Why an Ohio welding supply company is getting into the electric vehicle charging business

Energy News Beat

A 128-year-old Cleveland-area industrial equipment manufacturer is among the newest makers of fast chargers for the growing electric vehicle market.

Lincoln Electric’s new Velion DC fast charger adapts and adds to technology the company has used for its welding machines and other heavy-duty power equipment.

The innovation is an example of how more U.S. manufacturers outside of the energy sector are beginning to find sometimes unexpected opportunities to participate in the country’s growing clean energy economy.

It all started almost two years ago when a group of senior engineers walked into president and CEO Chris Mapes’ office and explained the similarities between direct-current electric vehicle chargers and the plasma and electronics equipment the company has long manufactured, adding: “We think we can make these.”

“If you were to open up a welding machine or a plasma cutting machine, you would see power electronics,” Mapes explained, following a ribbon-cutting ceremony in Euclid, Ohio, last week for the company’s new fast charger product. Software engineering works with printed circuit boards to manage power, similar to what happens in a DC fast charger.

The company already has its own printed circuit board manufacturing facility. The innovation challenge was developing software to let a charger interface with any electric vehicle. When people plug in a vehicle, it and the charger go through a series of electronic messages and “handshakes.” Those share information about the car and the charger, as well as details about how much electricity is needed, signals and feedback for a precharge test, and then the actual charge.

Reliability has been a challenge for electric vehicle charging. Drivers can plan trips to stop at charging stations along the way, but out-of-order chargers can cause frustration and derail trips. That all adds to range anxiety.

Lincoln Electric’s new Velion charger, unveiled at an event in Euclid, Ohio last week. (Kathiann Kowalski / Energy News Network)

Steve Sumner, vice president for corporate innovation, said some other EV chargers “were born out of designs and manufacturing strategies that were more appropriate for lab-grade equipment — something that would see its whole life inside in perfect conditions.” In the real world, rain, snow, cold temperatures, hot temperatures, wind, dust and other factors can mess with electronics.

“What Lincoln Electric’s really known for, besides being a very good power conversion company, is making devices that last and live their whole lives outside,” Sumner said, noting that the company’s industrial products have been used on ships, in deserts and even in Antarctica. Likewise, the new charger is “purpose-built for ruggedness in the field.”

One reason for that reliability is that the company coats its printed circuit boards with a clear plastic epoxy. Two circuit boards go together in a metal casing to make 50-kilowatt modules.

Three of those modules make up the heart of the charger’s power tower, which typically sits behind a fence near a grid connection. The relatively few electrical connections between the modules and other parts of the equipment also provide protection from the elements.

“Because it’s so ‘simple’ and clean in design, and well protected, that’s where we believe the inherent reliability comes from,” Sumner said.

As an established company that began in the United States, Lincoln Electric was already compliant with Federal Highway Administration’s Buy America standards, levy standards and other regulatory programs, said Sheila Cockburn, who works with the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Joint Office of Energy and Transportation that advises on those standards.

“They’re leveraging their current technology to enter a newer market,” Cockburn said. “And they’ve been smart in being able to see the vision of where things are going and being able to pivot to use what they have to supply the new market.”

The move is an example of how companies can play a role in the clean energy economy, even if they aren’t currently part of the energy sector, said Rick Stockburger, president and CEO of BRITE Energy Innovators, based in Warren, Ohio. The organization acts as a hub to provide business and technical expertise to entrepreneurs looking to serve the energy sector.

“It’s exactly the type of leadership we need to see from all of our legacy manufacturers in developing new products,” Stockburger said.

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and other recent federal policies and funding programs can help private manufacturers make that transition.

“If you look at what came down in legislation from the past three years, we’re not leaving behind American manufacturing like we did with the solar tax credits in the Obama administration,” Stockburger said. “We put American-made caveats in all of these bills.” And he looks forward to seeing what comes next from other companies.

“The one thing I’ll never underestimate is the power of American innovation,” Stockburger said. “There are just really, really smart people that look at opportunity and frankly are interested in seizing it.”

 

The post Why an Ohio welding supply company is getting into the electric vehicle charging business appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Sentinel Midstream Announces ExxonMobil Joint Venture Serving the Louisiana Energy Market

Energy News Beat

Sentinel Midstream Announces ExxonMobil Joint Venture Serving the Louisiana Energy Market – Oil & Gas 360

Market Data copyright © 2020
QuoteMedia. Data
delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view
delay times
for all exchanges). RT=Real-Time,
EOD=End of Day,
PD=Previous Day. Market Data powered by
QuoteMedia.
Terms of Use.

 

The post Sentinel Midstream Announces ExxonMobil Joint Venture Serving the Louisiana Energy Market appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Maverick Energy Group, Ltd. and Willcox International Holdings, Inc. Form Joint Venture for Lithium Extraction from Saltwater Brine in Oil Production

Energy News Beat

Maverick Energy Group, Ltd. and Willcox International Holdings, Inc. Form Joint Venture for Lithium Extraction from Saltwater Brine in Oil Production – Oil & Gas 360

Market Data copyright © 2020
QuoteMedia. Data
delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view
delay times
for all exchanges). RT=Real-Time,
EOD=End of Day,
PD=Previous Day. Market Data powered by
QuoteMedia.
Terms of Use.

 

The post Maverick Energy Group, Ltd. and Willcox International Holdings, Inc. Form Joint Venture for Lithium Extraction from Saltwater Brine in Oil Production appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Biden administration’s new methane rule to hamper U.S. oil, gas production, trade associations warn

Energy News Beat

World Oil

(WO) – On Saturday, Dec. 2, the Biden administration unveiled a new methane emissions rule at COP28 aimed at “sharply reducing methane and other pollutants from the oil and natural gas industry” by “promoting the use of cutting-edge methane detection technologies,” according to a news release from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Source: World Oil

The news release stated, “Among other things, the final rule will phase in a requirement to eliminate routine flaring of natural gas that is produced by new oil wells; require comprehensive monitoring for leaks of methane from well sites and compressor stations, while giving oil and gas companies flexibility to use low-cost and innovative methane monitoring technologies; and establish standards that require reductions in emissions from high-emitting equipment like controllers, pumps, and storage tanks.”

The final rule also includes a “Super Emitter Program” that weaponizes so-called “third-part experts” to detect methane releases from oil and gas wells.

Oil and gas industry trade associations such as the Energy Workforce and Technology Council admonished the new ruling, warning that the regulation will hamper U.S. energy production. The American Petroleum Institute and the IPAA also released commentary that supports methane reduction and acknowledges the work the oil and gas industry has already done and continues to do to reduce emissions.

Energy Workforce and Technology Council comments. “While Energy Workforce shares the Administration’s goal of lowering methane emissions, we believe yesterday’s final rule will serve as a new tax on American energy production at a time when this industry could not be more vital. The implementation of a new tax on the oil and gas industry will directly impact the ability of Americans to obtain energy to fulfill daily needs, increasing the cost of oil and natural gas prices and decreasing domestic energy security,” said Energy Workforce President Tim Tarpley. “As global energy demand continues to skyrocket in the face of instability overseas, overburdensome regulations are not the answer to reducing methane emissions, technology and industry led initiatives are.”

“Energy Workforce companies have utilized American ingenuity and innovation to create technologies that cut energy usage, reduce methane emissions, detect leaks, and streamline operations,” Tarpley continued. “As an industry, companies are already voluntarily working to rapidly reduce emissions through industry-led initiatives, making the production of oil and gas cleaner, safer, and more cost-effective than ever before.”

Technologies in place include comprehensive methane monitoring, comprised of real-time leak detection that includes the location and rate quantification so that operators can take immediate action to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and save costs. Energy Workforce believes the most effective actions should incentivize the creation of these new technologies and streamline and make uniform the requirements under the rule while not creating overly burdensome federal regulations that serve as a tax on domestic energy production.

“We also continue to have concerns about the third-party emissions monitoring under the rule.  The federal government has taken unprecedented steps to allow potentially biased third parties to gather data and report emissions to the EPA,” said Tarpley.

American Petroleum Institute comments. “We share the administration’s goal of reducing methane emissions and smart federal regulation can help build on industry’s progress to date. To be truly effective, this rule must balance emissions reductions with the need to continue meeting rising energy demand. We are reviewing the complex rule to ensure it meets that dual objective.”

The U.S. natural gas and oil industry is taking action to reduce methane emissions while continuing to produce affordable, reliable energy. Average methane emissions intensity declined by nearly 66 percent across all seven major producing regions from 2011 to 2021.

API submitted comments on EPA’s supplemental proposed rulemaking in February. In the comments, API emphasized the importance of a practical implementation date and flexibility for the use of alternative detection technologies and the associated gas provisions. API also highlighted the need for permitting reform alongside EPA’s regulations to increase takeaway capacity and enable further methane emissions reductions.

Industry-led initiatives like The Environmental Partnership, whose members make up nearly 70% of the U.S. onshore natural gas and oil industry, are helping to accelerate progress on methane emissions reductions by driving collaboration and sharing best practices across the industry.

IPAA comments. “The Producers Associations will be evaluating the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) federal New Source Performance Standards revisions (Subpart OOOOb) and its Emissions Guidelines (Subpart OOOOc) mandating new state existing source regulations. The new source requirements will impose complicated new requirements, and the 2022 proposed existing source requirements have been estimated to lead to the shutdown of 300,000 of the nation’s 750,000 low production wells, wells that are essential to our country’s energy production. The Producer Associations support the cost-effective management of methane and volatile organic compounds emissions related to the oil and natural gas production industry that achieve sound environmental benefits while reflecting the significant differences between aspects of the industry. The Producer Associations are comprised of national, regional, and state associations that represent the full range of oil and natural gas producers from large publicly traded companies to small privately held companies.”

The Producers Associations group is made up of the following national and state trade associations: the Independent Petroleum Association of America (“IPAA”), Arkansas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners (“AIPRO”), Domestic Energy Producers Alliance (“DEPA”), Eastern Kansas Oil & Gas Association (“EKOGA”), Illinois Oil & Gas Association (“IOGA”), Gas & Oil Association of West Virginia (“GO-WV”), Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico (“IPANM”), Indiana Oil and Gas Association (“INOGA”), International Association of Drilling Contractors (“IADC”), Kansas Independent Oil & Gas Association (“KIOGA”), Kentucky Oil & Gas Association (“KOGA”), Michigan Oil and Gas Association (“MOGA”), National Stripper Well Association (“NSWA”), North Dakota Petroleum Council (“NDPC”), Ohio Oil and Gas Association (“OOGA”), The Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma (“The Alliance”), Petroleum Association of Wyoming (“PAW”), Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association (“PIOGA”), Texas Alliance of Energy Producers (“Texas Alliance”), Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association (“TIPRO”), and Western Energy Alliance.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Biden administration’s new methane rule to hamper U.S. oil, gas production, trade associations warn appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

EU countries buying record volumes of Russian LNG

Energy News Beat

Russian exports of liquified natural gas (LNG) to Europe hit an all-time high of 1.75 million tons in November, the Kommersant business daily reported on Monday, citing data by Kpler.

The previous record was set in December 2022, when Russia exported 1.737 million tons of LNG to the region.

The largest November volumes were reportedly shipped to France and Belgium, which received LNG from enterprises in the Yamal peninsula and the town of Vysotsk. The facilities are operated by Novatek, Russia’s second-largest gas producer.

Overall shipments of Russian LNG to global markets amounted to 2.914 million tons in November, surging 9.3% compared to the same period a year ago.

However, deliveries of Russian LNG to China saw a sharp decline to 0.1 million tons, compared to 0.8 million tons in the previous month.

Dutch Transfer Title Facility (TTF) gas futures for November deliveries were either equal in price or traded higher than spot LNG supplies to Asia on some days, according to independent energy expert Aleksandr Sobko, as cited by Kommersant.

The analyst added that the European market was becoming more attractive due to the significantly lower costs of transportation to the region from Yamal. Sobko noted that China’s CNPC, which purchases Yamal LNG, had previously redirected some shipments from Russia to more profitable markets, while compensating these volumes for the Chinese market from other sources.

Viktor Katona, lead crude analyst at Kpler, highlighted accelerated imports of LNG by China in November, saying the redirection of Russian supplies was not the result of weak Chinese demand, but rather the increased appeal of the European market.

Japan and South Korea continued to receive Russian LNG from the Sakhalin-2 project under long-term contracts with Gazprom. Supplies to Japan in November rose 22% year-on-year to 0.64 million tons, while imports by South Korea saw year-on-year growth of 50% to 0.28 million tons.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post EU countries buying record volumes of Russian LNG appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Daily Energy Standup Episode #263 – Opt-Outs, Copper Surges, EV Challenges, and Global Transition Struggles

Energy News Beat

Daily Standup Top Stories

Chevron, Exxon opt out of funding COP28 methane-reduction fund

(Bloomberg) — Six major oil companies each contributed tens of millions of dollars to a grant fund meant to help state-owned rivals cull the release of super-warming methane emissions, but Chevron Corp. and Exxon Mobil […]

Copper climbs to 11-week high on Panama mine risk, shortfall

Copper advanced to the highest level in 11 weeks on concerns over the looming shutdown of a large mine in Panama and amid expectations of a widening ore supply deficit in 2024. The Panama government has […]

Why Repairing Your EV Is So Expensive

Electric-vehicle owners are finding a surprising downside to their new wheels: They tend to be expensive to repair after a crash. When Scott MacFiggen’s neighbor backed into his Rivian R1T pickup truck last summer, the […]

Germany is the sick man of Europe – and the prognosis is grim

Few countries are more aware than Germany of how important it is to keep public finances in order. But few countries have indulged in more creative accounting. As Germany’s highest court ruled current spending plans […]

The Dangerous Futility of the Energy Transition in a Single Graphic

During the 1980s-2000s, the U.S. and Europe intentionally transferred their manufacturing and industrial sectors to China. Since 2015, we have been intentionally transferring our energy security to China. The chart below illustrates the utter futility […]

Highlights of the Podcast

00:00 – Intro
02:36 – Chevron, Exxon opt out of funding COP28 methane-reduction fund
05:18 – Copper climbs to 11-week high on Panama mine risk, shortfall
07:58 – Why Repairing Your EV Is So Expensive
11:06 – Germany is the sick man of Europe – and the prognosis is grim
13:20 – The Dangerous Futility of the Energy Transition in a Single Graphic
16:26 – Markets Update
19:40 – Outro

Follow Stuart On LinkedIn and Twitter

Follow Michael On LinkedIn and Twitter

ENB Top News

ENB

Energy Dashboard

ENB Podcast

ENB Substack

– Get in Contact With The Show –

Video Transcription edited for grammar. We disavow any errors unless they make us look better or smarter.

Michael Tanner: [00:00:14] What is going on, everybody? Welcome to another edition of the Daily Energy News Beat Standup here on this gorgeous Tuesday, December 5th, 2023. As always, I’m your humble correspondent, Michael Tanner, coming to you from an undisclosed location here in Dallas, Texas, joined by the executive producer of the show, the purveyor of the show, and the director, publisher of the world’s greatest website, energy news beat, Stuart Turley, my man, how are we doing today? [00:00:37][23.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:00:37] It’s a beautiful day in the neighborhood up here in Bear country. [00:00:39][2.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:00:40] Absolutely know awesome show. And we have an awesome menu lined up for the day. First up, Chevron, Exxon, opt out of funding at Cop 28 methane reduction fund. Who in the in the throngs of Cop 28, Chevron and Exxon make a name. Next up copper climbs to 11 week high on Panama mine risk and shortfall. We don’t cover the minerals markets as much as maybe we should, but do. Great article you’ve got on what’s going on with copper right now and why it’s really so expensive. Talking about that, speaking about copper being expensive, why repairing your EV is so expensive, may not. Not much have to do with the price of copper, but it has a lot to do with the supply chain system. We’ll dive into all that. Next up, Germany is sick of the man. A man in Germany is the sick man of Europe, and the prognosis is grim, unfortunately. So Stu will play doctor and talk to us about the health of Germany. And then finally, the dangerous futility of the energy transition in a single graphic. So, you know, an excellent show lined up stool. Toss it over to me. I’ll quickly then cover what happened in the oil and gas financial markets. Not much really happened, to be honest with you. So it’ll be pretty a late segment on my own and then we’ll let you guys get out of here, get back to work and start your day. As always, guys, before we begin the stories and analysis, you are about two years brought to you by the world’s greatest website www.energynewsbeat.com the best place for all your energy news. Doing the team do a great job of curating that website, make sure stays up to speed with everything you need to know to stay up to speed and at the tip of the spear. When it comes to the energy business, you can hit the description below, see the links to the articles, the timestamps, and check out all of our resources. You can follow us wherever you get your podcasts, Apple, Podcasts, Spotify or you can find us at YouTube at Energy News Beat Dashboard.EnergyNewsbeat.com data news combo product. You can email the show [email protected] I’m going to bet those two. Where do you want to begin? [00:02:33][112.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:02:33] Hey, let’s get rolling over there. Buddies over there. Chevron and Exxon opt out of funding at Cop 28 Methane Reduction Fund. Michael, this is an absolute. Who? Ursula, our good buddy over there, who’s in charge of the EU, made a comment that this fund is going to be into the billions there. The commitments have been about $100 billion over cop is their target. She says that’s not enough. We need trillions. I think that might have been the trigger for Exxon and Chevron to go, No, our checkbook is not that big. Let’s go through this here. A global flaring and methane reduction partnership that will run by the World Bank with initially 255 million earmarked to help developing countries and their oil companies stifle leaks on that potent greenhouse gas. Okay. I can understand why Exxon and Chevron later. Now, in the article, they say we’re not sure we want to donate to a fund that’s going to be controlled by our competitors. I applaud them for that decision. That’s pretty crazy. And so when you sit back and think you have BP and I Equinor, Occidental, Shell, Total and UAE, all of that was 100 million US put in 2 million, Germany put in 1.5 and Norway was one. [00:04:04][91.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:05] Wow. Yeah. I mean, if you’re Exxon, Chevron, I think the you know, from their perspective, they’re doing all they I mean, if you don’t think Exxon and Chevron are not trying to on their own reduce emissions because they understand that if they make that if they reduce emissions and produce sustainable oil and gas, it’s the best of both worlds. They’re probably spending more than 25 million to lower their emissions. So the fact that they have to now put it up is probably where they’re like, well, we don’t need you know, we don’t just need to just lose 25 million when we’re already doing. [00:04:38][32.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:38] I applaud them for that. Absolutely. And where I they were in there and Exxon said they join the pledge. But we’re going to give our expertise and what we’re already doing. Michael, I applaud them for standing up. We’ve got to have more of that kind of thing in our great Chevron and Exxon are doing better than my buddy Putin, you know, and you sit back and kind of go, eh, you know, Gazprom is leaking like a sieve. I mean, that’s like me in a Speedo. I’m leaking everywhere. [00:05:10][31.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:11] Okay, that’s on that lovely note. [00:05:13][1.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:13] So let’s go to the next A copper set. I just threw up copper climbs to an 11 week high in Panama. A mind risk shortfall. This is the ENB thread tonight. You’ll see this here in just a second to go in where this is fitting in. The Panama government said it will shut first quantum Merrill’s Cobra operation, which is 1.5% of the world’s supply in time. Michael, you take 1.5% of anything off and in a world supply, it’s going to start impacting it. That’s a bunch, Yeah, yeah. Chile, Chile and Peru or the others. Copper Climb 4.4 November As a slew of stimulus in China improve the outlook for commodity demand, this is going to impact everybody. This is big. [00:06:01][47.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:01] Yeah. No and I mean luckily copper is is is there’s other sources of copper available to go out and get. It’s not like we’re talking about a lithium mine. It’s not like we’re talking about one of these smaller minerals like neodymium, which I’m sure you’ve never heard of, but is probably the most critical mineral in your entire life. You know, there are multiple sources to go get copper. It’s one of the reasons why, you know, way back when, currency was backed on gold and not copper, because the amount of the amount of supply of copper was increasing too rapidly went right. Ironically, it’s what the monetary base is doing right now. So, yes, I do think that these these high copper prices are concern. I do think, as you mentioned, Chile and Peru and some of these other nations, as a lot of these other copper mines, wouldn’t be able to pick up the output. I do think in 2024 that we’re probably going to see a larger shift. And that’s going to, again, as you said, as we move into the next article, bleed into the markets. There still is a lot of copper. It’s not the main one. We were talking about a lithium mine, but you know, or a critical lithium mine. You know, we’d see if prices would shoot do this is going to have a long range affect and not just on Eads. This is I mean, copper used in wiring. Copper is an industrial process. Again, it’s one of the reasons why we don’t we don’t we wouldn’t want to eventually. You know, people always talk about, well, how do we pick something to back our currency up? Well, if you if you chose copper, the problem is it’s too it’s too prevalent in industry, not just EVs everywhere. I mean, you’re say I’m sitting in apartment right now. I bet you there’s miles of copper flying around me. So it’s going to have a long tail effect. Not necessarily just the EVs, but it will make them more expensive. [00:07:31][89.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:32] You you alluded on several of my comments that I was trying to go for, and that is all of the renewable projects. There are 24,000 renewable projects waiting to get attached to the grid in the US right row. And what is being attached to the grid? We’re talking power lines. Oh, Oops. So, okay. Electric vehicles. Why repairing your EV is so expensive? Michael, Remember about two months ago, you and I talked about insurance. Insurance companies are even more shark like than sharks. They actually understand dollars and cents. And so this is where it gets a little bit funny. If repairs following collision can cost thousands of dollars more than their gas counterparts because it tends more moving parts, the vehicles are more complicated and fewer people do side repairs. Michael I love my 43 willies. It was a 43 Willys Flathead. It was the only year they it was a first year they made the jeep. And I mean, it was the first four wheel drive car ever made. That thing would go. I pulled out people out of the mud in it. It was an old World War two Jeep. I loved it. I could work on it. Can’t work on anything since now. [00:08:58][86.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:08:58] Yeah. I mean, it’s it’s. I mean, obviously the eve is going to be a little bit harder to fix than the Model T, which was the Stu’s first car, but. Okay, what’s crazy is this 51 year old San Francisco guy, whatever his name is, Scott McFerrin. Right. All he had was a bumper issue, a dent on the size of a bowling ball underneath a real tail amp. Two and a half months to fix $22,000 worth of wrong business. Do we have to shut it all down and become mechanics? Oh. [00:09:29][31.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:31] Let’s see. Podcast host Evie Mechanic. There’s work involved with one of those. Nothing point. [00:09:37][5.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:39] In. In their defense, it is a rivian, which is one of those those new style cars. But you know, I love how they say down here, Stu, that the average cost of preparing an EV is about $6,500, which is about $1,500 more than the average car, lot $4,200. You know, and as you mentioned, it comes with the increased cost of just a lot of stuff. What’s interesting is that Hertz is even saying after entering an agreement to purchase a lot of Teslas and have a decent amount of Teslas in their fleet, they actually mention that part of the reason their third quarter profit. Was smaller than expected was due to the fact that they spent so much on repairing electric models, which just again goes to show you the UN economics of EVs at its finest. [00:10:20][40.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:10:20] Now, I will say I want a cybertruck and I ads. After I saw this video on TV, a guy came out and he actually there’s two videos that I thought were great. And I want to give Elon Musk a shout out. And that is they brought out a Tommy gun and shot 40 fives at the thing in it. Actually, it did fine. So I want me a bulletproof cybertruck. Now the other one was the showed these Tesla robots running around shooting at it and that actually was greenscreen and CGI and everything else. And people were thinking that that was real, that they had Tesla robots driving a cybertruck. So there are two different ones, but I do want a Cybertruck Okay, let’s go. Next, let’s go to Germany. Germany is the sick man of Europe and the prognosis is grim. Oh, yeah. Oh, clear. Hey, watch this. For our podcast listeners, I have two of my 30 mice that are normally on my desk. Clear cut. We got to have. [00:11:21][60.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:11:21] That 20 ccs stat. [00:11:22][1.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:11:23] Stat. Okay. German government, Germany, they had their BASF fertilizer plant closed. They’ve had the oldest steel mill in jaw in the EU closed this year. Volkswagen has absolutely shut down. And why, Michael? High cost of energy, their energy cost have continued to go through the roof. Former Chancellor Angela merkel like to evoke the idea of frugal what’s been housewife when she lectured others on sensible economics. It was her government that earned a debt break into the Constitution. She was good about some things. She didn’t like a little bit of a sharp pencil on the budget. She did some other things that were questionable. But let’s go in here. The necessary cuts will hit Germany amid cost living crisis. This is a new reality will bring more economic problems piling on pressure on a fragile and unpopular government. We’re now seeing that energy, high energy costs shut businesses down. They have less tax revenue coming in. People leave your countries and Germany’s economy. So goes Germany’s economy goes the EU. So this article is pretty scary for the EU. [00:12:49][86.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:12:50] Yeah, I mean, but they’ve done it to themselves, unfortunately. I mean, they’ve they’ve put themselves in the straitjacket and now they’re just jumping off the riverbank and. [00:12:59][9.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:13:00] Yeah. Guess who put themselves in the straitjacket with them. Newsom. Newsom has also done it, and Governor Holcomb is trying to do it to New York. So if you’re in one of those two states, you get you a cybertruck because the governor is going to shoot you. Yeah. So let’s never mind. Okay. Let’s go to the last article here, Michael. Dangerous futility of the energy transition in a single graphic. This goes back to Cop 28 and that’s I get to interview tomorrow. It’ll come out Thursday. You know, it’ll be 11:00 our time. It’ll be 9 a.m. in Dubai. Great stink with She’s Miss America and the nuclear thing and the reason that the energy transition to net zero you got to have nuclear and you got to have natural gas until 30 years from now until wind and solar can actually be made without printing money. Look at this graphic. If you, Andy, we can have you as our producer. Slide this in. Look at this map You have the green buttons are net decrease and the red is net increase. Look at that map. You have Europe, the EU and Russia and the United States, Michael, all reducing emissions. Look at the rest of that map. It is China. China looks like a python that eight an entire golf ball or something. I mean, is that just a giant game? Yeah, it’s like, wow. And then you take a look at at India’s below up. I mean, you know, you take a look at that. It’s wow, painful. So when you take a look, the false and heavily subscribed to energy transition has nothing to do with the climate or the environment. It’s the fact the most advanced transfer of wealth and national security in human history. That is from the author of this Oh, Steven team David Blackman. [00:14:58][118.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:14:59] Oh, well, we love him. I mean, if they if they say the picture is worth a thousand words, then this picture really is. [00:15:05][6.1]

Stuart Turley: [00:15:05] Worth it is it’s. [00:15:06][0.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:15:06] Worth more because it clearly shows us where. The emissions are coming from anybody who’s sitting in the United States saying we are not doing enough to curb emissions. You’re just not necessarily informed. Now, the problem is our net decrease in emissions is offset by huge net increases over in. But what do you expect India and China and Indonesia and Vietnam and the Philippines, what would you expect them to do when you. [00:15:29][23.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:15:29] Expect them to lower the. [00:15:31][1.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:15:31] Cost of energy for their citizens? What do you expect? [00:15:33][1.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:15:33] I don’t expect them to do anything different except use more natural gas and more nuclear. You can handle this very easily if you don’t have the world economic or the World Bank charging exorbitant rates to put in renewable that has a higher cost. So there is a way around this. Let’s help Africa use their own natural gas, charge a higher natural gas and help them export that and charge that and let that money go back to Africa. There is a way in order to get to net zero if we work together. David Blackman Follow him on blackman.substack.com. He is a cool cat. [00:16:14][41.2]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:15] Yeah. No, absolutely. We love that. [00:16:16][1.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:16:17] Our favorite random guy on Substack. [00:16:19][1.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:20] Favorite random guy on Substack. Is that all you got? [00:16:22][2.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:16:23] That’s all I got, man. [00:16:23][0.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:24] Well, I’ll keep it short on my side. Guys, we saw, you know, over on the finance markets today, we saw stock market drop about fell by about half a percentage point. Nasdaq or S&P down about, as I mentioned, half a percentage point, 45, 69. Nasdaq down about a full percentage point, 1589, which represents again, about 157 point drop. Crude oil dropped about two and a half percentage points from opening somewhere around 74, 75, currently trading 7326 as we record this about 557 here on the fourth. We did see natural gas stay fairly steady at about $2.70. Brant oil 7918 We did see bitcoin spike over 42,000, currently trading about 4197 right now. So for all you bitcoins enthusiast out there right now, a price is through the roof. Gold also hit, what, 21,008. So if you’re in if you’re in many of your metals, hey, it’s a good day for you. You know, as far as what’s holding, again, oil prices down, it’s really the fact that OPEC plus will probably not make more cuts. I mean, that that seems to be the sentiment out there right now. But it also as as it’s come out multiple times, OPEC plus has had to tamp down rumors that none of its countries are actually abiding by the supply cuts. The you know, the the Saudi prince came out today or the Saudi energy minister came out today and said, well, we think they’re abiding by the cuts. You think you really do your thing? I don’t think so. We’ve covered extensively on this show. They’re not, you know, talk about the Dark Fleet and all that stuff. But that’s really I think the market is starting to, you know, and again, $120 oil chirping. I’m not seeing it anywhere. Still. I’m looking hard, but I’m not I’m not seeing it anywhere. So we’re still working on putting that segment together. Point of it is, I think, you know, really as low, you know, I don’t know. I would have told you 75 is the floor. Stu So this is a little bit shocking in terms of me, but how low we’ve gone again, can’t complain. $73 oil. I won’t complain about that. But it’s interesting considering, again, the fact that most people were were were hoping for a 100 and $2,050 oil. So you know, we know you had a pegged at that. So it’ll be interesting to see see how things turn. But you know I this is not is not bullish coming in the end of the year do know. [00:18:34][129.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:18:34] Now Brazil just got accepted into OPEC plus and the head of Petro Bob Ross basically came out and said we’re a member of OPEC plus, but you’re not going to put a quota on us and we will produce as much as we possibly can. Oops. So welcome to the new member. And that just validates everything else that there is no quota. [00:19:00][25.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:01] Yeah, no, the only quota is only quotas on coal plants in China and that’s up. You know that. [00:19:06][5.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:07] No, the only quota is that we are going to cut all of ours. You know, our buddy Carrie has also, by the way, if anybody wants to know, I did put that on Twitter. Our staff over there at Cop 28 found a picture of Kerry. He got Photobombed and in a pool. So anyway, that being said, Kerry has agreed to cut all of our coal plants out. So that means blackouts. [00:19:33][26.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:34] Some issue. But we will have plenty of catch up. [00:19:37][2.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:37] That’s exactly right. Burn your catch up. [00:19:39][1.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:40] All right. What else do what what’s your big takeaway from Cop 28 first day? [00:19:43][2.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:44] It’s disgusting. I applaud the the oil companies for standing up. I applaud them. They Ursula from the EU. I’ve reached out to her invited her on the podcast but I don’t know that she’ll be here. She said, you know, billions are not enough. We need trillions. I’m like, You should be open. [00:20:06][22.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:07] I’ll help you. Brilliant. You’re right. It’s probably. 3 trillion. Give me a trillion, I hope. [00:20:11][4.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:11] Yeah, yeah, yeah. What’s a few trillion between friends? You and I started the podcast years ago going, What’s a few billion between friends with a. [00:20:19][8.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:20] Million between friends. Now it’s it went to billions and now it’s trillions now. [00:20:24][4.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:24] Unbelievable. So what should people wonder about? I’m interviewing Grace Stankey, Miss America 11:00 and it’s it’s 9:00 her time. So anyway, it’s gonna be a lot. [00:20:39][14.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:39] Of fun now. It’ll be great. But I appreciate you all. Your hard work will be covering Cop 28 and everything around the oil and gas and energy markets here. But we’re gonna let you guys get out of here. Finish up and start or finish up or start your day, depending on when you’re listening to this for Stuart Turley I’m Michael Tanner. As always, guys, we appreciate it. We’ll see you tomorrow. [00:20:39][0.0]First Fir[1201.6]

The post Daily Energy Standup Episode #263 – Opt-Outs, Copper Surges, EV Challenges, and Global Transition Struggles appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Germany is the sick man of Europe – and the prognosis is grim

Energy News Beat

Few countries are more aware than Germany of how important it is to keep public finances in order. But few countries have indulged in more creative accounting. As Germany’s highest court ruled current spending plans unconstitutional, it finally destroyed the nation’s cherished myth of fiscal prudence. The stakes could not be higher for Germany and its neighbours.

Former chancellor Angela Merkel liked to evoke the idea of a frugal Swabian housewife when she lectured others on sensible economics. It was her government that enshrined a debt-break into the constitution in 2011.

German governments have pretended to stay within this strait jacket, while wriggling out of it. In 2020, Covid spending was the excuse. But the crises didn’t stop there. The war in Ukraine brought a painful energy crisis and a U-turn on defence policy. Last year, Chancellor Olaf Scholz won approval for a €100 billion (£86 billion) fund to whip the country’s armed forces into shape.

Arguing that the debt brake hampered essential investment, Scholz’s coalition reallocated Covid funds to green projects and industrial subsidies. But a constitutional court ruling declared such relabelling illegal, blowing a €60 billion hole in public finances.

The money had been allocated to everything from semiconductor and battery factories to infrastructure and subsidies for the steel industry. Half of it had already been spent; the government declared 2023 as another emergency year to make this legal in retrospect.

With big question marks over the remaining funds, German industry is deeply concerned about its future.

Economy minister Robert Habeck warned of a 0.5 per cent drop in growth next year while Scholz told lawmakers that the ruling marked the beginning of “a new reality”, one which makes “goals more difficult for our country to achieve”.

This new reality will bring more than economic problems, piling pressure onto a fragile and unpopular coalition government – a record 8 out of 10 Germans are unhappy with its work.

The necessary cuts will hit Germans amid a cost-of-living crisis. The number of Germans not being able to heat their houses properly has already doubled since 2021.

Such public discontent is dangerous when coupled with political division. No country knows this better than Germany.

Priding itself in learning from its history, it hasn’t forgotten that it was almost exactly a century ago that a deep economic crisis nearly toppled its fragile, inter-war democracy.

Massive borrowing temporarily created an illusion of prosperity but the debt-fuelled economy of the “Golden Twenties” crashed badly a decade later, allowing the Nazis to rise to power with devastating consequences for Germany and the whole world.

Economic instability triggers existential fears in Germany. Waiting in the wings to benefit from the situation is the Right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), currently the second most popular party with the backing of over a fifth of the electorate.

Next year, elections will be held in three eastern German states where the AfD leads the polls. In Thuringia, it might even win outright, which would pass the state premiership to Björn Höcke, a far-Right firebrand previously charged with using Nazi rhetoric.

Germany’s belief in its own “bouncebackability” has been shaken to its core. Berlin is no longer in a position to lecture, or indeed bail out, fellow European states. As the fog of Germany’s self-delusion lifts, the deep cracks underneath are visible to all.

Source: Msn.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Germany is the sick man of Europe – and the prognosis is grim appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Copper climbs to 11-week high on Panama mine risk, shortfall

Energy News Beat

Copper advanced to the highest level in 11 weeks on concerns over the looming shutdown of a large mine in Panama and amid expectations of a widening ore supply deficit in 2024.

The Panama government has said it will shut First Quantum Minerals’s Cobre operation, which produces about 1.5% of the world’s supply. The mine already suspended output last month as a blockade of boats restricted key supplies amid mass protests from environmentalists and labor unions.

The disruption comes as the gap between demand and supply for copper ore is set to widen next year, according to BloombergNEF. Two key producing regions — Chile and Peru — are facing bottlenecks in increasing output, while demand is rising in China, it said. Copper prices are likely to remain elevated, it added.

Copper climbed 4.4% in November, the first monthly increase since July, as a slew of stimulus in China improved the outlook for commodity demand in the top consuming nation. A weakening dollar also helped commodities priced in the greenback as they became cheaper for buyers in other currencies.

Copper rose as much as 0.5% to $8,507 a ton on the London Metal Exchange, before trading at $8 490 by 11:09 a.m. in Shanghai. Most metals were higher, with aluminum and zinc up 0.2%. 

Source: Miningweekly.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Copper climbs to 11-week high on Panama mine risk, shortfall appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

The Dangerous Futility of the Energy Transition in a Single Graphic

Energy News Beat

During the 1980s-2000s, the U.S. and Europe intentionally transferred their manufacturing and industrial sectors to China.

Since 2015, we have been intentionally transferring our energy security to China.

The chart below illustrates the utter futility of this energy transition.

We are not achieving any real reduction in carbon and other emissions from burning coal. We are simply changing the location from which the emissions are blown into the atmosphere.

But for leftists pushing the spending of trillions of dollars on this pretend transition, the benefit is that the coal plants are not in their backyards anymore. So, they pretend they are accomplishing something real by pointing to their handy green checklists, and thus feel better about themselves.

If you were asked to create a plan to render the U.S. and Europe subservient to China for their future energy security, the Biden energy agenda is the plan you would devise.

Bottom Line: This false and heavily subsidized energy transition has nothing to do with the climate or environment. It is in fact the most massive transfer of wealth and national security in human history.

That is all.

Source: Blackmon.substack.com

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post The Dangerous Futility of the Energy Transition in a Single Graphic appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Turbine Accident Statistics

Energy News Beat

Summary of Wind Turbine Accident data

to 30 September 2023

The table includes all documented cases of wind turbine related accidents and incidents which could be found and confirmed through press reports or official information releases up to 30 September2023. Scotland Against Spin (SAS) believe that this compendium of accident information may be the most comprehensive available anywhere.

Data in the detailed table attached is by no means fully comprehensive – we believe that what is attached may only be the “tip of the iceberg” in terms of numbers of accidents and their frequency. Indeed, on 11 December 2011 the Daily Telegraph reported that RenewableUK confirmed that there had been 1500 wind turbine accidents and incidents in the UK alone in the previous 5 years. In July 2019 EnergyVoice and the Press and Journal reported a total of 81 cases where workers had been injured on the UK’s windfarms since 2014. Our data has only 15 of these (<19%). In February 2021, the industry publication Wind Power Engineering and Development admitted to 865 off-shore accidents during 2019 – we have only 4 of these (<0.5%). Finally, EnergyVoice published a report containing details of over 500 UK onshore wind turbine accidents in 2020 – we have only 5 of these (1%).

Additional evidence that our data only represents the “tip of the iceberg” can be found in the 13 August 2018 publication by Power Technology https://www.power-technology.com/features/golden-hour-paramedics-saving-lives-offshore-windfarms/ The article reports 737 incidents were reported from UK offshore windfarms during 2016 alone, with the majority occurring during operations rather than development.  44% of medical emergencies were turbine related. In comparison, only 4 UK offshore incidents are listed in our data – equivalent to 0.5%.

The data does however give an excellent cross-section of the types of accidents which can and do occur, and their consequences. With few exceptions, before about 1997 only data on fatal accidents has been found.

The trend is as expected – as more turbines are built, more accidents occur. Numbers of recorded accidents reflect this, with an average of 81 accidents per year from 2002-2007 inclusive; 148 accidents per year from 2008-2012 inclusive; 174 accidents per year from 2013-2017 inclusive, and 222 accidents per year from 2018-2022 inclusive.

This general trend upward in accident numbers is predicted to continue to escalate unless HSE make some significant changes – in particular to protect the public by declaring a minimum safe distance between new turbine developments and occupied housing and buildings.

In the UK, the HSE do not currently have a database of wind turbine failures on which they can base judgements on the reliability and risk assessments for wind turbines. Please refer to https://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr968.pdf.

This is because the wind industry “guarantees confidentiality” of incidents reported. No other energy industry works with such secrecy regarding incidents. The wind industry should be no different, and the sooner RenewableUK makes its database available to the HSE and public, the better. The truth is out there, however RenewableUK don’t like to admit it.

Some countries are finally accepting that industrial wind turbines can pose a significant public health and safety risk. In June 2014, the report of the Finnish Ministry of Health called for a minimum distance of 2 km from houses by concluding: “The actors of development of wind energy should understand that no economic or political objective must not prevail over the well being and health of individuals.” In 2016 Bavaria passed legislation requiring a minimum 2km distance between wind turbines and homes, and Ireland are considering a similar measure.  In 2023, Buffalo County Nebraska voted to have a 3 mile separation distance between wind turbines and churches, hospitals and agricultural residential property, and a 5-mile separation distance between wind turbines and villages/towns.

Our data clearly shows that blade failure is the most common accident with wind turbines, closely followed by fire. This is in agreement with GCube, the largest provider of insurance to renewable energy schemes. In June 2015, the wind industry’s own publication “WindPower Monthly” published an article confirming that “Annual blade failures estimated at around 3,800”, based on GCube information. A GCube survey in 2013 reported that the most common type of accident is indeed blade failure, and that the two most common causes of accidents are fire and poor maintenance. A further GCube report in November 2015 stated that there are an average 50 wind turbine fires per year, and this remains unchanged in the latest 2018 GCube publication http://www.gcube-insurance.com/reports/towering-inferno/

The 50 fires per year is over double the reported SAS data below, further underpinning that data presented here may only be “the tip of the iceberg”. Turbine fire prevention company FireTrace International estimate that 91% of wind turbine fires go unreported. https://www.thecheyennepost.com/news/turbine-fire-at-new-roundhouse-industrial-wind-facility-west-of-cheyenne/article_cebaf080-423a-11eb-bebe-97b85cbceb3f.html

The 2018 GCube report also notes the following:

Wind turbine fires are greatly outnumbered by problems relating to blades and gear boxes;
Failure of operators to undertake sufficient due diligence through maintenance checks is of increasing concern, and;
Operating wind farms outwith their design parameters has been noted as a significant contributor to fires.

Source: Scotlandagainstspin.org

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Turbine Accident Statistics appeared first on Energy News Beat.