Houthis Claim Responsibility for Another Attack in the Red Sea

Energy News Beat

The Iran-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen claimed on or around August 4-5, 2026, that they successfully targeted a Saudi-controlled medium-range (MR) product tanker in the northern Red Sea with ballistic missiles. The vessel, identified as the Bahri-controlled NCC Wafa (also referred to as Wafaa or NCC WAFA; IMO 9688348, approximately 49,990 DWT, built 2014, Saudi-flagged), was reportedly struck while transiting off Yanbu.

Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree stated via social media that the group “successfully targeted the Saudi oil tanker” in the northern Red Sea “with a number of ballistic missiles” and achieved a “precise hit.” Security sources in the region confirmed an attack occurred, though independent verification of the extent of any damage has been limited. The tanker had gone dark after last transmitting around July 19 while southbound; it appears to have U-turned northward after the Houthis’ July 20 blockade announcement on Saudi-linked shipping.

This follows a series of claimed and confirmed incidents after the Houthis declared a naval blockade on Saudi ports and vessels in mid-to-late July 2026, ending a relatively quiet period for Red Sea commercial shipping attacks. Earlier targets included the Saudi-flagged Encelia (struck and reported on fire near Jizan/Al Shuqaiq, with crew safe) and claims involving other vessels such as Layla and NCC Ghazal. An India-flagged dhow, Faize Noore Oliya, was also hit and later capsized/sank, with seafarers rescued. The group has claimed multiple operations against Saudi tankers and infrastructure, framing them as enforcement of a “siege for a siege” response to alleged Saudi actions in Yemen.

Disruption to Oil and Cargo Flows

The renewed Houthi campaign has significantly disrupted shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait (the southern gateway connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden), a critical chokepoint that had become an alternative export route for Saudi crude after broader Middle East tensions constrained the Strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia had ramped up use of its East-West pipeline to the Yanbu terminal on the Red Sea, exporting several million barrels per day (estimates around 3–5 million bpd or higher in peak periods, with a large share previously heading south through Bab el-Mandeb toward Asia). Following the blockade threat and attacks, many operators treated southbound Saudi-linked transits as high-risk or off-limits. Traffic through Bab el-Mandeb dropped sharply at times (e.g., to lows of around 11 commodity vessels on certain days, well below prior averages), with loadings and crossings declining notably.

Rerouting has become widespread: vessels head north through the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean and then around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope to reach Asian markets. This adds at least three to four weeks (or more, depending on destination) to typical voyage times—more than doubling sailing durations in many cases—while increasing bunker fuel needs and straining tanker availability (e.g., limited West-of-Suez VLCC ballast supply). Some Chinese and other vessels have continued limited southbound movements, occasionally in dark mode, but overall flows of Saudi crude and products have faced delays, higher costs, and logistical friction. Cargoes of other commodities have also been affected as shipping companies divert or delay. Freight rates for key routes, such as Yanbu to the Far East, roughly doubled in assessments shortly after the escalation.

These Red Sea issues compound existing constraints elsewhere, tightening global tanker markets and complicating physical supply chains for refiners, particularly in Asia.

Surging Insurance Rates

War-risk insurance premiums for Red Sea voyages have risen sharply. Indicative rates for southern Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb transits climbed from around 0.3% of vessel value (pre-blockade levels) to over 1%, with some quotes reaching 1–2% or as high as 3% for Saudi-linked ships or those calling at southern Saudi ports such as Jizan. Northern ports like Yanbu and Jeddah initially saw lower rates (around 0.1–0.25%) but later rose toward 1% as the high-risk zone was expanded by London’s Joint War Committee to cover more of the Red Sea coast near Saudi facilities.

Even modest percentage increases translate to hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional costs per voyage for typical tankers, further incentivizing longer alternative routes and adding to overall shipping expenses that ultimately pressure energy and commodity prices.

Oil Prices: Goldman Sachs Warnings vs. Current Reality

In recent months, Goldman Sachs analysts have highlighted severe upside risks to oil prices from sustained Middle East shipping disruptions. Scenarios involving prolonged constraints on the Strait of Hormuz (with Persian Gulf flows falling well below pre-war levels) and potential further impacts from Bab el-Mandeb or related Red Sea issues have pointed to Brent crude potentially exceeding $120 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2026 (or averaging around $100 into 2027 in adverse cases), especially if inventories remain depleted and multiple chokepoints face simultaneous pressure. Base-case forecasts have been more moderate (around $80 for late 2026 and $75 for 2027 under normalization assumptions), but the bank has repeatedly flagged the tail risks from geopolitical escalation.

As of August 5, 2026, however, benchmark prices have retreated substantially from earlier spikes (which saw Brent approach or exceed $100 amid the initial Houthi escalation and Hormuz tensions). WTI has traded near $75 per barrel, with Brent around $79–81, reflecting hopes of diplomatic progress, some supply adaptations, and demand factors outweighing the ongoing risks in the near term.

Physical (spot) oil deliveries and differentials continue to vary significantly around the world due to logistics, regional availability, quality, and delivery constraints. Recent periods have seen extreme swings—from large premiums (tens of dollars in tight conditions earlier in the year) to deep discounts (examples including West African or other grades at several dollars to over $10 below Dated Brent benchmarks in more amply supplied windows, alongside fluctuating Dubai, Oman, and other Middle East differentials). These regional price differences highlight how chokepoint risks and longer routes create localized tightness or oversupply even when global futures prices stabilize.

The latest Houthi claim underscores the fragility of Red Sea routes as a workaround. While markets have so far avoided a full $120 spike, continued attacks raise the prospect of further freight, insurance, and delivery cost pressures that could feed into energy prices and broader trade if de-escalation does not materialize.

The post Houthis Claim Responsibility for Another Attack in the Red Sea appeared first on Energy News Beat.