Daily Energy Standup Episode #249 – Weekly Recap: Wind Project Challenges, Pro-Nuclear Bills, LNG in Southeast Asia, Gas Discovery Operatorship Shift, Sinopec’s LNG Tank, Stellantis’ Hybrid Ram, Texas $10B Fund for Gas Plants

Energy News Beat

Daily Standup Weekly Top Stories

Daily Caller: Do Big Wind Project Cancellations Signal Peak Subsidy Has Been Reached? Will the IEA even admit the issue?

ENB Pub Note: David Blackmon’s article from the Daily Caller is excellent, and we highly recommend that you follow the Daily Caller and his personal substack. We also highly recommend subscribing to all of his […]

House panel advances raft of pro-nuclear bills

At a legislative markup session last week, a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee approved 17 energy bills for consideration by the full E&C committee, including 12 measures to boost and streamline the deployment of nuclear […]

Southeast Asia’s LNG investments predicted to peak by 2040: Study

More natural gas facilities than ever will be firing in Southeast Asia almost two decades from now, according to a report by Singapore-based research firm Asia Research & Engagement (ARE). Led by Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore, the region currently […]

Following BP’s exit, operatorship of giant gas discoveries changes hands, as US player takes the reins

U.S.-headquartered oil and gas exploration and production company Kosmos Energy has boosted its working interest and taken the operatorship helm of giant gas discoveries offshore Senegal, after BP’s withdrawal from the field. This is subject […]

Sinopec’s colossal LNG tank bolsters winter gas supply – 541M gallons

China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) achieved a significant milestone on November 2, 2023, as they officially put into service the world’s largest LNG storage tank at their Qingdao LNG Receiving Terminal. With a staggering storage […]

Stellantis’ new Ram pickup is an EV — with a gas-powered generator in case the battery runs out

Stellantis plans to produce an industry-first pickup for its Ram Trucks brand that’s equipped with an onboard gas engine and electric generator. The truck can operate as a zero-emissions EV until the vehicle’s battery dies […]

Texas voters approve $10B energy fund, with most going to build gas-fired power plants

By about a two-thirds margin, voters in the Lone Star State on Tuesday approved a constitutional amendment authorizing a new $10 billion Texas Energy Fund to provide low-interest loans to build gas-fired power plants, develop […]



Highlights of the Podcast

00:00 – Intro
01:48 – Daily Caller: Do Big Wind Project Cancellations Signal Peak Subsidy Has Been Reached? Will the IEA even admit the issue?
04:12 – House panel advances raft of pro-nuclear bills
09:37 – Southeast Asia’s LNG investments predicted to peak by 2040: Study
11:49 – Following BP’s exit, operatorship of giant gas discoveries changes hands, as US player takes the reins
13:41 – Sinopec’s colossal LNG tank bolsters winter gas supply – 541M gallons
15:37 – Stellantis’ new Ram pickup is an EV — with a gas-powered generator in case the battery runs out
18:35 – Texas voters approve $10B energy fund, with most going to build gas-fired power plants
20:25 – Outro

Follow Stuart On LinkedIn and Twitter

Follow Michael On LinkedIn and Twitter

ENB Top News

ENB

Energy Dashboard

ENB Podcast

ENB Substack

– Get in Contact With The Show –

Video Transcription edited for grammar. We disavow any errors unless they make us look better or smarter.

Michael Tanner: [00:00:14] What is going on, everybody? Welcome into a special edition of the Daily Energy News Beat standup here on this gorgeous Saturday, November 11th, 2023. As always, I’m your humble correspondent, Michael Tanner, coming to you from an undisclosed location here in Dallas, Texas, joined by the executive producer of the show, the purveyor of the show, the director and publisher of the world’s greatest website, energynewsbeat.com Stuart Turley, we got a great show for you guys lined up for our weekly recap of we segment and go over our top segments from the week before. Man big weeks do a lot of EV stuff we covered. [00:00:43][29.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:00:44] Oh, it was. It was absolute. You talk about being on a roller coaster. You know, when you and I were laughing and we love the new Dodge Ram, it was coming out that you’re going to have a six cylinder internal combustion engine. And it’s it’s not connected to the drive train. And all of a sudden you’re going to drive down the road with this thing like a World War two submarine and a snorkel on this truck. You know how heavy that truck is going to be? [00:01:14][30.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:01:15] Yeah, it’s going to it’s going to be absolutely insane. You can hear this and all the stories coming up. But before we do that and kick it over to the weekly recap, guys, again, all the stories you are about to hear courtesy that world’s greatest website www.energynewbeat.com here the description below to see all of the links follows Apple Podcasts Spotify at Energy News Beat on YouTube. If I was a 16 year old YouTuber, I’d say smash that like button, but I will avoid doing that and say that’s the best way to support the show [email protected] I’m out of breath tho Stu. Let’s kick it up for the weekly recap We’ll see on Monday, folks. [00:01:46][31.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:01:48] Do wind project cancellations signal peak subsidy has been reached. Where do I even admit the issue? We just we got a lot of the IEA over there saying that oil is still dead. I’ve reached out to them to try to jump on the leadership, to jump on the podcast and their advisor. So we’ll keep you posted. But they. [00:02:11][22.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:02:11] Agreed. But we got the time change switch. I mean, they’re so bad they couldn’t even get the time change, right? So we’ll, we’ll, we’ll try. [00:02:16][5.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:02:17] Yeah, we’ll work on it. They never mind. Okay. When we sit back and take a look, we’re dead. This is all predicated on a dead down here. In one of his paragraphs down here, worst is not the only wind developer taking write downs. Reuters reports that two big oil companies who have invested in Biden’s I’m sure the UK giant BP and Norway’s Equinor took 540 and 300 million. So even oil companies can’t do it right. But what oil companies had was they had income from the oil and gas Rush did did not have. And so first is about ready to just totally, you know, get hit in the back of the head. They can’t even keep going. Now, there is article after article in in our trends on energy news beat dot com. We are seeing lots of trends of people canceling everything. I mean it’s just they can’t support oil I mean wind offshore wind especially. [00:03:22][64.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:03:23] Yeah so offshore wind is has the very has some of the same economics as what I would say large scale you know I would say shale development, exploratory shale development. And the problem is there’s not a legitimate market to someone to sometimes sell these, you know, sell your distribution into the market. So it’s pretty funny. It’s the same stuff that happened in 2012 and been through 2014 with all these crazy shale companies taking up billions of dollars, making no money and investing billions of dollars into drilling new wells that oops, maybe don’t pay the bills. So you’re right, with without oil and gas equinor and BP, they’d be sunk too. Luckily, they do have a little bit of oil and gas in their business. [00:04:04][41.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:05] And the percentage, Michael, that are in the story, go read the story as well later on. But they had the percentage without a ruling gas they’d be done. Meet the House panel in the US. And in answer your question, I think you’re going to have to see some regulatory stuff. Lighten up. It’s been teed up. We’ve talked about it. But the House panel ever advances draft or draft pro nuclear? I don’t have to talk to the knucklehead that put that out there of pro nuclear bills. Jeff Duncan, Representative Jeff Duncan. I’ve reached out to him to see if I can get him on the panel to talk about this on the podcast. But there are some really cool ones that he’s put out here. Let’s get your real big quick quote in here. Our shared goal in this committee is to advance bipartisan durable policy that will expand nuclear energy and its benefits to the nation. He’s the chair of the agency’s energy. Climate and Grid Security Subcommittee. That’s pretty cool. All right. Let’s go through some of these. The Advanced Reactor three Reduction Act fee reduction, so that the they can reduce the hourly rate for the address collected by the NRC and applicants for advanced reactor licenses. Then you have the targeted awards to cover fees for the NRC national nuclear reactor. And then we have the preparation site for the brownfield. There’s some good stuff in here. Modernization of the Nuclear Reactor Environmental Reviews Act to submit a report and conduct rulemaking to facilitate efficiency. There’s some good stuff in here. [00:05:49][104.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:49] Yeah, the government in efficiency, though. That’s two words that you just got to put the word not in front of them. [00:05:55][5.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:55] It’s the first stuff I’ve seen that they’ve even tried. Okay. I am so thrilled to talk about legislative processes that don’t involve Trump or Biden falling asleep or falling off of Air Force One. I was pretty. [00:06:11][15.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:11] Shy. Yeah. Speaking of falling down some stairs. [00:06:15][3.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:15] Newsom. [00:06:15][0.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:16] A favorite governor, is trying to imitate Biden. He fell down earlier last week. He fell down. Oh. [00:06:21][5.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:22] He wasn’t imitating. It was in solidarity. That was his biting. So they removed himself that his bag was not lumpy enough. So he just did the nose, the back dive off of then. So a lot of ten. [00:06:36][13.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:37] So is there anything in here that pushes the regulatory process forward? Is there any one of these bills? [00:06:44][7.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:45] Because I’m going to have to go get copies of them. I will get copies of them and find out the key. [00:06:50][5.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:51] We’ve got 25 different things. They announced the first thing should have been, we’re just going to cut the red tape on a permit, because that’s really the issue, in my opinion, with all this stuff. Not that the technology doesn’t need to advance. Obviously we need the technology, but we have to understand that when, you know, if we can get licenses quicker and that specifically you talk about that license efficiency act, that’s hopefully going to solve it. The problem is there’s a lot of other councils that have to go around it. So if hopefully there’s enough meat on that nuclear licensing efficiency act, which they you know, they were told, you know, not our guy of the week here, the IR Guy, the week should have put that one upfront. It’s about seven down in this list of 18. So we need to that should have been the first thing we talked about. But if there’s no meat on that bone, then I give up because that’s really critical. And I think in in in my opinion, where all of this legislation needs to start is literally getting the legislator out of the way. [00:07:47][55.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:48] Right. I’ll tell you, you know, when you sit back and take a look, that’s what all of this is the thread, the underlying hidden thread between all these articles. People are tired, people are tired. And if you’re an elected official, unless you’re cheating, people are getting grumpy and you’re going to get voted out of office because of high cost of energy regulatory it being redone as part of the high. [00:08:12][24.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:08:13] Cost of you in here. You’ve got to modernize the nuclear reactor. Environmental reviews, which speeds up the NEPA process, which, you know, if you come from the mining business or you come from large infrastructure, you know that NEPA, the National Environmental Policy Act, which is one of the larger pieces of environmental legislation out there, for good reason. It does. It does some good stuff. The problem is certainly in the mining business, a NEPA review could be a thousand page document that you have to submit and could take five years. So I’m glad that’s in there. Again, they’re pitching this all wrong. They need to throw the legislation and the regulatory stuff higher, if only because that’s where the all of the issues come. Yes. You know, we need to have this global nuclear energy assessment and cooperation. And he cares about that. Cut the red tape. [00:08:55][42.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:08:55] Let me ask this. And I’m just asking. The Inflation Reduction Act absolutely did not do that. In fact, as you’ve heard me say, the Dan Bongino, it’s the Porkulus bill. Do you think that they’re learning that you quick work and you call it something else strawman here and then that way they might get it passed? It’s I don’t even know. I don’t know. [00:09:22][26.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:22] I mean, how much of this will actually get passed? I don’t know. It’ll be interesting. Hopefully we can create some bipartisan bipartisan consensus around this because we really need it. [00:09:31][8.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:31] We do. And we all need to get rid of energy poverty in the US. [00:09:35][3.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:35] Absolutely. That’s what we’ve been on. [00:09:37][1.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:37] In Southeast Asia. LNG investments predicted to peak by 2040. So we have a peaker here on the show. He just happened to walk in. I think it was Jerry Nadler as he was walking on stage more natural. Again, that was funny, by the way. More natural gas facilities will be firing in Southeast Asia in more than two decades, that is. Chestnut. Here comes if allowed to continue. The expanded LNG stands to thwart efforts to keep global warming below 1.5. Growing investment in LNG by the Philippines, Vietnam and other Southeast Asians will not only help push the world the world further beyond this critical target. People don’t understand that the only successful markets that will be rolling will be the Asian markets, because they’re going to continue to use low cost energy and they’re going to actually have a lower input imprint than using renewables. Look at this, Michael. The Philippines received a shipment in April to fuel a 1200 megawatt power plant, even though through its declining reserves in the natural gas field, the LNG is saving Asia. [00:10:59][81.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:11:00] Yep. Well, because it’s it’s it provides again, that baseload energy that people so desperately need, specifically where you’re in a part of the world where access to low cost energy can drastically improve your standard of living. You know, I think it’s interesting. Kurt Metzger, he’s the energy transition director for that Asian Research Council. He said Southeast Asia’s limited legacy LNG infrastructure makes the pivot to low carbon power sources a viable option compared to investing in new LNG infrastructure. So I think what they’re attempting to do is say since they don’t have any LNG, we might as well go build some unprofitable wind and solar, so we know where that’ll end up. [00:11:41][40.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:11:41] Oh, absolutely. It’ll be back into Germany shooting themselves in the foot and, you know, providing some extra shoes for them to eat in the winter. Following BHP’s exit operatorship of giant gas discoveries changes hands as U.S. player takes the reins. I really like this one. And Cosmos is the, I believe, Dallas based energy firm that’s taking over for this. And I was looking around on their website today and they are a offshore firm. Do you know much about them? [00:12:16][35.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:12:17] I mean, I know a little bit about Cosmos. I know the fact that, you know, they’re they’re they’re what I would call a cash flow style company, which means they’re going to live and die off cash flow. And if they’re going in and acquiring this 90% working interest specifically in this gas field. Right. They plan to produce the heck out of this 25 trillion cubic feet that they’ve got. So I think it’s an interesting move. I you know, from BP, it probably is more of a consolidation of their assets to the Gulf of Mexico versus a, you know, a move that maybe makes operational economic sense. We know they’ve been pulling off wind farm. This is probably a shift away from heavy natural gas wind assets typically to be able to invest more in their oil business. But it will be interesting to see how this goes. You know, these large project, you won’t know if this is a good deal or not for two or three years, but in two or three years it’ll be obvious whether or not it’s a good deal and we’ll be able to look back and see if that that 25 trillion cubic feet is actually a legitimate number. [00:13:13][56.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:13:14] Yeah. That field your car Tangier gas field he they got 90% working interest in that bed. Doug Mm hmm. That’s a lot. Yeah, it’s. [00:13:24][10.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:13:25] It’s a lot. They can. They’ll be able to crank it up. [00:13:27][2.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:13:27] I’m going to reach out to Andrew in English and see if I can get him on the podcast. That would be a really good one to visit with. See what his thoughts are on it. [00:13:36][8.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:13:36] It would. You want to talk about people in the forefront of energy security. [00:13:39][2.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:13:40] Right there, baby. Sinopec Colossal LNG tank Bolsters Winter Supply 541 million gallons. Okay, This is China’s petroleum and chemical. Oh, wait a minute. Hundreds still on the board. Sorry about that. This is actually in China. So China petroleum and chemical corporations and OPEC achieved a big, big run. They put into service the largest LNG storage tank at their King Lango. LNG receiving that thing is huge. We need one to take a bath. Indeed. [00:14:17][36.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:14:17] Yeah, no kidding. I mean, it’s a sign that China knows that there could be a coming global energy shortage and they’re just doing what they always do playing the ten, 15, 20 year long game. Yeah, it’s they, they again this investment signifies their stance to make sure that they have access to cheap energy regardless of what happens. And they specifically said this is providing a reliable supply to probably 2.1 million households for the next five months. The company claimed in a press release Exactly. [00:14:46][28.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:14:46] Now in Qatar and Sinopec. Sinopec number two, they just signed a 27 year contract for a delivery of 3 million tons per. Per year. Wow. Of LNG. [00:15:03][17.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:15:04] So not saying we are not only locked out of the future energy mix, I’ll tell you that much. Now, is that a bad thing? I don’t know, because we would love to be self-sufficient here. We could be self-sufficient. But it is interesting. We are being left behind when it comes to the global energy landscape. [00:15:18][13.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:15:18] Oh, we are. And and, you know, so here is the world’s biggest renewable manufacture of gear going with LNG, with the world’s largest storage and then the longest contract. [00:15:33][14.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:15:36] All right, we’re moving to wind. Don’t worry. [00:15:37][1.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:15:37] Stellantis new RAM pickup is an EV with a gas powered generator in case the battery runs out. Now, I’m going to laugh for a half a second, but this is actually kind of cool. Tell me you on this one and I’ll tell you why for a little bit and then a yes no. Okay. The truck can operate as a zero emissions Eevee until the battery dies and the electric onboard generator powered by a 3.6 liter V6 engine, kicks on to power the vehicle after its initial charge. Here’s the thing. It’s like an old World War Two submarine. The electric batteries drive the engine. So you get that fast, take off, you get all that. But the problem is your gas. And then the range on these things was crazy. The range on it could go down 690 miles. Yeah, I was like, Man, this is kind of good. And the torque would be great for killing. The problem is the body mass is going to weigh more than some of my college date. I mean, this is going to be nuts. Hey, I went to Oklahoma State. If you had you know, you went out to the dairy barn and, you know, hey. [00:16:58][80.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:59] This is hilarious, though. So a couple of things here, Stu. Diane estimates that that range of the RAM charge will be up to 960 miles. Not terrible, but only 145 miles of that is supposed to be powered by the 92 kilowatt hour battery when fully charged without the rest. So only 145 of those miles we can contribute to the battery. What I love about this is they’re calling it an EV. Wait, wait. Isn’t this a hybrid? Is it really a hybrid vehicle? [00:17:24][25.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:25] By definition. [00:17:25][0.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:17:26] From the top of our lungs, That hybrid is probably the way the place where car should go. Maybe this means remember Toyota two years ago, they didn’t get into the EV space, right? What did they do? They went in with the hybrid. I think this is the first step from Stellantis, who again, owns Chrysler and GM. So when you hear Stellantis think GM, Dodge, Chrysler, all that jazz, they’re dipping their toe into the hybrid space. IR Guy of the week on this one because this is sleight of hand in my opinion. [00:17:50][24.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:51] There’s there’s about 16 sleight of hands over here and that is very very good for them do do do do do they’re going after all tax incentives that they can because from a technical standpoint, it needs an electric ATV. And but yet you’re going to get people like me that are going a I got to drive a thousand miles to the office in a vehicle. [00:18:16][25.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:18:17] But you’ve got six mice in the backseat losing their mind on a treadmill to power the thing. So. [00:18:21][4.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:18:22] Oh, absolutely. But then you sit back and it will power a house. So now you can burn your I wonder if they’re going to have this in a diesel model so that I can get me a diesel. And then. Just kidding. Okay, that was bad. Texas voters approved 10 billion energy fund with most going to gas fired power plants to stabilize the grid. Michael, I love me from Texas. I love having Texas license plates. I love sitting here in West Texas by a two thirds margin. Voters in the Lone Star State Tuesday approved a constitutional amendment by authorizing a new 10 billion energy fund to provide the low interest loans to build gas fired power plants. Wow, how awesome is that? There’s another eight 1.8 billion to support the development of microgrids and backup power for critical facilities. This is smart. This is Texas doing it right again? [00:19:22][60.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:22] Yeah. No, it’s it’s absolutely doing it right. And again, when it comes down to it, what is the new electricity that’s being built? Well, it’s gas fired generation and they say through reliable grid improvement can’t do that with wind or solar. [00:19:36][13.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:36] Now. [00:19:36][0.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:38] We’d be remiss to say if Texas, ironically, isn’t the one who is it one of the more advanced renewable energy states, which I think is fascinating to talk about because wind and solar are a great insurance program when it comes to backup power and grid specifically backup power and what’s known as dispatchable gen ers, what’s not non dispatchable generation because dispatchable generation would be considered baseload. It can be great with alongside great baseload energy. So again, Texas, they’re doing it right, in my opinion, and going gas fired over rolling this out for new wind farms. [00:20:10][32.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:11] Oh, I agree. And I think this is going to be part of the thing that we’re seeing, Michael. I have never seen this kind of activity with everybody around the world bailing on wind farms. I mean, it’s wind is dead. Long live natural gas. [00:20:11][0.0][1164.1]

– Get in Contact With The Show –

 

The post Daily Energy Standup Episode #249 – Weekly Recap: Wind Project Challenges, Pro-Nuclear Bills, LNG in Southeast Asia, Gas Discovery Operatorship Shift, Sinopec’s LNG Tank, Stellantis’ Hybrid Ram, Texas $10B Fund for Gas Plants appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

‘Nuclear warming’ is biggest global threat – Trump

Energy News Beat

The incompetence of current Washington threatens WWIII, the 45th US president has argued

The real threat to the world is not global warming but nuclear warming” from a possible atomic war, former US President Donald Trump has said in an interview. He pointed to the Biden White House as the reason “everything is horrible” in both the US and around the world.

Trump, who was president between 2017 and 2021, is running for the office again. He gave an exclusive interview to the Spanish-American outlet Univision at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Thursday evening.

“Three years ago, we had no problems. We had no inflation. We had no Ukraine problem. We had no Israel problem. We had no problems literally whatsoever. We had a border that was secure, the most secure it’s ever been. The United States economy was the strongest it’s ever been,” Trump told Univision’s  Enrique Acevedo. “Now everything is horrible. You’re going to end up in a world war. You could end up in World War Three.”

“And when I hear these people talking about the environment and over a 300-year period, the oceans will rise by 1/100 of an inch. And this is such a threat! It’s not a threat,” the former president insisted.

The threat is not global warming. It’s nuclear warming. It’s the single biggest threat to your country, to our country, to every country.

Trump blamed his successor Joe Biden for the current state of affairs, from the war in Gaza to the Ukraine conflict and US relations with Russia and China.

“We have an incompetent leader of the United States. He can’t, he can’t walk off a stage. He can’t find the stairs. He can’t put two sentences together. He can’t talk. And this man is dealing with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and [Chinese] President Xi [Jinping] and all of these people that would probably not say they love us, but we have somebody that’s negotiating for us,” Trump told Acevedo.

The biggest threat to the world is from atomic weapons “and we have a man that doesn’t even know what a nuclear weapon is as our chief negotiator,” Trump added, calling it “a very scary thing.”

Earlier this month, Russia downgraded its participation in the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), citing the fact that the US has refused to ratify it for over 25 years. Moscow has also suspended the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) with the US, saying it was pointless while Washington was aiming for Russia’s “strategic defeat” via Ukraine.

The Trump White House withdrew from two major Cold War arms control treaties, the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) and Open Skies, citing alleged Russian violations. It also dragged its heels on extending New START, arguing that it should be replaced by a new treaty that would include China. The Biden White House extended New START through 2026, but rejected Russia’s comprehensive security proposal in late 2021, setting the stage for the Ukraine conflict.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post ‘Nuclear warming’ is biggest global threat – Trump appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Has The US Lost Its First-World Status?

Energy News Beat

Authored by Daniel Nuccio via The Brownstone Institute,

Everything is dirty. Nothing works. But everything’s also more expensive. And oh, by the way, you don’t have privacy anymore…

That is how I described life in the US to a friend who had been living abroad for a bit more than a decade when we met up earlier this year during his brief return to the states.

We’re not a first world country anymore, I told him. Hopefully our decline stops somewhere around second world, I half-joked. That’s probably the best we can hope for.

Earlier that evening over dinner at what was once our regular spot, he told me of his life as a physician in Poland. I told him about my PhD work on the health effects of social isolation. He told me about the influx of young American soldiers into his current country of residence.

I described to him the dismal state of education back here at home. The lack of standards. The fetishization of boutique ideologies. The compulsory commitments to further favored political causes. 

Now, after a mediocre movie intended for teenagers (or perhaps adults longing to be teenagers again) we meandered in the vacant parking lot of the Barnes & Noble we frequented when he’d return home from college, as well as in the years immediately following our undergraduate work when we were living at home, navigating our first few grownup jobs.

Standing under the sterile glow of aesthetically jarring LED lights, subtle symbols of our country’s progress, I told him about the drive through my hometown earlier that afternoon. The place where I’d grown up. The town where we both had attended high school.

For much of my life, it had seemed like a stereotypical suburb of the 90s, sort of akin to what you’d see in early episodes of The Simpsons. We were by no means Mayberry, but we were a largely clean, peaceful place populated by middle-class people going about their lives the best they could. 

With time, yes, a plethora of mostly little changes occurred and accrued as they do everywhere. The video rental stores and comic book shops had closed long ago. The movie theater at which I watched Independence Day, Men In Black, and so many of the other major blockbusters of my childhood with my dad became a 24-hour gym. 

The Toys R Us my parents or uncles would take me to for new video games and Nerf guns on random or special occasions was now an Indian grocery store. But for the most part, we retained many of the accoutrements of 90s suburbia well into the 2000s.

Yet, on the drive through that day, more stores just seemed abandoned. Everything appeared to have acquired a thin layer of grime I couldn’t recall being there in the Before Times or even on more recent trips home to visit family. There were also far more beggars than I had ever recalled seeing there at any time in the past. 

At the risk of sounding pretentious, beggars and homeless people had always been a rare sight where I grew up. As a child, I thought of them as a largely exclusive feature of the city, seeing them only when my father would take our family Downtown for some excursion to a baseball game or the like, reprimanding my siblings and me if he ever caught us making some discourteous remark at their expense, echoing the admonitions of the teachers and priests at my parochial elementary school that homelessness could strike anyone at any time like some unfortunate disease. I also remember never quite believing them.

Something about the homeless populations I encountered on those rare occasions as a child always seemed indescribably but notably different. Sure, some of them could have been auto workers who lost good union jobs when their plant closed. Yeah, some may have been investment bankers who had fallen on hard times. But even then I could tell many of them seemed to be struggling with mental illness or addiction even if I failed to fully comprehend those concepts at the time.

Now though, in my hometown, that seemed to hold less true.

The lost souls stationed at practically every major intersection along the main road appeared in many cases exceptionally ordinary – and perhaps were until only a few years or even a couple of months earlier when…what? The bar they worked at was deemed unessential by government bureaucrats? 

The restaurant they owned was forced to close because everyone was either too frightened by propaganda to eat out or didn’t wish to deal with all the multifarious government-mandated performative acts of obedience required by those simply seeking to sit down for a meal in public? They lost their low-level job as a municipal employee because they refused to take a medicine they didn’t want and in many cases likely didn’t need? Then again, maybe some still had a job but were struggling to keep up with the sudden spike in food prices?

Although I wouldn’t say I was struggling, I told my friend, it’s hard not to notice that my bag of broccoli and cauliflower seems to have a little more air than a year ago and my hummus container appears to take up a little less space in my fridge, while both items inexplicably now cost a dollar more. If someone was living paycheck-to-paycheck, especially if they had a family, it was difficult to imagine how they could keep up.

My friend reminded me this wasn’t just the US.

The price of basic food items like eggs had gone up considerably in Poland, he informed me. Having traveled more than I have in our current period of Reset and Reconstruction, he also told me how he’s noticed that sex-segregated restrooms were being phased out in a lot of places, circling back to our earlier discussion of the fetishization of boutique ideologies, albeit no longer relegated to university soil.

His saying this reminded me of how a colleague of mine reported something similar when traveling to New York earlier this year, describing the city as Gotham with gender-neutral bathrooms, zombified homeless people wandering the streets, and the constant smell of weed in the air.  

Before parting ways for what would likely be another who knows how long, we went for a drive under the watchful eyes of the automatic license plate readers that sprouted up on practically every street light sometime between the Pandemic Period and our current Reset and Reconstruction phase – more undeniable signs of our country’s progress. We talked about the future. My friend was working through whether he wanted to stay in Poland, move to Canada where his then-girlfriend resided, or return to the US.

I told him I didn’t really know how things were in Poland, but at least the US wasn’t quite as explicitly totalitarian as Canada…yet. I also told him that I had come to acknowledge that pursuing a career as a professor and a scientific researcher long-term may no longer be an option for me given that I had spent the past two years publicly criticizing many of the political positions you’re required not only to profess but actively promote if you wish to teach at a university or do scientific research in the US.

Something else I thought about while we were driving around, or maybe sometime later as I left behind the area in which I had spent so many formative years was how so few people seem to notice so many of these changes – or casually accept them as normal if they do.

One particular example that sticks out to me now is something that occurred not long after my brief reunion with my expat friend. Once more I was driving down the main road in the town in which I grew up. Many stores still just seemed abandoned. Everything still appeared to possess a thin layer of grime. Beggars were still stationed at nearly every major intersection.

This time I was returning to visit my mother for a small dinner. On the way home, I stopped at a Starbucks not far from the Indian grocery store that used to be the Toys R Us where I got my first Mario Kart game as a kid and my first Resident Evil game as a middle-schooler.

Outside the Starbucks was an elderly woman, probably living on the streets, a little more reminiscent of my childhood notion of a homeless person than most of the seemingly newly-minted beggars at the intersections. 

While I waited for my order, I overheard the baristas talking with a couple of customers about her. Apparently, she was always there, always troubled by demons no one else could see. Sometimes she came in and made a mess in one of the bathrooms. Sometimes she harassed customers in a way that went beyond just asking for a couple bucks or some change.

One of the customers with whom the baristas were speaking nodded along with the conversation, mentioning that she worked at a retirement home, authoritatively stating there was a full moon coming. From what she said, the old folks always get like this as the full moon approaches. The baristas nodded along in agreement.

Listening to this, I remember thinking we’re not a first world country anymore, but are we really a 1930s depiction of Nineteenth Century Romania? I knew we had accepted outrageous food prices and a steady population of beggars and homeless people in our suburbs as part of the New Normal, but I didn’t know we had accepted moon madness too.

Then again, maybe I was being overly pessimistic, overlooking obvious positives.

I mean, for all I know, the bathroom in which this old homeless woman suffering from moon madness regularly made a mess was gender-neutral, in which case, if that’s not a sign of progress, I don’t know what is.

Loading…

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Has The US Lost Its First-World Status? appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Pentagon Is Starting To Restrict Flow Of Military Aid To Ukraine As Money Runs Out

Energy News Beat

No more green for Zelenskyy.

With war funding for both Ukraine and Israel now seemingly snarled up beyond repair in Congress, on Thursday the Pentagon said that funding delays have forced the US to begin restricting the flow of military assistance to Ukraine, and the Pentagon has only $1 billion left to replenish stocks of weapons that were sent to the country, according to a spokeswoman.

“We have had to meter out our support for Ukraine,” Deputy Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh told reporters. “We’re going to continue to roll out packages but they are getting smaller.”

Singh urged Congress to break a deadlock and approve the Biden administration’s $61.4 billion request for emergency funds for Ukraine’s fight against Russia, part of a masive $106 billion package that would include aid for Israel and the US-Mexico border, but which now has virtually no chance of passing. House Republicans have sought to separate the aid for Ukraine and Israel, an idea both the Senate and the White House oppose.

Singh said the US had burned through about 95% of previous funding for Ukraine, which she said also totaled more than $60 billion; of course, much of that $60 billion was then rerouted back to the Military Industrial Complex and Deep state back in the US, where it served to boost various military companies, and their political supporters and assorted hanger-on lobbies.

She said the remaining $1 billion is part of a program that allows President Joe Biden to send existing US military hardware to Ukraine and replace it with new orders.

Singh’s warning was only the latest from the administration, which has said repeatedly it’s scrambling to keep military aid flowing for President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s forces. Last month, the Pentagon’s comptroller said a government shutdown, which is also looming later this month, would slow the pace of replacing weapons stockpiles sent to Ukraine.

Perhaps realizing that Ukraine’s military forces are about to expire, Telegraph reported that Russia has amassed an estimated 40,000 troops around the key battlefront in Avdiivka as it prepares for a third wave assault on the shattered eastern town, the Ukrainian military has said.

“They are building up reserves. They’ve brought in about 40,000 men here along with ammunition of all calibres,” said Anton Kotsukon, spokesperson for the 110th separate mechanised brigade. “We see no sign of the Russians abandoning plans to encircle Avdiivka.”

Russian forces, he said, had surrounded the town on three sides and were “playing cat and mouse”, sending up “huge numbers” of drones to scout out Ukraine’s defences.

Ukrainian forces regard the town as a gateway for future advances to recapture territory in the east; alternatively the Russian army expects capture of the town to allow to penetrate deep into Ukraine territory.

Loading…

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Pentagon Is Starting To Restrict Flow Of Military Aid To Ukraine As Money Runs Out appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Rising Inflation Expectations Heap More Risks To Treasury Market

Energy News Beat

Authored by Simon White, Bloomberg macro strategist,

The market’s point of focus in the UMich data is the higher-than-expected inflation expectations figure, which potentially brings more risks to bonds.

One-year inflation expectations rose to 4.4% from 4.2%.

But more saliently for the bond market, the long-term median of inflation expectations rose to 3.2%, its highest since 2011.

As we saw yesterday with the weak 30-year auction, the Treasury market is facing mounting challenges with oversupply and poor liquidity.

Rising consumer inflation expectations compound the issue as the household sector has become the marginal buyer of USTs as other sectors retreat.

Household’s rising inflation expectations therefore point to higher term premium (chart above), i.e. the US government will likely have to accept a bigger discount on its issuance to compensate for the household sector’s inflation outlook.

Loading…

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Rising Inflation Expectations Heap More Risks To Treasury Market appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

How an Ohio-based steel company cut greenhouse gas emissions by nearly a third

Energy News Beat

​Ohio-based Cleveland-Cliffs’ success in beating its goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions from its U.S. iron and steel operations won recognition from the Department of Energy last month.

The progress is part of a broader industry trend to cut pollution that drives human-caused climate change. Yet advocates say there’s lots of room for further cuts.

Cliffs slashed greenhouse gas emissions for almost four dozen U.S. facilities by nearly one-third from a 2017 baseline as of the end of last year. As a result, the Department of Energy named the company a 2023 Goal Achiever in the agency’s Better Climate Challenge.

The steel industry was responsible for about 7% of global carbon dioxide emissions as of 2020, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported last year. That’s roughly one-sixth of all worldwide emissions from generating power, according to a Canary Media analysis of the International Energy Agency data. The iron and steel industry led the industrial sector, with the cement industry coming in second.

The achievement and ongoing decarbonization efforts by Cliffs and other companies stand out because the steel industry has been seen as a hard-to-decarbonize sector, due to its need for high heat and continuous operations, as well as process reactions that emit more carbon dioxide.

At the same time, the energy transition and growth of renewable energy will likely increase demand for steel, and global demand for low-carbon steel should grow as well, according to a McKinsey & Company analysis released earlier this year. Companies in the steel industry also see a need to curb emissions in order to limit the worst impacts of climate change.

“We do know that we play a role in global warming,” said Traci Forrester, executive vice president for environmental and sustainability matters at Cliffs.

Added incentives come from the prospect of possible government regulation of carbon emissions in order to address climate change, as noted in the company’s 2022 annual report to shareholders, released this past April.

Customer demands also play a role. “At U.S. Steel, it’s not just about reducing our own carbon footprint,” said Arista Joyner, who manages financial and sustainability communications for that company. “We must adapt to the changing needs of our customers and their sustainability goals too.”

The traditional method of making steel mixes iron ore in a blast furnace with a high-carbon form of coal, called coke. The carbon combines with oxygen in the ore to form carbon dioxide. The iron melts. Other leftover waste takes the form of slag.

The iron — called “pig iron” at this stage — is then sent to a second furnace that blows in oxygen to make steel from the iron and some other elements. That also releases greenhouse gas emissions.

Together, the two steps account for nearly three-fourths of the U.S. iron and steel industry’s carbon dioxide emissions, according to RMI, a nonprofit whose work focuses on decarbonization.

Much of Cliffs’ progress on emissions is thanks to the 2020 opening of its “direct reduction” plant in Toledo. The facility starts with pelletized iron ore, which comes primarily from Minnesota, where a preliminary baking process has already removed some impurities.

Direct reduction removes oxygen from the ore with reformed methane, which is basically a combination of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Both the hydrogen atoms and the carbon monoxide molecules can combine chemically with the oxygen. So, direct reduction is a lower-carbon way to process the ore pellets. The plant’s output is hot briquetted iron.

The Toledo plant has not eliminated the company’s use of blast furnaces. But hot briquetted iron can reduce the amount of coke needed if its next stop is a blast furnace, Forrester said. Transporting the briquettes while they’re hot also cuts down on fuel needs there or for the oxygen process furnace.

Hot briquetted iron can also go into an electric arc furnace. The steel industry mainly uses those furnaces now to recycle scrap steel.

“The beauty of steel is that it’s infinitely recyclable,” said Rich Freuhauf. The senior vice president and chief strategy and sustainability officer for U.S. Steel spoke at a Reuters Industry Transition conference in September.

Recycling eliminates the need to repeat the carbon dioxide-releasing steps of refining iron ore. And, as the name implies, electric arc furnaces run on electricity. So they could use nuclear power or renewable energy with battery storage instead of fossil fuels.

But recycled steel from electric arc furnaces won’t necessarily satisfy all the forecast demands for steel. Nor does it yet meet the requirements for some higher-grade or specialty types of steel. Those include higher-strength steel and high-ductility steel, which can be formed into different shapes, such as the exposed panels on automobiles.

“That’s really our niche in servicing the automotive market, in addition to many other markets,” Forrester said. Some carbon content can also help achieve different properties in steel.

Cliffs’ emissions cuts also reflect energy efficiency improvements throughout its facilities, Forrester said. And there’s room for more emissions reductions.

Cliffs is part of the Midwest Alliance for Clean Hydrogen. Assuming acceptable agreements can be negotiated with the agency, the coalition stands to get up to $1 billion in hydrogen hub funding, the Department of Energy announced last month.

The hub could help supply Cliffs’ Indiana Harbor and Burns Harbor plants. Hydrogen would likely be blended with natural gas at first, Forrester said. Then, if all goes well, hydrogen could substitute for more or potentially all of the fossil fuel.

Cliffs also was part of the Great Lakes Clean Hydrogen Hub Coalition, which proposed making so-called “pink hydrogen” with excess electricity at the Davis-Besse nuclear plant in Ohio. Although DOE did not pick the project for a regional hydrogen hub award, the Energy Harbor plant has been working on hydrogen production for several years. Spokesperson Todd Morgano said the project “is scheduled to be operational by spring of 2024.”

The steel industry has also been buying more renewable energy. Last December, for example, Cliffs agreed to a 15-year power purchase agreement with EDP Renewables for 180 megawatts of power from a wind farm in Indiana near the Ohio border. State laws passed in 2014 and 2021 make it extremely difficult to site new commercial wind farms in Ohio.

Carbon capture utilization and storage, or CCUS, could also curb the steel industry’s emissions, although its feasibility hasn’t been proven yet.

“While carbon capture technologies exist and are widely adopted in the oil and gas realm and some other industries, carbon capture has never been done with blast furnace gas,” Forrester said. Cliffs has multiple facilities near areas with suitable geologic formations for storing the waste carbon dioxide, she noted.

Other research is exploring whether carbon might be further cut or eliminated from the ore-processing stages. In June, the Department of Energy announced nearly $32 million in funding for projects to decarbonize iron and steel.

One of the 10 projects that won funding, led by Cleveland’s Case Western Reserve University, would use an electric current with molten salt to strip oxygen from iron ore. Case Western is also among the partners for the Center for Steel Electrification by Electrosynthesis, headed by Argonne National Laboratory in Lemont, Illinois.

“From our standpoint, Cleveland-Cliffs has been a good actor to date,” said Nick Yavorsky, an RMI industry analyst who co-authored a September report on opportunities for making near-zero-emissions steel in the Great Lakes region. But, he added, “now we have to look at the big stuff.”

While hydrogen could potentially power all of a direct reduction plant, there are limits on how much could be blended with coal at a blast furnace, he said. Further big cuts would likely call for retiring coal-burning blast furnaces and replacing them with more direct reduction plants. Yavorsky said he also thinks most specialty steel products could be made in electric arc furnaces run on renewables or nuclear power with hot briquetted iron.

Ohio policymakers could support investments to achieve those shifts, including through existing programs for JobsOhio, said Lachlan Carey, an RMI policy analyst and economist who also worked on the September report. Supporting green steel could increase the state’s steel industry employment, while also enhancing Ohio’s ability to attract other manufacturing jobs where companies want access to clean energy, he said.

U.S. Steel has already committed to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, Freuhauf  said. Cliffs has so far shied away from that.

“We take a very practical approach to reducing greenhouse gases and the statements and promises that we make,” Forrester said, adding that while the company has aspirations, it focuses on what it knows it can achieve. “We take action on what we can today,” she said.

The post How an Ohio-based steel company cut greenhouse gas emissions by nearly a third appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

German Gov’t Agrees To Bailout Giant Loss-Making Wind Farm, UK Increases Subsidies

Energy News Beat

Reuters reports the German government, Siemens AG, and other parties will provide billions of euros in project-related guarantees to support Siemens AG’s struggling wind turbine division. This financial assistance comes just weeks after the company warned about mounting losses amid a meltdown across wind and solar industries.

Three people familiar with the talks said that Siemens Energy’s top shareholder, Siemens AG, with a 25.1% stake, is prepared to provide some guarantees. Details are still scant, and nothing has been decided, as an agreement needs to be formally drawn up and supported by all stakeholders.

Last month, Reuters said Siemens Energy was discussing state guarantees with the German government.

Here’s more on the report:

As a result, Siemens Energy fears it will struggle to secure guarantees from banks, and has approached the government and Siemens to obtain a guarantee framework, business news weekly WirtschaftsWoche said.

The weekly, which first reported the talks along with Spiegel magazine, said Siemens Energy is seeking up to 15 billion euros in guarantees.

The German state would assume liability for 80% of an initial 10 billion euro funding tranche, while banks would be liable for the remaining 20%, WirtschaftsWoche said.

Siemens AG spokesperson said the company remained in “very constructive talks to define the best possible solution in the interests of all parties involved.”

Siemens Energy shares in Germany have crashed more than 70% since mid-June as it has abandoned its 2023 profit outlook after a review of its wind turbine unit revealed a billion euro problem. Shares were up 5% on Reuters’ report today.

Meanwhile, a financial crisis continues to accelerate across the wind industry, with the world’s largest offshore wind farm developer, Ørsted, pulling out of major US projects due to soaring inflation costs and a high-rate environment. And the renewable energy meltdown in wind has spread to solar as several solar power company stocks crashed on sliding demand.

And so, hot on the heels of Germany’s bailout of Siemens, Bloomberg reports that the UK government is preparing to offer significantly higher subsidies for new offshore wind farms to get the country’s clean-power strategy back on track after developers shunned a previous auction, because the price was too low for offshore wind to be viable.

Denmark’s Orsted A/S, the world’s largest offshore wind builder, will decide by December whether to proceed with a UK development, while Sweden’s Vattenfall AB shelved a giant project off the English coast earlier this year in response to soaring costs.

While higher subsidies in the next auction round, known as AR6, may well reinvigorate offshore wind development, it will likely feed through to increased electricity costs for consumers still burdened with sky-high bills in the wake of last year’s energy crisis.

The energy transition to renewables across the Western world is cracking. Remember, the Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act was all about ‘sustainable’ wind power… Time for another bailout? 

Loading…

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post German Gov’t Agrees To Bailout Giant Loss-Making Wind Farm, UK Increases Subsidies appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

N.C. industrial group will drop challenge to Duke Energy low-income assistance program

Energy News Beat

​A powerful consortium of pulp and paper mills and large manufacturers said Thursday it would drop its challenge to a Duke Energy aid program — ensuring tens of thousands of poor households in Asheville and eastern North Carolina will receive bill assistance next year after all.

Set to begin in January in Duke Energy Progress territory for a three-year trial period, the program gives a $42 discount for 12 months to customers struggling to pay their electric bills. Large industrial customers help pay for the program with a flat $1.70 monthly fee.

The Carolina Industrial Group for Fair Utility Rates had contended that regulators lacked the authority to approve the program, and that it violated the ratemaking principle that one class of customers shouldn’t subsidize another. The group moved for a delay until the matter was resolved by the state Supreme Court, a process that could take years.

The motions last month prompted a flurry of objections from the assistance program’s many supporters — from the state-sanctioned ratepayer advocate to clean energy advocates like the Sierra Club, who called the complaint over a $20 annual fee “shameful.”

And while these stakeholders looked to the North Carolina Utilities Commission to deny the industrial group’s bid to postpone the initiative, they also hoped the manufacturers’ better angels would prevail.

Perhaps they did.

Christina Cress, the attorney for the industrial group, declined to comment, citing a pending rate case for Duke Energy Carolinas. But she wrote to regulators Thursday that her client would withdraw its request to appeal and delay the bill assistance.

In exchange, Duke agreed to track the program’s costs and benefits and other metrics. The utility and other stakeholders would also “explore … how to identify and implement programs” that maximize existing strategies to help low-income customers, such as weatherization.

Stakeholders also pledged not to try to change or extend the three-year pilot program such that non-residential customers would be charged for it on a per-unit-of-electricity basis.

When the industrial group’s challenge is withdrawn as promised, the customer assistance program can proceed apace in Duke Energy Progress territory. The same initiative could be approved for Duke Energy Carolinas in a ruling expected next month. In all, 124,000 of the state’s lowest-income households are expected to benefit.

The post N.C. industrial group will drop challenge to Duke Energy low-income assistance program appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Oil giant sues Greenpeace

Energy News Beat

Shell is reportedly seeking over $2 million in damages after protesters boarded its floating oil production vessel

Greenpeace is facing one of the biggest legal threats in its history after the environmental group’s campaigners occupied energy giant Shell’s floating oil platform earlier this year, Reuters reports.

According to the news agency, citing relevant documents, Shell has filed a claim in London’s High Court, seeking $2.1 million in damages. The lawsuit also calls for an indefinite block on all protests at the company’s infrastructure at sea or in port anywhere in the world, otherwise Shell is threatening to make claims that could reach $8.6 million.

Shell confirmed to Reuters that legal proceedings were underway, claiming that boarding a moving vessel at sea was “unlawful and extremely dangerous.”

“The right to protest is fundamental and we respect it absolutely. But it must be done safely and lawfully,” the company’s spokesperson was quoted as saying.

Meanwhile, Greenpeace said in a statement that it would accept Shell’s offer to reduce the level of damages it is seeking if the company complied with a 2021 Dutch court order requiring it to cut its emissions by 45% by 2030. Shell has appealed this ruling.

Oil and gas production cut would be ‘dangerous’ – Shell 

In January, four Greenpeace protesters boarded one of Shell’s oil platforms just north of the Canary Islands while it was being transported to the Shetland Islands. The climate activists, who displayed signs demanding that the fossil-fuel company “stop drilling – start paying,” remained on the platform until it reached a Norwegian port.

For more stories on economy & finance visit RT’s business section

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Oil giant sues Greenpeace appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

News organisations reject allegations of complicity in October 7 attacks

Energy News Beat

Four international media outlets have denied accusations they had prior knowledge of the October 7 attacks by Hamas on southern Israel after an article by a pro-Israel media watchdog group HonestReporting questioned their work with Gaza-based freelance photojournalists.

After the publication of the article by HonestReporting, which describes itself as “a charitable organisation” with a mission to “expose anti-Israel media bias”, the Israeli government also demanded explanations from Reuters, The Associated Press, The New York Times and CNN.

In an article published on Wednesday, the website pointed out that the presence on October 7 of Gaza-based photojournalists in the border area breached by Hamas raises “serious ethical questions”. It went on to allege that their presence could have been “coordinated with Hamas” and questioned whether the news outlets “approved of their presence inside enemy territory”.

“Reuters categorically denies that it had prior knowledge of the attack or that we embedded journalists with Hamas on October 7,” Reuters said, responding to the article and subsequent allegations by Israeli government officials.

“Reuters acquired photographs from two Gaza-based freelance photographers who were at the border on the morning of October 7, with whom it did not have a prior relationship,” it said.

“The photographs published by Reuters were taken two hours after Hamas fired rockets across southern Israel and more than 45 minutes after Israel said gunmen had crossed the border. Reuters staff journalists were not on the ground at the locations referred to in the HonestReporting article,” Reuters added.

More than 1,400 people, most of them civilians, were killed in the assault on military posts and border communities.

Since then, Israel has launched an air and ground assault on Gaza, which has so far killed at least 10,812 Palestinians, including more than 4,400 children.

Israeli government spokesperson Nitzan Chen said in a statement that Israel was demanding explanations from the four news outlets regarding the HonestReporting article, saying what the report had described “crosses every red line, professional and moral”.

The AP also rejected allegations that its newsroom had prior knowledge of the attacks.

“The first pictures AP received from any freelancer show they were taken more than an hour after the attacks began. No AP staff were at the border at the time of the attacks, nor did any AP staffer cross the border at any time,” a statement said.

“The role of the AP is to gather information on breaking news events around the world, wherever they happen, even when those events are horrific and cause mass casualties.”

The news agency also said it was “no longer working” with photographer Hassan Eslaiah, one of the four photographers who documented the attacks.

CNN has also cut ties with the photographer, who was pictured in a photograph alongside Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar.

In a tweet on Thursday, HonestReporting said it was not accusing Reuters of collusion but had raised “some serious ethical issues regarding news outlets’ association with these freelancers and asked important and relevant questions that everyone deserves answers to”.

Backlash from officials

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said it viewed with “utmost gravity” the suggestion that journalists working with international media had joined in covering the Hamas attacks.

“These journalists were accomplices in crimes against humanity; their actions were contrary to professional ethics,” it said.

Former Israeli ambassador to the UN Danny Danon went further and called on the four photojournalists to be added to the list “of participants to the October 7 massacre” to be “eliminated” by Israel’s security services.

The New York Times, which works with Yousef Masoud, another of the four photojournalists, called the accusations that its newsroom had advance knowledge of the attacks “untrue and outrageous”.

“We also want to speak in defense of freelance photojournalists working in conflict areas, whose jobs often require them to rush into danger to provide first-hand witness accounts and to document important news. This is the essential role of a free press in wartime,” a statement by the newspaper said.

“We are gravely concerned that unsupported accusations and threats to freelancers endangers them and undermines work that serves the public interest,” it added.

Two outlets cut ties with a Gaza-based photojournalist after pro-Israel site accuses them of prior knowledge.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post News organisations reject allegations of complicity in October 7 attacks appeared first on Energy News Beat.