Ukraine ‘open’ to Russian gas transit – Slovakia

Energy News Beat

The current transit deal is due to expire at the end of this year but Bratislava is negotiating to extend it, Prime Minister Robert Fico says

Ukraine may allow Russian natural gas to be piped through its territory beyond 2024 when the current transit deal is due to expire, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has said.

In a video posted on Facebook after a meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart Denis Shmigal on Wednesday, Fico said a new deal would benefit both Ukraine and Slovakia, as well as a number of other EU countries that still rely on Russian energy.

“Ukraine is open to the transit of Russian gas to Europe after 2024. Work on the details of the agreement may be completed in the near future. The very fact that the transit can continue is excellent news… That means that we in Slovakia will also be able to continue the transit of this gas, which will also benefit Austria and Italy,” Fico said.

Kiev has been reluctant to renew the deal and said on Thursday that it does “not intend to negotiate with the Russians” for an extension. However, the Ukrainian government admitted that it “can negotiate with a European country on the use of its gas transportation network” for further deliveries, Interfax-Ukraine quoted the government’s press service as saying.

The transit line through Ukraine and the European arm of the TurkStream pipeline are now the only two remaining conduits for piped Russian gas to reach Central and Western Europe. The current five-year transit contract between Russia and Ukraine was signed in 2019. Under the deal, Russian energy giant Gazprom agreed to deliver 65 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas to the EU through Ukraine in 2020, and 40 bcm annually between 2021 and 2024.

However, actual delivery volumes have been running short of the agreed amount after in May 2022 Ukraine closed the key pumping station at Sokhranovka, which had handled about a third of the Russian gas flowing through the country. Currently, only the station at Sudzha remains in operation.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Ukraine ‘open’ to Russian gas transit – Slovakia appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Adnoc eyes LNG carrier orders

Energy News Beat

UAE’s energy giant Adnoc is looking to order liquefied natural gas carriers for its planned LNG terminal in Al Ruwais, according to shipbuilding sources.

Sources told LNG Prime that Adnoc recently issued a tender inviting offers from yards in China and South Korea for six firm plus four optional standard-size LNG carrier newbuilds.

The vessels will feature the latest technologies and GTT’s Mark III Flex+ and NO96 Super+ membrane systems are being considered.

The sources said that the LNG carriers are expected to serve Adnoc’s second LNG terminal in Al Ruwais, but they did not provide any further information.

Adnoc Logistics & Services, a unit of Adnoc, is already working to renew its fleet of LNG carriers and it has six 175,000-cbm vessels on order at China’s Jiangnan Shipyard worth more than $1.2 billion.

The firm will take delivery of these vessels in 2025 and 2026.

These “LNG Jumbo” dual-fuel carriers will feature GTT’s Mark III Flex membrane system and a partial reliquefaction system.

Adnoc L&S’s existing fleet of Moss-type, steam turbine LNG carriers serves the company’s 6 mtpa LNG terminal on Das Island.

Last year, Adnoc announced it will build its second LNG terminal in Al Ruwais.

The firm previously planned to construct the facility in Fujairah and is yet to take a final investment decision on the project.

When completed, the project, which consists of two 4.8 mtpa LNG liquefaction trains with a total capacity of 9.6 mtpa, will more than double Adnoc’s LNG production capacity.

Last month, Adnoc signed a heads of agreement with a unit of Chinese independent gas distributor ENN to supply the latter with 1 mtpa of LNG for a period of 15 years from its planned terminal in Al Ruwais.

This is the first Ruwais LNG supply agreement.

The deliveries are expected to start in 2028, upon commencement of the facility’s commercial operations.

The post Adnoc eyes LNG carrier orders appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Grants would help less affluent New Hampshire towns invest in public solar projects

Energy News Beat

​New Hampshire’s energy department is preparing to road-test a grant program meant to help disadvantaged cities and towns access the environmental and financial benefits of solar power.

The state plans to use $1.4 million from the 2021 federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Act to help fund the installation of solar projects up to 60 kilowatts on municipal buildings or land. The grant will cover up to 95% of the costs of a qualifying solar project for lower-income cities and towns and 60% for other municipalities.

In addition to cutting carbon emissions, solar can also make a community more resilient in case of power outages. And using it to power municipal facilities can save money that can be reinvested in public projects or used to hold down property tax rates in the long-term.

The funding application has been submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy, and New Hampshire is now in “wait-and-see mode,” said Joshua Elliott, director of policy and programs in the state energy department.

The state is also looking at the program as something of a trial run, to see if it makes sense to continue and expand the grant offering in the future.

“We’re looking at this program as almost the guinea pig to see what demand is out there, what can we do, what we can improve,” Elliott said. “Then we’ll use this process to inform what potentially a [larger] municipal program could look like.”

As a whole, New Hampshire lags the region in solar adoption. The state ranks 41st in the country for installed solar capacity, behind even lower-population New England states like Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont, according to the Solar Energy Industry Association. State policies to encourage solar are limited, with incentives for residential solar maxing out at $1,000 per project and rebates for commercial solar limited to $10,000.

On the municipal level, though, many New Hampshire cities and towns are very interested in solar power. For example, in Hanover, a more affluent town and the home of Dartmouth College, solar arrays provide nearly all the power used by municipal facilities. Smaller towns and those with lower average incomes, however, often have a harder time realizing their solar goals.

New Hampshire property owners already have one of the highest property tax burdens in the country, so proposing that the residents of small, disadvantaged towns pay more to install solar is a big ask, even if there could be financial benefits down the line. Beyond the issue of funding, there are the logistics: researching options, hiring consultants, assessing different grant options.

“If you have the idea that you want solar on the town hall, you have to go from the idea to the implementation,” said Margaret Byrnes, executive director of the New Hampshire Municipal Association. “For municipalities that don’t have that internal staff, it’s a significant lift.”

The grant program aims to lighten that burden. And to maximize the benefits these towns can achieve, the grant guidelines encourage municipalities to skip entering into leasing arrangements and instead buy their solar arrays outright, so they retain the rights to sell renewable energy credits.

“We want all of those benefits flowing to the community itself,” Elliott said.

Colebrook, a town of roughly 2,000 people just 10 miles south of the Canadian border, is looking at the grant program as a potential way to fund a solar array on the roof of its town hall. Tourism is the main economic driver in the remote and scenic town, and there is little industry and few high-paying jobs. The median household income in town is just over $48,000, well below the state median of $91,000.

“We can’t just go out and ask for $150,000 from the town to foot the bill” for a solar project, said Colebrook town manager Tim Stevens. “Any time you have to go back to the town and ask for more money than you did before, that has a negative impact on them.”

Hinsdale, a small town near the state’s southern border, has plans to open its transfer station full-time and hopes to build a solar array on the site to help power the operation. A recent report, however, found that most residents’ property taxes had increased between 25% and 48% between 2018 and 2022, making it challenging to ask for yet more money. And there’s a bridge in town that needs to be rebuilt and other pressing infrastructure issues.

“Unfortunately, solar is not on that priority list,” said Josh Green, Hinsdale’s community development coordinator.

He estimates that a 60-kilowatt array at the transfer station would cost about $260,000. With the grant, the town would only have to pay about $13,000 of that total tab.

“The solar grant would definitely help the town out tremendously,” Green said.

Though the planned grant program is modest in size — the total budget will likely be able to fund only a handful of projects — it is well-tailored to the needs of the state, said Melissa Elander of Clean Energy New Hampshire, a nonprofit advocacy group that has been working with municipalities in the northern part of the state to prepare for the launch of the grants.

“It’s a good fit to focus on smaller towns that often get forgotten in some of the larger grant programs,” she said. “I am thrilled that it’s going to be available at all.”

The post Grants would help less affluent New Hampshire towns invest in public solar projects appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Rotterdam LNG bunkering volumes hit record high in 2023

Energy News Beat

The Dutch port of Rotterdam said its LNG bunkering volumes reached a record level in 2023 as prices dropped from 2022 and demand continues to increase.

Europe’s largest bunkering port reported LNG volumes of 619,243 cubic meters in 2023, a rise of 53 percent compared to 406,599 cbm in 2022 when volumes dropped considerably due to high prices.

However, LNG bunkering volumes also rose 2.6 percent compared to record 603,690 cbm in 2021.

During the fourth quarter last year, LNG bunkering volumes reached 148,933 cbm, down from the previous quarter’s 204,418 cbm.

The port of Rotterdam said that only its LNG bunkering volumes increased last year due to lower prices of the fuel.

Last year, shipping firms bunkered less fuel in the port Rotterdam with volumes reaching 9.9 million tonnes, down 6.7 percent from 10.6 million tonnes in 2022, it said.

The Rotterdam port is home to Gasunie’s and Vopak’s Gate LNG import terminal.

Gate LNG also handled a record number of vessels last year mainly due to a rise in demand for LNG as fuel.

Gate’s small-scale jetty, which launched operations in 2016, handled record 151 vessels, loading close to 900,000 cbm of LNG last year.

Earlier this month, classification society DNV said that there are now 1006 LNG-powered vessels in operation on order, showing the fuel’s continued importance in the maritime energy transition.

These statistics do not include dual-fuel LNG carriers and smaller inland vessels.

The post Rotterdam LNG bunkering volumes hit record high in 2023 appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Türkiye unlikely to let US warships enter Black Sea – Lavrov

Energy News Beat

Ankara has assured Russia it will continue to abide by the Montreux Convention, the foreign minister says

The US will not be able to persuade Türkiye to allow access for its warships to the Black Sea amid the Ukraine conflict, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

Speaking at a press conference in New York on Wednesday, where he was attending a UN meeting on Ukraine and the Middle East, Lavrov was asked on whether Türkiye could abrogate the Montreux Convention regulating maritime traffic via the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits connecting the Aegean and Black Seas.

The question came after Pentagon official Celeste Wallander said on Tuesday that Washington wanted to work with Black Sea powers, including Türkiye, to “move away from the state of conflict” which allowed Ankara to block warships from passing through the Turkish straits.

Earlier this month, Turkish officials cited the treaty when denying passage to the Black Sea to minesweepers donated to Ukraine by the UK.

Commenting on Wallander’s statement, Lavrov suggested that the US was trying to convince Ankara to soften the maritime regime in the straits, particularly regarding foreign military vessels entering the Black Sea.

“If this is the case, our Turkish colleagues have told us that they, as the guardians of the legacy of the Montreux Convention, will strictly abide by its provisions,” Lavrov said. He suggested that the US has stepped up diplomatic efforts on this front after Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin was released from the hospital last week following two weeks of treatment for prostate cancer.

Adopted in 1936, the Montreux Convention grants commercial ships unhindered passage through the Turkish Straits. Warships must comply with a number of regulations in times of peace, while in wartime belligerents are not allowed to sail them through the straits, except when they are returning to base.

Shortly after the start of Russia’s military operation against Ukraine – which Ankara has described as “a war” – Türkiye banned all foreign states from sending their warships through the straits, repeatedly stressing that it intends to follow the rules stipulated in the convention.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Türkiye unlikely to let US warships enter Black Sea – Lavrov appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Belgorod plane attack: Why did Ukraine shoot down a plane carrying dozens of its own soldiers?

Energy News Beat

Kiev is now only fighting to prolong the life of Zelensky’s regime, that’s why it’s doing stupid things

On Wednesday, an Il-76 transport plane was downed in Russian airspace. It was reportedly carrying 65 Ukrainian POWs scheduled for a prisoner swap, escorted by three Russian military guards, as well as six crew members. All on board were killed. It seems the aircraft was destroyed by missiles launched from a US-supplied Patriot system.

The incident prompts a critical question: What were the Ukrainian soldiers doing so far from their homeland that air transportation was necessary? The answer is simple: The POWs were initially held in the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics, but then came a Ukrainian HIMARS attack on a prisoner camp in Olenovka near Volnovakha on July 29, 2022, killing 53 people. This seems to have been the reason for the transfer, aiming to distance the POWs from high-tech precision weapons systems provided to Kiev by NATO.

Today, we can say with absolute certainty that this did not help. Ukraine has once again shown the world just how dangerous it can be for its own citizens.

What happened? 

Around noon on Wednesday, Moscow time (9am GMT), footage spread online depicting the crash on snow-covered fields. A distinctive church seen on video meant the location was soon identified as being near the village of Yablonovo, Korochansky District, in Belgorod Region.

Almost immediately, Ukrainian Telegram channels, both anonymous and verified (such as Unian and Ukrainskaya Pravda), were inundated with posts citing sources close to the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU). These posts claimed that a) the plane was purportedly carrying missiles for Russia’s S-300 systems intended for use in attacks on Kharkov, and b) the downing was attributed to the Kiev’s actions.

A short time later, the Russian Defense Ministry officially announced that 65 captured Ukrainian soldiers who were being transported to Belgorod for a prisoner exchange were on board the plane, along with six crew members and three guards.

Immediately afterwards, statements about the involvement of Kiev’s forces began to disappear from the Ukrainian internet, as well as any mention of the alleged cargo (missiles for the S-300 system).

At 3pm Moscow time, the Russian Defense Ministry made an official announcement, stating that two Ukrainian missiles had been launched from the Liptsy suburb of Kharkov. The point of impact was approximately 100km away, a range well within the coverage of the AFU’s Patriot missiles of all modifications, including PAC-2 GEM-T and PAC-3 MSE.

Concurrently, lists featuring the names of Ukrainian servicemen surfaced, which can be verified through the meticulous maintenance of Ukrainian POW databases by dedicated enthusiasts.

Background 

Belgorod’s civilian airport has been shut down since Russia launched its military operation in February 2022. This closure is a precautionary measure due to the airport’s location within the range of Ukrainian air defenses.

Nevertheless, the air transportation of prisoners to Belgorod for exchange is a well-established practice. Previous instances were conducted using the Il-76 aircraft, notably on January 3, 2024, with the actual exchange occurring on January 8.

It’s reasonable to assume that the Ukrainian side was notified about these flights, similar to how Russia is informed about visits by foreign leaders to Kiev.

On Wednesday, two planes were involved; the second Il-76 aircraft, transporting another group of prisoners, promptly reversed course and returned to base after the first aircraft crashed.

The AFU’s actions have precedents. On multiple occasions, they have covertly positioned Western air defense systems, including Patriots and IRIS-Ts, near the border of Belgorod Region or the line of contact, attempting to use them to engage aircraft within Russian airspace. Despite claiming success in these operations, Ukrainian forces have consistently failed to substantiate their reports with evidence.

What now?

Ukraine, as always, is firmly in denial, so we are unlikely to learn the real motives behind the actions of its military anytime soon. Was it a mistake caused by a lack of coordination and general sloppiness, a deliberate provocation, or both? Were they aiming to shoot the plane down on its way home with Russian POWs on board, but something went wrong?

Is this the end of prisoner exchanges? One would hope not. In just under two years, more than a thousand captured Russian soldiers have been brought home in POW swaps, but many others are still being held captive, so these exchanges need to go on.

Will there be any reaction from the West? I’m certain there won’t be. At best, we’ll hear routine hypocritical expressions of concern, or, more likely, another round of tirades about how Russia is to blame. The West continues to use Ukraine, while it can get away with it, and will keep turning a blind eye to anything, including the killing of Ukrainians by Western “weapons of freedom.”

Not that it matters to the dead Russian pilots or Ukrainian soldiers who were on their way home. What matters is that the idea that the Ukrainian government being the worst enemy of its own people has just be bolstered.

Moloch

The Ukrainian army, which is getting weaker by the day, is not fighting for a “better future.”

The Ukrainian army is not fighting for “freedom.” People at the highest levels in Kiev have confirmed that they were offered what would be incredibly accommodating terms by current standards at the peace negotiations with Russia in Istanbul back in March and April 2022.

The Ukrainian army is not fighting “to expel the enemy,” as only the craziest of fanatics continue to claim that this can be achieved by military means.

It’s not even fighting for “the European way,” as NATO and EU membership is receding into background, like a dot on the horizon, which is no secret to anyone.

The Ukrainian army is fighting and Ukrainian soldiers are rotting alive in rat-infested trenches, dying by the thousands for one thing only: to keep the current Kiev regime in power.

It’s a regime that refuses to accept reality and keeps saying it’s winning.

It’s a regime that has no qualms about sacrificing thousands upon thousands of its own citizens for a fleeting spot in the media limelight, just for the show.

It sacrificed them in Bakhmut, even though trying to hold the city was clearly pointless. It sacrificed them near Rabotino, even though the Ukrainian army leadership realized the failure of the counteroffensive after just a few days.

It sacrificed them during suicidal, flag-waving raids on Snake Island and Crimea, even though few came back from those escapades. It’s sacrificing them today in Krynki, in Avdeevka, and near Belgorod – just like that, for nothing in particular.

Every day, Ukraine’s plight is getting worse. Zelensky is running out of fuel for his fire, but he keeps throwing more soldiers into the flames, sending people-catchers to grab anyone they can get their hands on in the street.

All of those are not separate incidents but the work of an inhuman machine of annihilation, which will only go down when the Ukrainian state falls.

The plane incident is just another episode. But one would like to think that this will be the straw that breaks the camels back.

If that happens, it will mean that the deaths of our pilots and Ukrainian POWs will not have been in vain.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Belgorod plane attack: Why did Ukraine shoot down a plane carrying dozens of its own soldiers? appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

“Effective Immediately,” Fed Shuts Down Arbitrage Opportunity with the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP)

Energy News Beat

This is funny, in a central-bank kind of way.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

The Fed confirmed today in a press release at 7 PM EST that its infamous tool to deal with the March 2023 bank-panic and bank-liquidity crisis, the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP), will cease making new loans to banks, as scheduled, on March 11. Existing loans can continue for their term of up to one year. This decision was disclosed on January 9 by Michael Barr, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision, at a panel appearance.

What’s new – the funny part – is that the Fed also said that, “effective immediately,” it would shut down the arbitrage with which banks have been gaming the BTFP to make some extra bucks. We’ve been discussing this BTFP arbitrage for a while, including here with a chart. The whole thing was a hoot.

The BTFP was conceived in all haste over a weekend in March 2023 and was announced on Sunday after two regional banks, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, had collapsed and were shut down by regulators on Friday, with visions of contagion turning this into a full-fledged financial crisis.

But the BTFP had a fatal flaw: under certain conditions, the interest rate that the Fed charges on loans at the BTFP (the rate is market-based) could fall substantially below the interest rate the Fed pays on its reserve balances (the Fed sets this rate).

And that’s exactly what happened starting early November during rate-cut mania. It opened up a riotous risk-free arbitrage opportunity that banks took advantage of.

Today the Fed had had it with this deal and shut down the arbitrage for new loans “extended from now through program expiration.” In the press release, it says that the interest rate to borrow at the BTFP will be “no lower” than the interest rate on reserves. And with this change, the arbitrage becomes unprofitable for new loans. The press release:

“As the program ends, the interest rate applicable to new BTFP loans has been adjusted such that the rate on new loans extended from now through program expiration will be no lower than the interest rate on reserve balances in effect on the day the loan is made.

“This rate adjustment ensures that the BTFP continues to support the goals of the program in the current interest rate environment. This change is effective immediately. All other terms of the program are unchanged.”

On the new BTFP term sheet released today, applicable to new loans, the rate calculation paragraph now reads (I marked the new language in bold; IORB = interest on reserve balances):

“The rate for term advances will be the one-year overnight index swap rate plus 10 basis points, provided that the rate may not be lower than the IORB rate in effect on the day the advance is made; the rate will be fixed for the term of the advance on the day the advance is made.

When the worker bees at the Fed hashed out the terms for the BTFP over the weekend (eating pizza and sleeping on the floor?), they overlooked the possibility that the market-based interest rate to borrow at the BTFP – the one-year overnight index swap rate, plus 10 basis points – could fall substantially below the Fed-set interest rate that banks earn on their reserve balances.

In March 2023, the rate at the BTFP was close to the rate the Fed paid on reserves. But during rate-cut mania starting in early November, Treasury yields from one-year on up plunged, and related yields plunged in parallel. By mid-December, banks could borrow at the BTFP below 4.8%, and then leave the cash in their reserve accounts at the Fed and earn 5.40%. Risk free, hassle-free income for nothing.

From July through October, the BTFP balance was around $110 billion. But at the beginning of November, it began to surge. Last week, it jumped by a $14 billion. Since November 1, it has jumped by nearly 50%, or by $52 billion, to $161 billion.

On Thursday, the Fed will release the new figures through Wednesday, and the balance likely jumped again. But that should be the last increase in the BTFP balance because the door to make money on this circus has effectively closed now:

The post “Effective Immediately,” Fed Shuts Down Arbitrage Opportunity with the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Did the $5-Billion Acquisition of Homebuilder MDC Holdings by Japan’s Sekisui House Mark the Top for Homebuilder Stocks after the Rate-Cut-Mania Rally?

Energy News Beat

With uncanny precision?

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

The deal came up during D.R. Horton’s earnings call with analysts, without the two companies being named. The analyst posing the question referred to it as “a large acquisition by an offshore player of a domestic homebuilder,” and everyone knew what he was talking about.

One of Japan’s largest homebuilders, Sekisui House, had agreed to buy US homebuilder MDC Holdings on January 18 for nearly $5 billion, or $63 a share, a 19% premium over the prior day’s closing price, and a 41% premium over the 90-day volume-weighted average trading price. Sekisui House has been buying smaller and regional homebuilders in the US since 2017. But MDC will be its largest acquisition in the US.

Sekisui House’s bid was impeccably timed after the huge rate-cut-mania rally that had kicked off in early November and had driven some homebuilder stocks to all-time highs

But D.R. Horton’s earnings call had sent homebuilder stocks skidding, now for the second day. D.R. Horton shares [DHI] fell 9.2% yesterday and another 2.7% today, to $139.21, the lowest since December 12. The company disclosed that gross profit margins narrowed by 2.2 percentage points quarter-to-quarter, as the massive costs of mortgage-rate buydowns came home to roost.

The three-year chart also shows the dizzying rate-cut-mania rally starting at the beginning of November, and how the stock has tripled since February 2020. So January 18 was a good time to buy a homebuilder?

And the other homebuilder stocks also sagged yesterday and today. The exception was MDC, whose stock was propped up by the $63-a-share purchase price written into the merger agreement; it just dipped a little to $62.62.

The Homebuilders ETF [XHB] rose to an all-time high on January 22, two trading days after the Sekisui-MDC deal was announced.

The ETF – in addition to homebuilders, it includes big retailers, such as Home Depot and Lowe’s, building materials suppliers, and other companies related to the housing construction and remodeling industry — has doubled since February 2020. The announcement of the acquisition of MDC had fueled a two-day rally on hopes for more big acquisitions before D.R. Horton poured cold water on it yesterday. The ETF has now sagged for the second day in a row.

With buyers stretched by sky-high prices and mortgage rates that have doubled over the past two years, and with builders having to offer smaller and lower-priced homes and having to buy down mortgage rates aggressively at a substantial cost to keep sales from collapsing, as they have already collapsed for existing homes, while their stocks are perched at all-time highs, it’s now a perfect time for Sekisui House to buy a big US homebuilder, no?

During the D.R. Horton earnings call, the analyst wanted to know if D.R. Horton, which had become the largest homebuilder in the US in part through a series of acquisitions, would also go out and buy a big one because that stuff gets Wall Street all excited.

But CEO Paul Romanowski brushed it off. He said, “we’re more interested in the smaller tuck-in builders that may add to our market share in an existing market or give us some entry,” and he added, “I don’t see on the horizon a significant large acquisition.” So that was that. More cold water.

Surely, it took weeks from the beginning of the talks between Sekisui House and MDC to when they signed the merger agreements on January 17. So they may have started talking during the rate-cut-mania, when only the sky was the limit.  And it sure looks like a bell getting rung at the top for homebuilder stocks, when a foreign company makes a big acquisition in the US during a mania-rally, just when the housing market has gotten very complicated and difficult.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Did the $5-Billion Acquisition of Homebuilder MDC Holdings by Japan’s Sekisui House Mark the Top for Homebuilder Stocks after the Rate-Cut-Mania Rally? appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Daily Energy Standup Episode #294 – White House Delays, Carbon Tax Concerns, and Diversified Energy Under Scrutiny

Energy News Beat

Daily Standup Top Stories

White House Said to Delay Decision on Enormous Natural Gas Export Terminal

Before deciding whether to approve it, the Energy Department will analyze the climate impacts of CP2, one of 17 proposed LNG export terminals. The Biden administration is pausing a decision on whether to approve what […]

Navigating Market Sensitivities: A Deep Dive into Winter Forecast Impacts on LNG Trade

Navigating Seasonal Uncertainties In the volatile world of LNG trade, understanding the impact of winter on market dynamics is crucial. This commentary introduces a novel approach: scenario planning as a strategic tool for navigating seasonal […]

The US says it needs 22m acres for the solar energy transition – here’s what that looks like

The Bureau of Land Management proposed using 22m acres of public land for solar projects – roughly the size of Maine, or an area larger than Scotland If the US is to rid itself of […]

“For Natural Gas, It’s Buckle Up and Hang On for 2024” – Steve Reese, CEO

ENB Pub Note: Steve Reese, CEO of Reese Energy Consulting Company is a global thought leader in the natural gas markets. I have had the pleasure of getting to know Steve through our podcast interviews […]

“For Natural Gas, It’s Buckle Up and Hang On for 2024” – Steve Reese, CEO

ENB Pub Note: Steve Reese, CEO of Reese Energy Consulting Company is a global thought leader in the natural gas markets. I have had the pleasure of getting to know Steve through our podcast interviews […]

Senate Opens Door to Massive Carbon Tax Despite Critical Economic Concerns

This week, Congress took a step toward passing a carbon tax—an inflationary, regressive tax on all products that would lower economic growth; make all Americans worse off; and disproportionately harm poor people, farmers, and small businesses. Politicians […]

 

Diversified Energy Faces Short-Seller Attack From ESG-Focused Snowcap

Diversified Energy Co., the largest owner of US oil and natural gas wells, is being targeted by a short seller claiming the company may not have enough money to meet obligations to plug inactive wells. […]

 

Highlights of the Podcast

00:00 – Intro
01:40 – White House Said to Delay Decision on Enormous Natural Gas Export Terminal
03:51 – Navigating Market Sensitivities: A Deep Dive into Winter Forecast Impacts on LNG Trade
05:11 – The US says it needs 22m acres for the solar energy transition – here’s what that looks like
07:00 – “For Natural Gas, It’s Buckle Up and Hang On for 2024” – Steve Reese, CEO
09:14 – Senate Opens Door to Massive Carbon Tax Despite Critical Economic Concerns
14:07 – Markets Update
15:46 – Diversified Energy Faces Short-Seller Attack From ESG-Focused Snowcap
21:11 – Outro

Follow Stuart On LinkedIn and Twitter

Follow Michael On LinkedIn and Twitter

ENB Top News

ENB

Energy Dashboard

ENB Podcast

ENB Substack

– Get in Contact With The Show –

Video Transcription edited for grammar. We disavow any errors unless they make us look better or smarter.

Michael Tanner: [00:00:14] What’s going on, everybody? Welcome in to the Thursday, January 25th, 2024 edition of the Daily Energy News Beat standup. Here are today’s top headlines. First up, white House said to delay decision on enormous natural gas export terminal. Next up on the menu navigating market sensitivities. A deep dive into winter forecast impacts on LNG trade. Next up, the U.S. says it needs 22 million acres for the solar energy transition. Here’s what that looks like. Next up for natural gas. It’s buckle up and hang on for 2024. That’s according to friend of the show, Steve Reese. And then finally, Senate opens door to massive carbon tax despite critical economic concerns. Stool. Then toss it over to me. I will quickly cover what’s going on in the oil and gas markets include covering what happened with the EIA. Crude oil storage report and a new short seller report from Snow Capped Research targeting our fave, one of our favorite companies, Diversified Energy. It’s about time we saw some short, some short interest on them. So we’ll cover all that. And a bag of chips, guys. But as always, I am Michael Tanner. Joining me is Stuart Turley. What do you got today for us? [00:01:34][79.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:01:34] I’ll tell you what. We got us an action packed discussion. Let’s start out where our buddies in the white House. White House says the delayed decision on enormous natural gas export terminal. This is about some of the dumbest things I could even imagine. Even I wouldn’t do this. They’re delaying this project until right after November. Why? Well, it’s. So they can sit back and tell the green folks. Oh, we’re putting a halt on it. Well, let me give you a quote, Senator Mitch McConnell. Is he the one they call turtle? This would move the amount to a functional ban on the new LNG export permit. That’s the only thing I think he’s even said. I’m not sure if one of his aides did that. The administration’s war on affordable domestic energy has been bad news for American workers and customers alike. I think this just as a telltale quote. He doesn’t know that LNG has to get exported because of the Jones Act, and natural gas is used domestically. So I think this is a confirmation that he’s out for lunch permanently. So this is just it’s the, Colosio, pass. [00:02:54][79.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:02:54] It’s the blind leading the blind. [00:02:55][1.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:02:56] Oh, Democrat. We we got an old folks home up there, and, we don’t even, anyway, it’s just I’m going to go buy stock in. Depends who makes the pins anyway. [00:03:09][13.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:03:10] I don’t know, but it comes from fossil fuels. But it is. It’s ironic that they’re delaying this natural gas plant until right after the election because, you know, you know, regardless if Biden wins or loses right after, they’ll go ahead and approve it. [00:03:25][14.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:03:25] Oh, what? Maybe here’s from a financial, reason you would want to approve it. Because of that, we get exports. You get a little bit of energy security to your, allies. We have not been a very good ally. All right, let’s go to the next one. I wouldn’t want to do business with the US. Navigating market sensitivities. A deep dive into winter forecast impacts on LNG trade. This is from our buddies over there at, Rbac. Going to interview them again? Cyrus on Friday with billions at play, with, talking about how Africa needs to go first. But anyway, they have a great the LNG trade. Their software allows to for folks to go out and do the deep dive on the forecast for LNG around there. It begins in December 2023 and goes through the 2023, 2024. The charts are amazing. If we can take a look at the, four charts, we can just kind of bring those up in here. I’m not going to go through the numbers right here. But I want to leave this in the show notes for people to go through and really do a deep dive on the LNG and the importance to these countries in the brevity of time for the show. We’ll just leave it that this is a great resource from the folks over there. They’re great, great peoples. Let’s go to the next story here, Michael. All right. How about the US’s need? 22 million acres of solar energy transition. Here’s what it looks like. Miss producer, can you bring forward the Bureau of Land Management graphic? Take a look at Utah. It’s three quarters of Utah. Nearby. Unbelievable. I don’t get it. You you saw. That doesn’t include the battery. The beard BLM. It’s not black lives matter. It is the Bureau of Land Management. But yet, look at how many, lizards and dinosaurs and all the hypocrisy going on. That much a true acreage covered up. [00:06:03][157.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:03] What I don’t understand is the difference between the 700,000 acres which they claim will be needed to reach the 100% clean electric goal by 2035 that President Biden has. But where’s this 22 million coming from? What’s that earmarked for? [00:06:18][15.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:19] I think it’s probably hills. Valleys. You can’t just run them up continuously. You gotta have room in between them. You know, so you may need 700,000 acres, but there’s a lot of land. There’s transmission lines. There’s all this other stuff. It is a, not very ESG friendly for something that’s supposed to be ESG. [00:06:42][23.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:43] I was going to say that, as you say, it sounds real environmentally friendly. It ain’t 222 million acres of solar panels. [00:06:50][6.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:51] Oh, where’s. All right? Hey, let’s go to the next one here. This one’s really, really cool one. It’s a really short one from our buddy over there, Steve Reese. For natural gas, it’s. Buckle up and hang on for 2024. Over at Reese Consulting. They have absolutely. Measure. They know natural gas. He is an industry thought leader. And, Michael, I have to give him a shout out. He looked at one of my podcasts and put a comment on LinkedIn. Steve Reese, I can’t wait to hug that name for this comment. He goes, you’re sporting one heck of a dome hat. For for even for our podcast listeners, I got a little bit of a flesh hairline. [00:07:41][50.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:07:44] It’s really shiny. [00:07:45][0.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:45] It’s really I. Yeah, I don’t waste much in my hair cutting anymore, but let me go through some of these. If market forecaster Craig this is a quote from Steve. Natural gas producer will take it on a chin in 2024 before the heavens part and gear started turning and new LNG export terminals adding capacity in 2025. So Steve is taking into consideration some of the issues that the Biden administration is working on this and that regulatory thread that we were talking about is going to be a widespread impact. Listen to this quote. In an ironic twist to a milder, winter, a week long freeze this month triggered the cancellation of five LNG, cargoes to set sail from Louisiana and Texas. Cheniere energy requires a 40 day notice for cancellations. Gas storage is up to its eyeballs. I love Steve. Anyway, so. [00:08:53][67.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:08:54] We love Steve Reese. He’s he he’s one of the smartest people and most informed people when it comes to the midstream business, because this is what he’s done for 40 years. [00:09:02][8.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:03] Oh, and, he he calls it like he sees it. And he is a trusted resource to CEOs all around the world. Hey, let’s go to the next one here. Senate opens door to massive carbon tax despite critical economic concerns. There are some numbers in this article on carbon tax that make me airsick. Let me just give my one little, opinion here because wind and solar are failing around the world and, and carry large as is now, pounding his head against the sand, you know, and saying, wait a minute. Everybody’s realizing they’re not sustainable because people are having to print money in order to get them rolling. Carbon tax is the next way to continue the wealth transfer of, the what the renewables was doing. That’s exactly what this is. And it let’s talk about some of this. The U.S. Treasury estimated into 2017 a carbon tax of $49 a ton, rising at 2% per year, would raise over 2.2 trillion over ten years. Such a carbon tax would raise taxes on gasoline by $0.44 per gallon, on natural gas by 260 per thousand cubic, feet, by on oil, 2150 per barrel, and on coal by 62, to one point. 26 per ton, depending on the carbon content what I just described. Michael. Right, there was a steam roller to the economy and every the poor are going to get poorer, the middle class is going to go away and the rich are going to get richer. That is exactly what that paragraph that I just read said. It is absolutely horrific. And in fact, this the Daily Signal author even says this a carbon tax would hurt the poor, raise domestic prices relative to the private prices of many imports. It would be another add on levy with exemptions for, quote, political friends and punishments for enemies. Wow. Down like Holy smokes, Batman, we can’t buy this kind of stupid. Well, we did anyway. [00:11:40][157.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:11:41] Yeah, it’s it’s here’s here’s my my my problem is that we have absolutely nobody who’s thinking if we pass a carbon tax, that’s great. The problem is second order effects. You know, we’ve talked about the SEC coming in and regulating this. Well, you got to do one or the other. You can’t do all this stuff. You can’t regulated by the SEC. You can’t go ahead and tax it. You can’t do all of this stuff. We know exactly what’s going on here. And these you know, these these unfortunately these. You know, I applaud Chris Coons for trying to get in on this Democrat. But I don’t know if I necessarily this approach if it’s going to hurt, as you said, the small businesses the most. [00:12:26][45.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:12:27] Everybody that is not the 1%, this is going to hurt. The next thing it’s going to hurt is, the what people don’t realize is that the carbon tax doesn’t change the behavior that they’re trying or thinking that they’re going to go after. This does not change anything. And then you have large erroneous forest wrecks going around the world putting out, more carbon. Let’s start taxing that son of a gun. Well, the only problem is he’s going to. Instead of having a $22 million budget for being the climate czar, he’s going to have a $30 billion budget. So he’s just going to pass it off to the rest of the world anyway. [00:13:11][44.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:13:12] Anyway, it’s it’s absolutely ridiculous. [00:13:14][1.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:13:15] We had a great that was a great show. Thank you very much for being my therapist. And I know you’re going to have a couch now installed into your office. Yep. [00:13:22][7.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:13:23] So we can sit back there. We’ll go ahead and move over to finance. But before we do that, guys will pay the bills here. As always, the news and analysis you just heard, and our continue to hear is brought to you by the world’s greatest website www.energynewsbeat.com. The best place for all your oil and gas and energy news. Doing the team do an outstanding job, staying up to speed and making sure you are at the tip of the spear when it comes to the energy business. I gave the description below for all the time stamps. Go back. Listen to one of our segments. You can also go ahead and see all of the links to the articles. dashboard.energynewsbeat.com data news combo product. You can check out the EIA numbers which we’re about to cover here. And you can also check out an email the show interact with us [email protected]. But again let’s move to finance. Overall market’s fairly flat today. S&P 500 only about a 10th of a percentage point. Nasdaq rising about a, about a half a percentage point, mainly off the back of some intriguing earnings that drop we saw Bitcoin up about a half a percentage point still about 40. Still trending above 40,000 right now. We saw crude oil jump mainly about 1% settling about half a percentage, 7540 as we record this here at about 6 p.m.. Brant up to, just creeping over above 80 at, about a half percentage point. Natural gas a big today, up about one and a half percentage points, $2.67. Mainly what we’re seeing is, is a large draw from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. We saw about 9 million barrel draw, that got dropped today at about 930, which was a 3 million barrels more than what the API was recommending. We also saw that China will come out and, and, and, and basically cut the amount of cash that banks, need to hold in reserves, which is, you know, hopefully expected to pump more. They think it’s supposed to pump more money in the economy, which should continue to boost their economic stimulus, which which hopefully, will lead to higher oil prices as they continue to move. We also saw that or higher demand numbers and help support, price increases. We also saw the the rising geopolitical tensions. There’s a lot going on. In terms of, what’s going on with oil prices? Yeah. I think the only other thing I saw in the oil oil space, too, I thought was, was hilarious was, diversified energy there, one of the largest owners, of U.S. oil and natural gas wells. They’re being targeted by a short seller, claiming that the company may not have enough money to meet its obligations to plug inactive. This one you can find. Enter diversified energy phases. Short seller attack from ESG focused snow cap. What’s interesting is this snow cap research, their London based act, was a activist investor who focuses specifically on ESG government matters, went ahead and released a 39 page report. And I mean, I will have the report on the website should it’s absolutely brutal what it breaks down. So to give you guys an idea, let’s introduce Diversifies Energy’s business model. And now this is, you know, straight up off their website. So they go ahead and acquire mature, low productive oil and gas wells. They’re the largest oil and gas or owner of oil and gas wells in the country, more than Exxon, more than Chevron and more than everybody. What they do is they don’t drill new wells. They claim to extend the life of operating lives via, quote, Smarter Asset Management Hmhm next, they delay well retirement and associated plugging costs by pushing out those cost as much as 50 years. Again, they do not engage new drilling or exploration, instead must replenish any declining production with new acquisitions. And they securitize wells with amortizing debt to support higher leverage. All that means no cap. Research says these guys suck. So give you just to give you an idea what they’re claiming, what they’re claiming is a few things. They’re claiming that their self-reported discretionary cash flows, they’re being used basically they’re using not what they claim is this. I’ll wrap up the slide here. I want to make sure I sell this right because we’re about to body these people. [00:17:19][236.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:21] Wow. [00:17:21][0.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:17:22] Where is it. [00:17:22][0.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:22] Here. I it just done it. When you said that, it dawned on me what was going on. That is a that’s worse than a Ponzi. [00:17:30][7.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:17:31] So here to give you guys an idea when they are calculating. So one of the chief things that they claim Snow cap says is that, oh, the dividend that they’re giving out, they’re $150 million a year of dividends is nowhere near what they’re going to be. They’re not going to nearly be able to sustain that, because their methodology for calculating, dividends was based off adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP number basis, instead of basing it upon cash from operations and adds back new debt issued for acquisitions despite excluding debt repayments in in line with its declining EBITDA. That also means that instead it basically they calculate. All that being said, if you recalculate discretionary class flows based in 2022, it’s a 73% difference and not in a good way, folks. Diversified energy if you have any investment in them. I don’t give investment advice, but I’d seriously look into getting rid of absolutely incredible 39 page story. I mean, still didn’t even read the report. He sees what’s going on right now. [00:18:35][64.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:18:36] You just read the thing and it just dawned on me, this is not good. [00:18:40][3.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:18:41] No, it’s absolutely not. Shares are down as much as 20%. We’re down as much as 20% in the day, but they only are down 3%. You know, in in diversified defense, they did come out and say report contains numerous inaccuracies, ignores meeting financial and operational results, and sustainability actually is designed for the sole purpose of negatively impacting the share price for the short sellers benefit. I mean, if the 65,000 oil and gas wells is, it’s a lot. It’s more than everybody. And they’re based out of Birmingham, Alabama. Bama they don’t drill wells, which is just crazy. [00:19:13][32.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:16] No. You know, that goes back to what we talked to, to our clients about oil and gas. Not all oil and gas investments are the same. And do your homework. [00:19:27][11.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:28] I love that you were just like, no, no, I’m good. Because you know what? I’m the same way. You know I’m good. [00:19:36][7.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:37] Yeah. I’m just like, Holy smokes, that’s just unethical. [00:19:41][4.2]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:42] It’s extremely unethical. Well, it’s extremely unethical. Oh, so absolutely unbelievable, stew. We’ll see how it plays out. What else should people be worried about today? [00:19:53][10.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:54] Well, you know, Davos is only 300 more days away, 345 days away. And they are their heads are exploding. I’d like to give a shout out to the truckers that are starting in the US to protest and say, secure our borders, just like the great farmers in all through Europe. And the media is not covering this stuff. So shout out to our truckers that are trying to help the, Texas Border Guard, and, standing up, for what our, our federal government, Federals are not doing. [00:20:35][41.2]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:36] Yeah. No, we, it’s absolutely unbelievable what’s going on in the border. I will say this. If you ever hear Stu and you hear the first words out. His mouth is. I’m Stuart Turley and I’m live from the border. Just tune out. Just tune out. We’ve gone too far. [00:20:50][14.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:51] Hey, it’s all about. It’s all about energy. And I guarantee you all my stories are around that. Michael. It’s the border. It’s the the Chinese that are dropping in by parachutes like red dumb. Yeah. [00:21:05][14.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:21:07] It’s cool, it’s funny. So. All right, guys, well, we’ll spare you the rest of this. Let you get on out of here, finish up your day. We appreciate you guys hanging with us all week. Who do we have on the podcast? Friday. [00:21:17][9.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:21:18] We had, Sharon, mine’s just got, rolled out. And then we have coming around the corner. We have, Michael Ryan is coming out here. I’m going to wait till probably another week. We have Nick Burns. He is a way cool guy in Midland. Odessa, we have Debra Wald coming out, and we talk about home schooling. And I tell you the importance of energy and getting all of our content into a format for tests, curriculum. Kind of cool. [00:21:55][37.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:21:56] Absolutely, guys. Preciate it. We’ll see you guys, with the weekly recap then on Saturday. And we will be back in your inbox Monday. Well, until then guys, have a great weekend. [00:21:56][0.0][1268.2]

– Get in Contact With The Show –

 

The post Daily Energy Standup Episode #294 – White House Delays, Carbon Tax Concerns, and Diversified Energy Under Scrutiny appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Diversified Energy Faces Short-Seller Attack From ESG-Focused Snowcap

Energy News Beat

Diversified Energy Co., the largest owner of US oil and natural gas wells, is being targeted by a short seller claiming the company may not have enough money to meet obligations to plug inactive wells.

Snowcap Research, a London-based activist investor focused on environmental, social and governance matters, said in a 39-page report released Tuesday that Diversified may struggle to meet plugging obligations as soon as 2036. The company’s debt load may hurt its ability to pay dividends within the next 12 months, Snowcap said. “A dividend cut looks imminent,” it said.

Shares of Diversified closed down 3% Tuesday in New York after dropping as much as 20% earlier in the day.

“This report contains numerous inaccuracies, ignores specific financial and operational results and sustainability actions, and is designed for the sole purpose of negatively impacting the company’s share price for the short seller’s own benefit,” Diversified said in an emailed statement. “Diversified continues to take a deliberate approach to capital allocation focused on delivering long-term shareholder value, prioritization of outstanding debt reduction, and continues to evaluate strategic growth and accretive value-additive opportunities.”

The Birmingham, Alabama-based gas producer operates about 65,000 wells from Pennsylvania to Texas and has steadily boosted dividends since going public in 2017.

Run by brothers Chris and Henry Kinnersley, Snowcap says it targets companies where it sees “significant potential for ESG improvement.” In past campaigns, Snowcap invested in Australian utility AGL Energy Ltd. and oil producer Santos Ltd. and pushed for changes.

Snowcap’s Diversified report echoes questions posed last month by Democrats on the US House Energy and Commerce Committee. In response, Diversified told committee members it was focused on cutting methane emissions and responsibly retiring inactive wells.

The post Diversified Energy Faces Short-Seller Attack From ESG-Focused Snowcap appeared first on Energy News Beat.