TotalEnergies Closes Sale of Fort Hills Oil Sands to Suncor

Energy News Beat

TotalEnergies has completed the sale of TotalEnergies EP Canada Ltd., which holds a 31.23 percent working interest in the Fort Hills oil sands mining project, to Suncor Energy Inc.

Aside from the Fort Hills asset, the acquisition also includes associated midstream commitments. The consideration for the transaction is around $1.1 billion (CAD 1.47 billion) and has an effective date of April 1, TotalEnergies and Suncor said in separate news releases Monday. Including adjustments, TotalEnergies said it received a cash payment of roughly $1.3 billion (CAD 1.83 billion) at closing.

Suncor now owns 100 percent of the Fort Hills Project, which it operates. The project is an open-pit truck and shovel mine located in Alberta’s Athabasca region, 56 miles (90 kilometers) north of Fort McMurray. The acquisition adds 61,000 barrels per day (bpd) of net bitumen production capacity and 675 million barrels of proved and probable reserves to Suncor’s existing oil sands portfolio, the company said in an earlier news release announcing the acquisition.

Along with its 100 percent ownership of Firebag and MacKay River in-situ assets, the acquisition provides Suncor with additional long-life, physically-integrated bitumen supply to maximize the utilization of its wholly-owned Base Plant upgraders post the end of the Base Mine life. Suncor’s Base Plant operation includes two mines and extraction operations north of Fort McMurray, in the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo.

In October, TotalEnergies completed the sale of its 50 percent participation in the Surmont oil sands project and associated midstream commitments to ConocoPhillips. TotalEnergies received approximately $2.75 billion in cash (CAD 3.7 billion) after closing adjustments, as well as future contingent payments of up to approximately $0.33 billion (CAD 0.44 billion).

ConocoPhillips owns 100 percent of Surmont and is continuing as the asset’s operator. Surmont is located in the Athabasca region of northeastern Alberta, approximately 35 miles south of Fort McMurray. According to the company website, Surmont’s net production reached 69 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2011.

“With these two divestments over the last couple of months, TotalEnergies effectively exits the Canadian oil sands, focusing our allocation of capital to Oil & Gas assets with low breakeven”, TotalEnergies Chief Financial Officer Jean-Pierre Sbraire said. “The company has hence received more than US$4 billion from these sales during the fourth quarter 2023, out of which, as previously announced, US$1.5 billion will be shared with shareholders as buybacks in 2023”.

Gas Power Plant Acquisitions

Meanwhile, TotalEnergies signed an agreement to acquire three gas-fired power plants with a total capacity of 1.5 gigawatts (GW) in Texas for $635 million from TexGen. The three plants are connected to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the second largest power market in the USA, according to a separate news release. The transaction remains subject to approval by the relevant authorities.

The acquisition is for the Wolf Hollow I plant, with a 745-megawatt (MW) combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plant on the outskirts of Dallas; the Colorado Bend I plant with a 530-MW CCGT and a 74 MW open-cycle gas turbine (OCGT) south of Houston; and the La Porte site with a 150-MW OCGT, southeast of Houston.

The 1.5 GW additional flexible production capacity will complement the company’s renewable capacity in Texas, which currently has 2 GW gross installed, 2 GW under construction and more than 3 GW under development, TotalEnergies said, adding that the acquisition would strengthen its trading capabilities in the gas and power markets.

“We are delighted with the agreement signed with TexGen to acquire 1.5 GW of CCGT in ERCOT. After the signing of several corporate PPA over the last couple of years and the recent start-up of the utility-scale Myrtle solar plant, this deal is a major milestone for our Integrated Power strategy in the ERCOT market”, TotalEnergies President for Gas, Renewables and Power Stephane Michel said. “These plants will enable us to complement our renewable assets, intermittent by nature, provide our customers with firm power, and take advantage of the volatility of electricity prices”.

Source:

The post TotalEnergies Closes Sale of Fort Hills Oil Sands to Suncor appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Glencore Adds Teck’s Mines To Its Global Coal Business

Energy News Beat

Unintended but not unexpected is one way of describing what’s happening to the price of steel-making coal as governments suppress supply in the face of steady demand growth, a perfect recipe for a higher price.

On cue, high-quality hard coking (or metallurgical) coal has risen by 9% over the past three months to around $264 a tonne, and is forecast by Goldman Sachs to rise by another 6% to $280/t before the end of the year.

Multiple factors influence the price of coking coal and its lower-grade cousin, thermal or steaming coal used in the production of electricity, with both blamed by environmentalists and governments for causing carbon pollution and climate change.

But lumping all forms of coal into the same basket and limiting supply growth by withholding mine development approvals, which is what’s been happening in Australia and Canada, is having the predictable effect of driving up the price of coking coal even as thermal coal falls.

The gap, and the promise of long-term demand growth for coking coal, has sparked a burst of corporate activity as some mining companies concerned about the outlook for coal quit and others, confident that the business has a bright future, buy more.

Two recent case studies highlight that point with Whitehaven Coal buying two coking coal mines from BHP in Australia earlier this year, and Glencore leading a syndicate which is in the process of buying the steelmaking coal business of Teck Resources in Canada.

Investor reaction to the deals has been mixed but the Teck/Glencore transaction has produced an interesting stock market reaction with Teck shares slipping 6% lower over the past month and Glencore rising by 8%, the opposite of what normally happens in an asset transaction when the buyer falls, and the seller rises.

The Teck decline is also curious because its exit from coking coal has generated $9 billion which management proposes to invest in other mining interests, especially copper which is one of the key metals in energy transition.

Jonathan Price, president and chief executive of Teck, said in a statement last week that the deal would be a catalyst for the company to re-focus as a Canadian critical metals champion,

“This sale will ensure that Teck is well capitalized and able to realize value from our base metals business and deliver strong returns to our shareholders while maintaining a strong balance sheet,” Price said.

Glencore has a different view, delighted to become the majority owner of Teck’s steelmaking coal business with Japan’s Nippon Steel and Korea’s Posco as minority shareholders.

But what appears to have caught the eye of investors is Glencore’s long-term aim of incorporating the Teck coal mines into “a standalone company” which will also contain the other steelmaking coal assets of Glencore in Australia and Colombia.

The new business, according to a statement by Glencore’s chief executive Gary Nagle, “would be well positioned as a leading, highly cash-generative bulk commodity company, likely attracting strong investor demand given its yield potential”.

Jefferies is another investment bank which shares the optimism for coking coal seen by Goldman Sachs and concern for the outlook for thermal coal.

In a research note published last month Jefferies said: “The outlook for premium low-volatility benchmark metallurgical coal may be the best of any commodity, but it is also seriouslyt underappreciated”.

Source: Forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Glencore Adds Teck’s Mines To Its Global Coal Business appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Residential solar power saves less energy than expected

Energy News Beat

Imagine a household that consumes 1,000 kilowatt hours of energy per month. Then they install solar panels on their roof that generate 500 kilowatt hours of electricity per month on average. How much should their consumption of electricity drawn from the power grid decline after they install solar? Five hundred kilowatt hours is the expectation, but in reality, it’s less than that for most people. Now, they’re consuming more than 1,000 kilowatt hours per month.

This paradox is called the solar rebound effect: the ratio of the increase in energy consumption to the amount that is generated by the solar panels. In new research from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Matthew Oliver, an associate professor in the School of Economics, presented this argument for how the economics of solar power really work, in “Tipping the Scale: Why Utility-Scale Solar Avoids a Solar Rebound and What It Means for U.S. Solar Policy,” published in The Electricity Journal.

“Getting people to adopt this technology does reduce their reliance on conventional energy sources, but not by as much as you think,” Oliver said. “This is because people end up increasing their electricity consumption after adopting solar panels, as an economic and behavioral response.”

People may believe they are saving money due to subsidies, or might perceive that their electricity consumption isn’t as environmentally damaging as it was before—so they leave the lights on longer and appliances running.

Policymakers must account for solar rebound when determining solar subsidies, Oliver argues. Take the example of a typical household. If their solar rebound is 20%, they’re eliminating 20% of the carbon reduction benefits that they should have received from adding panels.

“You have to build the estimated rebound effect into your benefit-cost ratio with regard to how much electricity consumption you’re actually displacing,” he said. “Because it’s not happening on a one-for-one basis.”

If subsidizing residential solar proves to not be worthwhile, then shifting subsidies to utility-scale solar may be a good alternative. While household solar rebound effects happen because of individual consumer behavior, this is not an issue with utility providers. Utility-scale solar could enable solar to reach its full carbon reduction potential.

“Policymakers could consider reallocating subsidies in a more optimal way to support greater investment in utility-scale solar,” Oliver said. “That’s not to say policymakers wouldn’t continue to subsidize residential solar, but there has been an overwhelming policy focus on the adoption of residential solar.”

Source: Techxplore.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Residential solar power saves less energy than expected appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

The Dramatic Downfall of ESG Investing

Energy News Beat
Investors withdrew $14.2 billion from U.S. sustainable funds over the past year.
Global renewable energy funds experienced record outflows in Q3 2023, with stocks plummeting amid rising costs and market challenges.
Political and regulatory changes, including challenges to the Biden Administration’s ESG rule and SEC’s anti-greenwashing efforts, contribute to the decline in sustainable investing.

Investors are withdrawing money from sustainable funds as the ESG enthusiasm of the past few years is waning amid high interest rates, poor returns, plunging renewable energy stocks, tightened SEC rules, and political backlash.

Over the past year, investors have withdrawn a total of $14.2 billion from U.S. sustainable funds in four consecutive quarters of net withdrawals, data from Morningstar showed.

Green Energy Stocks Battered 

Globally, renewable energy funds saw record outflows of money in the third quarter of 2023 as stocks of wind and solar developers and suppliers crashed amid rising costs, higher interest rates, and supply-chain challenges.

Renewable energy exchange traded funds (ETFs), tracking the performance of clean energy companies, suffered a total of $1.4 billion of outflows in the third quarter, the highest outflows of any previous quarter, according to data from LSEG Lipper cited by Reuters.

The record outflows between July and September only partially offset net inflows of $3.36 billion for the first half of 2023, the data showed.

A perfect storm of soaring costs, supply chain delays, rising interest rates, and low electricity prices at auctions have been hurting renewables-related companies in recent months.

“There’s a dark cloud hanging over green stocks,” Martin Frandsen, a portfolio manager at Principal Asset Management, told the Financial Times last month.

Investors Pull Billions From U.S. Sustainable Funds 

It’s not only the recent flop in renewable energy stocks that’s keeping Wall Street away from sustainable investments. The high interest rates and politicians targeting sustainable investing have also played a role in investor decisions, industry executives and analysts say.

In the third quarter of 2023 alone, investors pulled $2.7 billion from U.S. sustainable funds, continuing a trend of net withdrawals that started in the fourth quarter of 2022, per data from Morningstar Direct.

“Although the motivations behind outflows cannot be perfectly quantified, many factors are in play. These include rising energy prices, high interest rates, concerns about greenwashing, and political backlash,” Alyssa Stankiewicz, an associate director of sustainability research for Morningstar, wrote in an analysis last month.

All U.S. funds also saw net withdrawals in the third quarter of 2023, but the demand drop in sustainable funds was steeper compared to conventional funds, according to Morningstar.

As a result of net withdrawals and poor performance, assets in sustainable funds dropped back below the $298.8 billion mark at the end of the third quarter—falling by 17% from the record-high of $358.2 billion at the end of 2021 but up by 10% from the recent low of $272.2 billion in the third quarter of 2022, Morningstar data showed.

Moreover, for the first time ever, more sustainable funds closed in the third quarter than the number of funds launched. Three new sustainable funds launched, and one existing fund was added to the sustainable funds landscape in Q3, while 13 sustainable funds closed and four funds moved away from ESG mandates, Morningstar said.

Columbia Threadneedle, Hartford, and BlackRock liquidated the largest sustainable funds in terms of assets in the third quarter.

As a result, the total number of sustainable open-end and exchange-traded funds in the United States were 661 at the end of the quarter.

After the third quarter, the list of the top 12 worst-performing ETFs in October was packed with thematic funds in the clean energy space, according to Morningstar Direct research from early November. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure UCITS ETF, First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF, and the Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF were the biggest ETF losers.

New Rules And Political Backlash Discourage Sustainable Fund Investors

In recent months, the Biden Administration’s rule allowing employee retirement plans to consider ESG factors in investment decisions has been challenged by Republican-led states. Fund managers say the rule may have impacted the popularity of sustainable funds.

“We found that the demand for ESG investing, by financial professionals working with retirement-plan participants, was more limited than we anticipated,” Ron Rice, vice president of marketing at Pacific Financial, told The Wall Street Journal.

In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been stepping up efforts to combat the greenwashing of labeling funds as sustainable. The SEC updated in September the so-called Names Rule, requiring 80% of a fund’s portfolio to match the asset advertised by its name.

“The updated rule will apply not only to funds whose names suggest a focus in particular investments, industries, or geographies—but also to funds whose names suggest a focus in investments with particular characteristics. This includes names suggesting an investment focus on Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG)-related factors through names such as “sustainable,” “green,” or “socially responsible,” SEC chair Gary Gensler said.

In addition, sustainable investing in the U.S. has been criticized by Republican states, most notably Texas, which says that ESG standards are harming America’s energy industry and threatens millions of jobs. Texas prohibits state contracts and investments with companies that boycott energy companies.

At the end of last year, the Florida Treasury said it would divest $2 billion worth of assets under management by BlackRock because of the ESG investing by the world’s largest asset manager.

“If Larry, or his friends on Wall Street, want to change the world – run for office,” Florida Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Jimmy Patronis said at the time.

“Using our cash, however, to fund BlackRock’s social-engineering project isn’t something Florida ever signed up for.”

Source: Oilprice.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post The Dramatic Downfall of ESG Investing appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

A Massive U.S.-Led Pledge Could Be A Global Gamechanger

Energy News Beat

The United States is preparing to announce a pledge to triple the world’s production of nuclear energy by 2050, with more than 10 countries on four continents already signed on to the first major international agreement in modern history to ramp up the use of atomic power.

Signatories to the pledge, set to be unveiled at the United Nations climate summit in Dubai later this month, include many of the largest current users of nuclear energy such as the United Kingdom, France, Romania, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates, Japan and South Korea, a senior Biden administration official familiar with the efforts confirmed HuffPost. A handful of newcomers that have not yet built reactors, including Poland, Ghana and Morocco, are also said to have joined the pledge.

The plan will put pressure on the World Bank to end its long-standing ban on financing nuclear-energy projects, which the American Nuclear Society, a nonprofit of academics and industry professionals who advocate for atomic energy in the public interest, said was crucial to any buildout.

“Tripling the world’s nuclear energy supplies by 2050 is the catalyst required to halt rising temperatures and achieve a sustainable future,” the ANS said in a statement to HuffPost. “A large-scale build-out of new nuclear energy can only happen with the crafting of nuclear-inclusive lending policies by financial institutions like the World Bank.”

More countries are expected to sign on to the pledge before international negotiators convene in Dubai on Nov. 30 for the 28th Conference of the Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change ― known as COP28 ― the annual two-week summit aimed at brokering a global deal to speed up efforts to slash planet-heating emissions and help countries already suffering from the effects of climate change. The 2015 conference is what yielded the watershed Paris Agreement, the first pact to include the world whole in an effort to cut emissions enough to keep the planet’s temperature from climbing above 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.3 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial averages. The world has already warmed by at least 1.1 degrees Celsius.

“It’s great to see the extension of this commitment to countries like Ghana and Morocco for whom nuclear could be a game-changing technology for energy reliability and emissions reduction,” said Jackie Toth, the deputy director of the progressive pro-nuclear group Good Energy Collective. “Energy demand in Africa is going to scale significantly in the coming decades, so if we’re going to hit our global climate goals, a lot of the new capacity in Africa is going to need to be carbon free.”

Reactors for Units 3 and 4 sit at Georgia Power’s Plant Vogtle nuclear power plant on Jan. 20 in Waynesboro, Georgia, as cooling towers of the older Units 1 and 2 billowing steam. Unit 3, completed in July, is the first new reactor built from scratch in the U.S. in a generation.

When reached by phone Thursday, Toth said she had just left a meeting in Washington of the Biden administration’s Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee at which officials from the Commerce Department, State Department, Energy Department and other federal agencies discussed ways to boost U.S. exports.

Unlike the Obama administration, which canceled key nuclear projects for what the federal government’s own watchdog called political purposes and stacked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with hard-line opponents of atomic energy, the Biden White House has adopted what Toth described as a “concerted whole-of-government effort” to “support nuclear energy as an important component of a clean-energy transition.”

The nuclear pledge, details of which Bloomberg first reported, represents one of the most ambitious attempts by the U.S. yet to reassert itself as an exporter of atomic energy technology. For decades, Russia has dominated the export market, with its state-owned Rosatom nuclear company offering a one-stop shop for reactors, uranium fuel and financing. Nearly one-third of the roughly 60 reactors under construction worldwide are Russian designs, including the debut nuclear plants underway in Turkey, Egypt and Bangladesh. Moscow’s virtual monopoly over key types of nuclear fuel has made Rosatom immune to the sanctions the U.S. and Europe have piled on Russian gas, oil and mineral exports in the nearly two years since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine began.

Ghana President Nana Akufo-Addo speaks at a state banquet at the Jubilee House in Accra, Ghana, on March 27, during a visit by U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris. Ghana, which has yet to build a reactor, has joined the pledge for a global increase in the use of nuclear energy.

Though China has yet to begin exporting its nuclear technology, Beijing has emerged as the world’s new atomic energy superpower, building its own plants so efficiently that the country completed four of America’s flagship new large-scale reactors before the U.S. could complete even one. China is widely expected to enter the export market in the coming years and reportedly offered to help Saudi Arabia build its first nuclear plant in what was widely seen as a direct challenge to the U.S.

Saudi Arabia is not currently part of the Biden administration’s nuclear pledge.

In a sign of cooperation between the world’s two largest emitters of greenhouse gases, the Biden administration this week announced a separate pact with China to triple the world’s capacity for generating renewable energy, such as wind and solar power, by 2030. The White House unveiled the deal during a diplomatic summit in San Francisco that included President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Backing up the same goal in the agreement with China, the Biden administration is forging a separate pact co-led by the European Union and the UAE to triple renewables. More than 70 countries, including much of the African continent, have already backed the renewable energy pledge, and the official said more are signing on by the day.

The U.S. push to address climate change also includes a pact to work on deploying carbon capture technology ― an umbrella term for hardware that filters carbon dioxide out of smokestacks before the heat-trapping gas enters the atmosphere ― with an aim of bringing at least a dozen other countries on board before the start of COP28.

Source: Huffingtonpost.co.uk

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post A Massive U.S.-Led Pledge Could Be A Global Gamechanger appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Golar makes progress on FLNG plans

Energy News Beat

Golar LNG said it continues to progress the company’s FLNG growth pipeline, while it is now in detailed commercial discussions to recharter its Hilli FLNG.

The LNG firm led by Tor Olav Trøim said in its third-quarter report that it continues to hold talks on recontracting Hilli upon the end of its current charter in July 2026 with a “number of counterparties and gas field owners”.

Golar said it is now in “detailed commercial discussions for three recontracting opportunities with a 2024 commitment targeted.”

The FLNG, located offshore Cameroon’s Kribi, recently offloaded its 100th cargo of liquefied natural gas since it started operations in 2018.

According to Golar, the unit unloaded its 102nd cargo on November 15, 2023, or more than 7 million tonnes of LNG up to date.

The floating LNG producer has in total four trains installed onboard with a production capacity of 2.4 mtpa.

Earlier this year, US LNG player New Fortress Energy sold its stake in the FLNG to Golar.

Golar acquired a 50 percent interest in trains 1 and 2 of the FLNG.

Besides this FLNG, Golar owns the 2.7 mtpa Gimi which will serve the first phase of BP’s Greater Tortue Ahmeyim FLNG project offshore Mauritania and Senegal under a 20-year contract.

This FLNG has just left Seatrium’s yard in Singapore and is on its way to the GTA hub site.

Golar expects the voyage to take around 60 days, including refueling stops in Mauritius prior to rounding the Cape of Good Hope and in Namibia prior to its arrival.

The firm said that commissioning is expected to take about six months from the commissioning start date with commercial operations (COD) expected thereafter.

This means that the commercial launch of the project could be achieved in the second or third quarter of 2024.

Golar and the GTA partners are “working on initiatives to further optimize the commissioning period in order to achieve COD as early as possible,” it said.

BP’s interim CEO Murray Auchincloss recently said the company is “hopeful” that it will launch the first phase of its Greater Tortue Ahmeyim FLNG project in the first quarter of 2024.

The company pushed back the start of the project due to a delay in the subsea scope.

BP also recently selected Swiss-based offshore contractor Allseas to complete the remaining subsea pipelay scope for the FLNG project, replacing previous contractor Houston-based McDermott.

US firm and project partner Kosmos said in its third-quarter report that the delivery of first gas from the first phase of the project has the potential to slip into the second quarter of 2024.

Golar said it continues to progress the company’s FLNG growth pipeline, including advancing commercial terms with gas resource owners, technical site-specific work, and governmental interaction and approvals across “several West African countries”.

“We are also seeing increasing interest for our market leading FLNG solution in other geographies, including the Americas,” it said.

Most of the projects under discussion are structures where Golar either participates as an equal partner with the gas resource owner and upstream partner in a gas field development, or commercial structures where Golar is exposed to gas offtake prices, it said.

“Golar’s market leading capex per ton and focus on proven gas reserves with attractive lifting costs in geographical areas with shorter shipping distances to end users versus US export projects secures a low break-even LNG production cost with attractive upside to current and forward LNG prices,” the firm said.

In August, Golar signed a heads of terms with Nigeria’s NNPC for joint development of gas fields using floating LNG producers, expanding on their deal signed in April this year.

The relevant fields could fully utilize FLNG Hilli following the end of its current contract in mid-2026, or utilize a MKII FLNG with an annual capacity of 3.5 mtpa, Golar previously said.

Earlier this year, Golar exercised its option to acquire the 148,000-cbm Moss-type carrier, Fuji LNG, which it aims to convert to a floating LNG producer.

The firm said that the cost of a converted Fuji FLNG is expected to be around $2 billion, equivalent to about $570 per ton.

“We continue to progress construction of long lead item orders for a MKII 3.5 mtpa FLNG project and expect to take delivery of the Fuji LNG carrier intended for FLNG conversion during Q1 2024,” Golar said in the third-quarter report.

The company said that engineering and detailed design is “fully developed and ready for project initiation.”

However, the complexity of offshore gas developments drives the timeline for these contemplated FLNG growth projects, it said.

“Until commitments on a gas field and secured debt financing are in place, we do not plan to take a final investment decision or incur significant incremental MKII FLNG capex beyond current committed levels,” the company said.

Golar also said in the report that its remaining LNG carrier, Golar Arctic, has completed a 12-month charter in September and its 5-year drydock in early November.

The 2003-built steam LNG carrier has a capacity of 140,000 cbm.

“Alternatives for this vessel including conversion projects, chartering, or sale are being considered,” Golar said.

The company also finalized the sale of the 1977-built LNG carrier, Gandria, for net consideration of $15.2 million.

Golar reported a net income of $114 million in the third quarter, and adjusted Ebitda of $75 million, inclusive of $39 million of non-cash items.

During the quarter, Golar repurchased 0.2 million shares at an average cost of $21.36 per share, leaving 105.9 million shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2023.

Golar’s board of directors approved a total third-quarter dividend of of $0.25 per share to be paid on or around December 11, 2023.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Golar makes progress on FLNG plans appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Chevron says third Gorgon LNG train returns to full production

Energy News Beat

A Chevron spokesperson said that Gorgon Train 3 had returned to full production “over the past few days.”

The spokesperson did not provide any additional information.

Earlier this month, Chevron said that an electrical incident occurred on October 31 in a substation which provides power supply, resulting in the plant’s third train to produce at 80 percent capacity.

Chevron said domestic gas and the remaining two LNG production trains at the Gorgon plant were unaffected.

The Gorgon LNG plant on Barrow Island has three trains and a production capacity of some 15.6 mtpa.

Chevron and its workers at the Gorgon and Wheatstone LNG terminals recently agreed on new labor agreements following lengthy negotiations between Chevron and unions representing the workers.

In September, Chevron also resumed full production at its 8.9 mtpa Wheatstone LNG terminal near Onslow after a fault reduced about 25 percent of the plant’s production.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Chevron says third Gorgon LNG train returns to full production appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

India and Russia hold joint naval drills

Energy News Beat

22 Nov, 2023 06:47

HomeIndia

The joint exercise in the Bay of Bengal is aimed at countering global threats and ensuring safe shipping in the Asia-Pacific region, Moscow said

The Russian and Indian navies are holding joint drills in the Bay of Bengal, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced on Tuesday.

The exercise is aimed at “comprehensively developing and bolstering naval cooperation” between the two countries, as well as jointly countering global threats and ensuring safe shipping in the Asia-Pacific region, the statement noted.

During the drills, naval sailors from both countries are conducting joint maneuvering in various naval formations and holding air defense and communications exercises,” the ministry added. During the course of the exercise, which will wrap up on Wednesday, the navies will work out the replenishment of supplies on the move as well as the joint-use of deck-based helicopters.

Two ships from Russia’s Pacific Fleet, the Admiral Tributs, a large anti-submarine guided-missile destroyer, and the Pechenga, a medium sea tanker, are participating in the drills along with two Indian naval ships: the INS Ranvijay, a Rajput-class destroyer, and the INS Kiltan, an anti-submarine warfare corvette. Warplanes and helicopters are also taking part in the exercise.

The Russian warships had arrived at the Indian port of Visakhapatnam on Saturday, the defense ministry said.

The joint drills are being conducted a week after Moscow and New Delhi held high-level talks on bilateral issues, including trade, economic cooperation, connectivity and defense.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko and Indian Foreign Secretary Vinay Kwatra met on November 13 in New Delhi, where they discussed in detail the engagement in key areas of cooperation and confirmed their commitment to “strengthening coordination in the international arena, including at the UN, as well as at the sites of the Group of Twenty, BRICS and SCO,” the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement.


READ MORE:
Russia and India sign deal on Igla-S missiles – TASS

Meanwhile, India is also holding the 14th edition of its Vajra Prahar drills involving the Indian Army and US Army Special Forces, the country’s defense ministry announced on Tuesday. The drills are held at the Joint Training Node in Umroi, in the northeastern state of Meghalaya. Over the course of three weeks, both sides will jointly plan and rehearse a series of special operations, counterterrorist operations, and airborne operations in mountainous terrain.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post India and Russia hold joint naval drills appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Clean Energy start-ups are struggling as they wait for government aid

Energy News Beat

Oil Price

Some American clean energy and technology startups are struggling to keep afloat while waiting for the U.S. Administration to disburse the pledged loans and funds under the landmark Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

Source: Oil Price

Several startups have already filed for bankruptcy, others have flagged the ability to continue as a going concern or hired advisors to evaluate financing and strategic alternatives as soaring construction costs and high interest rates challenge their initial plans and timelines for having production sites up and running.

The IRA, passed in August last year, has nearly $370 billion in climate and clean energy provisions, including investment and production credits for solar, wind, energy storage, critical minerals, funding for energy research, and credits for clean energy technology manufacturing such as wind turbines and solar panels.

However, many developers and manufacturers are still waiting for guidance on which specific technologies – including in the hydrogen and low-carbon fuels industries – would qualify for tax credits under the IRA.

Large diversified companies with deep pockets – including fossil fuel producers such as Exxon, Chevron, or Occidental proposing blue hydrogen and direct air capture technologies – can afford to wait to get loans from the Loan Program Office under the IRA.

But small startups created and focused on one clean energy technology only are struggling without government funding.

“If we were part of a larger company, you have a larger whole that absorbs the impact. This is the main show for us,” Ajay Kochhar, chief executive at battery recycling startup Li-Cycle, told The Wall Street Journal in an interview.

Li-Cycle said last month it is pausing construction work on its Rochester Hub project pending the completion of a comprehensive review of the go-forward strategy for the project. The company flagged “escalating construction costs” that now exceed its previously disclosed guidance.

“The Company is actively engaged and continues to work closely with the DOE to satisfy conditions precedent for financial close for the loan for gross proceeds of up to $375 million as it undertakes its comprehensive review of the go-forward strategy of the Rochester Hub,” Li-Cycle said earlier this month.

Li-Cycle has also engaged Moelis & Company as financial advisor to assist in evaluating financing and strategic alternatives for the company.

Another startup, Plug Power, aiming to produce green hydrogen, warned earlier this month that it expects its existing cash and available for sale and equity securities will not be sufficient to fund its operations through the next 12 months, and “These conditions and events raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

NuScale Power, which develops small modular reactor (SMR), terminated in early November the Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) it was planning with Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (UAMPS) in Idaho as “it appears unlikely that the project will have enough subscription to continue toward deployment.”

These are just three examples of stalled or canceled projects due to rising costs and the slow process of DOE disbursing funding to startups.

In the summer, U.S. electric truck manufacturer Lordstown Motors filed for bankruptcy, and so did EV technology manufacturer Proterra, which saw Volvo Battery Solutions as the winning bidder to acquire the Proterra Powered business line as part of a Chapter 11 sales process.

Despite supply-chain and tariff challenges unrelated to the IRA and despite the fact that developers are still waiting for clarity on some of the IRA provisions, the benefits of the landmark climate law have started to manifest themselves, clean energy associations say.

Between August 2022 and July 2023, more than $270 billion in capital investment was announced for utility-scale clean energy projects and manufacturing facilities in the United States, the American Clean Power Association (ACP) said in a recent report. This exceeds the combined clean energy investments made over the previous eight years.

However, IRA funding is sometimes a Catch-22 for startups. The Administration won’t issue the loans until the companies have moved ahead with projects and external financing, which many firms struggle to do due to soaring costs and interest rates.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Clean Energy start-ups are struggling as they wait for government aid appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Enviva, the world’s largest biomass energy company, is near collapse

Energy News Beat

The forest biomass energy industry took a major hit this month, as Enviva, the world’s largest producer of wood pellets — burned in former coal power plants to make energy on an industrial scale — saw catastrophic third quarter losses. Enviva’s stock tanked, its CEO was replaced and the company seems near collapse.
Founded in 2004, Enviva harvests forests in the U.S. Southeast, with its 10 plants key providers of wood pellets to large power plants in the EU, U.K., Japan and South Korea — nations that use a scientifically suspect carbon accounting loophole to count the burning of forest wood as a renewable resource.
A former manager and whistleblower at Enviva told Mongabay in 2022 that the company’s green claims were fraudulent. Last week, he said that much of Enviva’s downfall is based on its cheaply built factories equipped with faulty machinery and on large-scale fiscal miscalculations regarding wood-procurement costs.
How the firm’s downfall will impact the global biomass for energy market, and worldwide pellet supply, is unknown. European and Asian nations rely on Enviva pellets to supply their power plants and to meet climate change goals, with the burning of forests to make energy erroneously claimed as producing zero emissions.

This year has been a financial disaster for Enviva, the world’s largest producer of wood pellets for the biomass energy industry. With more than $250 million in losses to date and worsening results expected in the fourth quarter, the once high-flying company’s viability, by its own admission, is in grave doubt.

Also in question is where Enviva’s European Union and Asian customers will source the pellets they burn in their converted coal power plants and — without those pellets — how nations will meet their energy needs and their pledged Paris Agreement carbon emission cuts.

To many financial analysts who closely follow company performance, Enviva’s near collapse this month appears to have happened rapidly and suddenly. But did it?

“The problems have been there for years. There are lots of issues, but they stem from fundamental challenges Enviva faces in wood costs and keeping its manufacturing plants operating at full capacity,” a former Enviva maintenance manager told Mongabay. “It’s all coming home to roost in a kind of cumulative way.”

In exclusive interviews with Mongabay, the former Enviva employee detailed critical problems he witnessed and grappled with as a top operations manager at two of Enviva’s 10 Southeast U.S. plants between mid-2020 and mid-2022. His insights help explain why Enviva is now in dire financial straits.

Small mountains of forest wood, chipped from whole trees and loaded into tractor-trailers for delivery, are piled up outside the Enviva wood pellet mill in Ahoskie, North Carolina. According to a former Enviva maintenance manager and whistleblower at the company’s plants in North and South Carolina, the mix of wood Enviva uses is 80% pine and 20% hardwood. Pine is cheaper for Enviva to purchase, but it has a quick and corrosive impact on pellet-making machinery, leading to production slowdowns and shutdowns, and very high maintenance costs, the source told Mongabay. Image by Justin Catanoso.

In a Dec. 5, 2022, Mongabay story that reverberated globally, this Enviva whistleblower was the first insider from the multibillion-dollar international wood pellet industry to ever go public. At the time, he accused Enviva of falsifying its green claims and not being truthful about where and how it sourced forest wood for the tons of pellets it makes every day in the U.S. for export.

“The company says that we use mostly waste like branches, treetops and debris to make pellets,” the whistleblower told Mongabay a year ago. “What a joke. We use 100% whole trees in our pellets. We hardly use any waste. Pellet density is critical. You get that from whole trees, not junk.”

But junk wood is cheap, while whole trees are not, and therein lies a part of Enviva’s operational problems.

The former employee — who declined to be named to protect his professional and family’s privacy — said last week that this wood-sourcing deception is one reason Enviva has been losing money.

“Enviva built a business model saying it uses mostly scrap and waste from lumber mills and cut sites to make its pellets,” he said. “If that were true, its feedstock would basically be free. But it has to buy trees, a lot of trees, and it’s competing for them with other companies that want that wood. Loggers sell to the highest bidder, right, and that drives up the price. It’s something Enviva can’t control.”

In its 2023 third quarter filing on Nov. 9 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Enviva wrote that among the myriad reasons impacting its financial viability is “the amount of low-cost wood fiber that we are able to procure and process.”

“So that’s your first problem,” the former employee said. “Your feedstock is costing way more than you’re letting on, and that’s before you start dealing with the costs of making pellets.”

Enviva did not respond to multiple requests from Mongabay for comment.

Mongabay contributor Justin Catanoso spent an afternoon in November 2022 on a 52-acre formerly wooded site in Edenton, North Carolina, being cleared in part for Enviva feedstock. While the company claims it uses mostly wood scraps and treetops for its pellets, Catanoso witnessed whole trees being chipped for Enviva and loaded into a tractor-trailer for delivery to the company’s nearby plant in Ahoskie. Limbs, treetops and wood waste, seen in the foreground, were left behind. Enviva’s publicly trumpeted manufacturing model claims to use cheap wood waste to make pellets; instead, the company uses expensive whole trees, resulting in cost overruns. Image by Justin Catanoso.

Tracking the collapse

For Maryland-based Enviva, 2022 looked to be a financial launchpad for future growth. Revenue topped $1 billion for the second year in a row, up 24% from two years prior. Its stock price hit a peak of $87 per share in April 2022. New multiyear contracts were locked in with taxpayer-subsidized customers across the European Union, United Kingdom, Japan and South Korea as the firm dominated the global market for wood pellets used by the energy industry.

Enviva boldly predicted it would double wood pellet output, from 6.2 million metric tons shipped overseas in 2022, to 13 million metric tons by 2027. With 10 pellet mills operating between southern Virginia and the Gulf Coast, the company secured a $570 million line of credit to build its biggest plants yet in Alabama and Mississippi, which have been under construction.

Enviva could even afford to ignore its persistent global critics, forest advocates who argue the company is increasing deforestation amid the climate crisis by exploiting a renewable-energy policy loophole overseas that — with little scientific validity — designates wood burning as a renewable, carbon-neutral substitute for coal.

The company was on a steady upward trajectory since its founding in 2004. But cracks in the corporate façade broke wide open May 3 of this year in reporting of its first quarter results. Wall Street analysts, who were bullish on Enviva stock at the time, were stunned when the company lost $117 million between January and March, three times worse than it forecasted. Enviva canceled its shareholder dividend, a red flag for a company in distress. Its declining stock price plunged in hours from $21 to less than $8.

Enviva’s stock collapse this year: The company’s stock was trading above $51 per share on January 13, 2023, and gradually slid to half that until the May 3 plunge. It dived again on November 9, bottoming out at 62 cents per share that day, and has not recovered much value since. It is now trading as a penny stock. Source: November 16 end of day trading screenshot from Google.com.

In a conference call, CEO Thomas Meth made a passing reference to operational challenges at Enviva’s plant in Southampton, Virginia — challenges he said were a priority to address.

Things got far worse for Enviva, and Meth, on Nov. 9 with Enviva’s third quarter results. Another $85 million lost, four times more than third quarter losses in 2022. The stock price, which had climbed above $13 in August, plunged to 61 cents as major shareholders dumped their shares. The company acknowledged it had exhausted its $570 million line of credit used for construction of those plants in Alabama and Mississippi, casting those projects in doubt.

Meth was demoted from CEO to president, and Enviva made this startling admission: “The conditions and events in the aggregate raise substantial doubt regarding the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

Glenn Nunziata, who had joined Enviva just three months ago as chief financial officer, was named interim CEO. In a conference call to investors on Nov. 9, Nunziata also referenced the Southampton plant, saying it had improved its operating costs by shutting down half of the manufacturing lines that make pellets.

The former Enviva maintenance manager told Mongabay he knew why.

This aerial view of Enviva’s wood pellet production mill in Ahoskie, North Carolina, pictured in fall 2022, shows the large conveyors and chains in the background that move pine and hardwood chips into dryers to pull the moisture out of the wood before it is pressed into pellets roughly the size of medicine capsules. According to a former Enviva maintenance manager, those conveyors and chains are composed of carbon steel, which corrodes and rusts quickly when exposed to moisture, especially from drying resinous pine. This causes frequent and costly facility shutdowns and delays, which has contributed to Enviva losing millions of dollars over the past two years due to maintenance and manufacturing costs per ton of wood pellets made, creating a huge loss for the company as it sells pellets under fixed-price contracts. Image courtesy of the Dogwood Alliance.

Wood pellets on the cheap: Pine meets carbon steel

When Enviva built its first plants — four in eastern North Carolina along with the one in Southampton, Virginia — the goal was to contract with local loggers to supply 80% hardwoods and 20% pine. That mix proved unsustainable.

“Enviva’s business shifted to 80% pine and 20% hardwood and here’s why,” said the former employee, a mechanical engineer by training. “Let’s unravel the [Enviva] myth. You’re not getting free scraps or tree limbs; you’re buying whole trees. And hardwood costs a lot of money. Also, the thermal value of pine (how much heat it produces when burned) is higher and it’s cheaper to buy.

“But the wood scientists at the company should have known that there is pitch and resin in pine. It’s not environmentally friendly during processing; it releases a lot of on-site air pollution. But significantly for us maintaining the machines, pine is corrosive to anything but stainless steel. And all of our equipment is made out of carbon steel,” which degrades and rusts quickly when exposed to moisture.

If Enviva had been processing mostly hardwood trees into pellets, its manufacturing operations may have held up better, keeping down manufacturing costs of pellets per ton. But its pellet-making machinery, at least in Virginia and North Carolina, being made from carbon steel, while far less expensive to install than stainless steel, couldn’t hold up under the strain of nonstop production demands.

“I couldn’t believe what I was seeing,” the former maintenance manager said. “The carbon steel chains and conveyors were being sandblasted away by all the pine that was going through it. Look, these chains and conveyors are gigantic, and all this equipment is just rotting away because it’s made out of the wrong material. You can’t really repair it; you should replace it. But that’s too expensive. So, you patch it up until it breaks down again. Repairs would range from $700,000 to $1 million — just to patch things up for a while.”

Thus, higher wood-procurement expenses, coupled with expensive equipment breakdowns and repairs, have both reduced output and driven up pellet making costs. This combination turned Enviva’s profits to losses for years on contracts with fixed sale prices per ton of pellets, the former employee said.

In its SEC filing on Nov. 9, Enviva wrote that $21.1 million of its $85.2 million in third quarter losses, or 25%, was attributed to “asset impairments,” which in accounting jargon means damaged equipment and machinery.

The company also noted that its survival is based in part on “our ability to renegotiate customer contracts.”

A loaded logging truck pulls into the Enviva biomass wood pellet plant in Northampton, North Carolina. Image courtesy of the Dogwood Alliance/NRDC.
In the spring of 2019, investigators tracked logging trucks coming from a mature hardwood forest and going to Enviva’s Northampton, North Carolina, facility. The clear-cut, seen here, was located in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, alongside Sandy Creek, feeding into the Pamlico Sound of North Carolina. Image courtesy of the Dogwood Alliance.

Hanging global questions

Forest advocates — who have long decried the stark contrast between Enviva’s forest-friendly claims and its contributions to deforestation during a climate emergency, celebrated the company’s crisis and said they weren’t surprised by it.

“Enviva built a business model based on environmental injustice [and] forest destruction,” the North Carolina-based Dogwood Alliance, an NGO, said in a statement. “The [wood pellet] industry operates on a model of greenwashing, bad climate science, large-scale clearcutting and cutting corners on community protections.”

Many questions remain. In 2023, U.S. wood pellet exports were up 6% through September over last year’s record shipments, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But if Enviva, its 10 plants and the 6 million metric tons of pellets it ships to the U.K., EU and Asia vanishes, who if anyone will fill the gap? If Enviva plants in Virginia and North Carolina remain in the same poor condition as the former employee knew them to be, do they hold much, if any, resale value?

U.K.-based Drax, one of Enviva’s biggest customers, which also has profitable pellet mills in the Deep South, did not respond to questions from Mongabay. Japanese companies Sumitomo and Mitsubishi Corporation are big Enviva customers. But there is no evidence that either is willing to extend a financial lifeline to Enviva or take over its operations.

Fenna Swart, a forest advocate with the Clean Air Committee in the Netherlands, has helped coordinate opposition to EU wood pellet imports and subsidies. She told Mongabay she sees Enviva’s possible downfall as a potential incentive to move away from forest biomass as an energy source.

Forest biomass protestors outside Enviva’s Raleigh, North Carolina, offices. Image by Kimala Luna courtesy of the Dogwood Alliance.

“If Enviva indeed fails to load the bulk carriers to Europe with tons of crushed forests, the EU, and the Netherlands in particular, are expected to seize the opportunity to accelerate the phasing out of [forest biomass for energy] subsidy flows,” said Swart, referring to the billions of dollars paid annually by the EU to subsize wood pellet purchases. “In addition to the decision of the Dutch government last year to immediately stop all subsidies for new biomass projects, this will also limit long-term subsidies.

“We know that EU biomass from [manufacturer] Graanul Invest [in the Baltic states] has been limited since the Ukrainian war,” Swart noted. “With Enviva falling short, if this [trending] development continues, European governments will ideally focus more on [natural] gas as a transition fuel and redirect biomass subsidies to real forms of sustainable energy such as hydrogen and investment in energy savings.”

Banner image: Enviva has long claimed that it uses mostly wood scraps and treetops for its pellets. That’s clearly not true as evidenced by this aerial view showing a massive ring of thousands of whole trees at Enviva’s Sampson County, North Carolina, forest biomass facility. Most wood pellets made in the U.S. are shipped to Europe. Image courtesy of the Dogwood Alliance.

Justin Catanoso, a regular contributor to Mongabay, is a professor of journalism at Wake Forest University in North Carolina.

Source: News.mongabay.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Enviva, the world’s largest biomass energy company, is near collapse appeared first on Energy News Beat.