US announces 10-nation force to counter Houthi attacks in Red Sea

Energy News Beat

The United States has announced the launch of a multinational force to protect trade in the Red Sea after attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels forced at least a dozen shipping lines to suspend operations.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said on Monday that Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, the Seychelles and the United Kingdom would be among the countries joining the 10-nation “multinational security initiative”.

“Countries that seek to uphold the foundational principle of freedom of navigation must come together to tackle the challenge posed by this non-state actor,” Austin said in a statement, describing the attacks as an issue that “demands collective action”.

The announcement comes after the US and UK navies said over the weekend that their destroyers had shot down a total of 15 drones in the waterway.

The Iran-aligned Houthis have ramped up drone and missile attacks on vessels in key shipping lanes since the start of the war in Gaza, targeting ships alleged to have links to Israel or Israelis.

The rebel group said on Monday it had attacked the Norwegian-owned Swan Atlantic and the MSC Clara using naval drones to show solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.

Swan Atlantic’s owner, Norway’s Inventor Chemical Tankers, said in a statement the vessel had no link to Israel and was managed by a Singaporean firm.

There were no injuries reported by either vessel.

Mohammed al-Bukhaiti, a senior Houthi official and spokesperson, told Al Jazeera on Monday that the group would confront any US-led coalition in the Red Sea.

More countries to be included

The coalition might also include Egypt and Jordan as additional Arab nations to Bahrain, as they have a vested interest in ensuring the safe passage of ships, said Al Jazeera’s Sara Khairat, reporting from occupied East Jerusalem.

“It is still not clear whether they will join the fold later. Egypt and Jordan, as well as some of the GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] countries, including Saudi Arabia, are part of the Combined Maritime Forces, which the coalition will be under the umbrella of,” Khairat reported.

“Reading between the lines, it’s a very difficult situation for some of these Middle Eastern countries. You have Saudi Arabia, which is very close, it seems, to signing a deal with the Houthi rebels in Yemen,” she added.

“You have Egypt, which doesn’t want to be seen as going against the Houthis’ message on Gaza – which is for Israel to stop the war on the enclave.”

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken held a call with Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud on Monday on the issue, discussing the ways to avoid further conflict.

Blinken “condemned continued attacks by the Houthis on commercial vessels operating in international waters in the southern Red Sea and urged cooperation among all partners to uphold maritime security”, the US Department of State said in a statement after the call.

Austin, who was visiting Israel, is scheduled to hold talks in Bahrain and Qatar on Tuesday.

Companies avoid Red Sea

At least 12 shipping companies, including the Italian-Swiss giant Mediterranean Shipping Company, France’s CMA CGM and Denmark’s AP Moller-Maersk, have suspended transit through the Red Sea due to safety concerns.

UK oil giant BP on Monday became the latest firm to announce it would avoid the waters.

“In light of the deteriorating security situation for shipping in the Red Sea, BP has decided to temporarily pause all transits through the Red Sea,” the company said in a statement.

“We will keep this precautionary pause under ongoing review, subject to circumstances as they evolve in the region.”

Houthi attacks have effectively rerouted a significant portion of global trade by forcing freight companies to sail around Africa, imposing higher costs and delays for energy, food and consumer goods deliveries.

About 12 percent of global trade passes through the Red Sea, which connects to the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal, including 30 percent of container traffic.

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin says coalition will include Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, UK and other countries.

The post US announces 10-nation force to counter Houthi attacks in Red Sea appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Croatian FSRU gets 80th LNG cargo

Energy News Beat

Croatia’s Krk LNG terminal has received its 80th liquefied natural gas cargo since the launch of operations in January 2021.

The 2010-built 170,000-cbm, Methane Julia Louise, arrived at the 140,000-cbm FSRU on December 18, according to a short statement by state-owned LNG terminal operator LNG Croatia.

Methane Julia Louise’s AIS data provided by VesselsValue shows that the LNG carrier delivered the cargo to the FSRU from Cheniere’s Sabine Pass plant in Louisiana.

GasLog’s LNG carrier serves a charter deal with LNG giant Shell that also has a long-term contract for volumes from the Sabine Pass plant.

Back in 2020, Shell signed a six-year deal with Hungary to supply the country with LNG via the Croatian terminal.

The Croatian FSRU mainly receives shipments from the US, but it also received cargoes from Qatar, Nigeria, Egypt, Trinidad, Indonesia, and reloads from European terminals.

Hungary’s MFGK and a unit of Switzerland-based trading firm MET are some of the users of the facility.

From the start of commercial operations, the LNG terminal has regasified more than 10.8 million cubic meters of LNG and shipped more than 6.52 billion cubic meters of natural gas into the Croatian system, according to LNG Croatia’s website.

Due to high demand, LNG Croatia is currently working to boost the capacity of its FSRU-based Krk LNG terminal.

Earlier this year, Finland’s Wartsila won a contract to supply one regasification module for the FSRU.

Under the contract, Wartsila Gas Solutions, a unit of Wartsila, will build the regas module with a maximum capacity of 250,000 m3/h. The firm recently awarded the module contract to China’s CIMC SOE.

The current three LNG regasification units have a maximum regasification rate of 451,840 m3/h.

Following the upgrade, the Krk LNG facility will have a capacity of about 6.1 bcm per year in 2025.

The post Croatian FSRU gets 80th LNG cargo appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Permian operator Callon Petroleum mulls options amid buyer interest

Energy News Beat

World Oil

(Bloomberg) — Permian Basin operator Callon Petroleum Co. is considering strategic options amid takeover interest from rival oil and gas players, people familiar with the matter said, as dealmaking accelerates in the U.S. energy industry.

Source: World Oil

The Houston-based company has been working with an adviser to study possibilities including a potential sale, said the people, who asked to not be identified because the information is private. Callon shares rose 2.9% to $32.59 at 11:15 a.m. in New York, giving the company a market value of about $2.2 billion. They’re down 12% for the year.

No final decision has been made and Callon could opt to remain independent, they said. Representatives for Callon couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

Oil and gas companies have been increasingly looking to consolidate in order to add scale and cut costs, underscored by ExxonMobil Corp.’s $60 billion deal for Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

Like Pioneer, Callon is active in the Permian of West Texas and New Mexico, the biggest and most productive oil field in the country. The Permian has long been ripe for consolidation because it’s highly fragmented thanks to the scores of shale upstarts that have begun drilling there in the past two decades.

The post Permian operator Callon Petroleum mulls options amid buyer interest appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Goldman cuts 2024 Brent price forecast on strong US supply

Energy News Beat

Nasdaq

Goldman Sachs trimmed its price expectation for Brent crude in 2024 by $10 per barrel to between $70 and $90, saying strong production from the United States would moderate any upside in oil prices.

Source: Reuters

“We still look for range-bound prices and only moderate price volatility in 2024. Elevated spare capacity to handle tightening shocks should limit upside price moves,” its analysts said in a note dated Sunday.

The investment bank now expects Brent to recover to a peak of $85 per barrel in June 2024, and to average at $81/$80 in 2024/2025 compared to $92 previously.

Brent LCoc1 was trading around $77 as of 0526 GMT on Monday, down 20% from multi-month highs hit in September. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was around $72 a barrel. O/R

Continued supply from non-Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) sources, led by the U.S, shows that several tailwinds to the U.S. production are likely to persist in 2024, Goldman Sachs added.

Analysts said they expect U.S. Lower 48 crude output to reach 11.4 million barrels per day (mb/d) in the fourth quarter of next year, and hiked U.S. total liquids supply 2024 growth forecast to 0.9 mb/d from 0.5 mb/d earlier.

However, OPEC decision to rein in supply, a recovery in China, restocking in the U.S. and modest recession risk should limit downside risk to oil prices, the bank noted.

“Saudi Arabia is unlikely to ‘flush’ the market in 2024”, Goldman analysts said, adding “we expect full extensions of the OPEC+ cuts announced in April 2023 (1.7 mb/d) through 2025, and of the additional 2.2 mb/d package through 2024Q2.”

“We adjust our OPEC range trade to a short $70 put, long $80/90 call spread option on Brent Jun24, and still recommend long summer 2024 gasoline margins,” they added.

(Reporting by Tina Parate and Brijesh Patel in Bengaluru; Editing by Varun H K)

The post Goldman cuts 2024 Brent price forecast on strong US supply appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Tokyo Gas to buy Rockcliff Energy for $2.7 billion in U.S. shale push

Energy News Beat

World Oil

(Bloomberg) — Tokyo Gas Co. said its subsidiary Tokyo Gas America Ltd. will purchase Haynesville shale operator Rockcliff Energy II LLC for about $2.7 billion in a move to expand its U.S. shale gas operations.

Source; World Oil

Tokyo Gas America will acquire all the shares of Rockcliff, a portfolio company of Quantum Energy Partners, through its ownership interest in TG Natural Resources, the Japanese company said in a statement. The deal was signed on Dec. 15 and is scheduled to close on Dec. 29, it said.

The purchase comes amid a wave of multi-billion dollar deals in the global energy industry as oil and gas producers figure out the best way to deploy windfall profits from rising resource prices.

Recent activity includes Occidental Petroleum Corp.’s deal to buy Texas shale driller CrownRock LP, Exxon Mobil Corp.’s $60 billion purchase of Pioneer Natural Resources Co. and Chevron Corp.’s $53 billion agreement to buy Hess Corp. Woodside Energy Group Ltd. is also in preliminary talks with Santos Ltd. on a tie-up that would create a dominant liquefied natural gas exporter.

LNG terminals

The construction of new LNG export terminals in the US is set to boost gas demand, the company said. Tokyo Gas is seeking to expand shale operations and has looked for assets around existing ones in Texas and Louisiana, it said.

After this acquisition, the production volume of gas and natural gas liquid held by TG Natural Resources will increase by about four times to 1,300 million cubic feet per day, the company said. “The outcome from TGNR will become the base of overseas earnings,” it added.

While acknowledging the risks associated with resource prices, Takashi Nakao, senior general manager at Tokyo Gas’s global business development department, said “it is cheap” in an online press conference Saturday.

TG Natural Resources and Rockcliff have mining claims in adjacent areas, and Nakao believes they can survive in changing market conditions because they can improve their competitiveness by lowering production costs.

The post Tokyo Gas to buy Rockcliff Energy for $2.7 billion in U.S. shale push appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

India boosts LNG imports in November

Energy News Beat

India’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports rose in November compared to the same month last year, according to the preliminary data from the oil ministry’s Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell.

The country imported about 2.34 billion cubic meters, or about 1.8 million tonnes of LNG, in November, a rise of 5.3 percent compared to the same month in 2022, PPAC said.

During April-November, India took 20.09 bcm of LNG, or some 15.4 million tonnes, up by 12.4 percent, PPAC said.

India paid $1.2 billion for November LNG imports, down from $1.5 billion last year, it said.

As per India’s natural gas production, it reached 3.04 bcm in November, up by 7.1 percent compared to the corresponding month of the previous year.

During April-November gas production rose by 5.1 percent to about 24 bcm, PPAC said.

At the moment, India imports LNG via seven facilities with a combined capacity of about 47.7 million tonnes.

India’s Adani and France’s TotalEnergies started supplying natural gas in April to the grid from their 5 mtpa Dhamra LNG import facility located in Odisha, on India’s east coast. In August, the partners completed the first truck loading operation at the facility.

During April-October, Petronet LNG’s 17.5 mtpa Dahej terminal operated at 95.1 percent capacity, while Shell’s 5 mtpa Hazira terminal operated at 37.1 percent capacity, PPAC said.

The Dhamra LNG terminal operated at 26 percent capacity, it said.

The post India boosts LNG imports in November appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Daily Energy Standup Episode #273 – Duke’s Rate Hike, BlackRock Lawsuit, and Global Supply Chain Concerns

Energy News Beat

Daily Standup Top Stories

Woke Duke Energy Jacks Up Electric Rates to Pay for ESG, Zero Carbon Mandates

Duke Energy has thrown consumers under the proverbial (electric) bus to make their operations carbon neutral by 2050. As a result, electricity prices in North Carolina may increase by 19% over the next three years. The company’s […]

EXCLUSIVE: Conservative State Files First-in-the-Nation Lawsuit Against BlackRock Over Deceptive Climate Policies

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti on Monday sued the investment company BlackRock for deceptive practices. “BlackRock has said two things that can’t both be true,” Skrmetti, a Republican, told The Daily Signal in an […]

He fixed California’s power grid for Arnold Schwarzenegger. He’s worried about the energy transition

Former Albertan Yakout Mansour moved to California two decades ago when he was recruited to run the state’s power grid under then Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The way he tells it, it sounds like the government […]

Extensive power grid upgrades and expansion threaten the energy transition

People are becoming increasingly concerned about the mineral requirements for the energy transition and how these will be met. In October, the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) published a report entitled Electricity Grids and Secure Energy Transitions in […]

Houthi Attacks Start Shutting Down Red Sea Merchant Shipping

Attacks linked to war in Gaza are threatening global trade Oil and gas prices jump as big companies avoid Red Sea Shipping in the Red Sea is grinding to a halt with oil tankers idling and […]

Highlights of the Podcast

00:00 – Intro
02:39 – Woke Duke Energy Jacks Up Electric Rates to Pay for ESG, Zero Carbon Mandates
05:29 – EXCLUSIVE: Conservative State Files First-in-the-Nation Lawsuit Against BlackRock Over Deceptive Climate Policies
10:28 – He fixed California’s power grid for Arnold Schwarzenegger. He’s worried about the energy transition
12:38 – Extensive power grid upgrades and expansion threaten the energy transition
15:34 – Houthi Attacks Start Shutting Down Red Sea Merchant Shipping
17:39 – Markets Update
19:51 – Outro

Follow Stuart On LinkedIn and Twitter

Michael Tanner: [00:00:14] What is going on, everybody? Welcome to another edition of the Daily Energy News Beat standup here on this gorgeous Tuesday, December 19th, 2023. As always, I’m your humble correspondent, Michael Tanner, coming to you from an undisclosed location here in Dallas, Texas, joined by the executive producer, the show, the purveyor of the show and the director and publisher of the world’s greatest website site energynewsbeat.com, Stuart Turley, My man, how we doing? [00:00:39][24.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:00:39] Today is a beautiful day in the neighborhood and I’m whipped. Holy smokes. [00:00:42][3.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:00:43] Absolutely. We’ve had a busy day. The news line has been absolutely buzzing. We have an absolutely packed show and menu burst up on said menu, woke Duke Energy Jacks up electric rates to pay for ESG, zero carbon mandates. Next up, this is an exclusive from the Daily Signal. Conservative state files first in the nation lawsuit against BlackRock over deceptive climate policies. Next up, he fixed California’s power grid for Arnold Schwarzenegger. He’s worried about the energy transition now. Next, an expensive power grid. Update upgrades and expansion threaten the energy transition. And then finally, who these attacks start shutting down Red Sea merchant ship. That’s going to flow nicely into our finance segment because that’s really what drove prices both up today to above $74 and then also has dropped in a little bit was said attack on that Red Sea merchant ship is people are a little bit worried about what might happen with oil flows through the Red Sea. So we will cover all of that in a bag of chips. Guys, Before we do all that, remember all of the news and analysis you are about to hear is brought to you by the world’s greatest website, Energy News Beat.com The best place for all of your energy news. Stu and the team. Do an outstanding job of making sure that stays up to speed with everything you need to know to be at the tip of the spear. When it comes to the energy in the oil and gas business. Hit the description below on all of our podcast. Whether you listen to us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or YouTube, you can see the description below. Timestamps links to all of the articles and ways to get a hold of the show. That’s [email protected] you’ll see that will link to our dashboard.energynewsbeat.com which is one of our best a bill ways to do kind of data news combos. We appreciate everybody who’s check that out. I’m going to break those too. Where do you want to begin? [00:02:28][105.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:02:29] Hey, let’s start with our buddies over a joke. I mean, Excuse me, Duke. I love Duke Energy. I’m not sure why this article is a little bit slanted, but it says the title Duke Energy jacks up electric rates to pay for ESG zero carbon mandates. This is really not fair on Duke because they have good management and they’re doing the best they can. Duke Energy has thrown consumers under the proverbial electric bus to make their operations carbon neutral by 2050. You can’t blame them. That’s where I thought this article was was kind of hard on the management. I’ll be the first to admit on this. Listen to this. They are attempting to decarbonize the Tar Heel State by 70% by 2030 and full decarbonize by 2050. These are absolutely abysmal guides. Guess who gets to pay for this, Michael? No. The consumer, the consumers, the power grid. This misguided initiative will force everyday families to subsidize a complete overhaul of the state’s power grid at a total cost, approaching $160 billion. This is the government on stupid steroids. They have got some kind of stupid beer in the water there. I don’t know. You know, holy smokes, This is not Duke Energy. This is Duke Energy trying to read the requirements that were put in under the Biden legislation through regulation at 3 a.m. right before COP. This is also part of the coal plan stuff. [00:04:11][102.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:12] Yeah, and what I find what I like about this article is they take it is they take the approach of look like we’re all for attempting to clean up for what is a really bad history of these companies. Only to points out that Duke Energy, you know, a few years ago was forced to pay $200 million to clean up its leachate toxic coal waste. It shut off half of the power to residents on Christmas Eve in 2022. They took 1300 megawatts of coal and natural gas offline during that period, all without really, you know, you know, the $200 million is is a pretty small sum relative to the amount of stuff that they’re going after them in the wrong way when they should have been focused on, as this article points out, the other things that they’re doing wrong. [00:04:54][41.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:54] Right. But as a general rule, Duke’s got some good things going on for them. Those are mistakes. I’m not going to I’m not going to make any excuses on that. But they have a lot of good things that. [00:05:05][10.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:05] They say for $200 million, all at Duke Energy, leached some toxic coal waste into my apartment. So next time they need to just call me up. I’m good. [00:05:13][7.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:13] Okay. Hey, we could have a new bathtub. Remember when we. You and I were doing tankers with the bathtubs? You could do that. [00:05:19][5.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:20] All right, let’s start. [00:05:20][0.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:20] An action here. Yeah, let’s go. What’s next? Before I get a hook, Now that I’ve lost all my stories. Yeah. Still gets a hook film. Here we go. Conservatives. State files. First in the nation lawsuit against BlackRock over deceptive climate policies. Well, I know this is kind of You cannot be this kind of entertainment tent. City Attorney General Jonathan Carmody on Monday sued the investment company BlackRock. Here’s a quote. BlackRock has said two things that can’t both be true. Giamatti, a Republican, told The Daily Signal in an interview Monday. The first is that they are taking investors money and investing it purely for the purpose of maximizing the return on the investment. But they’ve also put out a statement saying that they are committed to net zero carbon emissions to combat climate change by a certain date. Both things can’t be true and I agree that he is is hitting on that. The here’s where it gets a little funny. I’m going to be wondering how it’s going to pan out in the courtroom, Michael, because pledge member of the climate groups is to force companies to disclose their targets for net zero emissions for environmental political reasons. This is coming down into the carbon tax. It’s coming down into the MP operators. But here’s where this I get a little confused on this article. The Larry said it’s okay to invest in ESG, in oil and gas. So where I think this is really going to need a follow up is the requirements for carbon neutral for reporting from oil companies. [00:07:03][102.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:07:04] This is a serious question. So to take this, it’s again, this is a serious question I’m asking are companies are are companies required to make a profit? [00:07:12][8.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:13] Yes. If they are says who they are, they have a requirement to their. [00:07:17][4.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:07:18] To their shareholders. But it’s not like a law, Not like if you don’t produce a profit, you’re going to go to jail. Or we have seen a lot of tech companies be out of business and B, we’d have a lot of tech people. So I asked this question seriously, I’m all for. I think what BlackRock is doing is obscene. They’re they’re fleecing the world, so to speak. They’re greenwashing, the whole ESG movement to take money from investors under the ruse of ESG, but deploy it as they see fit. Yes, that’s shady business practice. Question, though, is it actually illegal? There’s a difference between stoop. So illegal to be stupid. It’s not illegal to necessarily not necessarily invest the money wisely as it should. So this is where I understand that it looks good on a headline that we’re going to go sue BlackRock. I’m all for it. I think what they’re doing is a travesty. The question is, is it illegal? And that’s where I think the difference becomes, you know, is he in this process of you know, and, you know, Stu disagrees with me so much, he just left the point of the matter, I think when it comes to, you know, whether or not this lawsuit is worthwhile, I mean, I mean, this guy’s, you know, Jonathan and he’s probably got a little bit of time on its hand when it comes to it. But the real question is, is these, quote, deceptive practices? I mean, this guy’s going to know. But the real question is, you know, what’s a jury going to think? I think the interesting thing is that, you know, we know BlackRock has walked back a lot of these, you know, so-called targets that they want to push. You know, they they haven’t necessarily followed through as much as maybe they would have. They would have you would have thought, you know, two years ago, I mean, two years ago, you know, they they were attempting to influence companies like Chevron, United Airlines, Wal-Mart in order to, you know, push these shareholder proposals that were much more climate related. But in 2022, they said that in a response to the state’s attorney general, the company, quote, doesn’t dictate to companies what suspicions are or what specific emissions targets they should meet or what type of political lobbying they pursue. So they’re speaking out of both sides of their mouth. The question I go back to is, are your I think you were allowed to speak out of both sides of your mouth. There’s no law that says you can’t. [00:09:32][134.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:33] But they do have a fiduciary responsibility for not I. That’s a good question. Do they are they legally responsible? Yes. Depends on a shared responsibility. [00:09:43][10.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:44] But that’s different than being illegal. Right. I’m not a lawyer. It’s a dumb question. But, you know, when we talk like like, for example, bankruptcies, bankruptcies, it’s not illegal to be an idiot and drive your company into bankruptcy. Now, you’re going to probably never raise money again. But the question is, is being incompetent illegal? I don’t. [00:10:04][19.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:10:04] Know. Well, it does take a village to raise an idiot. [00:10:07][2.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:10:08] So I’ll tell you this, though. If it’s illegal to be an idiot, Stu, we’re in trouble. And we’ve been he’s going to be knocking on our door very quickly. Oh, wait, that’s them. [00:10:17][9.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:10:19] I just had to go get the door. It was actually. It was actually the FBI. [00:10:23][3.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:10:23] All right. That’s where you left? Yes. He showed up and. [00:10:27][3.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:10:28] He fix California’s power grid for Arnold. He’s worried about the energy transition. Former Albertan says promises made at COP 28 bring risk, higher cost and lower reading liability. I’m not saying don’t do it, but do it right. I like that line. Hey, let’s just be careful. He goes, I don’t work for the governor, but I had to work with the governor. Oh. [00:10:53][25.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:10:55] That’s the type of leadership and ingenuity and working relationships that we need to people. They don’t agree on anything but are willing to put aside their differences to work towards a common mutual goal. [00:11:07][12.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:11:08] It sounds like me and you on his podcast, dude. [00:11:10][2.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:11:11] Maybe. [00:11:11][0.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:11:13] And he sits there and in 1975, he immigrated to Canada, sailed through, graduated. Calgary is near, but too cold for an Egyptian. I thought that was just absolutely a hoot. But he was treating electricity as a commodity and deregulation. That’s where he really helped Arnold out. So when you take a look at the electrical and imagine yourself sitting on a stool with three legs, as long as the three legs are equal in length, you’re steady. If any one of those three legs becomes too long or too short, you will fall. That’s he’s talking about three renewables or just pension out the grid in coal. [00:11:56][42.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:11:56] No, I mean, we need a lot more of this collaboration from people that may be on two opposite sides of the political spectrum. The problem is when we’re talking about energy, it shouldn’t be political. It should be, as you would say, lower energy poverty for the cheapest way possible while attempting to, yes, minimize emissions. We shouldn’t just go ahead and burn coal. 24 seven. I’m with you there. The problem is the trade offs between, you know, going too far down the renewables path shortens one of the legs. So your chair ends up being slanted. Excuse me, on the renewable. [00:12:27][30.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:12:29] And both of us had our automatic cameras turned off. Otherwise it looked like we had been on a roller coaster. So. Okay. Extensive. Let’s go to the next one. Extensive power grid upgrades and expansions threaten the energy transition. I just want to let you know, I had a deal with some folks at family gatherings that are slightly ignorant when it comes to the grid and electrical. Yeah, you cannot electrify the grid with an electric cars right now if you want to. We have 1% of our cars are electric. You go to two, maybe three, and the grid is going to blow. You can handle. You can handle the truth. I guarantee you they can handle the truth. Then their heads are going to explode if we selling more EVs. Now let’s go into this article. To achieve country’s national energy and climate goals, the world electricity needs to grow 20% faster in the next decade than it did in the previous. Reaching national goals means adding or refurbishing a total of 80 million kilometers of grid by 2040, the equivalent of the entire existing global grid by the IEA. I mean, that is one agency full of chatter heads. So when you sit back and think about this, we barely have enough money to even get our economies going. We’re going to be lucky if we don’t if we avoid bankruptcy. So you can’t afford to redo the grid from ground up, period. It’s just not there’s not enough of it there. And then in the Inflation Reduction Act, the I.R.A., Michael, there was a couple million in there for the grid, 40 million or something like that out of the Brazilian trillion dollars. [00:14:29][119.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:14:29] Well, clearly, they’re going to need way more, because if you’re telling me the world and not just the United States, but the world has to double its electric capacity in order to meet these unquote new, you know, electrification standards. We’re in big trouble. [00:14:41][11.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:14:42] Oh, yeah, it ain’t going to happen. And so anyway, we can reduce and I’ll put you right now, if you and I were made energy czars, we could reduce the world’s carbon output. We need carbon combo carbon. Just giving a shout out to our sponsors. But we would also be able in ensure and have people talk. I’d say nuclear natural gas. Use coal for when you can. And as we transition, get the pipelines built, go to natural gas, use wind, solar. If it’s fiscally responsible, we could do it. You and I. Right now, energy czars dominates ominous. We be it. [00:15:23][40.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:15:23] Love it. Love it. Still. What’s the let’s go somewhere. This last article that really flows. This is where prices went. [00:15:28][5.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:15:29] Yeah Moody’s are out and as Larry the Cable guy would say and then Houti attack starting shutting down the Red Sea merchant shipping. Michael, this brings up two gigantic questions I’m going to kind of touch on the first one, the supply side and then the other one being in the year, there are Arctic in there. Companies at the transport, consumer goods, BP and molar mascot are all having some serious problems. This article goes into the billions of dollars it’s going to cost. And in the weeks that it adds to the trips around the Cape of Good Hope or the Cape of Good Horn, because a lot of those carriers cannot go through the Panama Canal. And if you’re going to cut out the Suez Canal, ooh, this is bad. [00:16:20][51.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:21] And why are in there doing that? Not to spike oil prices, but they’re doing that to just disrupt global trade. Correct. Or what’s the endgame here? [00:16:29][8.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:16:30] I think the endgame is they didn’t eat their Wheaties this morning and they actually were watching the Kardashians because I don’t know what was going on. Maybe they were a little confused. This is part of their their mode, really. Nobody knows. And they’re not shooting at Iranian ships. It does not make any sense. The only thing that I heard that I on the Twitter feeds was that it was enough to split up the U.S. Navy in order to get them sidetracked and spread them out more so that China could do something. I mean, that was a conspiracy theory. It was like, now, why didn’t I think of that? I don’t know, Michael. I mean, this was I’m not a hoodie now. I’m now Hootie and the Blowfish was really good. [00:17:22][51.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:17:22] Well, we hope that we hope they’re not in charge of whatever these efforts are, because that’s not good. [00:17:27][4.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:28] Oh, no. That was a good song, though. [00:17:29][1.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:17:30] It was a good song. Anything else for us? [00:17:31][1.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:32] No, Just, you know, wrap us up here with the finance. Yeah. [00:17:39][6.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:17:39] I mean, we’re going to be pretty quick today, guys. Oil prices, as we know, moved due to this Red Sea attack. We did see S&P 500 up about 5/10 of a or about a half a percentage point. And we’re only 1.2 percentages off all time highs, which we saw in January of 2022. Nasdaq was actually up 6/10 of a percentage point. The Dow Jones Industrial average topped about 0.86 points. Bitcoin, we saw about up three and a half percent to $42,000. Crude oil, as we mentioned, up and down all day, was down early in the session, all the way to about $71. Rose on this read, see who did attack up to about $75 a little bit below that, 7480 is where it peaked out. And then slowly over the rest of the afternoon session began to trade down where we currently sit, about 70 to 83, you know, outside of of of of where oil prices are going. Again, guys, we’re back to sentiment driven price action. And you can tell is as okay, great. You know prices were up in the wake of this event they did in that afternoon session continue to to slow down. BP did say they temporarily paused all transit through that water. Other shipping forms also said they’re going to avoid that route. So is it necessarily going to drop overall supply of oil? It might just make it longer to come to market. I thought what’s interesting is that the EIA came out today and also announced that they believe that share oil production in a turn of events is actually going to be down in 2024, which is interesting relative to I think where a lot of the different markets are coming from, which is interesting. U.S. they say specifically that U.S. oil output from top shale producing regions is set to decline in January for the third consecutive month, while production from the Permian Basin is still set to rise to a record eighth straight production. So what we’re gaining from the Permian being drilled, we’re losing elsewhere. And what’s that a sign of the sign that there’s very there’s very few profitable basins left. If there’s one thing to snatch from what the EIA is telling you is the fact that there are very few basins that are still profitable right now and one of them still being the Permian Basin or at least what people think. So so they’re they’re continuing to dive in on that. It’s been a long weeks to spend a long year. What do you what should people be worried about going into going into Christmas? [00:19:54][134.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:55] Well, I’d say it’s a supply chain, Michael, this Hootie and the Blowfish thing going on over there. Ooh, Hootie and the blow up fish. [00:20:02][7.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:02] We got to add that to our our nonexistent merch. [00:20:05][2.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:06] Yeah. There you go. Hootie and the blow them up fish. I mean, when you sit back and kind of think that’s horrible because remember when the evergreen you and I were having a lot of fun with the names on that bad dog, the Scooby, the Captain, Scooby and all that kind of good stuff. That was a lot of fun. This is not so fun because they’ve actually got missiles in their launch animal ships and our our guys are in harm’s way. That’s the part. Snakes. [00:20:30][24.2]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:31] It is. So. Well, you know, we’re covered for everybody, guys. We get a few more shows this week before we finish out before the end of the year. We appreciate everybody who’s who’s checked in with us and stop by this week and year. But with that, we’re going to let you get out of here, get back to work, start your day. Appreciate everybody. Again tuning in for Stuart Turley. I’m Michael Tanner. We’ll see you tomorrow, folks. [00:20:31][0.0][1184.3]

– Get in Contact With The Show –

The post Daily Energy Standup Episode #273 – Duke’s Rate Hike, BlackRock Lawsuit, and Global Supply Chain Concerns appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

COP28: A Win for Climate Realism

Energy News Beat

The COP28 UN climate conference in Dubai ended last week with a flurry of self-congratulatory commentary about the “historic” nature of the final agreement in which parties, for the first time, overtly backed a process of “transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner.”

The final language was an enormous relief to many on the far left. Early in the conference, COP President Sultan Al Jaber shocked and offended that faction when he reminded participants that moving away from fossil fuels too quickly would “take the world back into caves.”

For those who haven’t attended a COP, think of it as the world’s largest trade show (80,000 people attended COP28) and copy-editor Survivor where high officials negotiate stilted prose over almost two weeks. COP statements have no binding authority on participating countries, but all participants and observers invest considerable time and energy in shifting the Overton Window toward their preferred policies and worldview.

For much of COP, the big question was whether the final statement would call for a “phase out” or “phase down” of fossil fuels. Just before the conference wrapped, Al Gore panicked when it appeared his preferred “phase out” language wouldn’t survive.

Just a few hours later, Gore saw an opening to at least claim the final language affirmed his dogmatic, anti-fossil fuel worldview.

Big did Gore really get his way? Not as much as he thinks. Al Jaber’s vivid imagery of bad climate policy sending the world back into caves will certainly linger longer than the final agreement’s bureaucratic prose.

When Gore insists “the climate crisis is, at its heart, a fossil fuel crisis” he’s sacrificing science – and the world’s poor – on the altar of ideology. Thankfully, many COP28 participants disagree passionately with Gore. Many would side with science and argue that the problem of greenhouse gas emissions is a problem of greenhouse gas emissions, not “fossil fuels” per se.

We hosted a frank off-the-record symposium on durable climate solutions with diverse and influential voices and compared notes with participants around the world. Behind the scenes, seriousness and sober realism loomed larger than dogma. COP28 shifted the conversation toward the realist bloc that recognizes that a bottom-up “all of the above” energy strategy that balances climate goals with energy security and food security will move the world away from carbon-intensive energy faster than a top-down “everything but fossil fuel” strategy that trades science and sound economics for protest theater and cartoonish demagoguery against “Big Oil” and “Petrostates.”

On that note, It’s important to recognize that COP had other important outcomes. The final agreement emphasized nuclear energy with 22 countries agreeing to triple their nuclear capacity by 2050. Oil and gas companies also pledged to voluntarily zero out methane emissions by 2030.

Al Jaber simply and wisely noted at the beginning of COP, “Energy is our friend.” He’s right. Backing energy tradeoffs that slow or stop growth would be catastrophic for global security, development, and the environment. Thanks to his leadership, COP28 inspired a shift toward climate realism that recognizes that lifting millions of people out of poverty through energy security and food security will lead to vastly better environmental outcomes than demonizing any form of energy.

Our latest Free Economies are Clean Economies report finds that countries that embrace economic freedom are twice as clean as countries that don’t. As Chris Wright, the CEO of Liberty Energy notes in our foreword, it’s impossible to manage energy markets from Washington or any central body. He argues that when central planners try to pick winners and losers “there will be many more losers than winners if policies trap people in energy poverty.”

If you’re serious about climate change, the primary goal should not be to “phase out” any form of energy but to phase in economic freedom and opportunity, especially in places where it is lacking.

Source: C3newsmag.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post COP28: A Win for Climate Realism appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

The oil industry’s mega-merger spree and a US production boom point to strong crude demand for years to come

Energy News Beat
This year has seen a flurry of oil mega-mergers worth more than $100 billion.
Big deal flow and rising US production point to industry forecasts of big demand for years to come.
The “inevitable” consolidation suggest oil companies are shrugging off peak demand concerns.

A string of multi-billion dollar mergers and acquisitions across the energy sector this year has coincided with a boom in US oil production, and together the trends point to an industry shrugging off peak oil demand concerns, with expectations of a healthy market for years to come.

Deals for companies active in the Permian basin, a key drilling region that stretches over a swath of west Texas and into New Mexico, have exceeded a record $100 billion in 2023, consultancy Wood Mackenzie said in a report published December 12.

Exxon Mobil’s $59.5 billion proposed deal for Pioneer Natural Resources — the largest oil and gas producer in the Permian basin — headlined those figures, in addition to Chevron’s $53 billion takeover of Hess, and Permian Resources’ $4.5 billion, all-stock acquisition of Earthstone Energy.

“Oil demand is expected to continue growing through the rest of the decade, hence consolidation in the US oil patch is a more measured approach to address this need via reduced costs and economies of scale,” Matt Smith, lead oil analyst for the Americas at Kpler, told Business Insider.

That contrasts to the boom-and-bust approach and “wildcatting” — or exploratory drilling — of the past.

“Continued consolidation within the shale industry is inevitable,” said Jesse Jones, head of North America crude production at Energy Aspects.

Jones told Business Insider oil production from private producers has ramped up faster than that of public companies over the last three years, and US oil production broadly has exceeded estimates.

This year, the US has averaged 13 million barrels a day of output. Some analysts have forecasted that will increase in 2024. US production hit a record 13.2 million barrels a day in September, which happened as OPEC+ leaders like Saudi Arabia and its allies like Russia struggled to get a handle on oil’s recent downward spiral.

“Upstream consolidation gradually ratchets down the growth potential from areas like the Permian, which is one reason we see US growth slowing appreciably next year,” Jones said. “But that should also result in healthier financial results over time as a larger portion of the operator universe is incentivized to exercise capital discipline.”

More confidence in demand than IEA

International Energy Agency executive director Fatih Birol in September forecasted the beginning of the end for global crude demand, but the oil and gas industry has effectively bet on the opposite.

A JPMorgan commodities strategist this week said demand for oil in emerging markets is vastly underestimated, and peak oil demand won’t be seen in our lifetime.

Jim Mitchell, head of Americas oil analysts for Refinitiv, said the surge in deal-making means corporations expect oil to be a major source of energy for a long time, and US firms are growing at a rate that allows them to compete on a bigger scale.

“For the biggest of oil and gas companies, the mergers mean they can compete on the world stage with oil companies owned by nations,” Mitchell told Business Insider. “For the mid-size and smaller oil and gas companies, the mergers give financial health in an environment where financing will continue to be difficult.”

The pace of merger and acquisitions next year will likely cool, in his view, but the oil market will remain strong.

“We’re seeing big players buying up smaller companies, as it is an easy way for them to add incremental production to their books,” Kpler’s Smith said. “It’s also an efficient way of them snapping up tried and tested assets and acreage.”

Meanwhile, notwithstanding recent declines in crude prices, Mitchell highlighted that a prolonged run of relatively higher prices has helped heal balance sheets from the “financial bloodbath that was COVID,” and provided capital for investments or returning money to shareholders.

“My opinion,” Mitchell said, “is that both the consolidation and the oil boom suggest demand will remain high and increasing at least through the remainder of this decade.”

Source: Finance.yahoo.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post The oil industry’s mega-merger spree and a US production boom point to strong crude demand for years to come appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Woke Duke Energy Jacks Up Electric Rates to Pay for ESG, Zero Carbon Mandates

Energy News Beat

Duke Energy has thrown consumers under the proverbial (electric) bus to make their operations carbon neutral by 2050. As a result, electricity prices in North Carolina may increase by 19% over the next three years.

The company’s president, Lynn Good, receives more than $20 million annually in compensation financed in part by ensuring that consumers lower their carbon emissions.

Following the 2021 enactment of the Energy Solutions for North Carolina Act, the vertically integrated Duke Energy is attempting to decarbonize the Tar Heel State by 70% by 2030 and fully decarbonize by 2050. This misguided initiative will force everyday families to subsidize a complete overhaul of the state’s power grid at a total cost approaching $160 billion.

The North Carolina Utilities Commission report and Chapter 4 of Duke’s 2023 Carolinas Resource Plan encourage the exploration of using dynamic rate designs in order to raise prices just when consumers need to use power the most. Essentially, the plan would increase the prices for power in the dog days of summer and the depths of winter. Even everyday activities such as cooking dinner, watching a TV show, or doing the laundry in the late afternoons and evenings could be subject to rate increases.

Duke’s exclusive focus on environmental, social, and governance nonsense has led it to shut down 56 coal-powered generators since 2010. The company has abandoned meritocracy and has mandated that a quarter of its workforce be women and people of color, irrespective of ability. Additionally, it wants to reduce customer energy consumption by 24,000 gigawatt hours and lower peak summer demand by 7,000 megawatt hours by 2025.

This focus on fake frugality over providing value can already be seen in its corporate history.

Duke announced it would pay more than $200 million to clean up its leeched toxic coal waste that spilled into ground water in Indiana, but subsequently tried to illegally and retroactively raise rates on the very consumers it harmed to pay for it. Additionally, Duke shut off power to more than half a million residents of North Carolina on Christmas Eve of 2022. No warnings were given when it took 1,300 megawatts of coal and natural gas capacity offline, ruining many family gatherings as temperatures fell to the low single digits.

The North American Electric Reliability Corp. warned Duke and other operators in the South in its 2018 report that these power plants needed to be weatherized properly. Additionally, the largest factor leading to outages was Duke’s failure to purchase dedicated or firm gas supplies for Christmas Eve, the exact issue a 2019 report from the American Petroleum Institute addressed.

Perhaps Duke—which employs more than 26,000 people and serves almost 10 million customers with natural gas and more than 50,000 megawatts of electricity in North and South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee—should refocus its efforts on providing electricity, rather than virtue signaling.

With an annual profit of $2.56 billion in 2022, Duke has ample resources to stabilize the grid without raising rates.

Instead, the quest to decarbonize North Carolina would cost between $140 billion and $160 billion through 2050, according to the John Locke Foundation’s analysis of Duke’s various carbon plans. The plans’ overemphasis on solar and wind and on unrealistic pricing of hydrogen come at the expense of “reliable, dispatchable power plants that would decarbonize at the lowest possible cost.”

Perhaps Duke is even aware of this, as it is trying to sell off its unregulated renewables division to Brookfield Renewable, which explicitly assumes carbon pricing in its investment process, despite the cost of carbon being far from settled. However, Duke is still pushing forward with its $150 million lease of the Carolina Long Bay for an offshore wind farm that will have the same inefficiencies, ecological damage, and tourism-destroying effects as New Jersey’s.

Even if the entire United States halted all fossil fuel emissions right now, global temperatures would only decline by 0.02 of a degree Celsius by the year 2100.

Despite the math not being in their favor, Democrats have weaponized ESG by imposing corporate environmental and social policy on companies that then in turn lobby legislatures, such as North Carolina’s, for decarbonization and massive tax subsidies.

Furthermore, the Federal Reserve has been indirectly backing the ESG wokeness that has pervaded corporate America, potentially leading to another banking crisis. North Carolina should repeal its law and join the ranks of the 31 state attorneys general who stand against woke investing.

Instead of continuing down the ESG path, North Carolina should take a page from South Carolina and explore electricity market reform.

The Brattle Group’s report for South Carolina suggested making a Southeast Transmission Organization with North Carolina and other Southern states to save each customer between $115 and $187 annually. Additionally, the benefits for South Carolina adopting such competitive investment reforms could be as high as $370 million a year if the state fully participates. Other states, such as North Carolina, could also see similar benefits, and it would further stabilize every state’s power grid.

If North Carolina wants to strengthen its economy and serve its residents, the state should deregulate the electricity market and foster a business culture encouraging economic development, regardless of ideology.

Renewables projects and their storage capacities that are economically viable should be able to compete against other sources without $160 billion in state subsidies or making consumers pay for the energy transition.

Certainly, North Carolina should not support policies that make electricity increasingly unaffordable to its residents and push them into poverty.

Source: Dailysignal.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Woke Duke Energy Jacks Up Electric Rates to Pay for ESG, Zero Carbon Mandates appeared first on Energy News Beat.