In North Carolina, Duke Energy to offer rebates for rooftop solar paired with batteries

Energy News Beat

​[[{“value”:”

It’s called the “solar coaster:” The ups and downs the industry faces as solar-friendly policies ebb and flow. And in North Carolina, rooftop installers are in the middle of one wild ride.

On the heels of cutting bill credits for residential solar panels in October, Duke Energy is now poised to offer new rebates for rooftop arrays that are paired with batteries. Combined with federal incentives, the new “PowerPair” rebates could cut the cost of solar and battery systems in half and inject new interest in rooftop solar, which many installers say waned last fall.

“We definitely saw a dip,” said Doug Ager, the CEO and co-founder of Sugar Hollow Solar, describing his company’s business in the last quarter of 2023. But at least in the short-term, he said, “PowerPair will change all that.”

Approved to roll out in May, the pilot program will initially serve only an estimated 6,000 to 7,000 households. But proponents say it could pave the way for a new paradigm in which Duke invests in and manages distributed renewable energy and storage the same way it might a traditional power plant.

“It’s opening the door to active load management from Duke that is going to be increasingly important,” said David Neal, the senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center who helped negotiate the program. Heralding the pilot as one of the first of its kind, he said, “it’s going to be a lot more cost effective than just building new generation to meet expected loads.”

Ultimately, advocates are also hopeful that the solar coaster can be smoothed out a little.

“The rooftop solar industry really has experienced quite a bit of ups and downs,” said Matt Abele, executive director of the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association, which also helped devise the rebates. There’s still the question of what long-term strategies would support installers, he said. “But I would say this is not an insignificant program in the interim.”

Greenlit by regulators last month, the rebates grew out of a years-long dispute between Duke Energy, advocates, and the solar industry about how rooftop solar owners should be compensated for the electricity they produce. 

About 40,000 rooftops across the state boast solar arrays, the bulk of them on homes and in Duke territory. The figure accounts for a tiny fraction of North Carolina’s roughly 5 million housing units.

Despite these small numbers, Duke, like other investor-owned utilities around the country, has long sought to lower the state’s one-to-one net metering credit, which it says unfairly burdens both the company and customers that don’t have solar panels.  

Solar installers and advocates contend that rooftop arrays provide more benefits than costs, including cleaner air, fewer electrons lost in transmission, and reduced need for electricity from centralized fossil fuel power plants. Their assertion is backed up by most independent studies of rooftop solar, a 2019 analysis found.

Still, a pair of state laws, both heavily influenced by Duke, mandate a change to the current net metering scheme by 2027. To avoid the bruising battles and excessive fees on solar customers seen in California and elsewhere, some of the state’s leading clean energy advocates and solar installers forged a complicated truce with the utility. 

The crux of the agreement is a move toward “time of use” billing. New residential solar owners are charged and rewarded more for electrons they add to or subtract from the grid during peak demand hours of 6 to 9 p.m. in the summer and 6 to 9 a.m. in the winter. On a monthly basis, any net solar electrons added to the grid are credited at the “avoided cost” rate — akin to a wholesale rate and currently about 3.4 cents per kilowatt hour.

Diligent solar owners can squeeze benefits out of this complex billing scheme, some installers say. But to ease the transition, they also negotiated a simpler, lower-risk “bridge rate” with Duke, in which solar customers enrolling before 2027 get a monthly credit at the wholesale rate for any electrons they add to the grid. 

Regulators on the utilities commission accepted these compromises last March and ultimately ordered new rates to begin October 1. But they rejected another component of the deal, which would have given customers with electric heat an extra rebate for enrolling in Duke’s smart thermostat program, in which the utility can make temperature adjustments from afar.  

“Instead, the Commission directs Duke to develop a pilot program,” their order read, “to evaluate operational impacts to the electric system, if any, of behind the meter residential solar plus energy storage.” 

PowerPair is the result. “This program was in many ways a result of our negotiations around net metering,” Dave Hollister, the president of Sundance Power Systems, said over email.

Devised after months of conversations between Duke, solar installers, clean energy advocates, and others, the new rebates would be based on the size of the solar array and battery and capped at $3,600 and $5,400 respectively. Combined with a 30% federal tax credit, the cash back could cut the cost of an average $40,500 system down to less than $20,000. 

For customers, the deal is “actually really, really good in terms of the economics,” one installer said. And for Duke, the rebates could prove a low-cost strategy for smoothing out spikes in demand and strengthening the resilience of the grid.

“Cost effective and dispatchable customer-sited resources are key components of our clean energy transition,” Lon Huber, a senior vice president at Duke, said in an email. “We are committed to expanding the scope and adding ways for our customers to deploy grid beneficial technology.”

Customers will be divided into two equal cohorts. Those subscribed to the simpler bridge will allow the utility to remotely control their battery up to 18 times a year and will earn an extra $37 a month on average. Enrollees in the more complicated time-of-use rate plan, on the other hand, won’t get monthly incentives but would have control of their batteries. 

“It will be interesting to see how many folks will allow Duke to control their battery and who wants to have that freedom and independence to manage their customer-generated electricity themselves,” Hollister said. “ We deal with so many folks who are looking for self-reliance and the idea of ‘smart grid’ is somewhat of a third rail for them.”

Already, batteries are popular options for rooftop solar customers. Installers say between a quarter and 40% of their clients were already choosing them for a variety of reasons, from a desire to save money to a quest for energy security in the face of outages. 

Sugar Hollow Solar’s Ager said residential storage fits with the western North Carolina vibe. “Being in the mountains,” he said, “people just want batteries.”

With the PowerPair, the percentage of solar arrays paired with storage will undoubtedly rise, and many installers predicted it would double. 

“I fully anticipate us selling tons of systems with batteries,” said Brandon Pendry, communications and outreach specialist with Southern Energy Management, one of the state’s oldest installers and a negotiator for both the bridge rate and the PowerPair scheme. 

To avoid the problem installers and their clients faced with the last round of rooftop solar rebates — when demand far exceeded supply each year and available grants disappeared in minutes — the architects of the program gave it an overall cap of 60,000 kilowatts but no annual limits. That way, rooftop solar and battery owners can get the rebates on a rolling basis.  

“In this case, there is only one capacity and it’s not time dependent,” said Pendry. “It’s just: when it runs out, it runs out.”

If customers choose the maximum allowable size of a 10 kilowatt solar array, a total of 6,000 households could benefit. But no one really knows when the capacity will be reached, with some predicting 18 months from May and others estimating as few as four. 

Duke projects it will connect 11,400 residential rooftop systems this year. But a spokesperson said it was simply too early to tell when PowerPair rebates would dry up. 

Once they do, the hope is that data gathered during the pilot will inform whatever comes next. 

“It may possibly be a win-win for everyone,” Hollister said, “especially if it can be extended or transformed into a more permanent program.” 

Since half of the PowerPair cohorts will be using the bridge rate, there’s some chance a permanent program would extend that rate’s life — a key priority for some in the industry.  

No matter what, while most installers contacted for this article eagerly await the pilot, they’re also clear-eyed about their business plan for the future.

“We have been installing solar in [the state] for over a decade and have certainly seen lots of incentives come and go, said Jesse Solomon, vice president and director of sales for N.C Solar Now, in an email. “But we have always been able to design the investment to make sense for our clients.” 

Solar installers also focus on the overall trends buoying their industry: Fossil fuels are becoming more expensive, while the materials designed to harness and store forever-free sunlight are getting cheaper.

Every year Duke raises rates, said Pendry of Southern Energy Management, “solar becomes a better and better investment.”

“}]] 

The post In North Carolina, Duke Energy to offer rebates for rooftop solar paired with batteries appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

TotalEnergies reports lower LNG earnings, sales

Energy News Beat

France’s TotalEnergies said on Wednesday that the company’s integrated LNG business logged a decline in its adjusted net operating income in the fourth quarter of 2023 due to lower prices.

The company’s integrated LNG adjusted net income reached about $1.46 billion in the fourth quarter, a drop of 40 percent compared to the fourth quarter in 2022.

Compared to $1.34 billion in the previous quarter, integrated LNG adjusted net income rose 8 percent, reflecting the evolution of prices and production volumes, TotalEnergies said.

For full-year 2023, integrated LNG adjusted net operating income was $6.2 billion, down 37 percent year-on-year, excluding Novatek, mainly due to the “exceptional environment in 2022 linked to the energy crisis in Europe resulting from the Russia-Ukraine conflict,” the firm said.

Cash flow from operations excluding working capital for integrated LNG was $1.76 billion in the fourth quarter 2023, up 7 percent quarter-to-quarter, reflecting the evolution of prices and production volumes.

Integrated LNG CFFO was down 25 percent year-on-year, mainly due to lower LNG prices that were partially offset by high margins captured in 2022 on LNG cargoes delivered in 2023, TotalEnergies said.

Last month, TotalEnergies said its average price for LNG equity sales in the fourth quarter was $10.28/MMBtu, up by 7 percent compared to $9.56/MMBtu in the previous quarter.

However, the price declined 31 percent compared to $14.83/MMBtu in the fourth quarter of 2022, when European demand was high as European countries worked to replace pipeline gas supplies with LNG.

Overall, TotalEnergies reported adjusted net income of $5.2 billion in the fourth quarter. This compares to $6.45 billion in the prior quarter and $7.56 billion in the same quarter in 2022.

“In an uncertain environment, TotalEnergies’ balanced transition strategy, which combines growth in oil & gas, in particular in LNG, and integrated power, delivered strong results in 2023, in line with its objectives. During the fourth quarter, TotalEnergies generated adjusted net income of $5.2 billion and cash flow of $8.5 billion. IFRS net income was $5.1 billion,” chief executive Patrick Pouyanne, said.

He said that in 2023 TotalEnergies reported adjusted net income of $23.2 billion and cash flow of $35.9 billion.

2023 IFRS net income was $21.4 billion, up 4 percent year-on-year.

“This year the company once again achieved top tier 20 percent return on equity and 19 percent return on average capital employed. TotalEnergies invested $16.8 billion, including 35 percent for low-carbon energies mainly in power,” Pouyanne said.

In the oil & gas business, fourth quarter production was 2.46 Mboe/d, which benefited from 7 percent LNG production growth quarter-to-quarter.

Moreover, full-year 2023 total production increased 2 percent year-on-year, excluding Novatek, driven by strong LNG production growth of 9 percent, he said.

Pouyanne said integrated LNG results “remain robust” and they rose compared to the previous quarter driven by higher production and strengthening prices.

“For full year 2023, integrated LNG generated annual adjusted net operating income of $6.2 billion and cash flow of $7.3 billion, which is lower than the exceptional results in 2022 but higher than 2021 thanks to growth in its portfolio,” the CEO added.

During the fourth quarter, TotalEnergies sold 11.8 million tonnes of LNG, down 7 percent compared to 12.7 million tonnes in the same period last year, and a rise compared to 10.5 million tonnes in the prior quarter.

In the fourth quarter, LNG sales increased 13 percent quarter-to-quarter, mainly due to higher production and higher spot volumes.

The company’s LNG sales decreased 8 percent year-on-year to 44.3 million tonnes in 2023.

TotalEnergies said LNG sales were down mainly due to lower spot volumes related to lower demand in Europe as a result of a milder winter weather and high inventories.

Hydrocarbon production for LNG, excluding Novatek, was up 7 percent quarter-to-quarter to 464 kboe/d, reflecting lower unplanned shutdowns.

For full-year 2023, hydrocarbon production for LNG, excluding Novatek, was up 9 percent to compared to 2022 due to increased supply to NLNG in Nigeria and higher availability of Ichthys LNG in Australia and Snovhit in Norway, TotalEnergies said.

Looking ahead, TotalEnergies said LNG markets “should remain in tension due to very limited LNG capacity additions expected in 2024 (2 percent) and growing demand thanks to lower LNG prices.”

TotalEnergies expects LNG sales above 40 Mt over the year.

“Given the evolution of oil and gas prices in recent months and the lag effect on price formulas, TotalEnergies anticipates that its average LNG selling price should be stable around $10/Mbtu in the first quarter 2024,” it said.

“Despite entering the winter period with high natural gas inventories in Europe, in a tense market, gas prices remain very reactive to production disruptions,” TotalEnergies said.

TotalEnergies expects hydrocarbon production to be above 2.4 Mboe/d in the first quarter of this year due to the start-up of Mero 2 in Brazil and the disposals of Canadian upstream assets, effective during fourth quarter 2023.

In 2024, the company expects net investments of $17-18 billion, of which $5 billion dedicated to integrated power.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post TotalEnergies reports lower LNG earnings, sales appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Venezuelan oil sanctions to return in April – Or will they be pushed out?

Energy News Beat

The US has announced the expiration of Venezuela’s oil sanctions exemption in April.

Last October, Washington issued a six-month general licence for transactions involving Venezuela’s oil and gas sector following an electoral roadmap agreement signed by Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and opposition politicians in Barbados. Since then, Maduro has not stuck to his promises for a free election.

Since the exemption was granted, the US has been importing 26% of Venezuelan crude, totalling 142,000 barrels per day, according to Vortexa. China remains the top destination for Venezuelan barrels, averaging 293,000 barrels per day in 2023.

“Oil exports have picked up in Venezuela over the last two years as the US has eased sanctions since the start of 2023,” analysts at Braemar noted.

“These developments show the potential fragility of oil sanctions relief deals as well as ongoing US commitment to upholding the other end of the deal in such a case,” tanker experts at rival broker Gibson suggested.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Venezuelan oil sanctions to return in April – Or will they be pushed out? appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Europe to give shipping priority access to greener fuels

Energy News Beat

The European Commission published on Tuesday its proposal for a 2040 climate target laying out the pathway to make the European Union climate neutral by 2050 with shipping shown its green pathway, and a noticeable rapprochement with the industry’s global regulator, the International Maritime Organization (IMO).

European shipowners welcomed the commitment of the commission to address “barriers to the deployment of low- and zero-emissions fuels including e-fuels and advanced biofuels” in shipping and to give the sector “priority access to these fuels over sectors that have access to other decarbonisation solutions”.

The commission acknowledged that the increased costs of sustainable fuels is a key factor for the competitiveness of shipping and has committed to consider regulatory measures to foster their production.

“It’s the first time we see such a strong commitment to give shipping priority access to low- and zero-emission fuels such as advanced biofuels and e-fuels. The price gap is immense, as the cost of sustainable fuels can be four times higher compared to fuels currently used in shipping. We look forward to working with the commission to translate this commitment into immediate action, and to leverage the earmarked ETS revenues through dedicated calls already under the current Innovation Fund” said Sotiris Raptis, secretary-general of the European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA).

ECSA endorsed the commission’s consideration of differentiated targets for shipping in alignment with the IMO’s greenhouse gas (GHG) strategy, under the three scenarios for the decarbonisation of the European economy. The IMO GHG strategy, which was agreed in July 2023, sets up a target of net zero GHG by 2050, with objectives of at least 70% striving for 80% by 2040.

“After the historic agreement of last July, this is a strong message of support to the IMO to develop the measures necessary to reach net-zero GHG emissions from international shipping by 2050. It’s also an important step forward to ensure European shipping operates on a level playing field” said Raptis.

In previous years, the EU, frustrated by slow progress at the IMO, had gone down on its own route for creating green regulations for shipping, something that saw the industry included in the bloc’s emission trading scheme from the start of this year.

Sofie Defour, climate director at the NGO Transport&Environment, commented: “It’s time to put an end to uncontrolled growth and profit of transport’s biggest polluters and instead focus on helping them go green by 2040.”

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Europe to give shipping priority access to greener fuels appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Twin strikes take Houthi ship attacks to the 50 mark

Energy News Beat

With more missiles yesterday the Houthis took their merchant ship strikes to the 50 mark, underlining the severity of the security situation in Middle Eastern waters where US-led counterstrikes have failed to deter the Yemenis.

In total six missiles were fired yesterday, three at the Star Nasia kamsarmax belonging to Star Bulk and three at the UK-owned Morning Tide general cargo ship. Both ships suffered minor damage but there were no injuries to crew.

What made these attacks – the 49th and 50th since the start of November – different to previous ones, as pointed out by Lars Jensen from consultancy Vespucci Maritime, is that they took place far apart – one in the Gulf of Aden and the other in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. Previously attacks have been in just one location and not both.

Speaking with Splash last week, Arsenio Dominguez, the new secretary-general of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), called for a “multi-faceted” solution to the ongoing Red Sea shipping crisis.

“The solution has to be multi-faceted: enhanced ship security; a cessation of hostile activity which targets innocent seafarers; and regional and international efforts to reach a peaceful resolution to the problem,” Dominguez said.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Twin strikes take Houthi ship attacks to the 50 mark appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Shadow fleet faces tricky path to the breaker’s torch

Energy News Beat

With the numbers of the so-called shadow tanker fleet peaking 10 months ago, there’s now evidence that many of the oldest vessels are being primed for scrap, though getting a good demo price for these sanctions-busting ships is proving hard.

The 25-year-old Bradley aframax is now headed on its final voyage to Pakistan to meet the breaker’s torch. The ship was first mooted for demolition last October when sold to a cash buyer for $500 per ldt, a deal that failed when it was accused of hauling Russian crude. The ship then remained anchored in the South China Sea with brokers BRS reporting recently it has now been sold for scrap at a cut price of $450 per ldt.

Shadow tankers will face challenges in the secondhand and demolition markets

“Any tanker accused of partaking in shadow fleet business will face challenges in the secondhand and demolition markets,” BRS noted in a recent tanker report.

Pareto Securities, meanwhile, has reported that the 2005-built Adisa VLCC has been sold for demolition, a ship sanctioned by the US for its involvement in Iranian and Venezuelan tanker trades.

A more infamous name in the dark fleet is also being dismantled in Southeast Asia. One of last year’s most high-profile tanker casualties has been towed to Indonesia where it is being scrapped.

The Pablo aframax exploded on May 1 in Malaysian waters, killing three crewmembers.  The charred remains of the 1997-built ship was one of the shipping images of 2023, a stark reminder of the risks associated with the dark tanker fleet. Since 2018, TankerTrackers.com evidenced this vintage ship transfer 16m barrels of Iranian oil on 29 occasions.

The Group of 7 Nations and Australia, known as the price cap coalition, agreed in 2022 to cap Russia’s oil export prices at $60 per barrel. In December, the price cap coalition also tightened compliance rules for insurance firms and shippers. This move will require service providers, including shippers and movers of Russian oil, to receive attestations from their purchasers and sellers each time they lift or load Russian oil. It will also require insurance and freight firms to share these documents upon request with entities further down the supply chain.

“Whether Russia can continue to maintain its shadow fleet remains to be seen but it is not becoming easier,” pointed out a recent report from Arctic Securities, which also noted that the US is tightening compliance on Iran and Venezuela.

Craig Kennedy, who authors the well-researched Navigating Russia substack, detailed last month how Moscow’s shadow fleet has been running into sanction headwinds.

The recent campaign by price cap coalition countries to step up pressure on intermediaries in the shadow oil trade appears to be having an effect, Kennedy argued.

“The campaign has included a series of public enforcement actions against a small sampling of market players—shipowners, ship brokers and oil traders. It has also, reportedly, involved private overtures to a range of other entities—foreign banks, flag registries, insurers and the like—urging them to show greater diligence in their price-cap compliance,” Kennedy wrote.

Analysts at Vortexa issued a recent report showing that tankers operating in opaque markets reached a record high in Q2 last year and have since declined.

The latest data from BRS suggests there are a total of 675 tankers in what it terms as the grey fleet, representing 7.4% of the total global tanker fleet.

The peaking of the shadow fleet is also reflected in the sale and purchase market in recent days with Splash reporting earlier this week that prices for vintage VLCCs are coming down.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Shadow fleet faces tricky path to the breaker’s torch appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Ørsted to cut up to 800 jobs and exit some offshore wind markets

Energy News Beat

Danish offshore wind giant Ørsted is cutting jobs and exiting several markets after a “substantially challenging” 12 months and massive impairments and additional costs related to its US offshore projects.

Ørsted said Wednesday it would withdraw from markets in Norway, Spain, and Portugal and cut as many as 800 jobs to reduce risks and “become a leaner and more efficient organisation”.

The move follows the termination of Ocean Wind 1 and Ocean Wind 2 offshore wind projects, the decision to reposition the Skipjack Wind project, and to primarily focus its US offshore portfolio towards the North-East Atlantic.

Project development in Japan will also be deprioritised with plans for a leaner development within floating offshore wind and power-to-x, to reduce costs and create further strategic market focus, Ørsted said.

Project cancellations and phasing of capex across the portfolio is expected to result in about $5bn of relief in 2024-2026. Farm-downs and divestment programmes are also set to speed up with targeted proceeds of about $16.5bn towards 2030, of which some $10bn-$11.5bn are estimated in the next two years.

The company said it expects a reduction of between 600 and 800 positions globally. Not all reductions will result in redundancies, but about 250 people will leave Ørsted within the coming months. Chairman Thomas Thune Andersen will be stepping down at the upcoming annual general meeting in March.

Ørsted currently has a renewable installed capacity of 15.7 GW and this is expected to increase to about 23 GW by 2026. However, the challenging market over the past few years has now forced the company to downgrade its renewable capacity target from 50 GW to 35-38 GW by 2030.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Ørsted to cut up to 800 jobs and exit some offshore wind markets appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Daily Energy Standup Episode #303 – Coal’s Resurgence, EV Challenges, and BP’s Strategy

Energy News Beat

Daily Standup Top Stories

Biden Makes Coal Great Again As Exports Soar To India

US thermal coal exporters recorded more than $5 billion in overseas sales in 2023, shipping upwards of 32.5 million metric tons of the high-polluting power fuel, according to Reuters, citing data from ship-tracking firm Kpler. These […]

Why Americans don’t want electric vehicles

Not long ago, pundits were telling us that gasoline-powered cars would soon vanish from the streets, replaced by sleek, space-age vessels powered by electricity. But consumer demand for electric cars never matched the hype. Fewer […]

Facing demand increase, Duke Energy seeks to delay its 2030 climate target in North Carolina 

  Facing a massive projected increase in electricity demand, Duke Energy on Wednesday proposed what advocates called a “tripling down” of new gas plants and scuttling a 2030 deadline to significantly curb its carbon pollution. […]

More questions than answers after Massachusetts order to transition from natural gas

  Massachusetts utilities, regulators, and lawmakers are beginning to chart their next steps following an order issued two months ago that signaled the beginning of the end of natural gas in the state. While hailed […]

Highlights of the Podcast

00:00 – Intro
01:33 – Biden Makes Coal Great Again As Exports Soar To India
03:34 – Why Americans don’t want electric vehicles
08:04 – Facing demand increase, Duke Energy seeks to delay its 2030 climate target in North Carolina
10:40 – More questions than answers after Massachusetts order to transition from natural gas
13:14 – Markets Update
14:58 – EIA “Short-Term Energy Outlook”
17:12 – BP beats forecast with $3 billion quarterly profit, boosts buybacks
26:45 – Outro

Follow Stuart On LinkedIn and Twitter

Follow Michael On LinkedIn and Twitter

ENB Top News

ENB

Energy Dashboard

ENB Podcast

ENB Substack

– Get in Contact With The Show –

Video Transcription edited for grammar. We disavow any errors unless they make us look better or smarter.

Michael Tanner: [00:00:14] What’s going on, everybody? Welcome in to another edition of the Daily Energy News Beat Standup here on this gorgeous Wednesday, February 7th, 2024. Here are today’s top headlines. First up, Biden makes coal great again as experts soar to India. Next up, why Americans don’t want electric vehicles. We’ve got a few reasons, but we’ll see what this one says. Next up facing demand increase, Duke Energy seeks to delay its 2030 climate target in North Carolina. Last, in our news segment, more questions than answers after Massachusetts orders to transition from natural gas stool. Then toss it over to me, I will quickly cover what’s going on in the oil and gas finance market. Today. We saw BP drop earnings after the market, actually beating their quarterly profit estimates and rolling out a dividend. So we saw that stock increase. We’ll also touch on crude oil prices and the API crude oil inventory numbers give us a forecast of what you guys might see today. And we also got the latest short term energy outlook specifically focusing on natural gas. So we will cover all of that in a bag of chips guys. But in person for the first time. Give me give me a pound here. Yeah I’m Michael Tanner. We’ve got Stuart Turley here. Let’s kick us off. [00:01:27][73.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:01:27] Hey let’s get rolling here. My buddy Biden diaper Dan, as I affectionately call him. Let’s head over to Biden. Makes call again great. And my so when we sit back and kind of go, it’s actually pretty funny. U.S. thermal coal exporters recorded more than $5 billion in overseas sales in 2023. Shipping over. Michael, are you ready for this? 32 million metric tons of the high polluting power fuel, according to Reuters. [00:02:00][32.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:02:01] As the title says. Make coal great again. [00:02:03][1.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:02:04] Great again. You know, the funny thing is they’re shutting down the coal plants. China and India are bringing them up. China has more than 400 in production and another 600 approve. [00:02:17][13.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:02:18] Well, this is one of our favorite sources routers. There’s a quote in here. India is expected to remain a keen buyer of international coal, as the domestic reserves are being depleted in power from to rely on coal. Forget this 75% of the electricity. They’re not going anywhere. [00:02:33][15.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:02:34] No. In fact, India is beefing up their cars, the EV cars that they’re bringing in from China. So it’s really pretty funny that India is becoming the number one destination. Here’s the coking coal. Here’s why they’re doing that. We are moving manufacturing from China to India so they can import our coal to make the pollution in India more. This is making my head hurt. [00:03:04][30.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:03:04] Well don’t worry, Apple’s moving its operations from China to India. So so they’re going to be using that coal as well. That’s the funny part is that you’ve got everybody now switching from China to India. Just as India becomes more reliant on all these quote unquote killer fossil fuels that everything’s going on. [00:03:21][16.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:03:21] Oh it’s unbelievable. I again, they’re they’re the Indian leaders are doing the best they can to elevate their economy and their people and eliminate energy poverty. But hey, Michael, let’s go to the next one. Why? Americans don’t want electric vehicles. Why do you think that? Just give me your first opinion a while. [00:03:43][21.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:03:43] Because I saw a tweet the other day from. I won’t call the guy out, but his name, he’s he’s a prominent he’s a prominent, energy like, renewable energy guy on Twitter. Right. And he tweeted out something of the effect of my app won’t work, so I can’t get into my Tesla. [00:03:58][15.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:03:59] No way. Yeah. [00:04:00][0.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:01] He was it seeking with you. So why don’t I like EVs too electronic I like I got my four wheel drive on a block. I don’t need the government driving me right to the right to the the police station when I make a wrong turn. [00:04:14][12.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:14] The government doesn’t like me anyway, but we’ll leave that alone. [00:04:17][2.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:17] And that’s maybe not EVs as much as it is the electronic car part. I think the problem with EVs is especially like the cold. Maybe in a hot weather environment. It works, right. Think about that cold streak we just had. [00:04:28][10.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:28] Oh, and they don’t. Here’s where the number one thing was. Fewer drivers are interested in driving electric vehicles. Hertz. According to a new survey, this is further confirmed by Hertz’s recent announcement to sell 20,000 electric cars in its fleet. We’ll be able. [00:04:47][19.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:47] To get them cheaper. [00:04:48][0.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:48] Oh, no, I would, but you gotta buy a new battery for $20,000. Now, here’s the thing. The zero the number one issue is the charging stations. The charging stations are a failure. And then the zero emissions label is misleading. This is coming up into a whole energy thread that we have. Is that the numbers for the green energy? Yesterday on our podcast we talked about the UK and how they are misleading. The electricity. Electricity. The green. I’ve interviewed several, big people on, green energy and how climate crisis is being mis reported. That’s coming out here as well too. So, when you sit back and take a look, who can afford Michael the tax incentives, the rich, do you think the poor people will ever care about a tax incentive. [00:05:47][59.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:48] Because they don’t have enough free capital to spend? Unfortunately, there are some. I know this comes as a shock to some people, but there are some people in the world. They just have to buy what’s around them because it’s cheap and they don’t have that much money. We don’t just have all this excess money to have a political stance around. [00:06:05][16.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:06] No, and I just felt so sorry for all the folks in Chicago that had to wait eight hours to charge their car. Now, on a side note, I’m about ready to go to the next story, Michael. But Toyota, is leading the charge on their, hybrids. You and I have been talking about hydrogen hybrids for over two years, and I’m all in on having a hybrid car and getting another 4 to 5. No, not a four. [00:06:35][29.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:36] Oh, yeah. I want to do. Neighborhoods are definitely the both the best of both worlds. I’m all for battery backup on houses, especially when you have when the grid is in such crazy condition like we’re in. You know, this is this is a, not an opinion piece, but more of a research paper. Jason Isaac, he’s the founder and CEO of the American Energy Institute. Okay. He recently was in front of Congress, the Senate or the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. They heard they had a hearing on the federal electric vehicle incentive that says, is that basically what their what their research showed is that every EV sold places in nearly $50,000 additional cost to taxpayers. [00:07:16][40.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:18] And yes. And then you have, the tires. Tires are lasting less than 5000 miles. [00:07:25][7.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:07:26] Why are the tires on EVs? Why is that? My tire mean my tires are bald right now, but they’ve lasted a while. [00:07:31][5.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:32] 30,000, 40,000 miles. It’s because the way. The way. And then the car parking lots are failing. You start putting in because, EV, the weight on an EV is 14, 15 times more than a normal car. [00:07:50][17.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:07:50] You’re right. They’re much heavier. It’s, you know, it’s. I mean, I’m not driving an EV, trust me. [00:07:55][5.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:56] No, but a hybrid gets you 60 miles per gallon. [00:07:59][3.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:07:59] Oh, yeah. I’m all about the hybrid. [00:08:00][0.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:08:01] I’m all in on the hybrid. All right, let’s go to the next one here. Facing demand increase, Duke Energy seeks to delay its 2030 climate target in North Carolina. Michael, you know what my opinion is of Duke? I always think good management, good numbers in any company. And they’ve always, really, done quite well. Duke is is trying to do all forms of energy, and they are now projecting to increase their, energy demand is really going, they are trying to increase 12% increase in demand by 2038, driven by two dozen economic, development in the Carolinas. And some of those are server, issues. So, AI is going to be just huge. However, they’re trying to load in more natural gas plants. I gotta hand it to them. It’s tripling down on the coal. The gas transition. Saddling customers with risky investments in new polluting power plants and failing to deliver clean energy. Future call for a state law was Will Scott, southwest climate and clean energy director for the Environmental Defense Fund, in a prepared statement. He’s not reading all of the tea leaves, but he. [00:09:25][84.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:26] But they’re retiring. They they they stated, if you read this article, they’re they’re moving up the retirement of coal and moving to natural gas, which should be celebrated by everybody, because that’s one of the bets. The biggest way, the biggest reason emissions fell. It is because the transition from coal to natural gas. [00:09:44][18.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:44] EIA several years in a row, right. That was their biggest reason. [00:09:49][4.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:49] But you’ve got the regulatory counsel for the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association, Justin, whatever his last name is, some Lafarge doesn’t know anything. Who knows what how to pronounce his last name. Point is, he says the bad news is they’re doing they’re doing that transmission asset to interconnect new gas. Xfinity. And I’m sorry. [00:10:09][20.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:10:10] That you can’t. When you sit back and take a look. People who just are religion are causing problem. Let’s talk about physics and finances and then let’s get everybody on the road. I’m all in on Duke Energy. Yep. I’m I’m with the managers on this. They are doing what’s right. And you just gotta love family meetings with people that don’t like, facts. Let’s go to the next one here. More questions and answers after Massachusetts. Duke. That’s Oklahoma. Way to talk. Order. To order. Transition from natural gas. I’m not sure how to even get into this one. They’re beginning to chart their next steps following an order issued two months ago that said, signaled the beginning of the end of natural gas in the state. This is a quote, said Senator Michael Barrett. The order poses the questions, but doesn’t answer them for the most part. Well, imagine that it’s opening statement in the huge, conversation Massachusetts needs to have about truly reducing the footprint in in the gas system in the state. It’s just unbelievable. They’re already on the track. Here’s, Caitlyn PL Sloan, vice president for, mass. Two sits at the Conservative Law Foundation. They are already on the track. Everything is going to be electrified, so it should be relatively aligned. Most of the changes are on the gas utilities where they have to reformat their business model to deal with this. These are regulatory, issues that they’re putting in on methane and controls. On that. [00:12:00][109.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:12:00] Since they even killed renewable natural gas, like, they they don’t even want they want to push us to such an end. They’re going to end up, as you know, once this all shakes out, buying their intermittent gas. From who? Your friend. Putin. [00:12:15][14.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:12:15] Putin. Right. A he all this is helping Putin. So, I’d, I’d say I had a fun segment off to you now, dude. [00:12:25][9.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:12:25] Yeah. But before we go ahead and dive into the finance section, guys, we’ll go ahead and pay our bills here. As always, this podcast is brought to you by the world’s greatest website, Energy News Beat.com the best place for all of your energy news. Doing the team. Do a tremendous job keeping that website up to speed. Everything you need to know to be the tip of the spear when it comes to the energy business. Check us out again. Online energy news be.com. Hit the description below this podcast. You can go ahead and see all the timestamps, all the links to the articles. You want to go back in here. You’re anything you could do that skip ahead to see how BP’s earnings shook out. Feel free to do that. You can also hit us up dashboard.energyNewsbeat.com. it’s our MVP that we’re looking at for for for our little data news combo products. So check that out. You can email the show questions@Energy News beat.com. [00:13:13][47.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:13:14] When we look at the markets today I mean they were there was some positive news. Remember we got a lot of earnings rolling out specifically. And then on oil and gas we saw the S&P 500 fairly flat today only up about quarter of a percentage point. Nasdaq that falls about a quarter of a percentage point. dollar index stays fairly flat only only down about a, 10th of a percentage point. We did see Bitcoin rise to above $43,000. Currently trading 4321. Markets are closed right now for oil or markets have reopened. Excuse me for the night trading session here as we record this about 7:00 Central Standard Time, we’re going to go ahead, and work that night. Session 7365 is the current trading price. That’s up about a dollar, from where it was trading at earlier, mainly due to the reason that there what seems to be, a growing ceasefire consensus going on in the Gaza Strip. The problem, the problem is, is we see prices rise in light of new ceasefire talks. Something between me and you doesn’t necessarily compute. And again, that’s again why when you’re reading something like Reuters, be mindful of the fact that they’re just they’re just taking the news of the day and trying to fit it in with what happened to oil prices, when that may or may not be the case. I think the big thing that was influencing prices today was the fact that we saw the API come out. We were forecasted to see AA2 point one, 2.1 million barrel build in the strategic petroleum reserves, which will drop as you guys listen to this, on Wednesday, they’re forecasting only about a 500,000 barrel increase, which again, that’s going to be, you know, aggressive on prices. So we absolutely love that. I think the only other thing that we saw, today’s 2 or 2 things. First EIA dropped short term energy outlook outlook. They go ahead and basically do this every single month. But if we don’t mind Andy going ahead and throwing up this this chart here. This first, this first. Chart that they have, which is basically comparing, West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices. Confidence intervals. Okay. So you’ve got basically the current price. You know, they’ve got the QE2 curve which gets in above $120. That’s their top one. They got the Tanner curve, which is the lower one which says prices could end up somewhere in the the the 60 to $40 range. I don’t know if I believe that, but really where they’re showing prices is is a downward spike. And I think that’s changing a little bit from the sentiment. If you go ahead and look at that, that first image, I mean they’ve got price is holding fairly constant at that $75 mark, which I think is absolutely super fascinating. Considering I think we’re a lot of other people believe prices to go. So if you, if you’re a, a believer in that forecast, which I am, and all of the deals that we’re currently working with, we’re underwriting at $75 oil, $70 oil. So we’re we’re not being too aggressive. But I think it’s interesting there. I think the other thing, to notice is that natural gas consumption, peaked at 118 BCF per day, consumed in January, which is a new monthly record, again, that was mainly driven by the renewable sector. We’re converting a lot of battery power, but absolutely have to love it. Natural gas storage in yeah, yeah, I basically had a withdrawal of about 920 BCF, which is the third most ever, which is interesting because we see prices come down. We’re currently sitting about $2, basically even for the spot price. Mainly what that means is the beginning of the month, we started with about 13% more natural gas storage than we did over the five year average. And that’s generally how things are covered in the natural gas markets. If you’re above the five year average, anything that brings you back down below that is going to see as positive. Anything that brings you up is going to see that. So, you know, prices on the natural gas side were were depressed. But we did see Brant again last, last month, January, averaging about $80 per barrel. I think the only other thing that I find interesting, Stu, is that BP did drop their earnings last night. They saw about a 5% bump in their their stock price, posting a basically beating their earnings by about $3 billion for the fourth quarter and went ahead and decided to do another round of share buybacks. This was the first time earnings call for newly appointed CEO. What’s his name? Murray. And to close, you know, basically this is and you know, he was named the permanent CEO a few weeks ago after being named the interim CEO. You know, just a little side note, Bernard Looney, the former CEO, got fired for having, inappropriate relations with colleagues. Well, guess what? Don’t worry. The new CEO, he’s dating somebody at BP, but he’s properly disclosed it, so. No, don’t don’t look over here. Look over here. Yeah, well, we’ll give it two years before that. The fallout on that. But, but but mainly what happened is and, and while we did see, you know, the stock price rise by 5%, something I found interesting is that, you know, in the earnings call, Andrew Close did come out and say BP remains strong, remain strongly committed to its strategy and attempt to reduce oil production by 25% from 2019 levels, basically to 2 million barrels per day, while still attempting to grow their renewables and low carbon business. But in the other breath, he said that they could grow its oil output beyond its 3% target for 2022 to 2027. So he’s talking out of both sides of his mouth. Yeah, hey, we’d like to reduce, but we probably won’t. It’s going to increase probably by 3%. As we drive towards this is the quote, as we drive towards 2025, we are focused on simplifying the business. We will pragmatically, pragmatically adapt to what’s happening in demand with society. We will go for the highest returns and the highest value projects. And we know that’s probably not going to be solar. They didn’t come out and say they are looking for partners, specifically in their Lightsource bp division and canceling their, wind offshore or their wind project with Equinor. They’ve got 12 to 16 oil and gas projects that could potentially get, a FDI, which is a final investment decision. Over the next two years, you know, to give you guys an idea, profit was about three. Excuse me. Profits. Excuse me, were about 2.99 billion, beating the forecast of 2.77 billion. That’s still about half from where they were last year, mainly due to the fact that really strong refinery profits. Remember, Exxon and BP have really strong refining businesses, which as prices rise, you almost get a premium for those refined products. So we absolutely love that. You know, both Exxon and Chevron last year did beat their profit expectations, mainly due to the back of higher oil and gas production. BP went ahead and said they’re going to maintain their dividend of $0.07 per share and increase the rate of stock buybacks to $1.5 billion over the next three months, which is up, excuse me, 1.75 billion, which is up from 1.5 billion on the previous three. So market reacted fairly positive for that. They generated about 32 billion of cash last year compared to 41 billion A. 2022. They did release their net debt by about $1 billion. But you know overall good, good earnings for BP. What I’m interested in Stu, is so they’ve got a new CEO now. But it doesn’t seem like they’re too terribly interested in changing strategy. This is going to continue to bite them in the bank as they move forward. This was an opportunity, I think, for them to shift strategies and get back into the oil and get back to what’s really making the money, which is their refining business and their oil and gas business. They’ve said some tea leaves about, oh, we’re going to bring in a partner for light sauce. Hey, we’re canceling this project with Equinor, but they still want to reduce their oil output by over 25%. Now as they said, they’re not going to do that. But I’m interested in where you think BP’s going the toilet. [00:20:51][456.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:51] And when you take take a look at Chevron in Exxon and Oxy. They’re not, total, total energy, as we call it on the show, is actually moving, more along the lines of the U.S. and they’re drill, baby, drill. And they are also doing it again, Saudi Arabia has the mold broken. Yeah, they are using their profits to pay for their hydrogen for their renewable. They’re doing it right in the U.S.. I gotta hand it to oxy. I mean, oxy, he’s doing it right. The the next big thing is the carbon capture and the carbon taxes. Oxy is leading the charge on that. [00:21:41][50.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:21:42] No, what I’m wondering is, you know, I would say pre-COVID, you know, there was a big push to, like, will BP officially divest BP? Remember, their U.S. onshore unit is a subsidiary that they fully own. It’s not floated on the stock market or whatever. There was talks that it may or may not. They may sell that business completely. Right now, I don’t think they do. [00:22:05][22.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:22:05] Know, because, total energy, but, enough gas powered plants two months ago, three months ago, in Texas that are equivalent to two nuclear reactors. So there are oil companies buying energy projects in the U.S. from the majors around the world? [00:22:29][23.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:22:29] Yep. Absolutely, guys. [00:22:31][1.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:22:31] Well, let me, throw this at you here. We just had this article about Duke Energy saying that in Duke Energy, the demand is going to increase in the next year, year and a half, 12%. I’m looking at the article that we had earlier, minus the short. [00:22:49][17.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:22:49] Term energy outlook. [00:22:50][0.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:22:50] On the short term energy outlook. And when you take a look at the, natural gas is going to go up next year and the following year to 42% of our electrical generation is natural gas. And then it’s going to downsize to 41 in a few years. Coal is going to keep going down 20, 17, 15 and then 14. They’re just going to keep closing those coal plant nuclear. 1919 1919. They’re not increasing our nuclear capacity. Renewables. This is where I think they’re wrong on their numbers 21, 22, 24, 26% of our, electrical generation will be done by renewables. [00:23:41][51.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:23:42] And what’s crazy is that’s not a big forecast jump. That’s only five, 6% a year, which to do all of the crazy transition stuff that everyone say to go net zero by 2030, we’d have to do 20, 30, 40% cuts a year. [00:23:56][14.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:23:57] And it’s not. [00:23:58][0.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:23:58] I don’t even believe. [00:23:59][0.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:23:59] It. No, the numbers are not there. But listen, here’s where the second order of magnitude of this report kicks in is the CO2 emission. Let’s go through this real quick. Okay. So remember we had 12% increase. But yet you’re going to remain flat on natural gas and you’re remained flat on, nuclear. And you’re going to increase your renewables, which does not help your, elimination of CO2. So here’s where this goes. It’s, 400 and 4941 metric tons, million of metric tons this year. 4700, 4783 million metric tons. And it’s flat from here on out. Even though they’re reducing coal, even though you’re increasing renewables, you’re not going to get any better unless you do more natural gas and more nuclear. And it ain’t going to happen. Yeah, we are going to flat. Line on reducing our, CO2 emissions. I think that it is actually hypocrisy in numbers is is screaming out of their report. [00:25:20][80.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:25:20] The IEA has taken a playbook out of the IEA. Maybe they borrowed some borrowed some analyst. Absolutely unbelievable. So all right. Well that that does it for us here folks. What else should people be worried about. We’re here down in Houston for Nape. It’s going to be awesome. [00:25:35][14.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:25:36] Oh we’ve got some, great events lined up. We are, communicating with the folks for the governor and, the governor of Oklahoma, governor of Texas. We have, three other, podcast tomorrow. We’re also working to try to get the inductees that are going to be there. We have, executives from embarrass. We have Doug Sandridge, he is, the executive director for the, oil and gas executives for nuclear. We have, Sharon Manns. She’s with, CEO of Nccn, technology and AI and oil and gas. We have Jay Young will be over in the booth. It is a phenomenal lineup. [00:26:25][49.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:26:25] We’ve got well database Pecos country operating and. [00:26:29][3.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:26:29] And. [00:26:29][0.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:26:30] W energy. We’ve got CEOs out the wazoo going to be at our booth. [00:26:33][3.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:26:34] We got was issued the CEO. It almost sounds like something you’d order at, Chipotle or something. Yeah. Ooh. Okay. We’re having fun though. Thank you all very much. [00:26:45][10.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:26:45] Now it’s going to be awesome. Guys will appreciate everybody checking us out. We will be back here on Thursday, back here tomorrow for our final show. And then you’ll be able to hear our weekly recap over Stuart Turley. I’m Michael Tanner. We’ll see you tomorrow, folks. [00:26:45][0.0][1562.0]

– Get in Contact With The Show –

 

The post Daily Energy Standup Episode #303 – Coal’s Resurgence, EV Challenges, and BP’s Strategy appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Tellurian explores sale of Haynesville upstream business to develop natural gas offerings

Energy News Beat

(WO) – Tellurian Inc. has asked its financial advisor, Lazard, to explore opportunities for the sale of Tellurian’s Haynesville upstream business.

Tellurian natural gas assets 2024 (Graphic: Business Wire)

Tellurian produced 19.5 Bcf of natural gas for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. Tellurian’s natural gas assets include 31,149 net acres, interests in 159 producing wells and over 400 drilling locations, primarily in the U.S. Haynesville play. Tellurian maintains an exemplary operational safety record and demonstrates responsible environmental stewardship. Implementing an active emissions monitoring program, electrifying all new production well sites, and committing to green completions are just a few examples of Tellurian’s efforts to reduce its carbon footprint.

Chief Executive Officer Octávio Simões said, “As we commercialize Driftwood LNG, Tellurian has been reviewing its strategy, including the dynamics of the U.S. natural gas market in the context of global LNG demand. We have concluded that there are alternative gas supply strategies available to us from various basins and our ownership of upstream assets is not necessary at this stage of Tellurian’s development. We have a substantial number of drilling locations that we believe will be highly attractive to oil and gas producers that can develop them more quickly than we would.”

“By unlocking the full value of these high-quality assets, we aim to substantially reduce our debt, further reduce our general and administrative expenses, and provide additional cash, enabling us to develop Driftwood LNG. Currently, this approach is more attractive than issuing equity to fund our 2024 development activities and working capital needs,” Simões added.

Source: Worldoil.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast

The post Tellurian explores sale of Haynesville upstream business to develop natural gas offerings appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Texas to explore new grid recovery options after 82% of blackstart units failed during Winter Storm Uri

Energy News Beat

Dive Brief:

There have been significant reliability improvements made to the Texas electricity grid since Winter Storm Uri in 2021 but the state should still consider new approaches to system recovery including the use of battery storage as a “blackstart” resource, representatives of Texas RE told regulators on Thursday.
About 82% of blackstart units in Texas failed during Uri, Mark Henry, chief engineer and director of reliability outreach for Texas RE, told the Public Utility Commission of Texas. He was presenting the findings of a December report which concluded the electric power and natural gas sectors should collaborate on a restoration plan.
Thursday’s meeting was the first with Chairman Thomas Gleeson leading the commission. Gleeson has been with the PUCT for 15 years, most recently serving as executive director. He was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott last month to lead the commission; he replaces Commissioner Kathleen Jackson, who served as interim chair since June.

Dive Insight:

The Electric Reliability Council of Texas grid was reportedly just minutes away from a total collapse during Uri in 2021, which would have significantly worsened widespread blackouts and extended the recovery period. Ultimately, almost 250 people died in the storm amid rolling blackouts.

The sweeping unavailability of blackstart units “raises some concerns because you would expect those units to be there when things have deteriorated to what is, frankly, an unthinkable condition where the grid could collapse,” Texas RE’s Henry told the commission. Texas RE is the North American Electric Reliability Corp. regional entity for the area served by ERCOT.

Recommendations from the December report include: greater collaboration between the electric and gas sectors;  require blackstart resources to perform alternate fuel startup tests; exploration of how gas storage can help with grid recovery; and consideration of inverter-based resources for blackstart applications.

Commissioner Jimmy Glotfelty said he was encouraged by the consideration of alternate resources, specifically batteries and adjacent interconnections.

“As our system grows from 5,000 MW of batteries to 10,000 MW of batteries … if these are viable resources for a blackstart plan we should know about it sooner rather than later,” Glotfelty said. “I hope we can facilitate that discussion, or push [Texas RE] to lead that effort and and work with ERCOT.”

“Adjacent interconnections is obviously a political issue unless they’re DC ties,” Glotfelty noted. The ERCOT grid has minimal interconnection with other regional grids.

Texas RE representatives also updated the commission on their compliance monitoring and enforcement priorities this year, including the reliability of inverter-based resources, cyber and physical security, and inspection of weatherized generation facilities.

“We’re continuing to see cybersecurity vulnerabilities and evolving threats. They’re really evolving at an unceasing pace, which is no surprise,” Joseph Younger, Texas RE vice president and chief operating officer, told the commission.

The PUCT has been working to improve reliability since Uri in 2021 exposed grid weaknesses. The commission on Thursday announced it was closing two projects opened in order to implement improvements, marking the end of the first phase of the commission’s reforms which largely focused on improving operational reliability through weatherization and back-up fuel programs.

“This doesn’t mean we’re done improving the grid. We are continuously looking for ways to strengthen reliability and meet the needs of our fast-growing state. We’re just closing the book on this first chapter,” Gleeson, the comission’s new chairman, said in a statement.

Gleeson has spent much of his career at the PUCT in a variety of roles, including chief operating officer, director of finance and administration, and fiscal project manager. Connie Corona replaces him as interim executive director of the commission. She has worked with the commission for more than a decade, including serving as deputy executive director since 2020. She also previously worked in NRG Energy’s regulatory affairs department.

The PUCT now has four members and one open seat; Commissioner Will McAdams announced his retirement in December.

Source: Utilitydive.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast

The post Texas to explore new grid recovery options after 82% of blackstart units failed during Winter Storm Uri appeared first on Energy News Beat.