The Top 5 Oil Producers of 2023

Energy News Beat

Oil Price

Defying earlier expectations of slowing growth, U.S. crude oil production has surged this year to extend America’s lead at the top of the ranking of the world’s biggest oil producers.  In September, U.S. oil output surged to a record high for any month in history, and forecasts are that production will continue to increase.

Source: Oil Price

U.S. oil producers are set to lower their 2024 spending by 1%, with private drillers cutting budgets by an average of 4%, per a spending survey by Barclays cited by Bloomberg.

Despite the expected slightly lower budgets for next year, the United States will continue to see production growth thanks to efficiency gains and longer laterals, analysts and forecasters say. The recent surge in oil production is putting the U.S. firmly in the lead among the five biggest oil-producing countries in the world.

The list also includes OPEC+ producers Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Iraq, and another North American producer—Canada.

#1 The United States

The U.S. is now producing more than 13 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil—more than any country ever—and is headed to a continued increase in the short and medium term.

U.S. crude oil production hit a new monthly record of 13.236 million bpd in September, according to the latest data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

“The growth has not just been a Permian story. We’re seeing many shale basins that were flattish experiencing a revival,” Francisco Blanch, Head of Global Commodities and Derivatives Research at BofA, said on a call to discuss the bank’s energy outlook, as quoted by Reuters.

The U.S. shale patch is now looking to do more with less as it seeks capital and operational efficiency to prove to shareholders that it has turned the page from growth at all costs to measured growth accompanied by higher returns to investors.

This year, U.S. crude oil production is set to average 12.93 million bpd, and rise further to average 13.11 million bpd next year, the EIA said in its Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) in December.

Soaring production is also leading to surging exports of U.S. crude oil and petroleum products.

“Not only is the U.S. producing more oil than any country in history, but the amount of oil (crude oil, refined products and natural gas liquids) that it is exporting is near the total production of Saudi Arabia or Russia,” Jim Burkhard, Vice President and Head of Research for Oil Markets, Energy and Mobility, at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said in research cited by Forbes.

#2 Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia, the leader of OPEC and the OPEC+ group, has been the second-largest oil producer in the world this year. Saudi crude oil production averaged around 10.2 million bpd in the first half of 2023, but since July, the Kingdom has been implementing an extra voluntary production cut of 1 million bpd, and its production has averaged 9 million bpd in the second half of the year. The Saudi cut, aimed at “market stability”, has been partly offset by soaring production from non-OPEC+ producers, most notably the United States, but also Brazil, Canada, Guyana, and Norway.

#3 Russia

Russia, the key Saudi partner in the OPEC+ alliance, is believed to be producing around 9 million bpd of crude oil. Russia classified its oil production and export data after it invaded Ukraine, saying it would not provide detailed information about its oil sector, which could be used by the West to track down and clamp down on Russia’s oil exports or oil revenues.

Earlier this month, reports emerged that Russia had promised oil-flow tracking companies and price reporting agencies to provide data about its production, inventories, and fuel output after OPEC+ asked Moscow for more transparency in tracking its compliance with the cuts.

At the latest OPEC+ meeting, Russia said it would deepen the export cut to 500,000 bpd in the first quarter of 2024, with May and June of 2023 being the reference export levels for the cut, which will consist of 300,000 bpd of crude and 200,000 bpd of refined products.

#4 Canada 

While Russia and Saudi Arabia have been cutting supply to the market, North America has been growing its production—not only from the United States, but also from Canada.

Last year, Canadian oil production hit a record 4.86 million bpd, per data from the Canada Energy Regulator.

Analysts now expect output to grow in 2023, 2024, and 2025 as companies are ramping up production at new and tie-back sites in Alberta’s oil sands. Canada’s crude oil production is set to grow by 8% by 2025, analysts say.

#5 Iraq 

OPEC’s second-largest producer, Iraq, has been the fifth-biggest oil-producing country in the world this year, with output averaging around 4.3 million bpd, per OPEC’s secondary sources in its monthly reports.

In the latest report for December, OPEC acknowledged that while the cartel’s crude oil production fell in November for the first time in months, U.S. oil output continued to reach new highs.

OPEC noted in its report that “US crude and condensate production as well as NGL output continue to reach new highs. Total US liquids output reached a record 21.6 mb/d in September due to persistent outperformance of onshore and offshore production.”

OPEC expects U.S. liquids supply to grow by 1.3 million bpd in 2023.

The non-OPEC liquids supply growth forecast remains unchanged at 1.8 million bpd for 2023, driven by the U.S., Brazil, Kazakhstan, Norway, Guyana, Mexico, and China, the cartel said.

Rising oil production from outside OPEC+ makes the group’s task of managing oil prices next year more difficult than previously thought.

By  Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

 

The post The Top 5 Oil Producers of 2023 appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Only half of all Ford dealers agree to sell EVs next year

Energy News Beat

Oil Price

Ford said on Thursday that half of all 1,550 Ford dealers chose to sell electric vehicles in 2024—down from two-thirds that said this time last year that they would opt in to sell EVs for 2023. The other half of Ford dealers will sell—and service—ICE and hybrid models.

Source: Oil Price

“EV adoption rates vary across the country, and we believe our dealers know their market best,” Ford spokesman Martin Günsberg told the Detroit Free Press.

The slack buy-in from Ford dealerships comes even after Ford relaxed its requirements for dealers in the EV dealer program last January that mandated fewer L2 chargers and extended installation deadlines. Certified Ford EV dealers were once required to spend $500,000 for a single public DC fast charger, or $1 million if they wanted to be in the Elite tier of EV dealers.

The extra $500,000 was for another fast charger and demo units, among other things. But the high price tag caused Ford dealers to balk.

Buick saw a similar engagement among its dealers last year, according to Electrek, with half of Buick dealers choosing buyouts of their franchises instead of selling EVs. As a result, GM now has 47% fewer Buick dealers as of the end of this year compared to January. The hardline taken by GM with regard to its Buick dealers is in line with Buick’s ambitious plan to be all-electric by 2030.

Ford said earlier this month that it was reducing the planned number of F-150 Lightning EV trucks by half starting next year, kicking out 1,600 F-150 per week beginning in January, down from 3,200 per week, saying that it would match production with customer demand.

By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com

 

The post Only half of all Ford dealers agree to sell EVs next year appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Daily Energy Standup Episode #276 – Weekly Recap: Market Shifts, Legal Showdowns, and Global Tensions

Energy News Beat

Daily Standup Weekly Top Stories

A Shale Oil CEO’s Second Act: Going Green

For almost a decade, Tony Sanchez III was the epitome of a shale-boom CEO—furiously drilling oil wells, piling on debt and hunting quail and nilgai with fellow executives near his family’s ranch in South Texas. Then tumbling […]

The US isn’t the only one eating into OPEC’s market share — Brazil and Guyana are hitting record oil production volumes

OPEC+ has seen its oil market share fall to 51% this year, the IEA said Thursday. While US oil output has soared, Guyana and Brazil have also produced record volumes in 2023. Brazil’s output jumped […]

the next three years. The company’s […]

EXCLUSIVE: Conservative State Files First-in-the-Nation Lawsuit Against BlackRock Over Deceptive Climate Policies

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti on Monday sued the investment company BlackRock for deceptive practices. “BlackRock has said two things that can’t both be true,” Skrmetti, a Republican, told The Daily Signal in an […]

Strategy to End Iran’s Aggression

History continues to offer lessons and strategy to Washington if only the Biden Administration had the wisdom to hear it. Eighty years ago, the allies quickly realized that both Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan fed […]

Another Offshore Wind Farm Hits the Dust

Key Takeaways 1: The developer of “Icebreaker,” a small project in Lake Erie, announced it is pulling stakes on its six-turbine project. 2: The project received a $50 million grant under President Obama, but the […]

Red Sea Tensions Threaten to Disrupt Diesel Market Stability

Increased distillate production and slowing economic activities have led to rising diesel stocks and falling prices. Weak manufacturing activity in the U.S. and Europe contributes to reduced diesel demand, easing the market. Geopolitical tensions near […]

Highlights of the Podcast

00:00 – Intro
01:33 – A Shale Oil CEO’s Second Act: Going Green
04:38 – The US isn’t the only one eating into OPEC’s market share — Brazil and Guyana are hitting record oil production volumes
07:46 – EXCLUSIVE: Conservative State Files First-in-the-Nation Lawsuit Against BlackRock Over Deceptive Climate Policies
12:38 – Energy Workforce: Biden’s Gulf of Mexico leasing auction “detrimental” to U.S. energy supply
14:23 – Strategy to End Iran’s Aggression
15:55 – Another Offshore Wind Farm Hits the Dust
18:33 – Red Sea Tensions Threaten to Disrupt Diesel Market Stability
21:37 – Outro

Follow Stuart On LinkedIn and Twitter

Follow Michael On LinkedIn and Twitter

ENB Top News

ENB

Energy Dashboard

ENB Podcast

ENB Substack

– Get in Contact With The Show –

Video Transcription edited for grammar. We disavow any errors unless they make us look better or smarter.

Michael Tanner: [00:00:14] What is going on. Everybody, welcome into a special edition of the Daily Energy News Beat. Stand up here on this gorgeous Saturday, December 23rd, 2023. As always, I’m your humble correspondent, Michael Tanner, coming to you from an undisclosed location here in Dallas, Texas, joined by executive producer of the show, the purveyor of the show and the director, publisher of the world’s greatest website, Energy News Beat.com, Stuart Turley, my man. Busy week. [00:00:37][22.7]

Stuart Turley: [00:00:37] Oh, it is. It’s just absolutely crazy. Got a lot of great stories out there. [00:00:42][4.5]

Michael Tanner: [00:00:42] A lot of great stories happening this week. Red Sea going absolutely insane. Another offshore wind farm bites the dust. We got everything. The team is going to cue it up with with our top segments from this week. Before they do that, guys, remember all the news and analysis you hear. It is brought to you by the world’s greatest website. Energy News Beat the best place for all your energy news. Stu and the team do a tremendous job of making sure that website is up to speed with everything you need to know. Is there the tip of the spear when it comes to the energy business? You can hit the link below on all your major podcast platforms and YouTube and check out the description links to all the articles timestamps so you can jump ahead. You can also email the show [email protected] Check out our Data News Product Dashboard.EnergyNewsBeat.com But until then, stay. I’m going to kick it up to the kids and the weekly recap. We’ll see you next time, folks. [00:01:32][49.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:01:33] A shale oil CEO’s second act going Green. Michael, I want to tee up our deal spotlight of Oxy and crown. And the reason for that is you and I didn’t know the outcome until we went through the steps. And it fits right into this because there is a way that Saudi Arabia is funding their move to green, just like Oxy is funding. Their move to green with oil and gas are a balanced approach is the only way that you’re going to get there, not shutting everything off. So let’s go to this story, Tony Sanchez. The third was the epitome of a shale boom, CEO drilling oil wells, piling on debt and hunting quail. I love that. In his ranch in south Texas, he got caught up in the the oil crash and everything else. But what were some of the things that caught you in this article, Michael? [00:02:35][62.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:02:36] Well, one, it’s one thing that caught me is if you’re familiar with the name Tony Sanchez or I’ve heard of Sanchez energy, absolutely the epitome of the early the mid 20 tens shale boom. I mean, when and when I mean, boom. And then I also should say the bust as well, because it ended with Sanchez Energy filing for bankruptcy. So I love nothing more than a failed oil executive building now through selling GRI and woe. So what’s his so if you read this article, do his current business one Nexis is a little bit different. This is his new business. He started I read a paragraph down here. One Nexis offers oil producers policies that pay out only when their wells are capped, ensuring that companies have money set aside. He’s now an insurance salesman. We went from he went, He’s literally an insurance salesman. Now. The rates are determined by actuary models that were adapted from human life insurance calculations, and the policy is structured to survive. Even if the oil producer or one Nexis goes bankrupt. He says, This is incredible. This is a legitimate this is the biggest grift I’ve ever seen. I love. [00:03:45][69.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:03:46] It, to be honest with you. If it’s, Hey, insurance rules the world, baby, You think the deep state does not. It’s insurance companies, insurance. [00:03:54][8.4]

Michael Tanner: [00:03:54] Sooner or later, Stu, you’re going to invite me to an event where I show up and it’s going to be Tony Sanchez up there. Hey, if you sell our policies and get five people underneath you, you’re going to be able to go to my president’s retreat with me in Cabo. This has multilevel marketing. I can see it now, Stu. One nexus. I’m a one Nexus business owner. [00:04:13][18.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:14] Yeah. Hey, if you see him as a sponsor of the show, you’ll know it’s on the way. [00:04:19][4.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:19] You’ll know he sold out. When one Nexus answers the show. And I’m here pushing insurance policies on you that you know. But take us off air. [00:04:28][8.3]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:28] Then we would have cradle to grave. We would not only be on the front end evaluating M&A, we’d be evaluating on the back end there. So that’s. [00:04:36][8.2]

Michael Tanner: [00:04:37] About me in saying. [00:04:37][0.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:04:38] The US isn’t the only one eating into OPEC’s market share. Brazil and Guyana are hitting oil production volumes as Governor Abbott is signing in. You know the deals that he’s doing, we’re getting more natural gas plants online. And when you sit back and take a look at not only total energy is investing in. In Texas. [00:05:02][24.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:04] Wee, wee. [00:05:05][0.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:05] Wee. You were doing well. What was it, Mike Myers, That you were just doing that. [00:05:10][5.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:10] Like some old school French way we beat. [00:05:12][1.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:13] Oh, no. You were talking about doing one of them evil characters that has a cat, Mr. Evil mystery out on cats. I’m sorry. No, but Mr. Evil. Mike Myers, bald. And he’s from Ohio. I’m going to hold the world ransom for million. [00:05:29][15.9]

Michael Tanner: [00:05:30] Okay. [00:05:30][0.0]

Stuart Turley: [00:05:31] So let’s go back to this one. Brazil and Guyana. You have the pricing model around the world. We’re going to cover this in more detail in the next few weeks. OPIC has seen its market oil market share fall to 51%, the IEA said while U.S. output has soared, Brazil’s output has soared 400,000 barrels a day to 3.6 million. Now, here’s the thing. Part of that number, Michael, I’m digging around on the CIA’s number, and it’s 51%. It is the dark elite. I’m going to do my Biden real quick. Everybody on our podcast, I’m leaning into the mike. I’m losing my mind as I lean in and go, It’s the 51%. Okay, so that was my Biden. That’s about all I can pull on that knucklehead. So why when we sit back and take a look at the pricing model, Michael is busted. And I’m working on some more stories on this because it effects Texas, so goes Texas goes the rest of the world. Anyway, I don’t know why my camera just. [00:06:35][63.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:35] Zoomed in, as you say. It knows it knows that that’s exactly as. [00:06:39][4.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:06:39] Creepy as it. [00:06:40][0.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:06:41] Gets. I mean, it is interesting that OPIC is losing its grip and it’s kind of clear with with that over the years, OPEC has been losing its grip, if only because, look what’s happening right now. OPEC is continued to cut and signal that they are going to cut production and are going to continue to cut until they can bring Brant Oil up. And what is oil done the past three months? Tumble, tumble, tumble. I mean, can’t be too mad at $71 oil but thinking about where Saudi Arabia and oh back and Russia and everybody wants oil prices to be it’s insane that they haven’t been able to achieve yet that so it’s clear that there are other sources a.k.a. Brazil and Guyana, as this article rightly points out, is the reason for that. I mean, it’s it’s it’s pretty high. It’s pretty insane. [00:07:26][45.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:07:27] It’s pretty insane. And the whole pricing paradigm, Michael, is changing. So it goes back to our great oil and gas in the US and then the war on oil that the Biden administration is done by trying to source oil through Venezuela or other countries. It’s just criminal conservatives. State Files first in the nation lawsuit against BlackRock over deceptive climate policies. Michael, this is kind of you cannot be this kind of entertainment. The city Attorney general Jonathan Carmody on Monday sued the investment company BlackRock. Here’s a quote. BlackRock has said two things that can’t both be true. Carmody, a Republican, told The Daily Signal in an interview Monday. The first is that they are taking investors money and investing it purely for the purpose of maximizing the return on the investment. But they’ve also put out a statement saying that they are committed to net zero carbon emissions to combat climate change by a certain date. Both things can’t be true, and I agree that he is is hitting on that. The here’s where it gets a little funny. I’m going to be wondering how it’s going to pan out in the courtroom, Michael, because pledge member of the climate groups is to force companies to disclose their targets for net zero emissions for environmental and political reasons. This is coming down into the carbon tax. It’s coming down into the MP operators. But here’s where this I get a little confused on this article. The Larry said it’s okay to invest in ESG, in oil and gas. So where I think this is really going to need a follow up is the requirements for carbon neutral for reporting from oil companies. [00:09:20][113.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:21] This is a serious question. So to take this, it’s again, this is a serious question I’m asking, are companies on are companies required to make a profit? [00:09:30][8.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:09:30] Yes. If they are says who they are, they have a requirement to their. [00:09:34][4.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:09:35] To their shareholders. But it’s not like a law, Not like if you don’t produce a profit, you’re going to go to jail. Or we have seen a lot of tech companies be out of business and B, we’d have a lot of tech be legal. So I ask this question seriously, I’m all for I think what BlackRock is doing is obscene. They’re they’re fleecing the world, so to speak. They’re greenwashing, the whole ESG movement to take money from investors under the ruse of ESG but to. PLoyed as they see fit. Yes, that’s shady business practice. Question, though, is it actually illegal? There’s a difference between stupid. Illegal to be stupid. It’s not illegal to necessarily not necessarily invest the money wisely, as it should. So this is where I understand that it looks good on a headline that we’re going to go sue BlackRock. I’m all for it. I think what they’re doing is a travesty. The question is, is it illegal? And that’s where I think the difference becomes, you know, is in this process of, you know, and, you know, Stu disagrees with me so much, he just left the baton. I think when it comes to, you know, whether or not this lawsuit is worthwhile, I mean, I mean, this guy’s you know, Jonathan Skirmished, he’s probably got a little bit of time on its hand when it comes to it. But the real question is, is these, quote, deceptive practices? I mean, this guy is going to know. But the real question is, you know, what’s a jury going to think? I think the interesting thing is that, you know, we know BlackRock has walked back a lot of these, you know, so-called targets that they want to push. You know, they they haven’t necessarily followed through as much as maybe they would have. They would have you would have thought, you know, two years ago, I mean, two years ago, you know, they they were attempting to influence companies like Chevron, United Airlines, Wal-Mart in order to push these shareholder proposals that were much more climate related. But in 2022, they said that in a response to the state’s attorney general, the company, quote, doesn’t dictate to companies what suspicions are or what specific emissions targets they should meet or what type of political lobbying they pursue. So they’re speaking out of both sides of their mouth. The question I go back to is, are your I think you were allowed to speak out of both sides of your mouth. There’s no law that says you can’t. [00:11:50][134.4]

Stuart Turley: [00:11:50] But they do have a fiduciary responsibility for not I. That’s a good question. Do they are they legally responsible? Yes. Depends on your. [00:12:00][10.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:12:01] Responsibility. But that’s different than being illegal. Right. I’m not a lawyer. It’s a dumb question. But, you know, when we talk like like, for example, bankruptcies, bankruptcies, it’s not illegal to be an idiot and drive your company into bankruptcy. Now, you’re going to probably never raise money again. But the question is, is being incompetent illegal? I don’t. [00:12:21][20.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:12:22] Know. Well, it does take a village to raise an idiot. [00:12:24][2.8]

Michael Tanner: [00:12:25] So I’ll tell you this, though. If it’s illegal to be an idiot, Stu, we’re in trouble and we’re going to be knocking on our door very quickly. Oh, wait, that’s them. [00:12:35][9.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:12:36] I just had to go get the door. Energy Workforce. Biden’s Gulf of Mexico leasing auction is detrimental to the U.S. energy supply. Only three oil and gas sales are scheduled for the Gulf of Mexico in 2025 and 2027 and 2029, a departure from the previous plans 11 net lease sales. This is critical. When we talk about natural gas, we talk about oil and gas investment and low cost energy. The Gulf of Mexico great offshore producers do a great job. We have to remind everybody ourselves, the only reason the United States has reduced their carbon footprint is because of lowering natural gas or, excuse me, lowering the coal usage and increasing natural gas. Natural gas off the Gulf of Mexico is pretty important. You got to have that for LNG. You got to have that for exporting. That goes into the other article with Europe as well. It is all related. The Outer Continental Shelf produces 90 be estimated to hold 90 Bowie and 300 tfc g. If developed, these could be more than 800,000 American jobs. You know, we always hear about President Biden being a for the American workers. Let’s pony up, let’s reduce and let’s get to carbon net zero, but let’s do it using great American energy. So anyway, that was pretty cool article there. A strategy to end Iran’s aggression. I just want to go and go on record and say that I do not think the United States needs to go to war anywhere. I am not an fan of war. Lindsey Graham. If you’re listening and you’d like to come on this podcast. I would love to talk to you. Threatening to bomb Iran’s oil is not a way enforcing sanctions. The way Trump had is the way to do it. Iran under Trump 350,000 barrels per day production under Biden. With all of the sanctions they are going to be. I believe it’s 3.4 million barrels per day. Sanctions don’t work. And bombing them gets our kids killed. I just want to be clear. I am a humanitarian and we need to not bomb people. Missiles fired by Yemen’s Houthi rebels is really causing a stink around the oil there around the Red Sea. And it is going to cost the world billions. The supply chain is going to increase. Those stories are on there as well, too. But we do not need to have the U.S. bombing this in order to stop it. So I thought this article was a good one. But Hamas is definitely the enemy and we need to let Israel do their due diligence and take care what they need to do. Another offshore wind hits the dust. This one is kind of sad because it is very systemic of more coming around the corner. The developer Icebreaker, a small project in Lake Erie, announcing it’s pulling out stakes on its six turbine product project. It received a $50 million grant under Obama. You know, that longing is to to get attached to the grid. And the Energy Department has pulled the grant and taxpayers will only get $37 million back. So somebody made let me think. I went to ask you, how many millions did they spend on regulations measuring rocks to make sure they get get these things up. [00:16:45][248.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:45] Over six turbines? I mean, what could that power like? Barely power, anything? [00:16:51][5.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:16:52] No. I mean, you’re talking, you know, six wads. I mean, I’m kidding. Whatever. [00:16:58][5.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:16:58] I love this part. According to developer, icebreaker, became financially untenable after the Ohio Power City Board in 2020 required the turbines to stop at night between March and November to reduce the risk of migratory birds and bats from hitting the turbine blades. [00:17:15][16.5]

Stuart Turley: [00:17:15] Oh, yeah, and it’s even funny. A large Dominion Energy, a large utility in Virginia, is moving ahead with its consisting of 176 and is spending 625 million on the first U.S. built ship capable of hauling more than 300 foot long blades. It’s a lot of money just to haul a blade out and put it up with duct tape. That’s just amazing to me. And here’s the conclusion. I thought this was really good. Another offshore wind is calling it quits is inflation, Interest rates, supply chain issues and legal challenges are making it too expensive and difficult to exceed. Michael, we’ve seen that over the last six months. It is going to escalate and curtail wind. I still see solar here as having some wind and I. I had lunch with Dr. Ed Ireland and Artie. Here’s a great one. The young lady out of London came up with an idea for wind in some ways. At first I was like a great idea. They all create wind. Why not put a little turbine down there every time it goes through? You could make some really nice. I think it’d be kind of cool. Let’s go to the Red Sea tensions. But I’ll tell you, the warmonger. Oh, shoot. What’s his name? Graham. Lindsey Graham. Oh, my gosh. He’s calling. He’s actually calling for us to bomb Iran’s oil field. That’s no. Step away from the microphone, dude. [00:18:51][96.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:18:52] We went from the nuclear weapons. Never. [00:18:55][2.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:18:55] No way. You do not have the football. Step away from Biden’s side. We do not need to do that. No. Okay. Let’s go to the here’s where Red Sea tensions threaten diesel market. Michael, here is a whole nother side of the hoodie is out there playing around with them. Drones. These are not your drones that your dad used to fly around. These are some serious kind of drones. The below average distillate stocks and just an uptick in manufacturing construction next year. Iran has gotten another million barrels coming on line, a million barrels per day. And then so does India and so does China. So, oh, yeah, guess who’s buying the diesel and gasoline and products from China? Dan in California. [00:19:51][56.0]

Michael Tanner: [00:19:53] As you say, no. [00:19:54][0.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:19:54] And well, why did President Z show up and why was it clean? I don’t know. [00:20:00][5.7]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:01] He just wanted to meet our favorite governor. [00:20:02][1.2]

Stuart Turley: [00:20:02] I thought he wanted some hairstyle tips. But when we take a look at the it’s just. It’s weird. On how diesel is now. Also they’re peeling some of the dark fleet off for diesel tankers. It’s weird. [00:20:17][14.3]

Michael Tanner: [00:20:17] Yeah, I think this is a this is a really niche problem that we we’ve had bad diesel prices right now. I mean if anybody remembers back in the in the early 2000 diesel was was always less than gasoline. It’s that now market is now flipped and where diesel is trading and for consumers at the pump much higher than gasoline which is why food inflation continues to stay high. We think that food inflation has to do with food commodity prices. It does, but it also has to do with transportation costs and with the majority of food being transported by truck. Hi. Diesel prices only going to inflate that supply chain a lot more. So anything any you know, the diesel market is already teetering. Anything that impacts that is going to be good. So I think while we won’t see the oil price freak out, what we might see is slight, almost food inflation or flight supply, slight supply chain inflation as we move forward. If I agree, diesel distillate problem becomes any stronger. [00:21:17][59.6]

Stuart Turley: [00:21:17] I couldn’t agree more. And the other side of that coin, though, is is the number one user of what was our you like before our podcast. I was just flipping a coin. Michael was starting to do a hula. [00:21:29][11.6]

Michael Tanner: [00:21:29] Was flipping a coin. [00:21:30][0.8]

Stuart Turley: [00:21:31] Oh, you’re oh, flipping a coin. Here we go. Heads or tails? Heads. [00:21:34][3.1]

Michael Tanner: [00:21:35] Heads. I win. Tells you lose. [00:21:35][0.9]

Stuart Turley: [00:21:36] It’s under the table. [00:21:36][0.0][1252.1]

– Get in Contact With The Show –

 

The post Daily Energy Standup Episode #276 – Weekly Recap: Market Shifts, Legal Showdowns, and Global Tensions appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Fly in the Ointment: Month-to-Month Rent Inflation Accelerated, Stuck at 6%+ Annualized since March

Energy News Beat

But overall and “core” PCE price indexes decelerated, on plunging gasoline prices, a dip in food prices, and a continued big drop in durable goods prices.

By Wolf Richter for WOLF STREET.

The fly in the ointment in today’s PCE Price Index by the Bureau of Economic Analysis was rent inflation, which accelerated in November from October, and has gotten stuck since March for the ninth month in a row with month-to-month increases that annualized were in the 6%-plus range. This stubborn rent inflation is a blow to the hopes trotted out for 18 months by the Fed and economists all over that it would come down further, that it was lagging, and that “we know it will come down,” etc., etc., but it has not come down further, and today it accelerated.

But the overall PCE price index and “core” PCE price index (without food and energy) decelerated further, driven down by the plunge in gasoline prices, a month-to-month dip in food prices, and a continued big drop in durable goods prices that are coming off their huge pandemic spike.

The PCE price index for rent accelerated to 0.50% in November from October, or 6.2% annualized, and has been in the same range since March. In late 2022 through March 2023, rent inflation decelerated sharply on a month-to-month basis. But starting in March – amid the wild and woolly hopes that it would continue to decelerate, cited by Powell many times – PCE rent inflation has gotten stuck at annualized rates in the 6% range (blue box):

The CPIs for rents, released earlier in December, have shown a similar trend: Month-to-month rent inflation stopped coming down in early 2023 and has remained at around 6% annualized. And that’s a tough nut to crack.

Year-over-year, the PCE price index for rent decelerated to 6.7%. This 12-month deceleration was driven by the sharp month-to-month deceleration late last year and earlier this year.

If month-to-month rent inflation continues on the same trend as since March, the year-over-year downward slope will begin to bend over the next few months and flatten by March 2024 around the 6% mark, close to double where it had been before the pandemic:

The “core” PCE price index, which excludes food and energy, decelerated to an increase of 0.06% in November from October (blue line), on a big drop in the index for durable goods (-0.43%) that are coming off their pandemic spike.

The three-month moving average, at 0.18%, has been roughly unchanged for the past three months (red). That translates into an annualized rate of 2.2%, which would be close to the Fed’s target range.

Year-over-year, the “core” PCE price index decelerated to 3.2% (red line). The overall PCE price index, driven down by the plunge in gasoline prices, decelerated to 2.6%:

Enjoy reading WOLF STREET and want to support it? You can donate. I appreciate it immensely. Click on the beer and iced-tea mug to find out how:

Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET publishes a new article? Sign up here.

The post Fly in the Ointment: Month-to-Month Rent Inflation Accelerated, Stuck at 6%+ Annualized since March appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Republicans Hold Hearing ‘to Prevent Energy Poverty’ in America

Energy News Beat

I’m not going to mince words here. By destroying America’s energy independence, the Biden Administration is directly making Black Americans more poor and less independent than ever. Since Biden’s first day in office with the shutdown of the Keystone pipeline project and his ongoing war on a key pillar of our economy, we’ve all experienced skyrocketing energy costs that punish the very people he claims to care so much about.

Just recently, the House Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held a legislative hearing on H.R. 5482 the Energy Poverty Prevention and Accountability Act of 2023. Introduced by Rep. Harriett Hageman R-WY, the bill seeks to prevent energy poverty in America by increasing government transparency, identifying rules and regulations that prohibit equal access to affordable and reliable energy to at risk communities including low income, minority, rural, senior citizens, and Native Americans.

Energy poverty occurs when individuals and families are unable to afford basic heating, electricity, and gas needs. High energy costs and the lack of energy services negatively impact a household’s well-being and limit opportunity. At risk communities are most often disproportionately affected by energy poverty. These inflationary pressures and the terrible consequences aren’t the result of a free market at work, but overzealous policy pushed by paternalistic lawmakers who think they know what’s best for everyone with a “one size fits all approach.”

I have been working to expand awareness of energy poverty in America and was invited by the subcommittee to provide witness testimony in support of bill H.R. 5482. My passion for American energy is deeply rooted in my own story, stemming from my grandfather, who was a black coal miner in Southwest Virginia, and my time serving as a brakeman for Norfolk Southern Railways, where we transported coal and other natural resources here and abroad. Since 2019, I have had the opportunity to appear before Congress six times to give testimony on energy poverty and other related issues impacting communities struggling with rising energy costs.

Energy is a fixed cost for small families and large enterprises alike, and we know when the price of energy increases, so does everything else. It costs more to drive, it impacts the cost of groceries, and most critically, come winter, it costs more to heat your home. Rising energy costs are making it harder or next to impossible for Black families to make ends meet. Tragically, the pause on new oil and gas leases on Federal land, and overregulation accompanied with an aggressive green agenda by the Biden Administration has many Americans experiencing energy poverty for the first time.

There is no reason anyone in our country should be without affordable energy. The U.S. is abundantly rich in natural resources, including natural gas, petroleum, and coal. America is more capable than ever of providing affordable energy to its citizens. The U.S. was energy independent in 2019 for the first time in decades, producing more energy domestically than what we consumed. This, along with a booming shale industry, helped America overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the top exporter of petroleum and natural gas globally.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), fossil fuels accounted for 81% of energy production in 2022. Renewables reached their highest production in 2022 and only accounted for 13% of all energy production. More figures from EIA show that renewables received $15.6 billion of subsidies in fiscal year 2022, compared to $3.6 billion for fossil fuels. Per the EIA report, renewable energy industries received nearly five times as much in federal subsidies than fossil fuels despite having minimal impact. Renewable projects are also very costly. New York state law now calls for 70% of electricity come from renewables by 2030. The Alliance for Clean Energy New York (ACENY) told regulators in June, due to cost, “canceled or delayed projects would drastically derail the schedule for renewable development” and cause the state to miss its mandates under the law.

Eliminating energy poverty should be a goal we all are interested in achieving. In working towards that goal, we need to be mindful of how environmental policies will impact the vulnerable communities that need our support. Radical environmentalists and the Biden Administration like to frame this as a fight against big energy, but all they are really doing is pushing Black Americans and other at-risk communities further into poverty. When the government creates policy, its priority should be the welfare of the people, especially those impacted the hardest. We need a market-oriented energy policy that will allow America to safely keep exploring and developing our own natural resources for a more secure and prosperous future for all Americans.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Republicans Hold Hearing ‘to Prevent Energy Poverty’ in America appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Russia, China completely abandon US dollar in bilateral trade, says Russian PM

Energy News Beat

Russia and China have completely abandoned the use of Western currencies, including US Dollar, in their bilateral trade, said Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin on Tuesday (Dec 19).

While speaking during a meeting with his Chinese counterpart Li Qiang in Beijing, Mishustin said nearly all payments were being carried out in Rubles and Yuan.

The Russian PM is on a two-day visit to the Chinese capital.

“We continue to increase the share of national currencies in mutual settlements. If in 2020 this figure was about 20 per cent, then this year we have actually completely gotten rid of the currencies of third countries in mutual settlements,” Mishustin was quoted as saying by Russian media.

Red hot business ties

The Russian leader also stressed that the business ties between the two nations were booming, with bilateral trade turnover already reaching $200 billion ahead of schedule.

He also mentioned that a joint business forum held in Beijing earlier this year saw the attendance of more than 1,500 entrepreneurs from both countries.

“We are creating comfortable conditions for the work of commercial firms on the Russian and Chinese markets. We have an extensive joint agenda,” Mishustin said.

Li Qiang also noted that the partnership between Russia and China had become extremely important against the backdrop of “global turbulence.”

Russia urges BRICS to ditch the dollar

Apart from abandoning the US dollar in its trade with China, Russia is also urging the BRICS organisation to develop financial relations and make mechanisms for settlements within the bloc.

Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov made this appeal at the Russia-China Financial Dialogue forum in Beijing on Monday, where his Chinese counterpart Lan Foan was also present.

The BRICS group of emerging economies – which currently incorporates Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – has been discussing ways to facilitate payments in local currencies between member countries.

“We need to further develop financial cooperation within the BRICS countries. Here we see opportunities to develop a payments system that would be independent of the infrastructure, which does not always fully fulfill the goals of individual countries,” Siluanov stated.

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Russia, China completely abandon US dollar in bilateral trade, says Russian PM appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Judge orders removal of wind farm opposed by Osage Nation

Energy News Beat

A judge has ordered the removal of a wind farm in Osage County and set a trial for damages in a win for the Osage Nation and its Mineral Council, which, along with the federal government, have been fighting the erection of the turbines for more than 10 years.

U.S. Court of International Trade Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves issued the ruling Wednesday in Tulsa federal court against Osage Wind LLC, Enel Kansas LLC and Enel Green Power North America Inc.

The ruling grants the United States and the Osage Nation through its Minerals Council permanent injunctive relief via “ejectment of the wind turbine farm for continuing trespass.”

The Minerals Council is an arm of the Osage Nation that manages the Osage Minerals Estate.

The ruling follows a 2017 appellate court ruling that determined that construction of the wind farm constituted mining and required a lease from the Osage Nation’s Minerals Council, which the defendants failed to obtain.
“The developers failed to acquire a mining lease during or after construction, as well as after issuance of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision holding that a mining lease was required,” Choe-Groves said.

“On the record before the Court, it is clear the Defendants are actively avoiding the leasing requirement,” Choe-Groves said. “Permitting such behavior would create the prospect for future interference with the Osage Mineral Council’s authority by Defendants or others wishing to develop the mineral lease.

“The Court concludes that Defendants’ past and continued refusal to obtain a lease constitutes interference with the sovereignty of the Osage Nation and is sufficient to constitute irreparable injury.”

Osage Minerals Council Chairman Everett Waller said in an interview Thursday morning that he was still “stunned” by the ruling.

“I hope no other tribe has to do what we had to do,” Waller said, referring to the long court battle.

“This is a win not only for the Osage Minerals Council; this is a win for Indian Country,” Waller said.

“There are a lot of smaller tribes that couldn’t have battled this long, but that’s why we’re Osages,” Waller said. “We’re here, and this is our homeland, and we are going to protect it at all costs.”

Osage Wind, for its part, claimed that while an appeals court found that it had “mined without a lease in 2014, it did not hold that Osage Wind was obligated to obtain a lease for that completed mining or for any other ongoing purposes.”

The legal saga has been ongoing for more than a decade, at one point reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Osage Nation filed a federal lawsuit in October 2011 seeking to halt the construction of the wind farm, alleging that the project unlawfully deprived the Osage Nation of access to and the right to develop the mineral estate.

The nation’s claims were denied, and the case was dismissed on merits.
The defendants began leasing surface rights for the project in 2013, according to the ruling.
The wind farm includes 84 turbines spread across 8,400 acres of leased surface rights in Osage County, underground lines, overhead transmission lines, meteorological towers and access roads, the ruling said.

Construction on the wind towers began in October 2013, with excavation for the towers beginning in September 2014.

The federal government filed a federal lawsuit in November 2014, seeking a declaratory judgment that the defendants engaged in unauthorized mining and excavation in the Osage Mineral Estate, according to the ruling.

The U.S. Department of the Interior administers the Osage Nation’s mineral rights, which include ownership of rocks and minerals below the ground’s surface. Federal law requires developers to obtain a permit from the tribe’s Minerals Council to engage in any mining activity in the county.
A federal district judge initially ruled in favor of the wind farm project in 2015, finding that excavation of the rock for the wind turbine concrete foundation did not constitute mining.

But the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver reversed that decision in a 2017 ruling.

The appellate court held that Osage Wind’s extraction, sorting, crushing and use of minerals as part of its excavation work constituted mineral development, thereby requiring a federally approved lease that was not obtained. It disputed the district judge’s interpretation that the definition of mining required the sale of minerals.

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request by Osage Wind to review the appeals court decision.

In considering whether to issue a permanent injunction, Choe-Groves weighed several factors, including balancing the tribe’s claim that the unleased wind farm damages its sovereignty against Osage Wind’s claim that it would suffer the inevitable loss of hundreds of millions of dollars if the wind towers were removed.

Osage Wind also claimed that removal of the wind turbines would result in a loss of revenue from two local schools, jobs, income for the surface estate owners and renewable energy for 50,000 homes.

But Choe-Groves was not persuaded by Osage Wind’s claims of the harm that would occur if the turbines were removed.

“Even if negative effects were to result, including the significant monetary impact of hundreds of millions of dollars, such effects would not negate the public interest in private entities abiding by the law and respecting government sovereignty and the decision of courts,” the judge wrote.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Judge orders removal of wind farm opposed by Osage Nation appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Biden Finally Picks A Side In The Big Clean Energy Fight Dividing Democrats

Energy News Beat

The Biden administration sided with Senate climate hawks in one of the highest-stakes debates over the future of U.S. efforts to cut planet-heating emissions, announcing its long-awaited proposal on Friday for strict rules on production of the hydrogen fuel the federal government is betting on to replace natural gas and oil.

When burned, the only byproduct from hydrogen is water. But nearly all the hydrogen on the market today is made with natural gas through a chemical process that leaves behind climate-changing pollution. Another method of making hydrogen by zapping water with electricity costs more and generates less. But if that power comes from a zero-carbon source, the resulting fuel is considered among the best emissions-free alternatives to jet fuel, diesel and coal in steelmaking.

To bring down the cost of clean hydrogen, the landmark climate-spending law President Joe Biden signed last year, the Inflation Reduction Act, earmarked hundreds of millions of dollars for companies that generate the fuel using clean electricity to claim as write-offs on federal tax bills.

But debate has raged since ― both among Democrats who wrote the legislation, and within the industries that want to make money off clean hydrogen ― over how the government should decide whether electricity is clean. No money can go out until the question is settled. On the Friday morning before Christmas, the Treasury Department provided its answer in a lengthy proposal now subject to 60 days of public comment.

It’s about much more than just hydrogen.

For the first time in more than half a century, the federal government is charting course for swift changes to American industry and infrastructure in the name of larger societal goals. Spurred on by a sense of global competition with China, the U.S. in just three years enacted three major new laws directing the equivalent of a mid-sized nation’s gross domestic product in spending toward rebuilding U.S. manufacturing, particularly of microchips and energy technologies. Future U.S. government efforts to remove carbon dioxide emissions from the atmosphere or incentivize new industries will likely follow the example the hydrogen program sets.

The most controversial issue centered on whether hydrogen is only clean if the producer helped bring enough new green power to the grid to offset the additional demand from electrolyzers ― the machines that use electricity to separate the H from H20.

Opponents said it takes so long to build anything in the U.S. that a strict requirement for new electricity supply would smother the country’s nascent hydrogen industry, allowing the fossil-fueled incumbent to retain its control of the market. Nuclear power companies in particular balked at a requirement the world’s largest but fast-shrinking atomic energy fleet could hardly meet, given that building a new reactor can take a decade or more. Nearly a dozen Democrats who co-authored the Inflation Reduction Act in the first place warned that regulations mandating new supply would clash with their intentions in writing the law.

But supporters of requiring new supply ― including environmentalists and the world’s largest hydrogen manufacturer ― said it was the only way to ensure that a green hydrogen boom didn’t simply shift emissions around the economy.

Worse yet, hydrogen coming off a dirty grid was actually generating more emissions than the same volume of the fuel made the traditional fossil-fueled way. Electricity is lost extracting the hydrogen from the water, so the total amount of energy contained in all the hydrogen produced from an electrolyzer is less than what was used to make it. If new clean supply isn’t required, Democrats like Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.) argued, then this policy they wrote to finance the creation of a clean industry would actually just cannibalize existing green electricity and fund a fossil-fuel bacchanal.

Whitehouse’s side won over the White House.

Three senior administration officials on a call with reporters Thursday morning stressed repeatedly the proposal is not final, and pointed out that the regulatory notice specifically requests comments on ways to help existing nuclear plants qualify for the tax credit.

But Department of Energy data show even the patches of the U.S. grid system with the most atomic energy stations aren’t clean enough on the whole to strike the requirement for new supply, they said.

Inside this shipping container is a machine called an electrolyzer, using electricity from the Nine Mile Nuclear Power Station in Oswego, New York, to produce zero-carbon hydrogen fuel. The project, seen here on Dec. 13, is the first in the country ― and possibly the world ― and received funding from the utility giant Constellation and the federal Department of Energy.

ALEXANDER C. KAUFMAN FOR HUFFPOST

So the plan as of now is to require companies seeking to claim one of the IRA’s so-called 45V tax credits for producing clean hydrogen with electrolyzers plugged into the grid, to submit documentation from an accredited third-party certification service showing that each kilogram of hydrogen was made with electricity that checks three boxes.

The first is that the electrolyzer facility was located near a source of clean electricity. The second is that the facility was generating the hydrogen at a time when there was plenty of clean electricity on the grid. The third ― and most controversial ― is that new, clean supply entered service on the grid to offset the electrolyzer’s demand.

The European Union enacted similar rules for its own hydrogen subsidies. But the law worked differently in Europe, and allowed for a specific carveout the French government demanded for nuclear energy.

Utility giant Constellation, the largest nuclear plant operator in the U.S., said the third “additionality” requirement in the U.S. government program unfairly cuts out atomic energy, and sends a confusing signal. The president’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which passed before the IRA, directed billions of dollars toward setting up eight hydrogen industrial clusters across the U.S., three of which include nuclear companies. Constellation has what it called the world’s first commercial nuclear-powered hydrogen operation going in Oswego, New York, funded jointly with the Energy Department. Now those projects are in jeopardy, the company said, encouraged through one law and discouraged by another.

“The proposed rule flies in the face of Congress’ clear intent to use America’s nuclear energy to produce hydrogen,” Constellation said in a statement emailed to HuffPost. “If finalized, America will surrender hydrogen and deep decarbonization leadership to China and Europe, both of which have policies that smartly utilize their existing nuclear plants to make hydrogen and speed decarbonization.”

The administration officials ― who declined to speak on the record ― said Thursday that Energy Department analysis found that about 5% of the existing nuclear fleet is at risk of retiring early, despite all the other incentives for atomic energy that were enacted in other parts of the IRA and in state laws. That “would or could suggest” that establishing some kind of 5% “allowance” for existing generation on the grid “would be appropriate,” one official said, noting that “this is why we need feedback from industry during the 60-day period.”

But enacting the rules as proposed would deliver a big win for another, nascent form of zero-carbon electricity that, like nuclear reactors, pumps out power 24 hours a day, unlike weather dependent solar and wind energy. Geothermal power, which harnesses the heat from the Earth’s core to make steam for electricity, exists at only a few commercial operations in the U.S. right now.

A photo distributed by Fervo Energy shows one of the geothermal energy company’s drilling rigs.

FERVO ENERGY

But the Houston-based Fervo Energy just broke ground on an “enhanced” geothermal plant in Utah that could set the stage for what executive Ben Serrurier called a “revolution.” Drilling technology once limited geothermal energy only to places where there was enough volcanic activity, seismic vents or shallow enough crust to reach the tap of the Earth’s heat for making steam. Borrowing the “fracking” technologies that transformed the U.S. into the world’s No. 1 producer of oil and gas, Fervo can drill down to heat virtually anywhere in the world, using the financing models, workforces and technologies that worked well in fossil fuels, vastly expanding the potential for geothermal energy. Its first power plants are expected to come online by 2028, the same year the rules for the tax credits propose to take full effect.

But geothermal offers not only the same benefit of constant, zero-carbon power that nuclear provides, it also generates huge amounts of steam, like atomic energy, which can be used for novel methods of producing hydrogen that promise to generate the fuel even more efficiently than the electrolyzers on the market today.

Sticking to the strict rules the Biden administration proposed Friday would make it easier for companies like Fervo to begin attracting private investors who might see the lack of government subsidies tailored specifically to geothermal as a risk.

So far, the company’s timing hasn’t been right.

Federal and state agencies have poured billions into offshore wind turbines and small modular reactors the nuclear industry is banking its future on, despite mounting cost overruns and developers canceling major projects. The president’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law made just $20 million available for help funding research on geothermal drilling. California regulators’ order in 2021 that utilities procure more geothermal was a game changer in terms of government support for the energy source.

“We feel like we’re jumping up and down raising our hands here,” Serrurier said. “Our technology matured two years too late to get into the IRA. It’s easily overlooked. But that’s going to surprise a lot of folks.”

But now, he said, Fervo is in the process of commercializing a first-of-its-kind technology, so competing in the hydrogen space hasn’t been a priority. The guarantee of a stringent rule that, in five years, will kick in fully, means its plants could come online in 2028 and bank on a hydrogen payday.

“Next-generation geothermal missed out before due to some timing issues,” Serrurier said. “It has not received anywhere close to the deployment support other technologies have.”

“Our technology matured two years too late to get into the IRA. It’s easily overlooked. But that’s going to surprise a lot of folks.”

– Ben Serrurier, Fervo Energy

Fervo said it was lobbying the Biden administration to write up a rulebook for geothermal companies to use tax credits under the IRA, which would make it easier for the company to show investors it can benefit from the law’s clean energy incentives.

But relying entirely on power plants just now going through the lengthy process of lining up investors, picking a location, winning over locals and securing permits ― much less a new technology still unproven at scale like geothermal ― “will make many clean hydrogen projects uneconomic and will create years of delay for the few projects that can move forward in the face of the Administration’s added constraints,” the Nuclear Energy Institute said in a statement. The industry group called the proposal “a major step back” on the climate progress the IRA heralded.

Other companies are moving forward with projects that comply with the strict rules. Air Products and Chemicals Inc., the largest commercial supplier of hydrogen fuel in the world, is building a $4 billion megaproject in Texas to generate green hydrogen with all-new wind turbines and solar panels.

“We urge you to be skeptical of claims that proposed strong guidance will kill the industry,” Air Products and six other hydrogen companies with a combined market value of nearly $100 billion wrote in a letter to regulators. “This is demonstrably false.”

Constellation did not say whether it would make good on its previous promise to sue the administration over the rule, but the company warned that excluding atomic fission from the American hydrogen mix right as the energy source is taking off would just put U.S. industry at a disadvantage in the global race.

“The U.S. invented nuclear energy, but policies like this turn our collective back on the hundreds of thousands of women and men working 24/7/365 to produce clean, reliable energy,” the company said, “and in an ironic twist, the rules claim that existing nuclear, ignored for years, is now simply too valuable to use for hydrogen production.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), the powerful head of the Senate’s energy committee and the vocal opponent of strict new supply rules, said last week the administration’s proposal was “horrible” and opened the door to joining any litigation challenging the regulation. But the senior officials said the administration was confident that the new supply regulation would comply with both the IRA and the Clean Air Act.

Asked about the pushback from fellow Democrats on Thursday’s call, the senior officials urged critics to read the fine details of what they called a complex proposal ― with an apparent emphasis on the second word.

HuffPost

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Biden Finally Picks A Side In The Big Clean Energy Fight Dividing Democrats appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

#ENB 165 John Ferrell, Co-Founder and CEO from WellDatabase stops by and oil and gas mergers, the environment, and making money all come up in the conversation.

Energy News Beat

Right now in the energy space, M&A activity is resurgent for several reasons. The first is the global realization that you cannot make an iPhone from a wind turbine and that the ESG investing movement into renewable energy has failed. BlackRock has announced that having oil and gas in ESG portfolios is okay. Well, oil and gas companies have been improving their techniques and practices over the past decades and are cognisant of investors’ demands for returns while taking care of the environment.

At Sandstone, we have been evaluating oil and gas deals, regulations, and the overall markets, and we rely on data. Being able to put disparate data threads and news stories is critical, but having a cool tool makes the job so much easier.

Michael and I just covered Occidental Petroleum’s Permian Basin Acquisition of CrownRock on our Deal Spotlight series. Many people thought that OXY overpaid, but I was looking at the formations of OXY’s wells and noticed their CO2 injection wells and projects. WellDatabase gave us the insights to review details in their press and financials to understand why Warren Buffet increased his investment again.

John Ferrell saw a need in the energy space and created a critical tool for energy companies. We must save the environment and not waste money to deliver low-cost energy to consumers. No “Wildcat Drilling” is going on anymore, and investors want their money back, so drilling a dry hole does not win anyone any favors.

I had a great talk with John and thoroughly enjoyed using WellDatabase as a tool for Sandstone and our clients.

Check out WellDatabase here: https://welldatabase.com/

Connect with John on his LinkedIn HERE: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnferrellsr/

– Get in Contact With The Show –

00:00 – Intro

02:20 – Tell us a little bit about how you got all of this kind of stuff.

05:48 – How long did you how long is well database been?

07:20 – Are you seeing a lot of M&A activity and things going on out?

09:21: Inquiry about strategies for managing diverse drilling activities and formations across different regions.

13:20: Emphasis on industry trends achieving more production with fewer wells, driven by a shift to a more measured and efficient approach supported by data.

15:31: Noting a shift towards a sophisticated approach due to the need for profitability, highlighting the significant increase in the value of data for optimizing drilling efficiency and addressing supply chain challenges.

17:59: Emphasis on a user-centric approach, aiming to improve individuals’ processes by providing better data solutions, with a commitment to prioritizing every user, from family offices to major operators, for collective success.

20:03 – How do I get my investors to know that I’m saving money or my profitability?

23:18 – What about this deal forecasting financial?

25:13 – What’s coming around the corner for you?

26:14 – How do people get a hold of you and what’s the best way? what’s your website?

26:36 – Outro

 Stuart Turley [00:00:03] Hello, everybody. Welcome to the Energy News Beat podcast. My name’s Stu Turnley, president CEO of the Sandstone Group. Have you ever been trying to do a deal and you have absolutely no idea if that deal is any good? Well, I can tell you if it is or not in the oil and gas space, you got to have the right tools. When you have the right tools, then you can go out and you can go out and check and see if it’s the offsetting wells, if there is anything that is like not been producing anything for years. Oh, I’ve got some swampland with an oil well on it. You don’t want to invest in that. I happen to have the co-founder and CEO of well database, John Ferrell here. And we’re going to talk about the M&A and deals and how we evaluate some things in the oil and gas space. Welcome, John. Thank you very much for stopping by.  

 John Ferrell [00:00:58] Oh, thank you, Steve. Thanks for having me. I appreciate it and looking forward to it.  

 Stuart Turley [00:01:01] I’ll tell you what, you get to see the eyeballs of almost every single well that’s out there with your data is some cool stuff. Michael Tanner and I a little inside baseball. We’ve been using your stuff and I love it.  

 John Ferrell [00:01:14] Oh, thank you so much. No, you’re right. It’s it is something that I couldn’t even fathom what it would be like to actually get in the data as deep as I have and everything from the comical errors in the public side of the data that we I mean, we have code you guys would crack up if you saw some of the comments in our code. How many times you see I don’t know why the Railroad Commission is doing this, but we have to work with it. And so, yeah, touching the data to get deep and, you know, really intimate with the data will say is been an eye opening to say the least. But honestly, it’s super enjoyable and really interesting.  

 Stuart Turley [00:01:48] Well, it will database when we’re looking at we also use a little you know we use combo curves. So we take your data, we evaluate the offset, the amount of stuff that’s just raw stuff in the formations. You can sort by formations, you can sort by company, E&P operator, you can sort by just about anything you need. And then all of a sudden, oh, wait a minute, orphan wells come in, there’s some ESG things going on and everything else. And I’m like, Tell us a little bit about how you got all of this kind of stuff. And we’re going to start going into the markets here in a little bit. But there’s layers after layers. And one other really cool thing that I love is Michael will work on the deals and then he’ll share the project with me because I’m too stupid to sit back and take a look at that project and go read it while he’s even in real time. He shares with me the project and then I can go in deeper later and go drill down. But anyway, sorry about that. No questions. I just simply.  

 John Ferrell [00:02:57] I’ll start with three. Number three. No idea. The final battery. Yeah. There’s so much data out there and it’s really been kind of an organic way that we built our product and in on hand. That’s a great thing. But the organic way really worked on it. People would come to us and say, Well, I need to see a tight curve by operating like, okay, well that’s, that’s easy enough where you aggregate the data, make a tight curve by operator, that’s cool. And someone says, okay, we need to normalize it bilaterally, okay, we can do that. And then like, well, let’s break this down by geo are let’s look at the different fields in this area. I mean, different people are everywhere attacking the data in every direction. And so after like a number of times that we kept like kind of adding feature feature, we like, okay, let’s take a step back and let’s get all of our data. And we already had it in a really clean data model. It was, you know, they like term analytic ready steps. We had it all normalized, all claims and all that thing. So anyway, what we ended up doing was building basically the ultimate tool that allows you to kind of control your view. So if you want to group by fields, if you want to group by by operators, you want to group by that well type that we defined based off of gas or ratios, then you can do it and then get all of the views that, you know, again, people like, I want to see a type curve by operator that I might want to see production by gas ratio. But now we just do you get all the toggles at your hand, so you pick how you want to group it and then take your visualization and you’re off to the races. And we started with production, which is still one of the biggest things people talk about. But as we kind of grew our dataset more and more, we started getting people wanting to look at different permitting activity because permits are, you know, people turned it around, show me the permits. The permits come in different flavors and for different reasons and different I mean, there are new wells, there’s workovers, there’s re completes. I mean, there’s a million reasons to permit. So again, depending on what you’re looking for, you need those same toggles. You need to be able to flip these things on and off and see looking at different directions. And we expanded into the completions, into frac data. We got into injection so that water, if people are working at water floods, can do injection things and try to compare that with production. And then even on the issues that you brought it at the disposition side where the flaring falls into, again, we’re looking for all the same type of visualizations, just a different data. And so what we did when we step back is that we basically made this platform. It would break down the data any way you want. And then the collaboration part was something I think was sorely lacking in this industry, being able to to take different kind of different areas of interest. And you do your job and like this is job and but still you put it in a project and everybody can see everything and it’s great. So no, I appreciate your kind words, but it definitely was an evolution. It was really interesting that it didn’t exist in this manner in the past, and it still does outside of, well, the database.  

 Stuart Turley [00:05:48] How long did you how long is well database been in I guess morphing or evolution.  

 John Ferrell [00:05:57] That’s a good story. We actually started our first line of code in 2008, so it’s been a long time ago, but we were heavily built on automation. We didn’t want to have a big headcount like, you know, hundreds of people on a data team. And data. We wanted to automate the processes. So we spent years, I mean, literally years building back in systems and not having a public facing product. And so it was a labor of love. But so that was 2000, eight, 2012, or at least our first customer facing product. And 2015 is when we did that kind of start of the analytics engine that you see today. So in reality, 2012 was our very first release. 2015 is really when we kind of went in the current current iteration. So it’s been some time.  

 Stuart Turley [00:06:46] You know, and Michael Tanner is absolutely a hoot. He’s he’s well aware of your product. He’s used it for he’s a bit of a freak. And I, I would love to just do a Vulcan mind melt on him and take all of his technical knowledge. But I would actually like to leave all of his personal stuff there. I just watch that stuff. Now, that being said, the amount of deals that we’re actually reviewing in other NPR operators you’re asking us to do is phenomenal. I mean, M&A, are you seeing a lot of M&A activity and things going on out? And it seems like when you got Exxon over here doing billions of dollars, investing in the Permian where total energies or total energy, as we say, and in Texas, is investing in natural gas plants in the in Texas, a lot of money changing hands in Texas right now.  

 John Ferrell [00:07:45] Oh, yeah. And those are the big ones. That’s the thing about it. Like the M&A activity, we always kind of homed in on the big ones that happen. But in between that, you’ve got, you know, small deals happening for, you know, bits of acreage here and there. And it’s it’s the treadmill is a constant treadmill of deal activity that’s happening even in slow times. It’s more than people realize. That’s good. That doesn’t necessarily make it headline every every you know, every deal that happens. It’s so yeah, it’s honest. It’s a huge part of what we do. M&A activity, as you guys have seen in our platform is is well suited to to evaluate that to help surface insights especially from offsetting wells and operators that try to basically determine and help you identify the strategy of each operator and the wells they’re drilling and what you can expect from your offsetting acreage. Yeah. Yeah. But M&A activity is it’s a nonstop and it’s only this year has been a kind of a crazy year honestly. But we had kind of a lull from the big deal situation for a couple of years there. And so this is playing some catch up. I think.  

 Stuart Turley [00:08:50] You know, John, with the world the way it is, we need our oil and gas more now than we I think we ever need it in the past. And I think that nobody’s saying anything different than we have Cop 28 going on right now. And the president of Cop 28 says there’s no reason for climate change and if you get rid of fossil fuel, will go back to the Stone Age. Okay. I think that’s pretty clear. Yeah.  

 John Ferrell [00:09:21] Yeah.  

 Stuart Turley [00:09:21] It’s pretty clear. We’re going to have a lot of drilling going on. And I was impressed to see the difference between that, the plays as well as the formations when we’re drilling down on deals and you’re saying, you know, and it’s just anywhere and in Canada and everything else you guys got at home down.  

 John Ferrell [00:09:43] Absolutely. And it’s you’re exactly right. It’s it’s I can’t say you never know with the media exactly where where people’s heads are when the talking heads especially but the political side where it is. But the simple fact that that you know, it’s not going anywhere and it’s a necessity for us to be where we’re at. And that being said, you know, we’re also running fewer rigs overall. I mean, we were up from 2020, but still, you know, you think back to the days where around 2000 rigs. Oh, yeah. And our production is higher today than we were running 2000 rigs. So the efficiencies and what we’ve done have gone through the roof and almost kind of under the radar. We spent a little bit of time kind of backtracking on some of our bad forecasting deals. The the the investment started to get a little quiet because of some of those things. But we’re now that we’ve quietly are running record production record profits and we’re doing really well with fewer, fewer rivers running. And you know, I think the biggest challenge today is going to end up being around the market dynamics the way OPEC and things we want to do, because America continues to kind of displace and screw up with their plans. But fundamentally, though, I mean, renewables functionally are this fine idea when the technology can keep up with the demand that we need. I don’t think anyone in the industry is sitting or saying we don’t want renewables in any way. I think we all are cool with it, right, If you get to ten. Technology in place where it functionally can give us in the same. Same place we are now. One of the examples I like to use is the way back when it’s. It probably didn’t show my age, but still the theses and. Aerosol cans. You remember that whole thing back in the hole in the ozone layer situation happened and oh yeah, it’s such a big deal. Well, it’s it went away because there were alternatives. There were viable alternatives that were put in the market. People adopted them. Just find the problem resolved itself with the Bible. Alternative is key there. People are completely okay with with changing their methods as long as it’s a. You know puts you doesn’t cost you anything. Right. So anyway, long long story short, when the renewables get to a place where they can actually be a viable alternative for the scale of energy use as needed, then this will be a real distraction to very it’s just posturing, if you ask me.  

 Stuart Turley [00:12:05] So it’s like Saudi Arabia is using all their profits from went from oil and gas to fund their hydrogen and their transition to the renewables and everything else. Right. Not a bad way to do it. And John, when we take a look at Texas, God bless Texas. We got more wind than California and we got more so than just about anybody else. We’re about to pass them. We got half the energy cost as we do as California or New York. And Governor Holcomb said the other day, I know people are tired of me, but I thought it was funny when you said all your energy costs are going to go up 20%. I’m like, Oh, nice. And then she said, Oh, by the way, next year your energy costs are going to go up another 20% and by within three years you’re going to be 100% more. I’m like, So that’s 100. And I went to Oklahoma State and that’s 140% now, you know, so but they want to get rid of fossil fuels now. And just what about trying to create out of your iPhone, out of a windmill? I am figured that one out yet you got to have petrochemicals in order to get your iPhone to work.  

 John Ferrell [00:13:20] Yeah, no, I think you need a hammer of some kind to make it out of a windmill. Now you could take it down and repurpose the parts or. Yeah. And it’s not really feasible anyway. It’s it’s a silly notion, but you know, it is cool though. The, the efficiency gains and all of these, we’re going to see a lot of that and well database you know they kind of break down the type curves over time. It’s remarkable. There are very strong trends that show that in areas in not just the Permian but all over, we are getting more out of less. You know, fewer wells are producing more production. And all in all, honestly, if you look at the profile of the two completions, the fracs there, they have on a per foot basis that are kind of normalized in this, you know, 5,000 pounds a foot kind of situation, and you get a little bit of variability in there. But you you’re seeing people focusing on efficiency. And that’s a really strong thing. It’s something that’s good for the industry because there was a time we were a little willy nilly. We were we couldn’t lose when oil was $100, if you remember that. And we were just, you know, poking holes in the ground and getting what comes out. And we couldn’t care less about the science because you couldn’t lose. Now we see a little bit more of a measured and efficient approach to things. And again, the data shows it’s really nice to be able to see it.  

 Stuart Turley [00:14:44] You know, the supply chain problems you’re on, the evergreen just went sideways in the Suez Canal. That was kind of bad.  

 John Ferrell [00:14:51] When.  

 Stuart Turley [00:14:52] The supply chain broke and the operators all of a sudden got real. You know, a $15 million well went to 30 million. I mean, it was crazy what the Biden Biden nomics did for that bad I mean, excuse me, the supply chain, just like you did and so will database and thing other tools got really really important because if your pipe costs go to double you better save some money somehow.  

 John Ferrell [00:15:23] Well, and that’s it. Yeah. The whole aspect of data science in general in the industry was a little bit overlooked for longer than it should have been. And where people did tacos and where kind of just for to say they did it and it’s a machine learning projects and they have projects and things like that. But you know, we were kind of getting in a car and had the horses. We had never gone down and done widespread, you know, just sophisticated analytical work. Sometimes it was these operators not utilizing the data, but as time kind of and I said, you know, we had that period where we had these kind of crazy forecasts that the even the investment groups weren’t getting the returns on because they weren’t coming back. And all of a sudden when all that stuff started drying up and people like, okay, wait, we actually have to make money now. We need to drill and be efficient, We need to be doing well. And we’re using it right now to. In the in the tax cut and in the tech sector where the layoffs are. I mean, I think I read today over a quarter million jobs have been laid off in the tech sector this year. And they’re focused on profitability. You know, Spotify today dug into data podcast, but they just laid off a sixth of their workforce again, because they weren’t hitting revenue projections or profit projections, not revenue projections, profit, which is news to tech industry profits. But anyway, that same notion, it took time for it to catch on. But once it did data the value of the data, it didn’t double or triple it quintupled. It was hugely valuable. And then beyond that, like you said, with supply chain and the costs and everything, you know, you need more data. And honestly, you can’t you can’t, you know, expend huge amounts of capital on it. And so that’s where that’s where we come in.  

 Stuart Turley [00:17:03] That’s you know, the fun thing is with the family and offices and more people. You mentioned ESG investing, and that is now changing. I mean, we had Bill Gates come out and say, oh, by the way, climate change is not real. I would have never expected that one. And then Larry Fink, the head of BlackRock, came out and said, oh, by the way, oil and gas and natural gas, oil and gas are okay to invest in our ESG funds. You know, John, I think it’s a little amazing when you lose $1.7 trillion in the first half of last year, suddenly oil and gas investing and I’m talking to so many different folks that are investing in oil and gas. The family offices love your stuff. I mean, it is important for even the smaller notes. I mean, smaller offices. You’re you’re is not just a Exxon product.  

 John Ferrell [00:17:59] Absolutely not. No. And that’s something that, you know, fundamentally, this is a funny thing to say, but I’ve grown really to lean on it, that we sell our product to users. And yes, we sign an agreement with companies and that kind of thing. But we’re really focused on the individual, the single person and how we can improve their process, their life, give them better answers, better data. I mean, honestly, when I talk to people when we’re doing demos, they’re just so frustrated that they have to spend so much time maneuvering, jacking with data, trying to make it work right so that they could start, you know, even get started with their job. I mean, it’s a joke. That Fidelity, I think, released a paper saying to take seven days to do their standard evaluation based off of a survey of the members. And half of that time was spent getting data in a place to where their job can be done. So you spend half of your time as a data tech analysis, ridiculous. And you kind of take that step back to to working for the people. That means that whenever we’re working to make an individual’s life better than the one person to person, people at the family office are just important to us. As you know, the major operator, because we’re not really talking about ExxonMobil, we’re talking about Dave, the reservoir engineer who needs this data so that he can do his job. That’s where our focus is. And what we found is if we do that well, then the results bubble up and the company wins by virtue of all of its employees winning. So it also means that we can pay attention to the little guy, the consultants, the companies, service companies, anybody. You know, it makes us more viable across the board.  

Stuart Turley [00:19:39] You know, it’s kind of goofy is, you know, I get see, you know, being the CEO of my company, I let the employees push me around like my wife did I say that? So, yeah, no, we don’t want them either. But when you sit back and take a look at whether or not how all of this plays in as a CEO, you take a CEO and he’s sitting there, I got to save money. How do I get my investors to know that I’m saving money or my profitability? You have done a great job with being able to make those land men, those geologists, those people evaluating deals more profitable with their time in making money for that executive and their CEO. So when I talk to other CEOs, they’re sitting there kind of going, well, you know, and they’re there. I’m hearing them say these decisions and my information in order to make that decision are taken too long.  

John Ferrell [00:20:38] So, you know.  

 Stuart Turley [00:20:40] Your data is critical.  

 John Ferrell [00:20:42] No, you’re exactly right. And our platform is geared for that. I think we had a great testimonial from a customer the other day was awesome. I think he was on a train. He was in Europe working on US assets, but he was on a train and his stop was like five minutes away. So and he got an email for like an emergency. It’s very small, like five wells. What does this look like? You know, we need to know in now. We have no time. This is a he said he opened a well database while on the train. Use the connectivity that was there that he could get. I don’t know if I’m trying and it’s been a long time on trains.  

 Stuart Turley [00:21:18] And been real good.  

 John Ferrell [00:21:19] So he pulled up those wells. He ran in his quick type curve on them, did a quick economics look on them. Just that back of the envelope. It was he looks on off that well to make sure he wasn’t missing anything. He looked at any permits outstanding and he said he composed an email with the results, screenshots, everything he needed and a go no go answer. And he closed his laptop before it was time to get off the train. So that was amazing. But the A definitely. That’s the thing about it. It’s, it’s, that’s.  

 Stuart Turley [00:21:52] That’s what gets you out of bed in the morning. John I can tell the way you were talking about for our podcast listeners his eyes kind of glued you know lit up a little bit. That’s what gets you out of bed in the morning in it.  

 John Ferrell [00:22:04] No, it’s great. It’s the thing that I actually beat my head against the wall quite a bit when I talked to some some potential users, I was like, okay, what are you trying to accomplish? Because they will be jumping through all of these hoops when all they really want is into your or something like that. And I was like, All right, if I can, I can show you my database. We can do that in two clicks rather than like six exports and five Excel spreadsheets and combine it. I mean, you’re just jumping through hoops because like, you didn’t have these options before and now you do. So let’s rethink the way we’re doing this. And once once you can get them the step back and tell you exactly what they want and you show them, then it can be done in two steps versus 20. And we you don’t lose a deal in that situation. And again, like you said, it all blows up If we make everybody at a company more efficient with their time, quicker to make decisions. The company as a whole wins, you know, but.  

 Stuart Turley [00:22:53] The investors win and all stakeholders win.  

 John Ferrell [00:22:58] Right? Yeah.  

 Stuart Turley [00:23:00] One of the other things about, well, database is so well done. The APIs and the hook ins on this, a shout out to combo curve because they have a strength with financial forecasting. So that goes back to my other CEO come in when he’s over there beating on me for saying, Hey, wait a minute, what about this deal forecasting financial? Well, wait, what if this and what if that? So you have a plug in and we go to a well database with combo curve. Are you coming in over here, pal? I’m like, so if you’re on a five minute train and you’ve got a CEO with a spear in your back, you might be able to make dinner.  

 John Ferrell [00:23:42] Right now, that’s all credit the combo curve because we we as technical people, as our cerebral database, we reach out to every popular software. And you want to integrate. Do you want to integrate? Do you want to integrate? Our goal was just to integrate with as many software as you can, and we hit a dead end after a dead end. This industry is not really used to wanting to collaborate in people with good faith. I just want to make my data go into your platform. That’s it. I don’t want anything else. Right? Yeah. It’s kind of beat your heads against the wall. And so over time, we’ve been able to make inroads in a lot of software package. Dealing was another one that was good to do because I was the first one that jumped out and was like, Yeah, let’s build connectors, let’s do this, let’s do that. And now is that, yeah, if you got combo curve, you have the connector that rolls in. If you’re using well database, you can export directly to a combo curve that the file that will import in the combo curve. And that’s just what our users need. Like you need to be able to do the job. You need to do whatever it needs to be done. You don’t need handcuffs, you need freedom to move around. So now it’s my hat’s off to Booker for, for spearheading that, that kind of API connection and we need more software doing that.  

 Stuart Turley [00:24:51] And if he if you got a software issue out there and you got I got freaks that work for me that are just absolute they enjoy the headache of disparate business systems. So I mean that’s the kind of fun thing that’s out there. And yeah, you got to have the right tools and that’s why we picked the right tools. Well, John, we got about another minute or two here. What’s coming around the corner for you? I hear you may be at night, so that be cool.  

 John Ferrell [00:25:19] Absolutely. Now, looking forward to tonight and some of the you know, I’m hoping to see a resurgence in some deals out there so we can look at them and maybe get some evaluations and then see some more activity roll out. Remember the day old days and they put big posters on every booth. So it’s like people putting sold signs on their maps. And I want to see some of that again. That was fun. But yeah, we kind of in an age, we’ve got a lot of stuff brewing, some more economic tools to kind of make your job easier, where we’re working on a data marketplace where we can start allowing you to get some third party data stacked on top of the public data all in one platform. It’s going to be super clean and easy. So next year is going to be a really, really fun year for us.  

 Stuart Turley [00:25:58] Oh, isn’t that great? I’ll tell you what, I do love your staff and I want to shout out to Aaron for helping put this together. So you got some good people working for years now.  

 John Ferrell [00:26:08] I don’t know how I got lucky. Yeah, especially with Aaron. She’s amazing. So. Yeah. Shout out to Aaron for that.  

 Stuart Turley [00:26:14] Well, John, how do people get a hold of you and what’s the best way? We’re going to have your LinkedIn information in the show notes. But what’s your website?  

 John Ferrell [00:26:23] It’s well database.com. It’s that easy one word well database and we’re on LinkedIn We obviously stay pretty active on LinkedIn and even even our ex these days we still post there. And then yeah, if you want to reach me directly, you can shoot me an email for a well database.com. I know you’re probably not supposed to give out your emails on podcasts, but I don’t care. I like talking to people. So anyway.  

 Stuart Turley [00:26:46] How fun. All right. We are going to have a lot of blast. And my name’s Du Turnley, president CEO of the Sandstone Group. Thank you all very much for listening to the Energy News Meet podcast. And we will see you guys soon.  

– Get in Contact With The Show –

Real Estate Investor Pulse

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 

ENB

Energy Dashboard

ENB Podcast

ENB Substack

The post #ENB 165 John Ferrell, Co-Founder and CEO from WellDatabase stops by and oil and gas mergers, the environment, and making money all come up in the conversation. appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Barcarena FSRU departs Singapore for Brazil

Energy News Beat

The 160,000-cbm, Energos Celsius, which will serve New Fortress Energy’s FSRU-based LNG import terminal in Barcarena, has left Seatrium’s yard in Singapore and is on its way to Brazil.

Seatrium announced on Friday the delivery of the converted FSRU to NFE.

NFE sold this LNG carrier and ten other vessels last year to a joint venture it formed with compatriot asset manager Apollo.

Apollo owns 80 percent in Energos Infrastructure and NFE holds the rest.

The 2013-built vessel, previously known as Golar Celsius, is on long-term charter to NFE in Brazil.

Seatrium said the conversion of the FSRU was completed on time and within budget, and the unit has departed the Seatrium shipyard for Brazil.

Energos Celsius was on Friday still anchored offshore Singapore, its AIS data provided by VesselsValue shows.

Energos Celsius will have a nominal regasification capacity of 750 million standard cubicfeet per day (mmscfd), up to a maximum capacity of 1,000 mmscfd.

It will subsequently be deployed at NFE’s completed LNG terminal in Barcarena, Para state, Brazil, Seatrium said.

This LNG import terminal will be the first LNG import facility in the state of Para and the Northern region of Brazil, it said.

NFE said in August it completed the 3 mtpa Barcarena terminal worth about $700 million and the firm planned to ship first gas supplies to Norsk Hydro at the end of this year.

Besides an FSRU, the terminal located at the mouth of the Amazon River in Para includes a jetty, a three kilometers long pipeline, and a gas conditioning station that will initially serve Norsk Hydro.

In December 2021, NFE and Norsk Hydro finalized a 15-year deal to supply regasified LNG to the Alunorte alumina refinery in Brazil.

NFE is also also building the 605 MW Barcarena power plant and this facility will also receive regasified LNG from the Barcarena terminal and deliver power under 25-year power purchase agreements linked to JKM.

In November, NFE secured financing to complete construction of the Barcarena power plant, which is about 37 percent complete.

The power plant, located adjacent to NFE’s LNG import terminal, is “on schedule” to start operations in the third quarter of 2025 under a 25-year PPA with several electricity distribution companies in Brazil, it said.

NFE also said in November the conversion of the Energos Celsius from an LNG carrier to an FSRU “remains on schedule” for November completion, before delivery and first gas to customers at the Barcarena import terminal beginning at year end 2023.

Besides the Barcarena facility, NFE said in November that its LNG import terminal in Santa Catarina, Brazil will start commercial operations in January 2024.

NFE has executed a definitive deal to charter the 138,250-cbm FSRU Energos Winter from Brazil’s state-owned energy firm Petrobras starting in December 2023.

This FSRU, also owned by Energos Infrastructure, will serve the Santa Catarina terminal.

 

The post Barcarena FSRU departs Singapore for Brazil appeared first on Energy News Beat.