Chord Energy Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial and Operating Results, Declares Base and Variable Dividends, Issues Second Quarter Outlook and Provides Update on Pending Combination with Enerplus

Energy News Beat

HOUSTONMay 7, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Chord Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: CHRD) (“Chord”, “Chord Energy” or the “Company”) today reported financial and operating results for the first quarter 2024.

1Q24 Operational and Financial Highlights:

Oil volumes of 99.0 MBopd exceeded the high-end of guidance;
Lease Operating Expense of $10.39/BOE was below the low-end of guidance;
Total volumes of 168.4 MBoepd;
E&P and other CapEx of $257.7MM (including $3.9MM of reimbursed non-operated capital);
1Q24 volumes and capital reflect activity acceleration driven by cycle-time improvement, along with strong well performance;
Net cash provided by operating activities was $406.7MM and net income was $199.4MM;
Adjusted EBITDA(1) was $464.8MM and Adjusted Free Cash Flow(1) was $199.6MM; and
Chord and Enerplus Corporation (“Enerplus”) expect to complete the previously announced transaction to combine on May 31, 2024, subject to customary closing conditions. See “Update on Enerplus Combination” below for additional information.

1Q24 Shareholder Return Highlights:

Return of capital was set at $153MM, or 75% of Adjusted Free Cash Flow (excluding $3.9MM of reimbursed non-operated capital);
Share repurchases totaled $30.0MM (weighted average price of $155.20 per share);
Declared a base-plus-variable cash dividend of $2.94 per share of common stock. See “Return of Capital” below for additional information.

(1) Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures under United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

“Chord delivered exceptional operational performance in the first quarter,” said Danny Brown, Chord Energy’s President and Chief Executive Officer. “The team rebounded quickly from difficult weather conditions in January while improving cycle times in our development program and exhibiting the strongest quarterly safety performance in company history. This improved operational performance, coupled with strong well performance, drove first quarter oil production and free cash flow above expectations. Shareholder returns remain robust, supported by deep, low-cost inventory and excellent capital efficiency.”

Mr. Brown continued, “Chord and Enerplus remain on track to combine at the end of the month, creating a premier Williston Basin operator with enhanced scale, significant low-cost inventory, financial strength, and peer-leading shareholder returns. Chord has completed numerous transactions since 2021, and our organization has made integration a core competency. The Chord and Enerplus teams are working diligently to identify incremental synergies and expect to see more than $150MM of synergies captured, excluding upside from stock-based compensation or cost of capital. We remain focused on our core operating philosophy emphasizing capital discipline, improving operational efficiency and returns, and sustainable practices. We remain excited about the oil and gas industry and the value we bring to the world.”

Update on Enerplus Combination:

Chord and Enerplus continue to make progress on their pending combination in a stock-and-cash transaction and expect the transaction to close on May 31, 2024, subject to customary closing conditions. The waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 expired on April 5, 2024, which satisfied one of the conditions to closing.

On April 9, 2024, Chord filed its definitive proxy statement relating to the special meeting of Chord stockholders to consider and vote upon (i) the issuance of shares of Chord common stock in connection with the transaction and (ii) the amendment to its charter to increase the number of authorized shares of Chord common stock from 120,000,000 to 240,000,000. The record date for the Chord stockholders entitled to vote at its special meeting was the close of business on April 8, 2024, and the special meeting is scheduled to be held on May 14, 2024.

On April 25, 2024, Enerplus filed its management information circular relating to the special meeting of Enerplus shareholders to consider and vote upon the transaction. The record date for the Enerplus shareholders entitled to vote at its special meeting was the close of business on April 22, 2024, and the special meeting is scheduled to be held on May 24, 2024.

1Q24 Operational and Financial Update:

The following table presents select Chord standalone 1Q24 operational and financial data compared to guidance released in February 2024:

Metric

1Q24 Actual

1Q24 Guidance

Oil volumes (MBopd)

99.0

95.0 – 98.0

NGL volumes (MBblpd)

34.4

33.0 – 34.0

Natural gas volumes (MMcfpd)

209.8

217.0 – 223.0

Total volumes (MBoepd)

168.4

164.2 – 169.2

Oil discount to WTI ($/Bbl)

$(1.71)

$(2.30) – $(1.30)

NGL realization (% of WTI)

20 %

15% – 25%

Residue gas realization (% of Henry Hub)

51 %

55% – 65%

LOE ($/Boe)

$10.39

$10.70 – $11.50

Cash GPT ($/Boe)(1)

$3.30

$2.80 – $3.40

Cash G&A ($MM)(1)

$14.5

$16.5 – $19.5

Production Taxes (% of oil, NGL and gas sales)

8.5 %

8.4% – 8.8%

E&P & Other CapEx ($MM)(2)

$257.7

$230 – $260

Cash Interest ($MM)(1)

$7.4

$7.0 – $8.0

Cash Tax (% of Adjusted EBITDA)(3)

0 %

0% – 5%

___________________

(1)

Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures under GAAP.

(2)

Includes $3.9MM of reimbursed non-operated capital.

(3)

Based on $70/Bbl – $90/Bbl WTI.

Chord had 29 gross (23.4 net) operated turn-in-line (“TIL”) wells in 1Q24 (52% three-mile laterals).

During the three months ended March 31, 2024, net cash provided by operating activities was $406.7MM and net income was $199.4MM ($4.65/diluted share). Adjusted EBITDA was $464.8MM, Adjusted Free Cash Flow was $199.6MM and Adjusted Net Income was $218.1MM ($5.10/diluted share). Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Adjusted Net Income are non-GAAP financial measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures under GAAP.

Updated Outlook:

Chord’s guidance outlook does not include impacts from the pending combination with Enerplus. Chord expects to update its 2024 guidance following the completion of the transaction.

Chord’s FY24 guidance remains largely unchanged relative to the outlook released in February, while 2Q24 guidance reflects the impacts of acceleration driven by cycle-time improvement. FY24 guidance was updated to reflect lower natural gas volumes and price realizations were adjusted to reflect current market conditions. On a standalone basis in 2024, Chord continues to expect to TIL 103 – 113 gross operated wells (approximately two-thirds three-mile laterals). Additionally, Chord expects to generate approximately $1.9B of Adjusted EBITDA and $870MM of Adjusted Free Cash Flow with a reinvestment rate of approximately 50% ($80/Bbl WTI and $2.50/MMBtu Henry Hub). Chord remains focused on generating strong returns and sustainable free cash flow for shareholders.

The following table presents select Chord standalone operational and financial guidance for 2Q24 and FY24:

Metric

2Q24 Guidance

Updated FY24
Guidance

Original FY24
Guidance

Oil volumes (MBopd)

97.5 – 100.5

97.0 – 101.0

97.0 – 101.0

NGL volumes (MBblpd)

34.0 – 35.0

34.0 – 35.0

34.0 – 35.0

Natural gas volumes (MMcfpd)

219.0 – 225.0

214.0 – 220.0

217.5 – 223.5

Total volumes (MBoepd)

168.0 – 173.0

166.7 – 172.7

167.3 – 173.3

Oil premium (discount) to WTI ($/Bbl)

$(1.80) – $0.20

$(1.75) – $0.00

$(1.75) – $0.00

NGL realization (% of WTI)

15% – 25%

15% – 25%

15% – 25%

Residue gas realization (% of Henry Hub)

35% – 45%

40% – 50%

45% – 55%

LOE ($/Boe)

$10.70 – $11.50

$10.50 – $11.30

$10.60 – $11.40

Cash GPT ($/Boe)(1)

$2.60 – $3.20

$2.40 – $3.00

$2.30 – $2.90

Cash G&A ($MM)(1)

$16.5 – $19.5

$63.0 – $73.0

$63.0 – $73.0

Production Taxes (% of oil, NGL and gas sales)

8.4% – 8.8%

8.4% – 8.7%

8.4% – 8.8%

E&P & Other CapEx ($MM)

$275 – $295

$905 – $945

$905 – $945

Cash Interest ($MM)(1)

$7.0 – $8.0

$28.0 – $32.0

$28.0 – $32.0

Cash Tax (% of Adjusted EBITDA)(2)

0% – 7%

4% – 9%

3% – 9%

___________________

(1)

Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures under GAAP.

(2)

Based on $70/Bbl – $90/Bbl WTI.

Select Operational and Financial Data:

The following table presents select operational and financial data for the periods presented:

1Q24

1Q23

Production data:

Crude oil (MBopd)

99.0

95.1

NGLs (MBblpd)

34.4

32.7

Natural gas (MMcfpd)

209.8

221.4

Total production (MBoepd)

168.4

164.7

Percent crude oil

58.8 %

57.7 %

Average sales prices:

Crude oil, without realized derivatives ($/Bbl)

$ 75.32

$ 76.04

Differential to NYMEX WTI ($/Bbl)

(1.71)

Crude oil, with realized derivatives ($/Bbl)

75.17

65.79

Crude oil realized derivatives ($MM)

(1.4)

(87.7)

NGL, without realized derivatives ($/Bbl)

15.09

21.13

NGL, with realized derivatives ($/Bbl)

15.09

22.10

NGL realized derivatives ($MM)

2.9

Natural gas, without realized derivatives ($/Mcf)

1.16

2.66

Natural gas, with realized derivatives ($/Mcf)

1.16

2.31

Natural gas realized derivatives ($MM)

(7.0)

Selected financial data ($MM):

Revenues:

Crude oil revenues

$ 678.9

$ 650.9

NGL revenues

47.3

62.2

Natural gas revenues

22.1

53.1

Total oil, NGL and natural gas revenues

$ 748.3

$ 766.2

Cash flows:

Net cash provided by operating activities:

$ 406.7

$ 468.8

Non-GAAP financial measures(1):

Adjusted EBITDA

$ 464.8

$ 408.3

Adjusted Free Cash Flow(2)

199.6

198.6

Adjusted Net Income

218.1

194.4

Select operating expenses:

Lease operating expenses (“LOE”)

$ 159.2

$ 153.4

Gathering, processing and transportation expenses (“GPT”)

54.0

37.0

Production taxes

63.9

60.5

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

168.9

133.8

Total select operating expenses

$ 446.0

$ 384.7

Earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share

$ 4.79

$ 7.13

Diluted earnings per share

4.65

6.87

Adjusted diluted earnings per share (Non-GAAP)(1)

5.10

4.49

___________________

(1)

Non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measures under GAAP.

(2)

1Q24 Adjusted Free Cash Flow includes $3.9MM of reimbursed non-operated capital.

Capital Expenditures:

The following table presents the Company’s total capital expenditures (“CapEx”) by category for the period presented:

1Q24

CapEx ($MM):

E&P(1)

$ 257.7

Other

Total E&P and other CapEx(1)

257.7

Capitalized interest

0.7

Total CapEx

$ 258.4

___________________

(1)

1Q24 includes $3.9MM of reimbursed non-operated capital.

Return of Capital:

Chord declared a base-plus-variable cash dividend of $2.94 per share of common stock, including a base dividend of $1.25 per share of common stock and a variable dividend of $1.69 per share of common stock. The dividends will be payable on June 5, 2024 to shareholders of record as of May 22, 2024. Details regarding the calculation of the variable dividend can be found in the Company’s most recent investor presentation located on its website at https://ir.chordenergy.com/presentations.

During 1Q24, the Company repurchased 193,269 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $155.20 per share totaling $30.0MM. Additionally, the Company purchased 279,587 shares of common stock for $46.1MM associated with tax withholdings on vested equity-based compensation awards.

As of March 31, 2024, the Company had $653.0MM of capacity remaining on its $750MM share repurchase program.

Balance Sheet and Liquidity:

The following table presents key balance sheet data and liquidity metrics as of March 31, 2024 (in millions):

March 31, 2024

Revolving credit facility(1)

$ 1,000.0

Revolver borrowings

$ –

Senior notes

400.0

Total debt

$ 400.0

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 296.4

Letters of credit

$ 8.9

Liquidity

$ 1,287.5

___________________

(1)

$2.5B borrowing base and $1.0B of elected commitments.

Contact:

Chord Energy Corporation
Bob Bakanauskas, Managing Director, Investor Relations
(281) 404-9600
[email protected]

Conference Call Information

Investors, analysts and other interested parties are invited to listen to the webcast:

Date:

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Time:

9:00 a.m. Central

Live Webcast:

https://app.webinar.net/RZ0XNDkgLM5

To join the conference call by phone without operator assistance (including sell-side analysts wishing to ask a question), you may register and enter your phone number at https://emportal.ink/3JrAorT to receive an instant automated call back and be immediately placed into the call.

You may also use the following dial-in information to join the conference call by phone with operator assistance:

Dial-in:

1-800-836-8184

Intl. Dial-in:

1-646-357-8785

Conference ID:

34205

A recording of the conference call will be available beginning at 1:00 p.m. Central on the day of the call and will be available until Wednesday, May 15, 2024 by dialing:

Replay dial-in:

1-888-660-6345

Intl. replay:

1-646-517-4150

Replay access:

34205 #

The call will also be available for replay for approximately 30 days at https://www.chordenergy.com

No Offer or Solicitation

This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to subscribe for or buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval with respect to the pending arrangement between Chord and Enerplus (the “Arrangement”) or otherwise, nor shall there be any sale, issuance or transfer of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

Important Additional Information

In connection with the Arrangement, Chord and Enerplus have filed, or intend to file, materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and on SEDAR+, as applicable. Chord filed a definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) with the SEC in connection with the solicitation of proxies to obtain Chord stockholder approval of the Arrangement, and Enerplus filed an information circular and proxy statement (the “Circular”) with the TSX and on SEDAR+ in connection with the solicitation of proxies to obtain Enerplus shareholder approval of the Arrangement. Chord has also mailed the Proxy Statement to the stockholders of Chord. This communication is not a substitute for the Proxy Statement, the Circular or for any other document that Chord or Enerplus may file with the SEC or on SEDAR+ and/or send to Chord stockholders and/or Enerplus’ shareholders in connection with the Arrangement. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF CHORD AND ENERPLUS ARE URGED TO CAREFULLY AND THOROUGHLY READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND THE CIRCULAR, RESPECTIVELY, AS EACH MAY BE AMENDED OR SUPPLEMENTED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED BY CHORD AND/OR ENERPLUS WITH THE SEC OR ON SEDAR+, WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT CHORD, ENERPLUS, THE ARRANGEMENT, THE RISKS RELATED THERETO AND RELATED MATTERS.

Stockholders of Chord and shareholders of Enerplus are able to obtain free copies of the Proxy Statement and the Circular, as each may be amended from time to time, and other relevant documents filed by Chord and/or Enerplus with the SEC or on SEDAR+ (when they become available) through the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov or on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca, as applicable. Copies of documents filed with the SEC by Chord are available free of charge from Chord’s website at www.chordenergy.com under the “Investors” tab or by contacting Chord’s Investor Relations Department at (281) 404-9600 or [email protected]. Copies of documents filed with the SEC or on SEDAR+ by Enerplus are available free of charge from Enerplus’ website at www.enerplus.com under the “Investors” tab or by contacting Enerplus’ Investor Relations Department at (403) 298-1707.

Participants in the Solicitation

Chord, Enerplus and their respective directors and certain of their executive officers and other members of management and employees may be deemed, under SEC rules, to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from Chord’s stockholders and Enerplus’ shareholders in connection with the Arrangement. Information regarding the executive officers and directors of Chord is included in its definitive proxy statement for its 2024 annual meeting under the headings “Item 1 – Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation Matters” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” which was filed with the SEC on March 19, 2024 and is available at https://www.sec.gov/ixviewer/ix.html?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1486159/000148615923000007/chrd-20230316.htm. Information regarding the directors and certain executive officers of Enerplus is included in its information circular and proxy statement for its 2024 annual meeting under the headings “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation”, which was filed on SEDAR+ on April 4, 2024 and is available at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1126874/000110465923041270/tm235372d3_ex99-2.htm. Additional information regarding the persons who may be deemed participants and their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, is set forth in the Proxy Statement and the Circular, and may be set forth in other materials when they are filed with the SEC or on SEDAR+ in connection with the Arrangement. Free copies of these documents may be obtained as described in the paragraphs above.

Forward-Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements

Certain statements in this document concerning the proposed Arrangement, including any statements regarding the expected timetable for completing the Arrangement, the results, effects, benefits and synergies of the Arrangement, future opportunities for the combined company, future financial performance and condition, guidance and any other statements regarding Chord’s or Enerplus’ future expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, financial conditions, assumptions or future events or performance that are not historical facts are “forward-looking” statements based on assumptions currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical facts. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “ensure,” “expect,” “if,” “intend,” “estimate,” “probable,” “project,” “forecasts,” “predict,” “outlook,” “aim,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “potential,” “may,” “might,” “anticipate,” “likely” “plan,” “positioned,” “strategy,” and similar expressions or other words of similar meaning, and the negatives thereof, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Specific forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding Chord’s or Enerplus’ plans and expectations with respect to the proposed Arrangement and the anticipated impact of the proposed Arrangement on the combined company’s results of operations, financial position, growth opportunities and competitive position, including maintaining current Chord and Enerplus management, strategies and plans and integration. The forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including, but not limited to, the possibility that shareholders of Enerplus may not approve the Arrangement or stockholders of Chord may not approve the issuance of new shares of Chord common stock in the Arrangement; the risk that any other condition to closing may not be satisfied; that either party may terminate the Arrangement Agreement or that the closing might be delayed or not occur at all; the risk that the Arrangement Agreement is terminated and either Chord or Enerplus is required to pay a termination fee to the other party; potential adverse reactions or changes to business or employee relationships of Chord or Enerplus, including those resulting from the announcement or completion of the Arrangement; the diversion of management time on transaction-related issues; the ultimate timing, outcome and results of integrating the operations of Chord and Enerplus; the effects of the business combination of Chord and Enerplus, including the combined company’s future financial condition, results of operations, strategy and plans; the ability of the combined company to realize anticipated synergies in the timeframe expected or at all; changes in capital markets and the ability of the combined company to finance operations in the manner expected; the risk that Chord or Enerplus may not receive the required regulatory approval of the Arrangement; the risk of any litigation relating to the proposed Arrangement; the risk of changes in governmental regulations or enforcement practices; the effects of commodity prices; the risks of oil and gas activities; and the fact that operating costs and business disruption may be greater than expected following the public announcement or consummation of the Arrangement. Expectations regarding business outlook, including changes in revenue, pricing, capital expenditures, cash flow generation, strategies for the combined company’s operations, oil and natural gas market conditions, legal, economic and regulatory conditions, and environmental matters are only forecasts regarding these matters.

Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be found in the Proxy Statement, Chord’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, which are on file with the SEC and available from Chord’s website at www.chordenergy.com under the “Investors” tab, and in other documents Chord files with the SEC and in the Circular and Enerplus’ annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2023, which is on file with the SEC and on SEDAR+ and available from Enerplus’ website at www.enerplus.com under the “Investors” tab, and in other documents Enerplus files with the SEC or on SEDAR+.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on information available at that time. Neither Chord nor Enerplus assumes any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by applicable securities laws. As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements.

About Chord Energy

Chord Energy Corporation is an independent exploration and production company with quality and sustainable long-lived assets in the Williston Basin. The Company is uniquely positioned with a best-in-class balance sheet and is focused on rigorous capital discipline and generating free cash flow by operating efficiently, safely and responsibly to develop its unconventional onshore oil-rich resources in the continental United States. For more information, please visit the Company’s website at www.chordenergy.com.

 

Chord Energy Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

March 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

ASSETS

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 296,354

$ 317,998

Accounts receivable, net

982,062

943,114

Inventory

78,118

72,565

Prepaid expenses

30,135

42,450

Derivative instruments

26,540

37,369

Other current assets

2,033

11,055

Total current assets

1,415,242

1,424,551

Property, plant and equipment

Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method)

6,575,306

6,320,243

Other property and equipment

49,087

49,051

Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

(1,218,284)

(1,054,616)

Total property, plant and equipment, net

5,406,109

5,314,678

Derivative instruments

22,231

22,526

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

114,181

100,172

Long-term inventory

28,360

22,936

Operating right-of-use assets

19,218

21,343

Other assets

20,173

19,944

Total assets

$ 7,025,514

$ 6,926,150

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities

Accounts payable

$ 39,511

$ 34,453

Revenues and production taxes payable

592,888

604,704

Accrued liabilities

545,820

493,381

Accrued interest payable

8,532

2,157

Derivative instruments

19,523

14,209

Advances from joint interest partners

2,484

2,381

Current operating lease liabilities

13,691

13,258

Other current liabilities

22,671

916

Total current liabilities

1,245,120

1,165,459

Long-term debt

396,324

395,902

Deferred tax liabilities

122,288

95,322

Asset retirement obligations

155,696

155,040

Derivative instruments

3,022

717

Operating lease liabilities

15,993

18,667

Other liabilities

11,893

18,419

Total liabilities

1,950,336

1,849,526

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity

Common stock, $0.01 par value: 120,000,000 shares authorized, 45,527,230 shares

issued and 41,551,082 shares outstanding at March 31, 2024; and 120,000,000 shares

authorized, 45,032,537 shares issued and 41,249,658 shares outstanding at December 31, 2023

459

456

Treasury stock, at cost: 3,976,148 shares at March 31, 2024 and 3,782,879 shares at

December 31, 2023

(523,288)

(493,289)

Additional paid-in capital

3,575,557

3,608,819

Retained earnings

2,022,450

1,960,638

Total stockholders’ equity

5,075,178

5,076,624

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 7,025,514

$ 6,926,150

 

Chord Energy Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

Revenues

Oil, NGL and gas revenues

$ 748,162

$ 766,200

Purchased oil and gas sales

337,098

130,317

Total revenues

1,085,260

896,517

Operating expenses

Lease operating expenses

159,206

153,408

Gathering, processing and transportation expenses

53,984

37,015

Purchased oil and gas expenses

335,762

129,593

Production taxes

63,911

60,517

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

168,894

133,791

General and administrative expenses

25,712

32,484

Exploration and impairment

6,154

24,864

Total operating expenses

813,623

571,672

Gain on sale of assets, net

1,302

1,227

Operating income

272,939

326,072

Other income (expense)

Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments

(27,577)

66,934

Net gain (loss) from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

16,296

(2,216)

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

(7,592)

(7,135)

Other income, net

2,826

5,193

Total other income (expense), net

(16,047)

62,776

Income before income taxes

256,892

388,848

Income tax expense

(57,539)

(91,849)

Net income

$ 199,353

$ 296,999

Earnings per share:

Basic

$ 4.79

$ 7.13

Diluted

$ 4.65

$ 6.87

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Basic

41,468

41,568

Diluted

42,747

43,149

 

Chord Energy Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income

$ 199,353

$ 296,999

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

168,894

133,791

Gain on sale of assets

(1,302)

(1,227)

Impairment

3,919

23,304

Deferred income taxes

26,966

73,923

Net (gain) loss from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

(16,296)

2,216

Net (gain) loss on derivative instruments

27,577

(66,934)

Equity-based compensation expenses

4,771

11,854

Deferred financing costs amortization and other

2,663

(3,791)

Working capital and other changes:

Change in accounts receivable, net

(62,081)

(14,657)

Change in inventory

(9,471)

(12,753)

Change in prepaid expenses

(291)

1,211

Change in accounts payable, interest payable and accrued liabilities

29,147

8,176

Change in other assets and liabilities, net

32,849

16,699

Net cash provided by operating activities

406,698

468,811

Cash flows from investing activities:

Capital expenditures

(222,149)

(172,328)

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

(334)

Proceeds from divestitures, net of cash divested

2,371

7,034

Derivative settlements

(12,062)

(91,656)

Proceeds from sale of investment in unconsolidated affiliate

12,347

Contingent consideration received

25,000

Distributions from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

2,287

3,015

Net cash used in investing activities

(204,887)

(241,588)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Purchases of treasury stock

(31,999)

(15,003)

Tax withholding on vesting of equity-based awards

(46,051)

(10,300)

Dividends paid

(152,389)

(202,473)

Payments on finance lease liabilities

(386)

(388)

Proceeds from warrants exercised

7,370

90

Net cash used in financing activities

(223,455)

(228,074)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(21,644)

(851)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Beginning of period

317,998

593,151

End of period

$ 296,354

$ 592,300

Supplemental non-cash transactions:

Change in accrued capital expenditures

$ 25,312

$ 46,097

Change in asset retirement obligations

973

234

Dividends payable

17,587

15,798

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following are non-GAAP financial measures not prepared in accordance with GAAP that are used by management and external users of the Company’s financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. The Company believes that the foregoing are useful supplemental measures that provide an indication of the results generated by the Company’s principal business activities. However, these measures are not recognized by GAAP and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP. Therefore, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures provided by other issuers. From time to time, the Company provides forward-looking forecasts of these measures; however, the Company is unable to provide a quantitative reconciliation of the forward-looking non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable forward-looking GAAP measures because management cannot reliably quantify certain of the necessary components of such forward-looking GAAP measures. The reconciling items in future periods could be significant. To see how the Company reconciles its historical presentations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, please visit the Investors-Documents & Disclosures-Non-GAAP Reconciliation page on the Company’s website at https://ir.chordenergy.com/non-gaap.

Cash GPT

The Company defines Cash GPT as total GPT expenses less non-cash valuation charges on pipeline imbalances and non-cash mark-to-market adjustments on transportation contracts accounted for as derivative instruments. Cash GPT is not a measure of GPT expenses as determined by GAAP. Management believes that the presentation of Cash GPT provides useful additional information to investors and analysts to assess the cash costs incurred to market and transport the Company’s commodities from the wellhead to delivery points for sale without regard to the change in value of its pipeline imbalances, which vary monthly based on commodity prices, and without regard to the non-cash mark-to-market adjustments on transportation contracts classified as derivative instruments.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of GPT expenses to the non-GAAP financial measure of Cash GPT for the periods presented:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

(In thousands)

GPT

$ 53,984

$ 37,015

Pipeline imbalances

(194)

(6,005)

Gain (loss) on derivative transportation contracts

(3,229)

11,157

Cash GPT

$ 50,561

$ 42,167

Cash G&A

The Company defines Cash G&A as total G&A expenses less G&A expenses directly attributable to certain merger and acquisition activity, non-cash equity-based compensation expenses, G&A expenses attributable to shared service allocations and other non-cash charges. Cash G&A is not a measure of G&A expenses as determined by GAAP. Management believes that the presentation of Cash G&A provides useful additional information to investors and analysts to assess the Company’s operating costs in comparison to peers without regard to the aforementioned charges, which can vary substantially from company to company.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of G&A expenses to the non-GAAP financial measure of Cash G&A for the periods presented:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

(In thousands)

General and administrative expenses

$ 25,712

$ 32,484

Merger costs(1)

(8,107)

(2,793)

Equity-based compensation expenses

(4,771)

(11,854)

Other non-cash adjustments

1,660

411

Cash G&A

$ 14,494

$ 18,248

___________________

(1)

Includes costs directly attributable to the arrangement with Enerplus for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and the costs directly attributable to the merger of equals with Whiting for the three months ended March 31, 2023.

Cash Interest

The Company defines Cash Interest as interest expense plus capitalized interest less amortization and write-offs of deferred financing costs. Cash Interest is not a measure of interest expense as determined by GAAP. Management believes that the presentation of Cash Interest provides useful additional information to investors and analysts for assessing the interest charges incurred on the Company’s debt to finance its operating activities and the Company’s ability to maintain compliance with its debt covenants.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the GAAP financial measure of interest expense to the non-GAAP financial measure of Cash Interest for the periods presented:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

(In thousands)

Interest expense

$ 7,592

$ 7,135

Capitalized interest

710

1,421

Amortization of deferred financing costs

(892)

(1,198)

Cash Interest

$ 7,410

$ 7,358

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow

The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”), merger costs, exploration expenses and impairment expenses and other similar non-cash or non-recurring charges. The Company defines Adjusted Free Cash Flow as Adjusted EBITDA less Cash Interest and E&P and other capital expenditures (excluding capitalized interest and acquisition capital).

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow are not measures of net income or cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP. Management believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow provides useful additional information to investors and analysts for assessing the Company’s results of operations, financial performance, ability to generate cash from its business operations without regard to its financing methods or capital structure and the Company’s ability to maintain compliance with its debt covenants.

The following table presents reconciliations of the GAAP financial measures of net income and net cash provided by operating activities to the non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow for the periods presented:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

(In thousands)

Net income

$ 199,353

$ 296,999

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

7,592

7,135

Income tax expense

57,539

91,849

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

168,894

133,791

Merger costs(1)

8,107

2,793

Exploration and impairment expenses

6,154

24,864

Gain on sale of assets

(1,302)

(1,227)

Net (gain) loss on derivative instruments

27,577

(66,934)

Realized loss on commodity price derivative contracts

(1,361)

(91,858)

Net (gain) loss from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

(16,296)

2,216

Distributions from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

2,287

3,015

Equity-based compensation expenses

4,771

11,854

Other non-cash adjustments

1,464

(6,213)

Adjusted EBITDA

464,779

408,284

Cash Interest

(7,410)

(7,358)

E&P and other capital expenditures

(257,748)

(202,296)

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

$ 199,621

$ 198,630

Net cash provided by operating activities

$ 406,698

$ 468,811

Changes in working capital

9,847

1,324

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

7,592

7,135

Current income tax expense

30,573

17,927

Merger costs(1)

8,107

2,793

Exploration expenses

2,235

1,559

Realized loss on commodity price derivative contracts

(1,361)

(91,858)

Distributions from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

2,287

3,015

Deferred financing costs amortization and other

(2,663)

3,791

Other non-cash adjustments

1,464

(6,213)

Adjusted EBITDA

464,779

408,284

Cash Interest

(7,410)

(7,358)

E&P and other capital expenditures(2)

(257,748)

(202,296)

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

$ 199,621

$ 198,630

___________________

(1)

Includes costs directly attributable to the arrangement with Enerplus for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and the costs directly attributable to the merger of equals with Whiting for the three months ended March 31, 2023.

(2)

The three months ended March 31, 2024 includes $3.9MM of E&P and other CapEx related to divested non-operated assets that will be reimbursed.

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures that are used by management and external users of the Company’s financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. The Company defines Adjusted Net Income as net income after adjusting for (1) the impact of certain non-cash items, including non-cash changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, non-cash changes in the fair value of the Company’s investment in an unconsolidated affiliate, impairment and other similar non-cash charges, (2) merger costs and (3) the impact of taxes based on the Company’s effective tax rate applicable to those adjusting items in the same period. Adjusted Net Income is not a measure of net income as determined by GAAP.

The Company calculates earnings per share under the two-class method in accordance with GAAP. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that computes earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share is calculated as (i) Adjusted Net Income (ii) less distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities (iii) divided by the weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding for the periods presented.

The following table presents reconciliations of the GAAP financial measure of net income to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted Net Income and the GAAP financial measure of diluted earnings per share to the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share for the periods presented:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2024

2023

(In thousands)

Net income

$ 199,353

$ 296,999

Net (gain) loss on derivative instruments

27,577

(66,934)

Realized loss on commodity price derivative contracts

(1,361)

(91,858)

Net (gain) from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

(16,296)

2,216

Distributions from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

2,287

3,015

Impairment

3,919

23,304

Merger costs(1)

8,107

2,793

Gain on sale of assets

(1,302)

(1,227)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

892

1,198

Other non-cash adjustments

1,464

(6,213)

Tax impact(2)

(5,664)

31,583

Adjusted net income

218,976

194,876

Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

(856)

(467)

Adjusted net income attributable to common stockholders

$ 218,120

$ 194,409

Diluted earnings per share

4.66

6.87

Net (gain) loss on derivative instruments

0.65

(1.55)

Realized loss on commodity price derivative contracts

(0.03)

(2.13)

Net (gain) from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

(0.38)

0.05

Distributions from investment in unconsolidated affiliate

0.05

0.07

Impairment

0.09

0.54

Merger costs(1)

0.19

0.06

Gain on sale of assets

(0.03)

(0.03)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

0.02

0.03

Other non-cash adjustments

0.03

(0.14)

Tax impact(2)

(0.13)

0.73

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

5.12

4.50

Less: Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

(0.02)

(0.01)

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

$ 5.10

$ 4.49

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

42,747

43,149

Effective tax rate applicable to adjustment items(2)

22.4 %

23.6 %

_____________________

(1)

Includes costs directly attributable to the arrangement with Enerplus for the three months ended March 31, 2024 and the costs directly attributable to the merger of equals with Whiting for the three months ended March 31, 2023.

(2)

The tax impact is computed utilizing the Company’s effective tax rate applicable to the adjustments for certain non-cash and non-recurring items.

 

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chord-energy-reports-first-quarter-2024-financial-and-operating-results-declares-base-and-variable-dividends-issues-second-quarter-outlook-and-provides-update-on-pending-combination-with-enerplus-302138836.html

SOURCE Chord Energy Corp.

Source: Rbcrichardsonbarr.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Chord Energy Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial and Operating Results, Declares Base and Variable Dividends, Issues Second Quarter Outlook and Provides Update on Pending Combination with Enerplus appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Oil settles lower on signs of easing supply tightness

Energy News Beat

NEW YORK, May 7 (Reuters) – Oil prices closed slightly lower on Tuesday on signs of easing supply concerns, while market participants shifted their focus to U.S. stockpiles data due later today and Wednesday.

Brent crude futures settled 17 cents lower at $83.16 a barrel, and U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures closed 10 cents lower at $78.38.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration on Tuesday raised its forecasts for this year’s world oil and liquid fuels output and lowered its demand expectations, pointing to a well-supplied market as opposed to prior forecasts that showed under-supply.

The premium of the first-month Brent contract to the six-month contract slipped to $2.90 a barrel on Tuesday, the lowest since mid-February, another sign of market participants betting on easing supply tightness.

Current inventory data shows crude oil and petroleum supplies are running 1.1 million barrel per day above forecasts in developed economies, according to an analysis by energy brokerage StoneX.

“Global inventories remain in a building phase and has accelerated recently,” StoneX analyst Alex Hodes wrote to clients on Tuesday.

Last week, Brent and WTI had their steepest weekly losses in three months as weak U.S. jobs data fueled hopes for interest rate cuts.

Oil prices found some support on Tuesday from a U.S. government solicitation to buy more than 3 million barrels of oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), but the focus remained on U.S. oil storage reports due on Tuesday and Wednesday, Mizuho analyst Robert Yawger said.

“We need to see refiners running more barrels heading into peak summer driving season. If the inventories data goes in the wrong direction, the SPR and the rest of it does not matter,” Yawger said.

U.S. crude oil inventories could have fallen by about 1.2 million barrels in the week to May 3, according to a Reuters poll of analysts.

The American Petroleum Institute will post its weekly U.S. oil and fuel inventories data after 4:30 p.m. ET (2030 GMT), and the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s weekly update on stockpiles is due on Wednesday.

Oil traders largely looked past escalating tensions in the Middle East, where the Israeli military seized control of the Rafah border crossing between the Gaza Strip and Egypt and its tanks pushed into the southern Gazan town of Rafah, as mediators struggled to secure a ceasefire agreement.

“Instead, their focus appears directed towards the uncertainties surrounding global economic growth prospects and the anticipated impact of sluggish growth on oil demand,” said Ricardo Evangelista, senior analyst at financial brokerage ActivTrades.

Source: Reuters.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

 

The post Oil settles lower on signs of easing supply tightness appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Energy News Beat

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

Following my last article, Homewood checked a swathe of other South American weather stations around the original three. In each case he found the same suspicious one-way “adjustments”. First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.

Source: Telegraph.co.uk

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

EU proposes first sanctions on Russia’s LNG sector

Energy News Beat

BRUSSELS — For the first time, the European Commission has proposed sanctions on Russia’s powerful liquefied natural gas industry, according to documents seen by POLITICO.

The measures wouldn’t directly bar Russian LNG imports to the EU. Instead, they would prevent EU countries from re-exporting Russian LNG after receiving it — confirming POLITICO’s previous reporting.

“This provision does not affect imports into the EU,” the proposal stresses.

The sanctions would also ban EU involvement in upcoming LNG projects in Russia. “Such a measure limits the expansion of Russia’s LNG capacity and thereby limits Russia’s revenues,” the proposal argues.

Additionally, the Commission, the EU’s executive, wants firms to share information on Moscow’s LNG imports more widely.

The move marks the first time the bloc has targeted Moscow’s lucrative gas sector, part of Brussels’ 14th sanctions package against Russia more than two years after it invaded Ukraine. And it comes as evidence mounts that Western efforts to drain Moscow’s fossil fuel revenues are falling woefully short, with an oil price cap largely failing and sanctions evasion rampant.

Still, while going after LNG marks a significant shift in EU strategy, the proposed penalties would only touch a fraction of Russia’s fossil fuel revenues. Last year, EU resales of Moscow’s LNG made up just a quarter of Russia’s total revenues from trading the highly-cooled gas. And the sanctions on upcoming LNG projects would be mostly preventative, experts say, as none of them currently send cargo to Europe.

EU ambassadors are set to discuss the measures on Wednesday. There is growing political support from EU bigwigs like Germany and Italy to hit Russian LNG, but Hungary — highly reliant on Russian energy — has historically blocked all gas sanctions.

The untouched gas

In the last two years, the EU has taken extraordinary steps to shun Russian energy, enacting bans on its coal and seaborne crude oil.

Yet Moscow has increasingly exploited loopholes and tapped black markets to keep the profits flowing. Meanwhile, a Western alliance attempt to cap Russian oil sales at $60 per barrel has largely fallen apart, with the product consistently selling above the desired limit.

That has increased pressure on the EU to clamp down on Russian gas.

Until now, the EU has stayed away from penalizing the vital energy source, with Hungary considering it a red line and several EU countries using it to keep the lights on.

Penalties or not, the EU has dropped its Russian gas imports by around two-thirds since the war began as Moscow slashed supplies and countries turned to alternatives in Norway and the U.S. By last year, Russian LNG made up just 5 percent of the EU’s energy consumption. Still, that amounted to an estimated €8 billion for the Kremlin.

The proposal cites this cash influx, noting that “Russia derives significant revenues” from its LNG sales. It specifically suggests prohibiting the use of EU ports, finance and services to re-export Russian LNG.

The proposed sanctions would force Moscow to overhaul its LNG business model — particularly for supplies it sends to Asia through Europe, where Spain, Belgium and France are major hubs. Without these countries as a pit stop, Russia would have to ship LNG through the Arctic Sea to Asia, requiring specially equipped icebreakers that are in short supply.

“If they can’t transship in Europe, they might have to take their ice-class tankers on longer journeys,” said Laura Page, a gas expert at the Kpler data analytics firm, during an interview last week while the sanctions were still being discussed. Russia, Page added, “may not be able to get out as many loadings from Yamal because their vessels can’t get back as quickly.”

The change would drain €2 billion from Russia’s LNG revenues, based on last year’s figures, Petras Katinas, an energy analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air think tank, estimated last week. That’s a lot of money but represents only 28 percent of Russia’s LNG profits and just over a fifth of its exports to the EU last year.

Meanwhile, the suggested sanctions on Russian LNG projects are a “paper tiger,” Katinas said, given these firms aren’t shipping anything to Europe.

Shadows, propaganda and history

The EU is also going after a critical component of Russia’s sanctions evasion strategy: Its “shadow fleet” — old vessels with murky ownership and insurance Moscow has purchased in large numbers to escape Western oil sanctions.

The Commission wants to ban EU ports from assisting vessels participating in “energy transport contrary to the objective of reducing Russia’s revenue in this sector.” It also suggests barring these ships from receiving EU services or financial assistance.

The energy measures are not the only new penalties Brussels is pushing.

It wants to sanction Voice of Europe, days after startling allegations that the pro-Kremlin website was spreading propaganda through “paid” European politicians. The proposal suggests banning the outlet.

There is also a prohibition on exports of Ukrainian cultural heritage items if there are suspicions the “goods have been unlawfully removed from Ukraine.” The measure aims to stop the wartime theft of historic items like paintings, religious artifacts and archeological treasures.

Separately, the package includes a recommended ban on helium imports — an attempt to cripple a small-but-growing Russian sector targeting high-tech customers in the semiconductor and medical equipment business.

Another item in the package is a proposal to mirror all of the EU’s Russia sanctions on neighboring Belarus, which has been effectively wrapped in Moscow’s embrace. Belarus’ customs union with Russia means the country serves as a major route for circumventing EU sanctions.

Source: Politico.eu

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post EU proposes first sanctions on Russia’s LNG sector appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Europe’s looming power grid roadblock: Transformers

Energy News Beat

A shortage of transformers is putting Europe’s grid build-out at risk, stretching project lead times and adding to a price surge that will be felt on consumers’ bills, researchers and experts have warned.

The EU is in the midst of a massive build-out of its electricity grid network, estimated to cost €584 billion between now and 2030. This expansion is needed to service the millions of new electric vehicles and heat pumps and accommodate a swathe of new wind turbines and solar panels.

But a roadblock is rearing its head. “We are facing a transformer shortage in Europe,” said Savannah Altvater, in charge of power distribution at the EU industry association Eurelectric.

While nobody knows the exact figure, the industry body estimates that within the EU and Norway, there are some 4.5 million transformers installed.

But that is because transformers, which increase and decrease voltage, are everywhere in the power grid. From offshore wind turbine to household, electricity voltage can change up to six times before we use it to do the laundry at home.

Transformers’ critical importance to power systems is being made painfully clear in Ukraine, where Russia is targeting these devices incessantly. Europe has sent 2,700 replacement transformers to Ukraine, further tightening the bloc’s shortage.

From industrials electrifying their production processes to renewable project developers, “everyone needs transformers,” said Joannes Laveyne, a research assistant at the electrical energy lab of Ghent University.

The result: Lead times that used to be 9 to 12 months, are now “at least double”, said the researcher, who has personally seen delays and price upticks in the transformers needed for his lab at Ghent University.

These delays are being felt even more acutely by industry.

“Without booking years ahead in the production capacity of European producers, you will have no chance to get a transformer. This is a huge issue,” explained Zsuzsa Cseko, senior adviser for network issues at Eurelectric.

Delays with transformers can have knock-on effects, prompting the European Commission to look into the issue, Euractiv understands.

The biggest potential ramification of the transformer shortage? Delayed connection of new renewables or large industrial machines to the grid, which could endanger the EU’s climate and energy independence goals. In Germany, transformer shortages may cause delays of up to two years in offshore wind development.

These delays happen because the largest transformers have bespoke designs, and though they are relatively few in number compared to smaller neighbourhood models, “they have an outsized impact on the functioning of the power grid,” said Laveyne.

But the number of manufacturers and their production capacity does not seem to increase, the researcher noted. Just three large companies dominate the market: Germany’s Siemens, US firm General Electric, and Japan’s Hitachi

In part, European companies’ reluctance to invest in new production facilities stems from a lack of certainty beyond 2030.

While “order books are full until 2030 due to EU policies like the Green Deal, manufacturers hesitate to invest due to uncertainty about the 2040 targets and beyond,” the researcher explained.

A lack of skilled workers adds to their challenges.

Transformers are “a very difficult product” requiring “a lot of technical manpower to build”. Little of the process is automated, and large bespoke transformers are produced via “manual labour,” said Laveyne.

Those skilled workers, combining electrical with technical expertise, are in “short supply,” he added. Similarly, US-based producer ERMCO cited a “very tough labor market” in a chat with the podcast Catalyst.

Then there is also a shortage of key components.

The ”iron core of the transformers are produced by only a handful of companies worldwide, so with their output limited, it has become another bottleneck,” said Cseko.

Price surge

Delays are only half the problem – high prices are another. Transformers use a lot of high-quality steel and cooper, for which prices have more than doubled in the past five years.

ERMCO’s Tim Mills said the cost of raw materials has caused a 75 to 100% increase in price”, adding that through utilities, these additional costs are ultimately passed on to consumers.

“We can still get them at a higher price,” explained Eurelectric’s Cseko.

The solution, according to the industry expert, would be for European industry to be “woken up” through “partnerships with governments or other incentives” that would pay off by keeping production in Europe and adding to security of supply.

Alternatively, grid operators, who have no choice but to install transformers, could turn to other global manufacturing hubs, such as Egypt or China.

Source: Euractiv.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

 

The post Europe’s looming power grid roadblock: Transformers appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

U.S. Dept. of Energy To Purchase Crude for Strategic Petroleum Reserve

Energy News Beat

ENB Pub Note: I bet they don’t ever fill it. It is too close to November Elections.

 

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has announced a new solicitation to purchase oil to replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), according to a DOE press release.

The solicitation, announced by the DOE’s Office of Petroleum Reserves, seeks up to 3.3 million barrels of crude oil for delivery to the SPR in October. The decision to initiate this purchase, according to the release, aligns with the DOE’s strategy of acquiring oil at $79 per barrel or below.

To date, the DOE has procured a total of 32.3 million barrels of oil at an average price of $76.98, in addition to expediting nearly 4 million barrels of exchange returns.

Bids for the current solicitation are due by May 14, 2024, with delivery slated for the Big Hill storage facility. The DOE has also canceled 140 million barrels of congressionally mandated sales scheduled for Fiscal Years 2024 through 2027 in a move that it counts as replenishing the SPR.

The SPR plays a vital role in safeguarding the economy and livelihoods during oil shortages.

Just a week ago, President Biden’s energy adviser Amos Hochstein said there was enough oil in the reserve and that the Administration would use crude oil from the SPR should the need arise.

“We have been replenishing into the SPR for the last several months. I think we have sufficient supply in the SPR to address any kind of concern in the economy if we need it,” Hochstein said, speaking at the Milken Institute Global Conference last week.

The U.S. saw the stockpiles of crude oil in the SPR fall from 638 million barrels at President Joe Biden’s inauguration to just 347 million barrels by the summer of 2023 as the Administration tried to bring down gasoline prices for consumers by releasing over 180 million barrels from the SPR.

Source: Oilprice.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post U.S. Dept. of Energy To Purchase Crude for Strategic Petroleum Reserve appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Innovative New Tech is Transforming the Battery Market

Energy News Beat
Lithium-sulfur and solid-state batteries offer higher energy density and longer life.
Fast-charging technology reduces charging time to minutes.
Sustainable initiatives focus on recycling and using eco-friendly materials.

In a world where the appetite for energy is insatiable, the battery market has become the playground for some of the brightest minds aiming to fuel everything from cell phones to electric vehicles. However, as our gadgets become even smarter, the traditional batteries we’ve relied on seem ever so dim-witted in comparison. Enter the era of cutting-edge battery technology, where the latest developments are juicing up the market with a blend of high energy and high drama.

The Latest Tech On (and Off) the Battery Market

Let’s kick things off with lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, which are currently stealing the limelight. Imagine a battery that can power your electric car from New York to Washington D.C. and back without a recharge. Lithium-sulfur batteries promise exactly that—significantly higher energy density at a lower cost than their lithium-ion cousins. But like every good saga, there are also challenges.

The main issue has been the battery’s lifespan. Like a one-hit wonder, Li-S batteries tend to fade into obscurity too soon. However, recent breakthroughs in stabilizing the materials have seen these batteries last longer, suggesting that a chart-topping hit may yet be on the cards.

If lithium-sulfur batteries are the pop stars of the battery market, solid-state batteries are the rock legends. We’ve talked about these behemoths before, and we’re inching closer to their production every day. By ditching the liquid electrolyte for a solid counterpart, these batteries are not just safer (no more fiery surprises!), but they also boast a higher capacity and a longer life.

Imagine charging your phone once a week instead of every night. Industry giants and startups alike continue to pour billions into this technology, with companies like QuantumScape and Solid Power racing to bring them to the growing battery market. The excitement is palpable, but mass production is the encore we’re all waiting to arrive.

A Renewed Focus on Speed and Cost

In our fast-paced world, waiting three hours for a battery to charge can feel like an eternity. Thankfully, the latest developments in fast-charging technology can cut this down to mere minutes. Companies like StoreDot are leading the charge with batteries you can juice up in just five minutes. This technology hinges on innovative anode and cathode materials that can handle quick power absorption and release without degrading. It’s like speed dating, but for electrons!

While lithium has been the star of the battery show, it’s not without its downsides—think resource scarcity and geopolitical tensions in lithium-rich regions. This has sparked a talent search for alternatives. Sodium-ion batteries are stepping up as promising candidates, offering a similar performance to lithium-ion, but at a lower cost (thanks to the abundance of sodium). Meanwhile, aluminum-air batteries continue to make waves with their potential for high energy density, though they’re currently reserved mostly for cameos, as they remain best suited to specialized roles.

A More “Green” Battery Revolution

As the demand for batteries soars, so does the need for sustainable practices. After all, what’s the point of powering a green revolution with fossil fuel processes? The industry is buzzing with initiatives to make battery production cleaner and greener. For instance, recycling is getting a makeover with advanced technologies able to recover up to 95% of a battery’s materials. Moreover, new battery designs are incorporating materials that are easier to recycle, ensuring that our energy future is as clean as it is bright.

The battery market is surging with innovation, and each breakthrough sparks a flurry of excitement and investment. From concerts in the park to intercontinental flights, we will feel the impact of these advancements across all facets of our lives. As we stand on the cusp of this energetic revolution, one thing is clear: the future is looking charged up, and it’s anything but static.

Whether you’re a battery purchasing manager, tech enthusiast, or just someone keeping tabs on this dynamic market, keep your eyes peeled on this space. The next big thing in batteries could be just around the corner, ready to power the world to the next level. Of course, we’ll be sure to keep you informed and updated about the ever-changing battery space all along the way.

Source: Oilprice.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

 

The post Innovative New Tech is Transforming the Battery Market appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Governments slap taxes on EVs as $110bn fuel duty shortfall looms

Energy News Beat

ENB Pub Note: The EV failure is only the tip of the iceberg. – Just watch as the insurance companies and investors are the key downfalls of the EV market. The markets will not support the “energy transition” any longer. 

Global policymakers are imposing new taxes on electric vehicles as the shift away from combustion engines threatens to leave a $110bn hole in government revenues owing to a drop in receipts from fuel duties.  The UK, New Zealand, Israel and the majority of US states are among jurisdictions introducing tax changes and charges on EVs and hybrid vehicles designed to raise funds and compensate for declines in petrol and diesel excise taxes.

The measures are varied, running from registration fees to road usage charges based on mileage and taxes on public charging points. EV owners and green campaigners say they will slow society’s switch from gas-guzzling vehicles to lower-emissions alternatives. “It is more like a penalty,” said Jeff Shoffner, who drives an electric Chevy Bolt in Tennessee, where annual fees doubled this year to $200. “I’m not averse to paying the extra fee, but I think it’s too high.” The new levies come at a tricky time for electric vehicle adoption.

While global sales are expected to reach record highs this year, declining profit margins and slower growth are leading automakers to pump the brakes on their electrification plans.  Last week, Tesla chief executive Elon Musk shut down the group’s entire supercharger division, laying off hundreds of staff in response to falling revenues at the EV maker. “A lot of these policies are not politically popular. It’s hard to raise taxes, but it is needed,” said Rachel Aland, transportation director at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, a Washington DC-based think-tank. She said fuel tax collection has been falling for some time due to increasing fuel efficiency of internal combustion engine vehicles. The growing prevalence of EVs on the road is putting extra pressure on an important source of government revenues.

By 2030 EVs are forecast to displace 6mn barrels a day of global oil consumption, according to the International Energy Agency. Demand in 2023 was 102mn b/d. IEA data shows the shift to EVs displaced $10bn in revenues from petrol and diesel taxes globally last year, net of modest gains from new electricity tax revenue. The net loss is projected to rise to $110bn by 2035 if countries meet their electrification targets, robbing governments of vital funds that are often ringfenced to pay for road maintenance and transport improvements. Europe, where countries tend to charge higher taxes on petrol and diesel compared with the US and China, made up 60 per cent of global revenue losses last year. While countries will claw back some funding in electricity taxes, the revenue is marginal compared with the loss in fuel taxes, the agency said. As a growing number of governments set deadlines for the phaseout of combustion engine cars, policymakers are being forced to consider unpopular tax reforms.

Last month New Zealand introduced road use charges based on distance travelled for EVs and plug-in hybrid vehicles for the first time, saying the policy was badly needed to raise revenues for road maintenance as fuel tax collections fell.   Owners of light EVs face charges of NZ$76 ($46) per 1,000km, a fee in line with equivalent diesel-powered vehicles. Plug-in hybrid owners must pay NZ$38 per 1,000km, a lower charge because they already pay tax on fuel. “This transition to road user charges is about fairness and equity. It will ensure that all road users are contributing to the upkeep and maintenance of our roads, irrespective of the type of vehicle they choose to drive,” said Simeon Brown, New Zealand’s transport minister, when justifying the policy change.    The charges were slammed by EV lobby groups and green campaigners, which have warned they will slow uptake of non-polluting vehicles and result in plug-in hybrid EV drivers paying more than those driving standard cars.

Israel tax authorities are proposing a similar travel usage charge for EVs, which is intended to come into force in 2026 to tackle congestion and the budget deficit, which has soared due to the war with Hamas.

But many governments facing a similar drain on fuel tax revenues, such as the UK and Ireland, have so far baulked at introducing unpopular mileage-based road user charges for EVs. Instead, they have begun to phase out or reduce tax breaks for EV drivers to bolster tax collection.     David Metz, honorary professor, Centre for Transport Studies, University College London, said road user charges were not really being talked about by the UK government because they were such a “hot topic” and there had been significant protests linked to previous attempts to raise fuel excise taxes.   “All the politicians and civil servants feel it’s just too difficult at the moment,” he said. But Metz added that a new system of road user charges was needed, not only to replace the “big chunk” of fuel tax revenues lost through the uptake of EVs but also to reduce road congestion and take polluting vehicles off the roads. He said congestion charges in Stockholm and London, which are levied using CCTV and automatic number plate recognition technology, provided a potential model that could be expanded.   In the US at least 38 states have annual registration fees for EV and hybrid car owners, including some states that otherwise offer incentives to buy or charge EVs that extend beyond a $7,500 federal subsidy for eligible vehicles.

 

For the entire article, FT 

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Governments slap taxes on EVs as $110bn fuel duty shortfall looms appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Wyoming’s Powder River Basin Closes In On 9 Billion Tons Of Coal Dug Up

Energy News Beat

Sometime this summer, there will be a silver anniversary celebration of sorts for Wyoming’s coal-rich Powder River Basin.

Despite all the gloom and doom of coal industry projections that call for falling production from the Cowboy State, America’s coal heartland is expected to hit an astonishing 9 billion tons of coal produced in the last 25 years since 1998.

It’s a silver lining for a region that has been bleeding red ink of late.

Given the projections about cuts in coal production expected this year out of St. Louis-based coal behemoths Arch Resources Inc. and Peabody Energy Corp., and previous trends reported on overall coal volume in the first half of the year being down more than 20%, it’s likely that the 9 billion ton milestone could be reached in July.

In a region where production of PRB coal is measured in the millions of tons, hitting 9 billion tons is something pretty remarkable, said Travis Deti, executive director for the Wyoming Mining Association.

“It really is remarkable when you think about it,” he said.

Those Billions Of Tons Has Meant Billions Of Dollars

Coal dug out of the Powder River Basin, which supplies about 40% of the thermal coal in the nation, has formed the fabric of life in Wyoming for years, Deti said.

“For the past three decades, billions of dollars in coal revenue from our vast coal resources in the PRB have built Wyoming’s schools, roads and highways, and our communities,” Deti said. “And the thousands of men and women that have worked in those mines over the years can be proud that they have not only helped to build Wyoming, but have provided reliable, affordable energy to hundreds of millions of Americans.”

The high-octane years for coal began in the late 1990s, when it produced 293.4 million tons of coal, and steadily grew by leaps and bounds over the next decade to a record haul.

In 2008, when the United States was mired in a deep recession that slowed the economy to its longest downturn since World War II, the Powder River Basin pulled the most coal ever out of the ground in a single year.

In that year, the record haul of 446.5 million tons produced out of Wyoming’s northeastern region hasn’t been seen since.

In the last 15 years, that pace of production has nose-dived more than 48% from the record year of 2008 and has plateaued at around 230 million tons over the past few years, with the outlook expected to dip even further in coming years.

A man standing next to an SUV gives perspective to this huge exposed coal seam at a Powder River Basin mine. (Bureau of Land Management Wyoming)

Challenges Ahead

The Wyoming State Geological Survey released data April 29 showing 2024 first quarter coal production plummeting nearly 21% from the first quarter of 2023, when the state dug up 58 million tons of coal.

The pressure to produce less coal is coming from the federal government, which last month announced rules that could force coal-fired power plants to close over the next 10 years.

The challenges for the state’s Powder River Basin are huge, as Arch and Peabody have highlighted in recent financial reports.

Lucas Pipes, an analyst with B. Riley Securities, who tracks the two coal companies, wrote in recent research notes that Arch faces challenges to “reverse course in the PRB” while the profit outlook for Peabody is softer due to the “near-term outlook” of PRB’s thermal business.

A mild winter, excess inventories of coal at coal-fired power plants and cheap natural gas have contributed to some of the challenges for PRB’s coal producers.

Meanwhile, as Wyoming approaches the anniversary for 9 billion tons of coal produced in PRB over the past 25 years, the state budget faces challenges.

Wyoming’s budget may see an estimated $50 million shortfall in revenue collection from severance taxes and federal mineral royalties from the state’s coal operators as it moves into calendar year 2025, warned Don Richards, co-chairman of the Wyoming Legislative Service Office in Cheyenne, in a recent email to Cowboy State Daily.

“If one extrapolates out the first 17 weeks of federal data on coal production (in 2024), the annual total Wyoming coal production is on pace for approximately 191 million tons, substantially lower than the 225 million tons forecast,” Richards said.

Source: Cowboystatedaily.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Wyoming’s Powder River Basin Closes In On 9 Billion Tons Of Coal Dug Up appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Greece suspends electricity imports until May 7 to protect system

Energy News Beat

The Independent Power Transmission Operator (IPTO or Admie) of Greece has announced the suspension of all electricity imports in the hours around noon through May 7.

According to the official announcement of IPTO, the import capacity in interconnections with Italy, Albania, North Macedonia, Bulgaria and Turkey will be zero from 8:00 until 17:00 every day from today through May 7.

The only exception is the direction Bulgaria-Greece, where 100 MW will be allowed for two hours every morning and 250 MW from 16:00 to 17:00.

The reason for the drastic measure is that in recent weekends there have been many consecutive hours of zero and negative prices in the day-ahead market as the production of renewable electricity far exceeds demand in Greece.

It is forcing IPTO, the country’s transmission system operator, to enforce ever higher curtailments, not because of the grid’s inability to handle the extra load, but simply because the power is not needed.

IPTO forecasted that today, on Good Friday, renewables in Greece would peak at almost 7 GW at 13:00, against a system load of just 4.7 GW.

It is notable that on the day-ahead market for today, Good Friday, the price was almost zero for five hours, with renewables at 63% of the production mix. According to IPTO’s projection, renewables will peak at almost 7 GW at 13:00, against a system load of just 4.7 GW.

Traditionally during the Easter weekend, demand falls steeply, meaning that an even greater surplus could occur. IPTO expects the hourly load to fall below 4.5 GW on Saturday and Sunday while the weather will determine the level of solar power production.

When it comes specifically to Bulgaria’s exports to Greece, they tend to increase during the hours around noon. Last Sunday they were near 300 MW in the morning and later they climbed to between 400MW and 500 MW. During these hours, Bulgaria’s wholesale price was slightly lower than Greece’s, meaning there is an incentive for exports.

It is why investors in the Greek renewables market are saying their solar and wind farms are suffering. Low demand creates the problem and imports make it even worse for them.

Source: Balkangreenenergynews.com

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Greece suspends electricity imports until May 7 to protect system appeared first on Energy News Beat.