Russian gas is now starting its journey to Slovakia via TurkStream,” crediting joint efforts by Russia and Türkiye. “We should acknowledge their role in making it happen,” he added.

Slovak state gas supplier SPP said last week that it had begun importing gas via TurkStream on February 1 and planned to double the supply volume by April.

Slovakia, which has a contract with Russian energy giant Gazprom, requires between 4 billion and 5 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas annually to meet its energy needs. Prior to the transit halt, it had been receiving around 3 billion bcm from Russia through Ukraine.

Kiev terminated its five-year gas transit deal with Gazprom at the end of 2024, cutting off Russian pipeline deliveries to Hungary, Romania, Poland, Slovakia, Austria, Italy, and Moldova. The countries had already experienced a significant reduction in Russian gas imports due to Ukraine-related sanctions on Moscow and the 2022 sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline, which was built to bypass Ukraine’s transit monopoly.

Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky defended the decision, arguing that halting Russian gas transit would deprive Moscow of crucial energy revenues. However, Slovakia and Hungary accused Kiev of deliberately triggering an energy crisis for political leverage.

While the TurkStream route helps Slovakia meet immediate energy needs, Bratislava continues to explore alternative supply sources to enhance long-term energy security, according to Fico.

The TurkStream pipeline consists of two branches, one serving Ankara’s domestic needs, the other supplying gas to Bulgaria. This Balkan route extends to Serbia and Hungary, connecting other EU states to Russian natural gas supplies. The pipeline has an annual capacity of 15.75 bcm.

The Russian Defense Ministry reported last month that Ukraine had targeted a compressor station in Russia’s Krasnodar Region, which supplies gas to TurkStream. The attack, which involved nine kamikaze drones launched by Ukrainian forces, was largely thwarted, according to the ministry. One fixed-wing drone crashed close to a gas meter and caused minor damage, it said.

Türkiye later confirmed the attempted attack but assured that gas flows through TurkStream remained unaffected.

Source: Rt.com

We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post EU country confirms resumption of Russian gas supply appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

‘Illegal’ US sanctions will not stop Russia’s oil trade – Moscow

Energy News BeatUS sanctions

 

Pavel Sorokin, Russia’s first deputy energy minister, said supplies to India, a key market for Russian crude, will continue despite Western pressure

Russia will continue supplying oil to global markets despite sanctions pressure, First Deputy Energy Minister Pavel Sorokin has insisted. Speaking at India Energy Week in New Delhi on Tuesday, Sorokin noted that while the impact of latest sanctions imposed by the outgoing Joe Biden administration last month remains to be assessed, Moscow will continue strengthening its energy ties with India, Russia’s key customer for crude.

“We are pragmatic. We value our relationships, and we will continue to supply the market. Our resources are competitive from an economic standpoint. Regardless of the pressure applied, we will remain in the market with a pragmatic approach, keeping politics out of it,” Sorokin told the conference, according to Interfax news agency.

He also noted that Western sanctions have taken a toll on the global economy with “tens of billions of dollars” taken away from developing economies, besides increasing costs of capital “for everyone in this industry.”

Speaking to TASS, Sorokin said Moscow expects to “maintain relations and preserve interactions” with New Delhi. “We consider sanctions to be an illegitimate and illegal tool, and we build our relations taking existing constraints into account, but in a bilateral format. We are grateful to our partners for the existing cooperation,” he added.

A day earlier, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko stated that the scale of energy cooperation with India is actively expanding despite US sanctions. “We are closely monitoring Washington’s efforts in the region aimed at discrediting Russia as a reliable supplier of energy resources to India. In response, we are implementing necessary countermeasures,” Rudenko told Interfax.

Indian Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri posted on X on Tuesday that he had a meeting with Sorokin, during which both sides “reviewed our ongoing cooperation in both the upstream and downstream sectors” and explored opportunities for further collaboration.

Despite Western pressure, India has maintained strong ties with Russia since the Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022.

New Delhi has resisted joining the West’s sanctions against Moscow, instead opting to strengthen economic cooperation, particularly in the energy sector. As a result, India has become one of the largest purchasers of Russian oil, with bilateral trade surging to over $65 billion in the 2023-2024 financial year, a more than fivefold increase from 2021.

The US announced large-scale sanctions against the Russian oil sector in early January, targeting oil and gas exporters and the so-called “shadow fleet” of oil tankers transpiring crude – a move affecting India which depends on sea transportation of imported energy.

Meanwhile, Indian officials, too, have stated that no disruption to its Russian oil imports are expected at least until March, when the new restriction will take effect. Head of state-owned Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) Arvindar Singh Sahney told PTI agency on Tuesday that the company is buying “clean Russian crude oil” that does not risk running foul of US sanctions going forward. Sahney also told reporters that in case of any “shortage” from Russia, Indian firms will seek additional oil from the Middle East and other parts of the world.

Source: Rt.com

We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post ‘Illegal’ US sanctions will not stop Russia’s oil trade – Moscow appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Himalaya Shipping seals fresh index-linked deal

Energy News Beat

Dry CargoEurope

Oslo-listed Himalaya Shipping has secured new employment for its newcastlemax bulk carrier currently trading on a fixed time charter.

The Tor Olav Troim-backed owner and operator has entered into a 14-to 38-month contract for the 2023-built Mount Norefjell starting after the vessel’s redelivery from its current charterer in late February 2025.

The vessel will earn an index-linked rate at a premium to the Baltic 5TC index that is higher than the average premium on the company’s current charters of 42.25%, with the option to convert the charter to a fixed rate, Himalaya said.

The charter also includes a profit sharing derived from operating the vessel´s scrubber or running on LNG.

Following the latest deal, the company will have all 12 newcastlemaxes trading on index-linked time charters.

In January Himalaya’s 11 vessels trading on index-linked deals earned about $16,700 per day, including average daily scrubber and LNG benefits, while the Baltic 5TC index averaged $10,150. The 210,000 dwt Mount Norefjell has been earning $30,000 per day since delivery.

The post Himalaya Shipping seals fresh index-linked deal appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Euroseas agrees charter extension for feeder boxship

Energy News Beat

ContainersEurope

Nasdaq-listed Greek boxship owner Euroseas has inked a charter contract extension for one of its feeder containerships.

Euroseas won a charter for the 1,740 teu EM Hydra for a minimum period of 24 to a maximum period of 26 months at the charterer’s discretion, at a gross daily rate of $19,000.

The new charter for the 2005-built vessel will begin on May 1, 2025, in direct continuation of its current charter.

According to the company, the charter is expected to contribute about $7.3m of EBITDA for the minimum contracted period and increase the Greek firm’s remaining 2025 charter coverage to about 85%. It also increases charter coverage for 2026 to about 50%.

“Despite the potential reopening of the Red Sea routes, which could normalize trading routes, the charter market for feeder containerships remains quite resilient, with limited vessel availability continuing to support strong periods and rates,” said Aristides Pittas, chairman and CEO of Euroseas.

In recent company news, Euroseas won new time charter deals for two of its containerships, the 2008-built Synergy Antwerp and the 2009-built Synergy Keelung.

The post Euroseas agrees charter extension for feeder boxship appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Russia Says Sanctions Shouldn’t Hinder Oil Trade With India

Energy News BeatIndia

U.S. sanctions against Russia’s oil exports and trade should not hinder Russian energy trade with India, Russia’s first deputy energy minister, Pavel Sorokin, said on Tuesday.

Indian refiners are scrambling for alternatives after the U.S. sanctions designated hundreds of tankers, as well as oil traders, last month.

Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the bans on Russian oil in the West, India has become a key buyer of Russian crude, alongside China. Russia, for its part, became the single biggest oil supplier to India, the world’s third-largest oil importer.

Now the sanctions have reduced the availability of non-sanctioned tankers to carry out the trades.

For India, which imports more than 80% of the crude it consumes daily, the costs are spiking and the cheap Russian barrels are disappearing as Indian refiners steer clear of tankers explicitly sanctioned by the U.S.

“We believe energy trade shouldn’t be hindered by any politics,” Russia’s Sorokin told the audience at the India Energy Week conference on Tuesday.

“Our relationship with India is based on economic pragmatism,” Sorokin said, as carried by Reuters.

It is too early to assess the impact of the U.S. sanctions on the Russia-India oil trade, the Russian official added.

“More time is needed to assess these things, but we believe that constructive relationships will continue to be successful,” Sorokin was quoted as saying.

For now, India has received clarification from the U.S. that the Russian oil tankers sanctioned last month are allowed to discharge their crude at Indian ports until February 27.

While the U.S. clarification could be a relief for India for this month, it is not certain how trade will proceed going forward.

Indian refiners are already scrambling for supply for arrival after February.

India will continue to buy Russian oil if it is sold below the $60 per barrel price cap and delivered on non-sanctioned tankers and without any involvement of sanctioned companies or individuals, Indian officials have said.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Russia Says Sanctions Shouldn’t Hinder Oil Trade With India appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

BP Teases Fundamental Reset of Strategy to Boost Returns and Cash

Energy News BeatBP

BP (NYSE: BP) on Tuesday pledged to fundamentally reset its strategy as it booked its lowest annual and quarterly profits in years and seeks to push up its stock performance and regain investor trust.

“Building on the actions taken in the past 12 months, we now plan to fundamentally reset our strategy and drive further improvements in performance, all in service of growing cash flow and returns,” BP’s chief executive Murray Auchincloss said in a statement as the UK-based supermajor reported its fourth-quarter and full-year 2024 results today.

BP’s leadership will communicate its new strategy, which “will be a new direction for bp”, at a Capital Markets Update on February 26, Auchincloss added.

The executive, who took over as BP’s CEO after the abrupt resignation of Bernard Looney, has already vowed to make the supermajor a simpler and far more focused company and has cut some investments in renewables.

Analysts and investors expect even more cuts to the low-carbon business and a pledge to boost oil and gas production at the capital markets day later this month.

Shell and Equinor have already announced significant reductions in their commitment to renewable energy.

BP’s stock has been underperforming its UK-based peer, Shell, in recent years and Auchincloss and the board have been under increased pressure to seek fundamental changes to the business to reward shareholders more.

The pressure became more intense earlier this week after reports emerged that activist investor Elliott Management had bought a stake in BP and would be pushing for changes in strategy, or even for board reshuffles.

Meanwhile, BP on Tuesday reported an underlying replacement cost profit – its proxy for net profit – of $1.17 billion for the fourth quarter, down from $2.27 billion for the previous quarter, and down from $3 billion a year earlier.

The Q4 2024 earnings missed the analyst consensus estimate of $1.26 billion and were the lowest quarterly profit since the fourth quarter of 2020 when the pandemic was hitting global oil demand. BP attributed the lower profit to weaker realized refining margins – as flagged last month – as well as higher impact from turnaround activity, seasonally lower customer volumes, and fuel margins.

Today BP announced a $1.75 billion share buyback program related to the fourth quarter results which will be executed prior to reporting the first-quarter results.

BP will announce its full 2025 buyback and capex guidance at the capital markets day on February 26.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

 

The post BP Teases Fundamental Reset of Strategy to Boost Returns and Cash appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Understanding the Catastrophic Downside Risk of the Kellogg Plan and Exploring Alternatives

Energy News Beat

ENB Pub Note: This is the third article in a series from George McMillan about the Ukraine/Russia conflict and a potential end with Keith Kellogg’s plan, which is DOA. There are many reasons, but one critical reason is the stripped information on the Biden-Harris administration on land vs. sea power and energy. 


Understanding the Risk to Be Avoided

Performing MDMP SWOT risk to mission, the catastrophic downside risk that must be avoided is that the Legacy media blame Trump for losing: (a) the Ukrainian War, (b) letting the EU collapse economically, and (c) letting the populist parties rise to power in Europe and oust NATO.

This combination could lead to the Democrats winning the House and the Senate in the 2026 midterms and impeaching Trump halfway through his presidential term.

That could pave the way for the Democrats to win the White House and retain the House and the Senate in the 2028 election cycle, bring back mass censorship and lawfaring of Trump supporters, reverse the D.O.G.E. streamlining of government, and the WEF Globalists would achieve the single-party socialist state in the United States.

The Present Post-Global War on Terror (GWOT) Reality

The reality is that the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz/RAND strategy has completely backfired and created the present conditions where (1) the Catholic Ukrainians are at war with the Orthodox Russian-speaking Ukrainians; (2) Russians are winning the war in the predominantly Orthodox Christian Russian-speaking areas of the Donbas; (3) Europe is cut off from affordable Russian natural gas and the European automotive and consumer goods industries are collapsing while the cost of living is declining as inflation is rising; (4) the populist parties wish to oust the Globalist WEF backed EU and legacy ruling class politicians in Europe, who in turn want to oust the WEF Globalist EU and NATO institutions; (5) would jettison the Petrodollar and begin purchasing Russian natural gas via pipeline if the US does not ease sanctions, and (6) oust the Green new deal leftist politicians and policies as well and restart their nuclear plants as well to ease energy prices in Europe.

Putin’s Best Interest is to Maintain the Present Course

It is in Putin’s best interest to delay negotiations on the Ukraine War for as long as possible let the energy prices continue to soar and let the British and European economies continue to collapse. Why would Putin change his course of action now and save the EU politicians and NATO?

The Brzezinksi/Wolfowitz/RAND/WEF Globalist Strategies Have Failed

The blame needs to be properly placed on the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz/RAND strategies of the WEF Globalists.

The objective is to avoid catastrophic downside risk and facilitate the Republicans keeping both Houses of Congress through the 2026 midterm elections to further the effort of President Trump and the streamlining effort of the D.O.G.E.

Understanding the Risk to Be Avoided

Performing MDMP SWOT risk to mission, the catastrophic downside risk that must be avoided is that the Legacy media blame Trump for losing: (a) the Ukrainian War, (b) letting the EU collapse economically, and (c) letting the populist parties rise to power in Europe and oust NATO.

This combination could lead to the Democrats winning the House and the Senate in the 2026 midterms and impeaching Trump halfway through his presidential term.

That could pave the way for the Democrats to win the White House and retain the House and the Senate in the 2028 election cycle, bring back mass censorship and lawfaring of Trump supporters, reverse the D.O.G.E. streamlining of government, and the WEF Globalists would achieve the single-party socialist state in the United States.

The Present Post-Global War on Terror (GWOT) Reality

The reality is that the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz/RAND strategy has completely backfired and created the present conditions where (1) the Catholic Ukrainians are at war with the Orthodox Russian-speaking Ukrainians; (2) Russians are winning the war in the predominantly Orthodox Christian Russian-speaking areas of the Donbas; (3) Europe is cut off from affordable Russian natural gas and the European automotive and consumer goods industries are collapsing while the cost of living is declining as inflation is rising; (4) the populist parties wish to oust the Globalist WEF backed EU and legacy ruling class politicians in Europe, who in turn want to oust the WEF Globalist EU and NATO institutions; (5) would jettison the Petrodollar and begin purchasing Russian natural gas via pipeline if the US does not ease sanctions, and (6) oust the Green new deal leftist politicians and policies as well and restart their nuclear plants as well to ease energy prices in Europe.

Putin’s Best Interest is to Maintain the Present Course

It is in Putin’s best interest to delay negotiations on the Ukraine War for as long as possible let the energy prices continue to soar and let the British and European economies continue to collapse. Why would Putin change his course of action now and save the EU politicians and NATO?

The Brzezinksi/Wolfowitz/RAND/WEF Globalist Strategies Have Failed

The blame needs to be properly placed on the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz/RAND strategies of the WEF Globalists.

The objective is to avoid catastrophic downside risk and facilitate the Republicans keeping both Houses of Congress through the 2026 midterm elections to further the effort of President Trump and the streamlining effort of the D.O.G.E.

Recommendations

First, the Russo-Ukraine War is a sunk cost fallacy Ponzi Scheme. Russia has approximately a 7:1 KIA/WIA ratio over the Ukrainian Armed Forces. It is best to end the sunk cost fallacy Ponzi scheme by not feeding anymore more Ukrainians into the Donbas meat grinder.

Secondly, Putin is not fighting a war for territorial expansion to restore the Soviet Empire as Western rhetoric maintains, instead, Putin is fighting a defensive war of attrition in the Russian Speaking Orthodox Christian regions of Ukraine in proximity to his only warm water port in Rostov-on-Don and to protect the Russian Black Sea Fleet that has been stationed in Crimea since 1783 when Catherine the Great defeated the Turks.

Thirdly, since the populist parties are winning the elections in the German Speaking World of Central Europe and the Slavic World in the Danube River Valley and want to rebuild Nordstream, restart their nuclear energy plants, and oust the WEF Globalist EU and donor-class politicians and the USAID/NED NATO and NGOs that support them, and if the European populists want to purchase Russian energy they will have to exit the Petrodollar also unless sanctions are eased.

Fourthly, the choice is to either (a) continue feeding the sunk cost fallacy Ponzi Scheme in the Donbas by feeding more Ukrainians into Russian artillery fire, while continuing the support of the WEF Globalist politicians in the EU and the donor class politicians in each country, which means (c) continuing the policies of the Biden Administration suppressing the populists, or (d) withdraw from the Ukrainian War as promised to the MAGA loyalists, and support the Populist Politicians in ousting the WEF Globalist backed EU and the donor class politicians throughout the UK and Europe.

If option (d) is taken it would feed the MAGA base in the US and merge the MAGA base with the Populists in Europe that are currently being censored, lawfared and dealing with USAID/NED/WEF color revolutions similar to the censorship and Antifa-BLM color revolution of the 2020 US elections. If option (d) is taken the populist movements on both sides of the Atlantic would love President Trump. The MAGA and European populists could then form a new trading bloc to replace the EU and NATO.

The Risk to the Mission is Always the Fake News Media

This brings about the risk to the mission of the legacy media lambasting President Trump before the midterms and taking both Houses in the 2026 elections cycle, and possibly all three Houses in the 2028 general election cycle.

But that can be avoided if the failure of the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz/RAND geopolitical strategy is properly articulated to the public.

The public is already excited by the closure of USAID, it should be followed up by closing down and exposing the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the Globalist NGOs that it funds.

That would entail everyone in the cabinet to understand what the Brzezinski/Wolfowitz/RAND geopolitical strategy is and overcome three decades of Gloalist rhetoric and fake news. But this is better than continuing to feed the Ukraine Ponzi Scheme with more Ukrainian bodies and better than supporting the WEF Globalists candidates over the populist candidates. That would severely disappoint the populist movements on both sides of the Atlantic.

 

Part 1: Why Keith Kellogg’s Plan is DOA: Avoiding the Catastrophic Downside Risk of Russo-Ukraine Negotiations

Part 2: Why Keith Kellogg’s Plan is DOA: Shifting the Global Political Center of Gravity Part 2

Other Stories and Podcasts from George McMillan on Energy News Beat 

 

The post Understanding the Catastrophic Downside Risk of the Kellogg Plan and Exploring Alternatives appeared first on Energy News Beat.