What do angry farmers in Nevada and Germany have in common? They’re being exploited by the far right

Energy News Beat

When environmental activists calling for less pollution sit in the streets, across Europe they are now abused and attacked, arrested and handed extreme and draconian sentences. When farmers contesting pollution rules block entire city centres and major roads and spray manure on government buildings, the authorities sit and wait for them to go home. Few, if any, are prosecuted, and those who are receive small penalties. The promise of equality before the law has seldom looked emptier.

The hard right and far right demonise people who challenge the status quo, and valorise those who seek to restore it. Governments and police forces across the rich world have proved all too responsive to their demands.

I understand the sense of threat felt by farmers, as environmental rules are belatedly enforced. In some cases, attempts across Europe to make farming greener, reducing its release of nitrogen, cutting diesel subsidies, limiting water abstraction and banning some pesticides, have been clumsily introduced and badly implemented. I understand that life is tough for many farmers, as it is now for workers in almost every sector. Like all of us, they have a right to protest. And other people, as in all cases, have a right to scrutinise their protests.

There are good reasons to do so. Farmers’ movements in several European nations are being influenced or exploited by political forces in ways that have chilling historical precedents. Alternative für Deutschland in Germany, Rassemblement National in France, the Sweden Democrats, Fidesz in Hungary, the Brothers of Italy, the Dutch far right and similar groups across the continent are cynically using farmers’ plight and protests as a means of building support. Farmers, some of these groups claim, embody the soul of the nation, but they are being uprooted by “globalist” forces, seeking to “replace” them with immigrants. The far right’s resurgence in Europe is fuelled to a large extent by what used to be called “agrarian populism”.

Farmers’ vehicles in Berlin, Germany, 15 January 2024, after a week of protests about diesel tax breaks. Photograph: Filip Singer/EPA

There are similar trends in the US. The Oath Keepers, and the Three Percenters, two of the militias that led the attack on the US Capitol building in January 2021, consolidated around an agrarian revolt against state and federal authorities. After the rancher Cliven Bundy was ordered to remove the cattle he had illegally herded on to public lands in Nevada, harming the brittle desert ecosystem, these militias arrived to defend him. In an armed confrontation on the freeway, they forced federal agents to back down. Then they stalked, harassed and threatened to kidnap officials: several had to flee the region and hide in safe houses. Though they committed crimes that in other circumstances would have been treated as terrorism, few were prosecuted or even arrested. Their impunity in Nevada is likely to have encouraged their attack on the Capitol.

As they did a century ago, these political movements exploit genuine crises: the accumulation of wealth by the few and impoverishment of the many, the erosion of workers’ rights and the stagnation of wages, public austerity and the multiple failures of public provision, the restriction of political choice as major parties cluster round neoliberalism, the destruction of small businesses – including small farms – by large ones, the environmental disasters now hammering many communities. They then use these crises as weapons against the very people seeking to address them: leftwing and environmental parties and protest movements.

Among their tactics are lurid conspiracy fictions. While, a century ago, similar political voices raged against “aliens” and “cosmopolitans” (Jews and other supposed “outsiders”), today these movements rage against “immigrants” and “globalists”. While demonising two plutocrats (Bill Gates and George Soros), today’s groupings align openly or tacitly with others, such as Elon Musk, Charles Koch and Donald Trump. A selective approach to financial power (demonising “Jewish bankers” while receiving funds from supportive plutocrats) was also a feature of 20th-century fascism.

It all looks horribly familiar. As the historian Robert Paxton points out, “It was in the countryside that both Mussolini and Hitler won their first mass following, and it was angry farmers who provided their first mass constituency.” Not all agrarian populism was right wing. In Russia, the US, France, Spain and Italy, there were socialist and anarchist strands. But while some progressive forms remain, the dominant varieties gravitate once more to the far right. And other agrarian strains, promoting conspiracy fictions, begin to sound like it.

In a podcast in 2021 with the anti-vaxxer and presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr, with whom she has long campaigned, the celebrated agrarian advocate Vandana Shiva claimed that first Gates “locked us all in for one year”; now he is “taking all this to the next step”, to “create starvation and hunger through lockdown, so that there is no food”. At one point, she says Gates will “make the right to good food a crime”, and at another says he has a plan to “empty out” people’s minds “by mining data and patenting it and turning everyone into zombies”. There are solid reasons to criticise Gates – we don’t need to make stuff up. Of global financial institutions such as the World Bank, she says, “That’s how the Shylocks of the world work: get you into debt and then want the pound of flesh.”

The grimmest themes in European history are being shamelessly disinterred at or around the farmers’ protests. At the tractor blockade in Berlin this week, some people displayed the flag of the Landvolkbewegung, a 1920s antisemitic agrarian movement. It troubles me that so much has fallen down the memory hole: the disgusting race politics of Rudolf Steiner, who developed biodynamic farming; Germany’s Lebensreform movement, which claimed that Jews were “injecting putrefying agents into the nation’s blood and soil” (ours is not the first age in which bucolic and anti-vaccine sentiments have merged); the Artaman League, which sought to restore an imagined agrarian past, on which the Nazis built their blood and soil politics; and nostalgic British farming movements led by fascist sympathisers such as Rolf Gardiner and Jorian Jenks.

It’s also troubling to see how few people in the 2020s are prepared to confront the far right’s new agrarian populism. Those who should contest these politics cringe and cringe again: there seems to be a moral forcefield surrounding farmers’ protests, defending them from criticism. As the left seeks to avoid a clash with supposedly “authentic” and “rooted” movements, the far right exploits this timidity. George Santayana’s famous maxim haunts our days. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

Source: Theguardian.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post What do angry farmers in Nevada and Germany have in common? They’re being exploited by the far right appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Why Did Saudi Arabia Clarify That It Hasn’t Yet Accepted BRICS Membership?

Energy News Beat

It can plausibly be hypothesized that Saudi Arabia’s unexpected decision to delay formal membership in BRICS is due to Western perceptions about this association, Iran’s involvement in the Red Sea Crisis, and Israeli-US pressure.

Saudi Commerce Minister Majid Al-Kasabi clarified on the sidelines of last week’s Davos Summit that his country hasn’t yet accepted BRICS membership despite being invited to join in August as a permanent member this year. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded to a question about this by reaffirming that “The work on the integration of Saudi Arabia with the BRICS countries continues; we consider it very important. It was also discussed during [Russian] President Vladimir Putin’s recent visit to Riyadh.”

Nevertheless, this development still caught a lot of observers off guard, especially those in the Alt-Media Community (AMC) who assumed that Saudi Arabia would join at the start of the year like all the other countries that were invited to do so apart from Argentina, whose new leader declined. Something clearly went wrong for the Kingdom to become the only notable exception among those that hadn’t explicitly turned this down.

BRICS’ pursuit of multipolarity isn’t akin to “anti-Westernism” like many in the West nowadays claim, but this perception might have still played in role in why Saudi Arabia suddenly got cold feet about joining. That’s not to suggest that it’ll ultimately decline membership like Argentina did, but just that it appears to have calculated that it’s best to wait a little bit for now. Another possible factor is the latest Israeli-Hamas war, which has since evolved into a regional Iranian-Israeli proxy war.

Saudi Arabia has thus far restrained itself from militarily reacting to the Houthis’ drone and missile launches through its airspace en route to Israel in order to avoid rekindling this nearly decade-long conflict, but it almost certainly believes that Iran emboldened them to carry out these attacks. Even though Iran has always denied arming that group and claims that its support for them is strictly political, only pro-Iranian members of the AMC actually believe that, with everyone else considering it to be false.

The resultant Red Sea Crisis that Saudi Arabia believes that Iran is responsible for via the influence that it exerts over the Houthis, not to mention its reportedly clandestine arms supplies to that group, might have made the Kingdom reluctant to join the same association as the Islamic Republic right now. Doing so could also further delay the resumption of its secret normalization talks with Israel, the successful outcome of which is a prerequisite for building the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).

IMEC is expected to bring more tangible dividends to Saudi Arabia than permanent membership in BRICS, so if there’s a speculative zero-sum choice between them, then the Kingdom is expected to go with that megaproject over participation in this association. To be clear, no zero-sum choice objectively exists, but Israel and the US might make their geo-economic and financial support of IMEC conditional on Saudi Arabia staying out of BRICS as long as possible.

The Kingdom can proverbially have its cake and eat it too, however, since neither of those two limit their cooperation with BRICS-member India. It can therefore in theory participate in both BRICS and IMEC, but the reality might be altogether different if Israel and the US attach the aforementioned strings to their participation in the latter. Those two’s involvement is crucial, and this megaproject will fail to come to fruition without them, hence why Saudi Arabia might be partially under their influence right now.

Altogether, while the Kingdom’s calculations can’t be known for certain, it can plausibly be hypothesized that its unexpected decision to delay formal membership in BRICS is due to Western perceptions about this association, Iran’s involvement in the Red Sea Crisis, and Israeli-US pressure. None of these obstacles are insurmountable, but they’re still pretty formable, so Saudi Arabia might opt for a wait-and-see approach while retaining friendly ties with BRICS for now unless it finally decides to fully commit.

Source: Korybko.substack.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Why Did Saudi Arabia Clarify That It Hasn’t Yet Accepted BRICS Membership? appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Biden Won’t Be Removed For Corruption In Ukraine But New Allegations Can Still Have An Impact

Energy News Beat

The Republicans could make support for more Ukrainian aid conditional on a joint investigation into these claims and thus doom any deal and/or the Biden Administration or the Zelensky regime could leak evidence if the other doesn’t do their bidding given their blackmail of one another due to these joint crimes.

Former Ukrainian MP Andrey Derkach dropped a bunch of bombshells about Biden’s corrupt dealings in Ukraine in a recent interview with Italian-American journalist Simona Mangiante. The takeaways can be read here, but they basically boil down to bribes and money laundering, among other crimes. While they might boost the Republicans’ impeachment efforts in the House where the opposition has a slim majority, their lack of a two-thirds majority in the Senate means that he won’t be removed from office.

Even so, these new allegations can still have an important impact on events, one that might be much more significant than his superficial impeachment by the House. Proceedings at that level have become politicized as proven by the Democrats’ witch hunt against Trump, which isn’t to say that the Republicans are carrying out their own against Biden, but just to emphasize that impeachment by the House has no tangible significance. At most, it’ll strengthen both parties’ efforts to get out the vote in November.

Where the actual importance of these latest allegations lies is in the larger context of the Ukrainian Conflict, which began to wind down late last year following the failure of Kiev’s counteroffensive and the consequent dwindling of Western aid. The Republicans already made their agreement on any more such deals contingent on robust border security reforms, but they might now also include the additional condition of a comprehensive joint investigation with Ukraine into Derkach’s bombshells about Biden.

If the opposition makes such a proposal, then there’s no way that the Democrats would agree, thus capsizing the possibility of any compromise on this issue until next year after November’s elections, which could shake up the congressional dynamics and potentially lead to Biden’s ouster as well. Furthermore, Zelensky’s regime can’t be counted on to assist any theoretical joint investigation in good faith since leading figures are also implicated in this corruption per Derkach’s revelations.

That particular point adds a curious twist to this scandal since it suggests that they might also be able to blackmail the Biden Administration, which provides a new layer of understanding to why the incumbent and his team have been so gung-ho about perpetuating NATO’s proxy war on Russia through Ukraine. Zelensky knows that any outcome short of the maximalist victory that he fantasizes about would kill his political career so he has self-interested reasons in wanting to turn this into a so-called “forever war”.

The US’ objective national interests aren’t served by depleting even more of its stockpiles and therefore reducing its ability to flexibly respond to foreign crises as they arise, or rather might even be provoked by America or its partners, hence why it’s become popular to talk about freezing the conflict. Former NATO Supreme Commander Admiral James Stavridis’ Korean-like “land-for-peace” armistice proposal last year could be a starting point but only if the West agrees to Russia’s security guarantee requests in Ukraine.

They’ve been reluctant to do so, however, hence why no progress has been made on this. One reason behind the US’ recalcitrance might not just be that it’s concerned about “losing face” upon reaching a pragmatic series of mutual compromises with Russia, but that Zelensky is blackmailing the Biden Administration that he’ll spill the beans if they dare to pursue this policy. Given his prior “godlike” status in the Western media, any corroboration of Derkach’s claims might be widely believed by Westerners.

They know that Zelensky isn’t a so-called “Russian agent” and have convinced themselves that he’s a “democratic freedom fighter” so it would be very damning to the incumbent Democrats’ reputation if he engaged in a “limited hangout” by sharing some relevant information. He of course wouldn’t implicate himself or his most loyal allies, but he could take down a couple less politically reliable officials in that event (perhaps as part of a purge) while possibly dooming Biden’s re-election and flipping the Senate.

Republican control of the White House and Congress coupled with what many regard as the right-leaning Supreme Court could lead to the Democrats’ worst nightmare of their opponents reversing most of Biden’s policies. Meanwhile, Zelensky’s worst nightmare is that Biden bows to the popular sentiment among Americans to scale back their country’s participation in this proxy war and coerce him to resume peace talks with Russia, so each can therefore keep the other in check through this mutual blackmail.

The legitimacy of both the Biden Administration and Zelensky’s regime is therefore dependent on each of them staying silent about their corruption scheme, but one or the other could at least in theory reveal some details about this if they begin to distrust the other or want to get rid of them. For instance, the Biden Administration could leak some information about Zelensky’s corruption to pro-Democrat media to pressure him into resuming peace talks or to pave the way for a “government of national unity”.

That proposal was pushed by a member of the influential Atlantic Council think tank last month in an article for Politico and could credibly be interpreted as a signal that the Biden Administration is beginning to get fed up with Zelensky. As for the Ukrainian leader, it was already explained that he might be the first to leak certain details about this scheme if he feels that the Democrats’ support for this proxy war is faltering, which could be one of his “nuclear options” in that case alongside a major false flag.

Circling back to Derkach’s latest corruption allegations, their impact in terms of the Ukrainian Conflict is much more important than the possibility of them aiding the Republicans’ efforts to impeach Biden in the House since they can’t remove him due to a dearth of support in the Senate. The Republicans could make support for more Ukrainian aid conditional on a joint investigation into these claims and/or the Biden Administration or the Zelensky regime could leak evidence if the other doesn’t do their bidding.

Source: Korybko.substack.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Biden Won’t Be Removed For Corruption In Ukraine But New Allegations Can Still Have An Impact appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

India will ‘commission a nuclear power reactor every year’: NPCIL chief

Energy News Beat

On December 17, 2023, India’s largest indigenously developed 700-MWe pressurised heavy water reactor (PHWR) – the fourth unit in Kakrapar, Gujarat – attained criticality. Six months earlier, another 700-MWe unit in the same facility had started producing commercial electricity. In 2024, another unit with the same capacity is expected to be commissioned in Rawatbhata, Rajasthan. Behind all these reactors is the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL). Its chairman and managing director B.C. Pathak told The Hindu NPCIL plans to “commission a nuclear power reactor every year” hence.

Mr. Pathak is a Distinguished Scientist of the Department of Atomic Energy and has more than 30 years of experience implementing the NPCIL’s nuclear power projects, including 220-MWe, 540-MWe, 700-MWe and 1,000-MWe reactors of both PHWR and pressurised water reactor (PWR) technologies. He assumed his current charge in NPCIL in February 2022. On December 13, 2023, he spoke to The Hindu on India’s nuclear power plans and strategy. Excerpts from the interview follow.

Watch | The life of Homi J. Bhabha, the father of India’s nuclear programme

In the conference on ‘Nuclear for Clean Energy Transition’ (in December), organised by the Indian Nuclear Society in association with the NPCIL, you made a distinction between electricity generation and energy. You said much of the energy currently comes from fossil fuels. Can you expand on this?

Globally, on an average, the energy composition consists of about 20% electricity and 80% energy from coal, petrol, diesel, gas, lignite, and other components. Efforts are being made to decarbonise the electricity sector by putting up solar power plants, wind energy, renewables, and nuclear power plants.  The 80% energy sector consists of fuel that is being directly used as molecules or as a reducing agent. There is a need to decarbonise that sector also.

Efforts are being made globally to replace this fuel by a fuel that does not emit carbon dioxide. That is why the emphasis is being made on the production of green hydrogen. Green hydrogen, to some extent, will help [in decarbonisation].

B.C. Pathak. | Photo Credit: NPCIL

In future, nuclear power may play a major role in producing hydrogen because nuclear is clean energy. Hydrogen, produced from clean energy sources, is generally termed green hydrogen. That is why nuclear has a dual role – in terms of electricity generation and as a promising potential clean energy source.

But a lot of work has to be done across the globe on this. It will take some time. That is what I was trying to explain by making a distinction between electricity and energy. Electricity is actually a subset form of energy only.

In the COP28 climate talks held in Dubai, many countries agreed to triple their nuclear power generation by 2050 to achieve net-zero emissions. Did India agree to triple its installed nuclear electricity capacity by 2050?

India already has a plan to increase its present installed nuclear power capacity of 7,480 MW to 22,480 MW by 2031-2032 in a progressive manner.

The 700-MWe Kakrapar-3 unit in Gujarat is the largest indigenous PHWR the NPCIL has built. Why did it take more than 18 months to connect it to the grid after it attained criticality? It was generating infirm power for many months, not commercial power.

We made the reactor critical in July 2020 and connected it to the grid in January 2021, in a span of six months. There were some commissioning experiments to be done after that. We had to take care of the commissioning challenges and we have addressed those issues now. Accordingly, it was declared commercial [on June 30, 2023] and started generating its commercial power of 700 MWe [on August 30, 2023].

Since this is the first reactor [to be scaled up] from the 540-MWe reactors at Tarapur, commissioning challenges are bound to occur and we have addressed those issues. This design has many advanced safety features comparable to the best in the world. Commissioning is a sort of validation of design parameters and is completed in phases after obtaining stage-wise clearances from the regulatory authority, i.e. the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board.

What are the new safety features in the 700 MWe reactors? Do they have a fuel core catcher?

These reactors are among the best reactors of this 700-MWe category. Many safety features have been included in them. Basically, the reactor should be made capable of controlling the reactivity. It should be capable of cooling the [fuel] core. It should be capable of containing [the releases] if any.

With reference to that, we have included many additional safety features like the lining inside the containment, passive decay heat removal system, containment filtered venting system, passive autocatalytic recombiners, etc.

Like the steel lining in the Kudankulam reactors?

From the floor to the wall … like in Kudankulam. We have introduced electrical penetration assemblies instead of individual cables. These electrical cables have modular components, which are done at the manufacturers’ end, brought, and assembled here. That will improve leak tightness of the containment.

We have introduced a passive decay heat-removal system. In case of station blackout, if there is no power supply available, it will ensure the cooling of the [fuel] core. We have introduced passive catalytic   hydrogen recombiner units.

One of the significant changes we have made in the 700-MWe PHWRs is feeder interleaving. It has been made probably for the first time in the world. It ensures that there is always water in the reactor even in the case of an off-normal condition. This unique feature is available in our reactors.

Our 700-MWe reactors have all the features available based on the operating experience within our country and elsewhere, and lessons learnt from events that took place in other parts of the world. I can say that the 700-MWe PHWRs are among the safest reactors in the world.

You mentioned the NPCIL would build only 700-MWe PHWRs from now on and in fleet mode. What are the reasons for this decision?

I did not exactly say this. The electricity requirement in our country is huge. Our indigenously built largest reactor is 700-MWe. For major capacity addition, we will go ahead with the 700-MWe PHWRs. However, if required, we may go for 220-MWe PHWRs, which are equally proven.

So, at times, not now, there may be requirements from industries for smaller reactors. We are ready for it. But with 700-MWe reactors, we will get the economy of scale.

Until now, we were building two or four reactors at a time. But now, nine reactors are under construction at present. Ten reactors are in various pre-project activities. So 19 reactors are under various stages of implementation.

Are 19 reactors under construction now?

Yes, as I already mentioned, 19 reactors are under various stages of implementation. NPCIL is capable of taking up [for construction] these many reactors. To ramp up our electricity generation capacity, it is better to go for a fleet of reactors at a time. But we are open to 220-MWe and 700-MWe reactors. The ultimate need is to increase the nuclear share in the country at the earliest.

Will these 220-MWe reactors be small modular reactors (SMRs)? The trend is to go for SMRs but nothing has been built so far.

A small reactor of 220 MWe per se is not a small modular reactor.  But yes, we can go for SMRs based on our experience in designing power reactors. Today, we have the proven technology of 220 MWe and they can be deployed at the earliest.  The manufacturing sector is mature for it. If a requirement comes for 220 MWe, it can be installed.

A large number of 700-MWe units are under construction now.  But we are open to 220-MWe units as well.

When will Rajasthan Atomic Power Station-7 (RAPS-7) of 700 MWe go critical?

I am expecting commissioning of RAPS-7 in the next year.

How is the availability of natural uranium in the country? To my knowledge, no new mines have been opened. If enough natural uranium is not available in the country, will you put the indigenous 700-MWe reactors under the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) safeguards so that they can get uranium from abroad?

We do not envisage any problem for supply of fuel for our nuclear power reactors.

What is the problem with Madras Atomic Power Station -1 (MAPS-1) reactor at Kalpakkam? It has been shut down for a long time.

MAPS-1 is a very old reactor. MAPS-1 and -2 were operating satisfactorily for a long time. MAPS-2 was operating at nearly 230 MWe. [Its capacity is 220 MWe]. Since they are old units, age-related issues are there. We are addressing them. A little upgradation needs to be done. I am expecting MAPS-1 to come online this financial year.

The TAPS-1 and -2 reactors in Tarapur are older reactors and they have been operating for more than 50 years…

Yes, TAPS-1 and -2 are the oldest operational nuclear power reactors in the world. Presently, both are shut down and undergoing life extension and upgradation works. The first unit will come on line next year.

What is the latest progress on Kudankulam-3,4, 5 and 6? Enriched uranium fuel bundles reached Kudankulam recently from Russia.

The construction work in these reactors is progressing well. A large [workforce] is engaged there, say, to the tune of 10,000 people. We are expecting these reactors to come online progressively. We are getting supplies from the Russian Federation for these projects.

As far as fuel is concerned, we are operating units 1 and 2 on a 11-month fuel cycle. With the new fuel added now in Kudankulam unit 1, it is operating on an 18-month fuel cycle. It means once we load the new type of fuel, the reactor will operate continuously for 18 months.

We are getting the fuel supply regularly. Both the reactors are operating at good capacity factors. These units are generating a good number, of million units of clean electricity, for the country.

The PWRs that we have developed and which use enriched uranium as fuel propel our two nuclear-powered submarines. Will we build commercial PWRs? A big uranium enrichment facility is coming up at Chitradurga in Karnataka.

As far as NPCIL is concerned, we are mainly mandated to work on the PHWRs. But the NPCIL now has the experience of construction, commissioning, operation, and maintenance of VVER-1000 type reactors [at Kudankulam], which will be useful for working on PWR technology.

Why is there so much delay in implementing the nuclear power projects at Jaitapur in Maharashtra and Kovvada in Andhra Pradesh, where the French and the Americans were to build reactors? Are they insisting they will not pay damages if there are accidents?

Discussions  with the EDF [of France] and Westinghouse [of the U.S.] on technical issues for Jaitapur and Kovvada are in progress.

The West Bengal Government has said it will not allow a nuclear power project to come up at Haripur. Have you found an alternative site to Haripur?

Site selection for establishing a nuclear power plant is an ongoing activity. Accordingly, the potential sites are identified and evaluated in accordance with the regulatory codes and guides for their suitability.

Homi Bhabha envisioned a three-stage nuclear power programme for India: the PHWRs in the first stage, the breeder reactors using plutonium in the second, and the reactors using thorium as fuel in the third. Why the delay of so many years in building the 300-MWe advanced heavy water reactor, which will use thorium and uranium-233 as fuel?

Nuclear is an evolving technology. Many changes are taking place. In my experience, in nuclear, one has to go slow and steady. We have matured the technology in stage one of our three-stage nuclear power programme. We are going into the second stage. Once we mature that technology, we will enter the third stage. It should be a gradual process…

I don’t think there is any delay. We are on the right track. Our three-stage programme is the best in the world.  It is self-sustaining.  For the first stage, everything is available for the Indian PHWRs.

Once we go to the third stage, we won’t have to get even fuel [from outside]. Everything will be available in India. The idea is we should be self-sufficient in energy security. This is a gradual process and a sequential process.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post India will ‘commission a nuclear power reactor every year’: NPCIL chief appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Swedish government scraps United Nations’ Agenda 2030 goals

Energy News Beat

Sweden has been doing a lot of things right lately. They have already scrapped the renewable energy plans and have been pushing for more nuclear power.

In the new year, Sweden removed climate taxes on fuel, causing diesel prices to collapse by over 4 SEK (€0.35) per liter.

In 2022, when the Socialist Democrats were in power, the diesel price reached a whopping 28 SEK (€2.46) per liter. After the right-wing government removed climate taxes, prices in the new year reached almost as low as 17 SEK (€1.50) per liter. That is around 39 percent lower diesel prices.

But further steps have been taken…

The previous Socialist government included formulations in directives to governmental organizations in Sweden that they had to work towards achieving the Agenda 2030 goals.

The new government has cut the budget for municipalities and regions’ cooperation for Agenda 2030.

And now, during the Christmas holidays, it removed the Agenda 2030 goals from the directives to government organizations such as the Swedish Energy Agency, the Swedish Chemicals Agency, the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, and the Swedish Food Agency among others.

This is huge.

The Global Goals are outlined in the Agenda 2030 app that comes installed on Samsung Galaxy phones.

***

Did you know that Bill Gates has donated a whopping $1.27 billion towards funding the U.N. Agenda 2030 global goals? And a large amount of that money is going towards global digital ID.

You can read all about Agenda 2030 and how Bill Gates is funding it in my article here:

***

This is a major win for the right-wing Swedish Democrats, who are very happy about this move.

“Generally, we don’t see any added value with the Agenda 2030 work and welcome the development,” said Martin Kinnunen, environment and climate spokesperson for the Swedish Democrats.

“During the reign of the Social Democrats and the Green Party, Agenda 2030 and gender equality have been put in place everywhere, and we do not think that is one of the most important tasks for authorities,” he added.

So there we have it. Sweden has begun to go against the Agenda 2030 global goals.

Source: Rmx.news

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Swedish government scraps United Nations’ Agenda 2030 goals appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

OPEC Chief Says Oil Demand Will Defy Predictions of a Peak

Energy News Beat

OPEC’s top official said forecasts that oil demand is heading toward a peak will prove just as misguided as earlier predictions that supply was reaching its zenith.

“Ultimately, peak oil supply has never come to pass, and predictions of peak oil demand are following a similar trend,” Secretary-General Haitham Al Ghais said in a statement on the group’s website. “Peak oil demand is not showing up in any reliable and robust short- and medium-term forecasts.”

Many forecasters project that oil demand is set to max out in coming years, as countries switch to renewable energy and electric vehicles in an effort to avoid catastrophic climate change. The International Energy Agency in Paris anticipates a peak before the end of this decade.

Al Ghais said that technological advances — which thwarted some geologists’ fears in the last century that oil supplies would start to run out — will also extend fossil fuel demand.

The development of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, helped drive the US shale industry and reversed the country’s declining output. Al Ghais said that innovations to improve fuel efficiency or capture and store carbon emissions, often known as CCUS, will similarly buoy hydrocarbons.

“Time and again, oil has defied expectations regarding peaks,” Al Ghais said. “Logic and history suggest that it will continue to do so.”

Source: Rigzone.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post OPEC Chief Says Oil Demand Will Defy Predictions of a Peak appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

LNS picks up multi-billion deal for project designed to reinforce Norway’s gas supplier position

Energy News Beat

Norwegian state-owned energy giant Equinor has hand-picked Leonhard Nilsen & Sønner (LNS), headquartered in Andøy in Nordland county, for work at its Snøhvit Future project, which is expected to fortify Norway’s position as a reliable long-term supplier of gas produced with very low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while securing jobs in the north and energy supply to Europe towards 2050.

In August 2023, the Norwegian government gave its stamp of approval, covering onshore compression from 2028 and electrification of the plant on Melkøya from 2030, for the Equinor-operated Snøhvit Future project, which comes with plans for the future operation of Snøhvit and Hammerfest LNG. The onshore gas compression is anticipated to provide sufficient flow from the reservoir to maintain high gas exports and jobs at Hammerfest LNG beyond 2030.

According to Equinor, the recently awarded Snøhvit Future construction and installation contract to LNS, worth some NOK 1.5 billion (almost $142.8 million), will generate 200 person-years of employment in the north while also generating spinoffs for Finnmark, Troms, and Nordland. Thanks to this deal, LNS will build a tunnel and landfall for the power cable that will run from Hyggevatn to Melkøya – an infrastructure allowing power from Statnett’s transformer substation at Hyggevatn to be transmitted to Hammerfest LNG on Melkøya.

Trond Bokn, Equinor’s Senior Vice President for Project Development, commented: “We are pleased to award this contract to a company in Northern Norway. LNS estimates that around 70% of the generated value will end up in Northern Norway, creating about 200 person-years (FTEs) of employment. For Equinor, it has been important that the Snøhvit Future project should create ripple effects throughout the region.”

Equinor confirms that the construction work will start once the necessary approvals/permits have been received. As the Snøhvit Future project includes onshore compression and electrification of Hammerfest LNG on Melkøya, high gas exports, jobs, and ripple effects are expected to be maintained with compression after 2030. The electrification of the plant will enable the emission cuts from the plant by 850,000 tons of CO2 annually.

Mette H. Ottøy, Equinor’s Chief Procurement Officer, remarked: “This is LNS’s first assignment for Equinor. They submitted the best bid overall, and we look forward to working with a new supplier in the region. LNS also has a number of sub-suppliers, including Viggo Eriksen in Hammerfest, Alta Anlegg and Hörmann Norway in Tromsø.”

Equinor’s Snøhvit Future partners are Petoro, TotalEnergies, Neptune Energy, and Wintershall Dea. Three large modules will be installed at the plant: a compressor, a substation, and electric steam boilers. In addition, extensive modification work will be carried out with a lot of activity around Hammerfest, including the construction of a tunnel and transformer substation, allowing power to be transmitted from Hyggevatn to Melkøya.

Moreover, the Snøhvit Future project is estimated to generate some 1,700 person-years (FTEs) of overall employment in Northern Norway in the construction phase. Equinor awarded an engineering, procurement, construction, and installation (EPCI) contract to Aibel for Hammerfest LNG modifications in connection with the Snøhvit Future project in February 2023.

Afterward, the Norwegian giant also handed out a deal to Multiconsult to deliver detailed engineering of the grid connection for the Snøhvit Future project, which would be performed by LNS. Additionally, Nexans will supply the power cable from Rognan and Halden while Consto in Northern Norway has been picked as the supplier for construction and installation work on Melkøya.

The Snøhvit partners are committed to ensuring that Hammerfest LNG will be competitive and viable in a low-carbon society. Hammerfest LNG provides 6.5 million households with electricity each day with the production from Melkøya accounting for 5% of Norway’s total exports.

Source: Offshore-energy.biz

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post LNS picks up multi-billion deal for project designed to reinforce Norway’s gas supplier position appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

China’s Coal Production Hit A New Record High In 2023

Energy News Beat

Higher power demand and efforts to boost energy security pushed China’s coal production to a record-high level in 2023, according to official statistics data published on Wednesday.

Chinese coal output rose by 2.9% year-over-year to 4.66 billion metric tons in 2023, per data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported by Reuters.

Coal imports also rose last year, as some domestic mining operations were suspended for some time in 2023 due to safety inspections and concerns.

Higher demand after the COVID restrictions were lifted and higher domestic coal prices led to record-high coal imports into China, which soared by 61.8% year-on-year to 474.42 million metric tons in 2023, data from the General Administration of Customs showed last week.

In the latter part of 2023, China ramped up coal and natural gas production, imports, and consumption as its electricity demand jumped in the second half and looks to hit a record-high winter peak demand.

Chinese authorities have been keen to avoid a repeat of the 2022 shortages and spiking prices and have instructed utilities and producers to maximize imports and output before the winter.

China continues to rely on coal and coal-fired power generation to meet its growing power demand, and despite being the world’s top investor in solar and wind capacity, it also plans a lot of new coal-fired electricity capacity.

During the first half of 2023 alone, China approved more than 50 GW of new coal power, Greenpeace said in a report this year. That’s more than it did in all of 2021, the environmental campaign group said.

China’s coal demand is expected to drop this year and plateau through 2026, and global demand is set to decline to 2026, “but China will have the last word,” the International Energy Agency (IEA) said in its Coal 2023 annual report.

The outlook for coal in China will be significantly affected in the coming years by the pace of its clean energy deployment, weather conditions, and structural shifts in the Chinese economy, according to the agency.

Source: Zerohedge.com

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post China’s Coal Production Hit A New Record High In 2023 appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

TotalEnergies issues force majeure over Novatek’s Arctic LNG 2 project

Energy News Beat

French energy giant TotalEnergies has initiated a force majeure process on the Novatek-operated Arctic LNG 2 project in Russia due to sanctions.

In November 2023, the US government issued new Russia-related sanctions due to the war in Ukraine, including for the Arctic 2 LNG project.

“We have initiated the force majeure process in accordance with existing contracts, and we will comply with applicable sanctions regimes in accordance with our principles of conduct,” a spokesman for TotalEnergies told LNG Prime on Wednesday via email.

“Consequently, no offtake of LNG from Arctic LNG 2 by TotalEnergies is planned in 2024,” he said.

In March 2022, TotalEnergies said it would no longer provide capital and book proven reserves for the Arctic LNG 2 project due to the uncertainty created by the technological and financial sanctions on the ability to carry out the development.

After that, TotalEnergies wrote down its 19.4 percent stake in Novatek and withdrew the representatives of the company from the board of Novatek

TotalEnergies holds a 10 percent stake in the 19.8 mtpa Arctic LNG 2 development, and a 20 percent in Novatek’s Yamal LNG project.

In August last year, Novatek completed the installation of the first gravity-based structure platform which will serve its Arctic LNG 2 project located on the Gydan peninsula.

According to reports in Russia, Novatek started production of LNG from this unit in December and expects to ship first cargoes soon.

However, the firm also issued force majeure on Arctic 2 LNG supplies to its customers due to US sanctions imposed on the project in November last year, the reports said.

The first GBS, or train, has a capacity of about 6.6 mtpa, such as the the two other units which are under construction.

The resource base of the Arctic LNG 2 project is the Utrenneye field located on the Gydan Peninsula in the YaNAO, about 70 km from Novatek’s Yamal LNG project across the Gulf of Ob.

Novatek is the LNG project’s operator with a 60 percent stake, TotalEnergies owns 10 percent, while CNPC and CNOOC of China have 10 percent, each.

Japan Arctic LNG, a consortium of Mitsui & Co and Jogmec, owns a 10 percent stake in the project as well.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post TotalEnergies issues force majeure over Novatek’s Arctic LNG 2 project appeared first on Energy News Beat.

 

Jiangnan delivers SAIC Anji’s LNG-fueled car carrier

Energy News Beat

China’s Jiangnan Shipyard has delivered the first LNG-powered pure car and truck carrier to compatriot SAIC Anji Logistics.

According to a statement by CSSC’s Jiangnan, the LNG dual-fuel PCTC with a capacity of 7,600 units, SAIC Anji Sincerity, has started its maiden voyage on Wednesday.

Jiangnan claims this is currently the world’s largest LNG-powered car carrier in operation.

The shipbuilder launched this vessel in August last year.

Back in 2021, the unit of Chinese largest carmaker SAIC Motor ordered two LNG-powered PCTCs with a capacity of 7,600 units and this vessel is the first in that batch.

After that, SAIC Anji ordered three more LNG-powered PCTCs with a capacity of 7,800 units.

Image: Jiangnan Shipyard

Designed by SDARI, all of the 199.9 meters long vessels feature WinGD dual-fuel engines and type C LNG tanks.

Jiangnan expects to deliver the second ship in 2024 as well, while the other three ships should join the fleet in 2025.

SAIC Motor said in a separate statement that SAIC Anji Sincerity will transport the first batch of new vehicles of China’s brands SAIC, Dongfeng Motor, and Yutong to Europe.

The carmaker said that SAIC Anji’s fleet includes 31 vessels and the firm operates seven international routes covering Southeast Asia, Mexico, South America, and Europe.

A total of 12 new PCTCs with a capacity of 7,000, 7,600, 7,800, and 9,000 vehicles will join its fleet in the next three years.

SAIC Motor sold a total of 5.02 million vehicles in 2023, maintaining its position as the top Chinese automaker, while it achieved overseas sales of 1.21 million units, a year-on-year increase of 18.8 percent.

1031 Exchange E-Book

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post Jiangnan delivers SAIC Anji’s LNG-fueled car carrier appeared first on Energy News Beat.