Energy News Beat
Nearly all modern warming and treeline advances at a Rocky Mountain ice patch occurred between the 1910s and 1940s, challenging global warming claims.
Nearly all modern warming and treeline advances at a Rocky Mountain ice patch occurred between the 1910s and 1940s, challenging global warming claims.
The post Study Finds Modern Warming And Treeline Advances Peaked By 1940s, Defying Climate Narratives appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
Shares of big Danish offshore wind developer Orsted dropped by 17% Monday, the same day President Donald Trump took the oath of office to become the 47th president of the United States. The two events are not merely coincidental with one another.
To be sure, Orsted’s loss of market cap was caused by several factors, including both the general slowing of the offshore wind business, and Orsted’s own announcement that it will incur a $1.69 billion impairment charge related to its Sunrise Wind project off the coast of New York. Company CEO Mads Nipper attributed the charge to delays and cost increases and said the project completion date is now delayed to the second half of 2027.
But there can be little doubt that the raft of energy-related executive orders signed by Trump also contributed to the drop in Orsted’s stock price. As part of a Day 1 agenda consisting of a reported 196 executive orders, the new president took dead aim at reversing the Biden Green New Deal agenda in general, with a special focus on wind power projects on federal lands and waters.
In addition to general orders declaring a national energy emergency and pulling the United States out of the Paris Climate Accords (for a second time), Trump signed a separate order titled, “Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects.” That long-winded title (pardon the pun) is quite descriptive of what the order is designed to accomplish.
Section 1 of this order withdraws “from disposition for wind energy leasing all areas within the Offshore Continental Shelf (OCS) as defined in section 2 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), 43 U.S.C. 1331.” Somewhat ironically, this is the same OCSLA cited in early January by former President Joe Biden when he set 625 million acres of federal offshore waters off limits to oil and gas leasing and drilling into perpetuity.
As with Biden’s LNG permitting pause, the fourth paragraph of Section 1 in Trump’s order states that “Nothing in this withdrawal affects rights under existing leases in the withdrawn areas.” However, the same paragraph goes on to subject those existing leases to review by the secretary of the Interior, who is charged with conducting “a comprehensive review of the ecological, economic, and environmental necessity of terminating or amending any existing wind energy leases, identifying any legal bases for such removal, and submit a report with recommendations to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy.”
Observant readers will know that the parameters of this order as it relates to offshore wind are essentially the same as a proposal I suggested in a previous piece here on Jan. 1. So, obviously, it receives the Blackmon Seal of Approval.
But we should also note that Trump goes even further, extending this freeze to onshore wind projects as well. While the rationale for the freeze in offshore leasing and permitting cites factors unique to the offshore like harm to marine mammals, ocean currents and the marine fishing industry, the rationale supporting the onshore freeze cites “environmental impact and cost to surrounding communities of defunct and idle windmills and deliver a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, with their findings and recommended authorities to require the removal of such windmills.”
This gets at concerns long held by me and many others that neither the federal government nor any state government has seen fit to require the proper, complete tear down and safe disposal of these massive wind turbines, blades, towers and foundations once they outlive their useful lives. In most jurisdictions, wind operators are free to just abandon the projects and leave the equipment to dilapidate and rot.
The dirty secret of the wind industry, whether onshore or offshore, is that it is not sustainable without consistent new injections of more and more subsidies, along with the tacit refusal by governments to properly regulate its operations. Trump and his team understand this reality and should be applauded for taking real action to address it.
David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more
Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote
ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack
The post DAVID BLACKMON: Trump Moves To Reverse Biden’s Green New Deal Agenda — With A Special Focus On Wind appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
[[{“value”:”
Jane Thornton tried and failed to stop the wood pellet plant from being built within earshot of her home in Faison, a tiny farming town in eastern North Carolina where she’s lived for over 60 years.
Now, some eight years later, she and her neighbors have a smaller but critical aim: getting the facility to better control its dust and the nuisance it creates.
Silver-haired and soft-spoken, Thornton is quick to wax philosophical about the forces that have fueled the pellet industry’s rise, largely driven by a decades-old carbon accounting loophole that countries use to allege climate progress. The unintended consequences are concentrated in the U.S. Southeast, which has emerged as a hub for the industry.
“It’s not green,” she said, referring to industry claims of sustainability. “Because when you cut the trees down, you lose the effect of them taking the bad stuff [out of the air]. And then we send them to Europe and use a lot of diesel fuel, which is not good. And they burn it and pollute their air. So how do they think it’s green?”
A host of advocates, scientists, and data backs up Thornton. Producing pellets, shipping them to Europe and Asia, and burning them in power plants all creates carbon pollution greater than that of burning coal. Too often, pellets are made from whole, hardwood trees that were absorbing carbon dioxide while they were alive. Their replacements, often pines, can’t regrow in time to make up for it.
As global climate negotiators debate the fuel’s carbon cycle, today Thornton and others in Faison are focused on dust. Indeed, neighbors of five wood pellet mills in the Southeast, including two operated by Enviva Biomass in North Carolina, list dust as their top concern, according to research conducted by the Southern Environmental Law Center and several other groups.
“That is the number one thing I have heard from almost every community I’ve talked to about pellet mills. It’s incessant dust,” said Heather Hillaker, senior attorney at the law center.
“We’re up against limited regulatory opportunities,” she acknowledged. But the state could force Enviva to tamp down the problem. “This is one area where there is a regulation that applies to an issue that is very prevalent for the community.”
At her home last month, Thornton described watching suppliers roll past on their way to Enviva’s factory.
“I’ve seen more log trucks come by today,” Thornton said. “They clear-cut everything. You get the oaks and the maples and the sycamores and whatever else is out there, and then you come back and plant pines. So, we’re going to have pine forests – or pine plantations.”
She added, “They’re not forests, because a forest is whatever the Lord puts out there.”
The practice of burning pellets for power isn’t economical without massive government supports, which don’t exist in North Carolina or elsewhere in the U.S.. What’s more, the Biden administration’s new rules for the Clean Electricity Tax Credit make it extremely unlikely that wood pellets could qualify.
Still, many countries count burning wood pellets as a positive on their climate ledgers, and the United Kingdom heavily subsidizes the fuel source. While those incentives are set to expire in 2027, the industry is campaigning heavily to get them renewed.
Often overlooked in the climate accounting debate is the experience of the disproportionately low-income communities of color in the Southeast, where pellet mills are invariably located. From the get-go, neighbors have sought to alleviate dust and noise from the mills.
Enviva’s first facility in North Carolina, in Ahoskie in Hertford County, began operating in 2011, and regulators required the company to control its dust soon thereafter.
“That pellet mill is a right smack dab in the middle of town,” said Hillaker. “So, it makes sense that they would have had some pretty significant dust issues immediately.”
Success in other communities has been more elusive.
A former professor at the University of Mt. Olive, Dr. Ruby Bell is an organizer with the nonprofit Dogwood Alliance in Faison. She lives far enough from the Sampson County mill that she doesn’t notice many impacts at her own home. Not so when she’s closer to the facility.
“When I first started this position,” Bell said, “I decided to go visit the people who live across the way. I sat outside for 20 minutes… When I left, I was sniffing. My nose was running. I had mucus beginning to form in my throat.”
Tiny air particulates invisible to the human eye are thought to be the most insidious to human health because they can burrow deep into the lungs and bloodstream. But large dust particles can cause the issues Bell described, because they tend to get trapped in the upper respiratory tract.
They can also exacerbate symptoms in people with pre-existing respiratory conditions. More than 100 households in the 300-person survey by Dogwood, Southern Environmental Law Center, and others, reported having asthma. Over half said they simply avoided outdoor activities like grilling and gardening to avoid the dust.
That’s part of why organizers want state regulators to require dust management plans at Enviva’s mills in Northampton, Richmond, and Sampson counties – not just the one in Ahoskie.
To be sure, the plan wouldn’t address every concern with the Faison facility. Neighbors complain about the noise from the mill’s 24-7 operations. They also blanch at the constant truck traffic, from the delivery of downed trees to the mill to the transport of the finished pellets some 80 miles south to the Port of Wilmington.
“This road out here was built as one of those farm-to-market roads,” Thornton said during the visit at her home, surrounded by farmland. “It wasn’t built for trucks, and they’ve torn it up I don’t know how many times.”
Activists are pressing Enviva to address all of their complaints voluntarily, saying that in addition to controlling its dust, the company should adopt best practices for incoming and outgoing trucks and cease operations between 10 at night and seven in the morning.
Yet even without these extra steps, the dust plan would make a measurable difference, community members believe. The Ahoskie plan, for instance, requires Enviva to apply water to “minimize fugitive dust emissions from any ground surfaces” when dust is observed or conditions are dry, among other measures. It also calls for grass berms, which could mitigate noise.
“The plan is better than nothing,” said Hillaker. “There’s better ability for [the state] to act if the plan itself is violated.”
But convincing North Carolina regulators to mandate the dust plans has been a slog. State rules say a plan is required if regulators can verify two dust complaints in a 12-month period. But that substantiation is far from simple.
“Trained Division of Air Quality inspectors visit the site and determine whether off-site dust is present,” Shawn Taylor, a division spokesperson, said over email. “If so, they attempt to determine the source of the dust by physically inspecting the dust, reviewing weather and wind data, reviewing operating schedules and air quality records of nearby facilities, and using other methods.”
Dating back two years, Bell has submitted grievances on behalf of neighbors in Faison that have yet to be confirmed. And while scientists from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill installed and collected air quality monitors at Thornton’s home and that of others, their research is ongoing and separate from the state’s process for verifying dust complaints.
“Fugitive wood dust usually consists of larger particles that are less likely to be detectable with these monitors, so physical inspection is used,” Taylor said. “Even if monitors detect dust, they cannot determine the source of the dust, so our investigation would need to rely on additional data to make this determination.”
Still, after years of little to no headway, organizers finally saw some progress last year. Regulators verified two complaints at the Enviva facility at the Port of Wilmington and will now require the company to enact a dust management plan.
“The details of that plan are still being developed by DAQ and Enviva,” Taylor said, “and will be implemented later this year.”
The success at the port has given a jolt of hope to organizers and pellet mill neighbors who feel they aren’t being heard.
“It’s hard to get them moving sometimes,” Bell said. With some justification, many in the community believe “it doesn’t matter what we say,” she said.
In Thornton’s eyes, the battle against wood pellets is all too typical of the way the country approaches environmental regulation.
“We’re not proactive to make sure what we’re doing is right,” she said. “We say ‘oh, this is new, this is good, we’re going to do a whole bunch of it,’ and after we get done, somebody comes along and says I don’t believe we should have done that.”
She added, “that’s true with a lot of things we’ve done in this country. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you ought to.”
“}]]
The post As world grapples with wood pellets’ climate impacts, North Carolina communities contend with dust and noise appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
Chinese builder New Dayang best known for its shipbuilding know-how in the dry bulk segment has sealed its first order for product tankers.
The shipbuilding arm of state-run machinery manufacturer Sumec Group has been commissioned to build four MR units for what it described as “world-renowned shipowners”.
Delivery details and financial terms have not been disclosed, but shipbuilding sources estimate each newbuild to cost around $45m.
New Dayang said the tankers would not only be “highly intelligent and have excellent environmental performance”, but also be methanol fuel ready.
The yard, which Sumec took over in 2018, has an orderbook that stands at more than 100 vessels most of which are ultramax bulkers of its flagship Crown 63 Plus design.
The post New Dayang lands product tanker debut appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
Oman’s state-controlled logistics giant Asyad Group has moved to sell shares in Asyad Shipping through an initial public offering.
Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank and Société Générale have been appointed as joint bookrunners for the group, which plans to sell a stake of at least 20% in Asyad Shipping and float it on the Muscat Stock Exchange.
Established in 2003, Asyad boasts a fleet of around 90 ships, including tankers, dry bulk vessels, and LNG carriers. Last July, the Middle Eastern owner ordered four VLCCs worth around $520m at Hanwha Ocean in South Korea, with deliveries set for 2026 and the first quarter of 2027.
The subscription period will start in February, and Asyad Shipping’s listing on the Omani bourse is expected in early March. Sohar International Bank will serve as the issue manager, while JPMorgan Chase, Jefferies Financial Group, EFG Hermes, and Oman Investment Bank are among the joint global coordinators.
The post Asyad Shipping charts Oman IPO course appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
Warsaw and Munich signed an unusual pact against transforming the CAP budget and the cohesion funds into a single programme managed by national governments.
Such a merger would mean reorganising over 60% of the EU budget and granting member states control over these funds, thanks to national plans.
Poland has repeatedly spoken out against such a reform, referring to the principle of subsidiarity set down in the treaty of the EU, which states that decisions should be made by an authority as close to the citizens as possible.
Bavaria, too, has consistently defended its autonomy and regional control over the cohesion fund and against a possible merger with the CAP.
In a joint declaration, the Agriculture Minister of Poland, Czesław Siekierski and his counterpart from Bavaria, Michaela Kaniber, called against this merger. Kaniber warned that the “renationalisation” of the EU budget posed “great risks.”
Cohesion and agricultural funds
Germany has long been considered a supporter of cohesion fund reforms, albeit with regional differences.
Eastern German states, which stand to benefit the most, have been vocal about radical reforms. In contrast, Bavaria, which would see significant cuts to its funding flows, has opposed altering the status quo and giving Berlin control over regional funding implementation.
With the February election approaching and CDU and its Bavarian sister party leading the polls, Germany’s stance could change.
Until now, the conservative union of the CDU/CSU has tried to include both positions.
Bavaria and Poland also converge on CAP fund allocation.
Small-scale farmers dominate both regions, and Czesław Siekierski promised to work towards noticeable changes in favour of family farms during the Polish presidency.
Eastern German agriculture ministers, however, said that small farms should not be given preferential treatment in allocating funds, in a recent document,
For instance, the document speaks out against any capping of direct payments for big farms.
The coming elections will be decisive to understand to which extent Bavaria can impose its demands within Germany.
We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more
Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote
ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack
The post Bavaria joins Poland against regional and agricultural budget merge appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
French Prime Minister François Bayrou on Tuesday announced plans to divide highly sensitive legislation that would legalise assisted dying into two separate parts.
The bill – adressing a politically charged issue in France – was under review by lawmakers last June but was halted following President Emmanuel Macron’s calling of snap elections.
Under Bayrou’s proposal, a revived bill would be split in two: one would legalise assisted dying for patients with short- or medium-term terminal diagnoses.
A second would reform palliative care – end-of-life medical treatment for those with complex or terminal illnesses.
Currently, assisted dying or euthanasia is prohibited in France, but the law allows patients to request access to deep and continuous sedation until death, under very strict conditions.
By splitting the text into two parts, Bayrou is responding to demands made by some members of the right and far right, who are ideologically opposed to assisted dying but may support the less contentious palliative care reform.
With his predecessor as prime minister, Michel Barnier, toppled by the far right in a no-confidence vote, Bayrou appears keen to make concessions to avoid the same fate.
Despite the separation, Bayrou has insisted that both texts should be reviewed “within the same timeframe.”
Opposition is expected from some members of parliament, including those typically associated with Bayrou and Macron’s centrist faction.
National Assembly President Yaël Braun-Pivet, a Macron ally, is among pushing for both issues to be dealt with in a single law as originally planned.
“The end-of-life bill is a constant collateral victim of the parliamentary chaos we are experiencing,” said Olivier Falorni, a lawmaker from Bayrou’s camp who had been the bill’s rapporteur before the legislative work was interrupted in June, speaking to Sud Radio.
Falorni believes that palliative care and assisted dying are, in practice, “complementary pillars”, with the former the “primary response” and the latter the “ultimate recourse”.
The issue deeply divides French society, with supporters seeing euthanasia as a fundamental freedom to defend, while opponents – particularly conservative voters and religious representatives – fear an ethically perilous ‘slippery slope’.
Some healthcare workers worry that the legislation might be too permissive, with unions expressing regret at not being included in its drafting process.
Tuesday’s announcement also stirred reactions among organisations and advocacy groups. Claire Fourcade, president of the French society for palliative care and support, told AFP that separating the issues could expedite necessary progress on palliative care by removing assisted dying from the debate.
Conversely, the Association for the right to die with dignity said the separation amounts to “giving in to religious representatives and opponents of euthanasia.”
A similar law to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales passed in the UK parliament November, following a free vote in which MPs were not whipped to support a party line.
We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more
Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote
ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack
The post France’s Bayrou to split controversial euthanasia bill appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
Ireland’s parliament, the Dáil, descended into chaos on Wednesday, postponing what was supposed to be a routine vote to confirm the new prime minister.
The Dáil was due to elect Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin as Taoiseach shortly after midday Brussels time. But opposition lawmakers disrupted proceedings over a plan to allow pro-government independents to speak from the opposition benches, during the opposition’s speaking time.
Opposition deputies shouted over the speaker, Verona Murphy, forcing her to suspend the Dáil three times, in the hope that different factions could strike a backroom deal.
No solid deal had materialised by early Wednesday evening. The legislature is due to resume at 10am Brussels time on Thursday.
Fianna Fáil and its old rival Fine Gael – centre-right parties whose ideological differences are minor – struck a coalition agreement with a small group of largely conservative independent lawmakers on 14 January.
The agreement followed a general election on 29 November, which extended Fianna Fáil’s lead in the Dáil. Fine Gael came third, behind the left-wing and nationalist Sinn Féin, the largest opposition party.
Besides the speaking time arrangement, the opposition also objected to a plan to adjourn the Dáil for two weeks after it ratified the new government – which was supposed to happen on Wednesday.
In a mistimed post on X, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen prematurely congratulated Martin, whom the Dáil had not yet elected due to the delays. “Together we will make Europe more competitive in these turbulent times,” she told him. The post was deleted a short time later.
Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have been in government together since 2020. Last year’s election all but wiped their third partner, the Green Party, while still leaving Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael together a few seats short of a majority in the Dáil.
That forced them to seek a new coalition partner, which they eventually found in the loose formation of seven independent deputies who were at the heart of Wednesday’s speaking time drama. Four of them are due to become ministers.
Irish parliamentary rules allow five or more deputies of different political stripes to form a ‘technical group’, which strengthens their right to question ministers.
However, members of technical groups must remain in opposition. That forced the group to formally split between ministers-to-be and the rest, which caused the dispute over the remaining members’ speaking time.
The coalition deal stipulates that Martin will resign on 16 November 2027 and pass the reins to the Fine Gael leader, currently Simon Harris, the outgoing Taoiseach.
Before the two parties entered into a formal coalition after the 2020 election, Fianna Fáil propped up a minority Fine Gael government during 2016-2020 in a “confidence and supply” deal.
The ideological differences between the two parties are fairly small. Both are socially liberal by European standards, but Fine Gael more so than Fianna Fáil. However, Fine Gael is also the more fiscally conservative of the pair.
Nevertheless, they were the main rivals of Irish politics for most of the last century, having grown from the opposing sides in the 1922-1923 Irish Civil War.
We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more
Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote
ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack
The post Farce in Irish parliament delays new government appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
Transport and Tourism Commissioner Apostolos Tzitzikostas told the World Economic Forum’s Davos summit today that the EU’s planned sustainable tourism strategy will allow the sector to keep growing.
When quizzed during a panel discussion on the citizen backlash against overtourism in Europe, Tzitzikostas quickly said the industry’s development is central to the EU’s plan.
He agreed with the comments of Saudi Arabian Tourism Minister Ahmed Al-Khateeb, who said that “there is nothing called overtourism.” There is “unbalanced tourism” and “mismanagement of traffic.”
His centre-right party colleague and Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotaki recognised Europe’s overtourism problem last autumn but said it was only in a few destinations. Mitsotaki promised to intervene where problems arise.
Similarly, Tzitzikostas said regions mostly focus on promoting their destinations “instead of managing the flow” of tourists. He hoped to funnel tourists to areas that are “undervalued touristically.”
The EU sustainable tourism strategy should be out in 2026, Tzizikostas told the audience.
(DC/MM)
We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more
Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote
ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack
The post EU’s ‘overtourism’ response: welcoming more tourists appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Energy News Beat
The country’s new president and prime minister have a mandate to reform the country—but do they have the power?
Lebanon has two new leaders and neither is to Hezbollah’s liking. On Jan. 9, Gen. Joseph Aoun, commander of the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), was elected president with 99 out of 128 votes from Lebanese parliamentarians across the political spectrum. Nawaf Salam, president of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and a Sunni who is backed both by Saudi Arabia and across Lebanon’s nonsectarian civil society, was appointed prime minister.
They were the candidates of national unity—and of finding a way to move past the country’s sectarian political system. That system was nearly the country’s undoing, especially after Hezbollah, the Shia-dominated militant group backed by Iran, fought a ruinous war with Israel in recent months.
Hezbollah preferred other candidates over Aoun and Salam, but it hasn’t resisted the new leadership at a time when it has been licking its wounds. “This was unthinkable,” said Sami Nader, a Lebanese political analyst. “For decades, Hezbollah has been calling the shots. But now, because of this geopolitical earthquake, since Hezbollah’s military defeat against Israel, since the toppling of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, that whole Iranian axis has collapsed.” Everyone in Lebanon, including Hezbollah’s Shia base, is primarily focused on building international trust, bringing in aid and investment from both the West and the Gulf, and enabling the reconstruction of homes and villages.
And yet, Aoun and Salam face daunting challenges going forward. Will they manage to form a clean government and usher in much-needed political reforms—reforms that some lawmakers may resist? And, more urgently, will they actually succeed in disarming Hezbollah?
Hezbollah’s flags still hang from shops, billboards, and traffic crossings in its areas of influence. A friend based in the country said his concierge believed that Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah had not died in the massive 80-ton bomb drop and was hiding in Iran somewhere. He expected Nasrallah to return as a mahdi, or messiah, at the time of his choosing.
Experts say that even as Hezbollah denies the severity of its losses in the war, it is aware of the need to rebuild southern Lebanon, parts of the Bekaa Valley, and the southern Beirut suburb of Dahiyeh, which are all home to its supporters and came under intense Israeli bombardment. According to the World Bank Lebanon needs an estimated $8.5 billion just to cover for the damages caused by the latest war.
“The party is now forced to go along with two candidates it opposed,” Michael Young, a senior editor at the Carnegie Middle East Center, posted on X. “Worse, if it wants Gulf funding for the reconstruction of mainly Shiite areas, it has to show a willingness to talk about disarmament and support economic reform. Reconstruction is their absolute priority.”
According to the 60-day cease-fire deal agreed upon by Israel and Hezbollah last November, both Israel and Hezbollah are supposed to withdraw from southern Lebanon. The deal also calls for the full implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 by Jan. 26. The agreement says, “Lebanon’s official military and security forces, infrastructure, and weaponry will be the only armed groups, arms, and related material deployed in the southern Litani area” with the exception of U.N. peacekeepers, who are allowed in the region to monitor violations.
Earlier this month, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted the risk posed by continued Israeli presence in the south and added that U.N. peacekeepers have discovered more than “100 weapons caches” belonging to Hezbollah and other groups since the cease-fire began.
Both Aoun and Salam emphasized the state’s right to be the only entity that carries weapons. “My pledge is to call for a defensive strategy and the establishment of a state—I repeat, a state—that invests in its army, controls all borders, and implements international resolutions,” Aoun said.
A politician from the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), a former political ally of Hezbollah, said that Hezbollah was likely to disarm but only south of Litani and not elsewhere. “I think that it is a given that Hezbollah will abide by the implementation of 1701 and disarm in South of Litani,” he said, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “North of Litani is yet to be discussed.”
Hezbollah was first told to leave the south at the end of the 2006 Lebanon War. It has taken the group two decades, and another war, to agree to evacuate southern Lebanon. To disarm Hezbollah north of the Litani will be an even bigger challenge.
The FPM politician said there was some talk that, under a new national defense strategy, Hezbollah’s fighters could be brought under the overall government command “without necessarily integrating it into the LAF, but maybe as a paramilitary force or something like that.”
Others have warned about leaving Hezbollah fighters to their own devices and thus unleashing the kind of chaos that befell Iraq after the United States invaded the country and banned Iraqi soldiers from being integrated in the armed forces. They argue that Hezbollah’s fighters must be offered an off ramp by inviting them to the LAF.
Gilbert Doumit, a Lebanese activist who fought the election as a part of a civil society group but lost, said Hezbollah is weak “but not as weak as we think.” It still has men and weapons, and it “can paralyze the country if not controlled.” To avoid that, he argued, then it must become a part of the LAF. “Is there a way to find a solution for a large percentage of Hezbollah fighters and to integrate them into the army?” he said. “Yes, I think there can be a mechanism, a dedicated unit for them. They are Lebanese, after all. “
But neither Hezbollah nor other political groups entrenched in Lebanon’s existing sectarian political system intend to make it easy for Aoun and Salam as they select their ministers for a new government and unleash reforms. “The [prime minister] can pick his cabinet but he needs to consult us,” said a politician belonging to a sect-based party, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. They added that Salam needs their support to make sure that he can pass a no-confidence motion.
But analysts like Nader believe the civil society movement is in the home stretch and that it is too late for the political class to run against the momentum. “Now is the best time for a cabinet of experts and for the parliament to vote special prerogatives to allow them to undertake radical reforms, for instance in the banking sector,” Nader said. “The parliament can but will not issue a no-confidence, not in my opinion. There is too much momentum, and no one wants to be in the losing camp.” However, he does fear that the old political class could delay the formation of a government to dampen spirits once again and wait out the positive political changes in Lebanon.
As the Lebanese welcome two qualified, unsullied people to top positions, they are cautiously optimistic. The country has endured far too much to celebrate just yet. “What do I think about Aoun and Salam? Ask me in six months,” said Samy, a Lebanese technician who did not want to give his full name due to the risk of being targeted in what is still a tense domestic situation.
We give you energy news and help invest in energy projects too, click here to learn more
The post Hezbollah Is Waiting for Lebanon’s New Leaders appeared first on Energy News Beat.
Pecos Country Operating, LLC is a privately owned oil and gas exploration and production company headquartered in Fort Worth. We own and operate wells across the South Central United States with our predominant means of production coming out of West and North Texas.
